HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
March 11, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 p.m. Tapes 76-77
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Joseph, Counsel
Ann Martin, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Informational Meeting: Medical
Liability/
Tort Reform-Opposing Views
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 76, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Williams |
Opens the meeting at 1:12 p.m. |
|
Introduction
and Malpractice Experiences |
||
|
016 |
Chair Williams |
Introduces first panel: Mic Alexander, Kathy and
Jerry Brooks, and Jessica Howard. |
|
024 |
Mic Alexander |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Testifies on tort reform. |
|
038 |
Kathy Brooks |
Victim of malpractice, mother of Jerry Brooks. Submits
testimony and testifies on tort reform (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
132 |
Jessica Howard |
Victim of malpractice. Submits testimony and
testifies on tort reform (EXHIBIT B). |
|
190 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks Ms. Howard what kind of consent she gave her
doctor. |
|
197 |
Howard |
Answers, that she did not give them consent and explains
her experience. |
|
What
did Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act ( MICRA) do for California |
||
|
216 |
Chair Williams |
Introduces Harvey Rosenfield. |
|
225 |
Harvey Rosenfield |
President, Foundation for Taypayer & Consumer
Rights. Submits testimony and testifies on tort reform (EXHIBITS C-E). |
|
380 |
Rosenfield |
Continues his discussion on tort reform. |
|
TAPE 77, A |
||
|
003 |
Rosenfield |
Continues his testimony in opposition to tort
reform. |
|
067 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks Mr. Rosenfield to explain California Medical
Malpractice Premiums graph. |
|
074 |
Rosenfield |
Explains graphs and discusses Proposition 103. |
|
099 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks Mr. Rosenfield about his comment on insurance
companies being non-exempt from anti-trust laws and how that will affect
premiums. |
|
105 |
Rosenfield |
Answers that there are two anti-trust exemptions
that are applicable, and explains. |
|
130 |
Rep. Krummel |
Inquires about the medical community and antitrust
laws. |
|
146 |
Rosenfield |
Says that he doesn’t see the medical community as
exempt from antitrust laws, but does see the government regulating the
doctors. |
|
155 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks questions about premium chart. |
|
166 |
Rosenfield |
Says that the chart reflects pure premiums taken in
by the insurance companies. |
|
189 |
Vice-Chair Anderson |
Inquires about caps placed on attorneys. |
|
198 |
Rosenfield |
Cites statistics from his testimony dated February
2003, on page 31 (Exhibit C). |
|
218 |
Vice-Chair Anderson |
Asks where expenses for a case come from. |
|
221 |
Rosenfield |
States that the expenses come from what the victim
gets. Stresses that the expenses come out of the plaintiff’s pocket, and explains. |
|
268 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if Mr. Rosenfield has reviewed Oregon’s
malpractice insurance rates. |
|
275 |
Rosenfield |
Answers, no he has not; he is not an actuary, but that
he would be very interested in seeing those figures. |
|
291 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks if he knows how the insurance companies invest
their money. |
|
304 |
Rosenfield |
Reports that they did a national study and concluded
that there were millions of dollars invested in Enron and WorldCom. Says that
he does not know about the companies in Oregon. |
|
Medical
Malpractice Experiences |
||
|
333 |
Chair Williams |
Introduces Steve Brown. |
|
342 |
Steve Brown |
Victim of medical malpractice. Submits testimony and
testifies in opposition to tort reform (EXHIBIT
F). |
|
Tape 76, B |
||
|
002 |
Brown |
Continues his testimony on his experience with
medical malpractice. |
|
059 |
Tempest Heston |
Victim of medical malpractice. Mother of Mikayla
Heston. Testifies on tort reform. |
|
Myths,
Facts and Solutions, the Impact on the State of Oregon |
||
|
171 |
Mic Alexander |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Concludes his
testimony in opposition to tort reform. |
|
TAPE 77, B |
||
|
002 |
Alexander |
Continues his testimony in opposition to tort
reform. |
|
023 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks Mr. Alexander how much he would receive if he was
his client and was awarded $5 million. |
|
029 |
Alexander |
Says if they went to trial then the fees would be
one-third, the out-of-pocket costs would be $50,000 to $100,000, and there
might be liens that would need to be paid off (EXHIBIT G). |
|
042 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if he might receive around 3 million dollars. |
|
045 |
Alexander |
Answers, yes that is probably about right. |
|
054 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks what Mr. Alexander thinks about forming a professional
liability fund (PLF). Asks if the costs per physician would be $5,000. |
|
059 |
Alexander |
Replies that he doesn’t know if it would cost that
much. Says that he thinks the cost would be more than that. |
|
075 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if they should set a cap on attorney’s fees. |
|
089 |
Alexander |
Answers, no. Explains why. |
|
122 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks what would happen if they restrict defense fees
also. |
|
124 |
Alexander |
States that he would be very interested to see that
legislation come forward. |
|
137 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks for his comment on a PLF system and how that
could affect the medical field. |
|
149 |
Alexander |
Responds that the tort system would identify
incompetent doctors. Explains his opinion on the PLF. |
|
192 |
Vice-Chair Anderson |
Says that he sees a parallel, but not a very good
parallel between limiting attorney’s fees and doctor’s liability insurance.
Wonders how he sees the PLF solving this problem. |
|
213 |
Alexander |
Answers that he doesn’t know if the PLF will be an
ultimate solution, but says that he does know that it will protect the
medical specialists. |
|
266 |
Vice-Chair Anderson |
Asks Mr. Alexander how he is willing to compromise. |
|
254 |
Alexander |
Says that he will accept a fair solution. Discusses the
tort reform bills and says that all of the bills deny access and increase
litigation costs. Feels that none of the bills are constructive to the
judicial system. |
|
307 |
Vice-Chair Anderson |
Points out that the legislature will make the
decision on this issue, not the lawyers. |
|
314 |
Alexander |
Replies that he knows that and simply wants to find
something that works. |
|
320 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks Mr. Alexander about securities. |
|
342 |
Alexander |
Answers that he thinks there is something for
securities. |
|
344 |
Chair Williams |
Comments that Counsel Joseph will check on the PLF
and securities. |
|
355 |
Vice-Chair Ackerman |
Asks Mr. Alexander what his reaction would be to fund
a task force in hopes of finding a middle ground. |
|
371 |
Alexander |
Answers that he thinks it would be helpful. Adds
that there are no solutions that will give immediate relief. |
|
393 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks Mr. Alexander how much payouts for an attorney
are. |
|
404 |
Alexander |
States that the standard is 30-40 percent. |
|
407 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if a lawyer’s costs of doing the preparation
for a trial and they are not successful then who pays that cost of $50,000 to
$100,000. |
|
428 |
Alexander |
Answers that normally he would absorb those costs
and that it would be an out-of-pocket loss. |
|
451 |
Chair Williams |
Adjourns the meeting at 3:00 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Written testimony, submitted by Kathy Brooks, 1 pg.
B
– Written testimony, submitted by Jessica Howard, 1 pg.
C
- Testimony of Harvey Rosenfield, 34 pgs.
D
– Report, How Insurance Reform Lowered Doctors’ Medical Malpractice Rates in
California, submitted by Harvey Rosenfield, 9 pgs.
E
– News Releases, from California Department of Justice, submitted by Harvey
Rosenfield, 6 pgs.
F
– Written testimony, submitted by Steve Brown, 1 pg.
G
– Notice of Lien, from Oregon Department of Human Services, submitted by Mic
Alexander, 1 pg.