HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 01, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 pm Tapes
113 - 117
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
MEMBER EXCUSED:
Rep. Jeff Barker
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Joseph, Counsel
Nancy Massee, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2340 Reconsideration and Work
Session
HB 3341 Public Hearing
HB 3386 Public Hearing
HB 2080 Public Hearing
HB 2637 Public Hearing
HB 2054 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2060 Public Hearing
HB 2761 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3177 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3329 Public Hearing
HB 3330 Public Hearing
HB 3370 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3371 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3372 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2057 Work Session
HB 2059 Work Session
HB 2060 Work Session
These minutes are in compliance
with Senate and House Rules. Only
text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the
tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 113,
A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Williams |
Opens meeting at 1:35 pm. Opens reconsideration and work session on HB 2340 which
transfers responsibility for Child Support Program and associated functions
from Department of Human Services to Department of Justice. |
|
HB 2340
WORK SESSION |
||
|
008 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of reconsidering the vote on HB 2340. |
|
010 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
VOTE: 6-0-3
EXCUSED: 3 - Barker, Macpherson, Shetterly |
||
|
011 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which
“HB 2340 was moved to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation.” |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Barker, Macpherson, Shetterly |
|
012 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
113 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2340 to the floor with a DO PASS AS
AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the Committee on Ways and Means by
prior reference. |
|
015 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
VOTE: 6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Barker, Macpherson, Shetterly |
||
|
016 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2340. Opens public hearing
on HB 3341 which authorizes Board of Medical Examiners for State of Oregon to
establish professional liability fund for certain medical professionals
licenses under ORS chapter 677. |
|
HB 3341
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
050 |
Mic Alexander |
President, Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Testifies in support of HB 3341 and
submits testimony (EXHIBIT A). Explains liability funds for lawyers
and doctors. |
|
095 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks how much could be raised for a Professional
Liability Fund (PLF). |
|
104 |
Alexander |
Responds based upon historical data, $5,000 was
estimated per year per physician; now
it would be about $17,000 per year per physician. Over time it would level out. |
|
118 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks how much money needs to be raised to cover
lawsuits in a year. Asks what the
average judgment against an attorney is.
Says the Lawyers Liability Fund works well for lawyers. What is an average judgment against a
physician as compared to attorneys? |
|
140 |
Alexander |
Replies insurance would be affordable to
everyone. Lower risk specialists
would have higher premiums. |
|
182 |
Rep. Krummel |
Discusses rewards to litigants. |
|
142 |
Alexander |
Responds that the funds are not comparable in
assessments, but it is comparable in that it will make insurance affordable
to high risk physicians. |
|
223 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Refers to page 2 of the bill which says that
coverage will be the same for each person which is a 100 percent pooling
theory. Asks if alternatives have
been considered to assist those physicians with lower risks. |
|
235 |
Alexander |
Responds there are creative ideas. Supports ideas
for new funding mechanisms. |
|
257 |
Chair Williams |
Asks about caps. |
|
264 |
Alexander |
Responds that there are not limits set in the bill. |
|
279 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks if the PLF is mandatory for attorneys. |
|
282 |
Alexander |
Responds that except for state employees, public
defenders, etc. Private attorneys
must belong to keep licensed. Explains why it must be a monopoly in order to
work. |
|
358 |
Dr. Jim Dorigan |
Chief Executive Officer, Northwest Physicians Mutual
Insurance Company, an Oregon domiciled mutual insurance. Testifies in partial
support of HB 3341 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT
B). Explains how the PFL would
work for physicians. Says the bill
does not address the increasing scale and claim severity. |
|
410 |
Dr. Dorigan |
Continues presentation. Describes tort reform in some states. |
|
TAPE 114,
A |
||
|
010 |
Dr. Dorigan |
Continues explaining effects of liability. |
|
042 |
Scott Gallant |
Oregon Medical Association (OMA). Discusses responsibility of actuarial
impact. Describes PLF
performance. Testifies in opposition
to HB 3341. |
|
129 |
Meg Reinhold |
Department of
Consumer and Business Services (DCBS). Testifies that the department supports these ideas. |
|
117 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Refers to page 1, problem with number 4, of Dr, Dorigan’s
testimony, (Exhibit B). Asks if
there was a study to confirm the figures on that page. |
|
125 |
Dr. Dorigan |
Replies the figures were based on the Insurance
Division’s $17,000 annual premium estimate.
|
|
150 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks if the estimation can be converted to dollar
amounts. |
|
152 |
Dr. Dorigan |
Refers to the two specialties of obstetrics (rate of
$61,203) and neurosurgery rate at
$62,704. Premium average is 25 percent below the filed rate with credits for
experience, credits for attending loss prevention work shops and credits for
board certification. |
|
198 |
Rep. Krummel |
Refers to section 2, page 2, which says the Board of
Medical Examiners create a committee to help physicians and surgeons. Asks if that is not already done. |
|
166 |
Dr. Dorigan |
Answers the Oregon Medical Association performed
that service until the 1980s when the Board of Medical Examiners took over
those duties. |
|
182 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if Pacific Northwest Mutual acts similar to
PLF. |
|
349 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3341. Opens public hearing on 3386. |
|
HB 3386
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
365 |
Mic Alexander |
OMA.
Testifies in support of HB 3386 imposes health insurance surcharge. |
|
371 |
Len Hagen |
Regence Blue Cross. Testifies in opposition to HB
3386 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT C).
Describes how costs are passed along.
HB 3386 does not address the professional liability crisis. Says Oregon needs the ability to cap. |
|
380 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Says according to Oregon’s Constitution, caps cannot
be implemented. |
|
390 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks of .1 percent increase in Blue Cross operations
would result in 10 percent increase in premiums. |
|
395 |
Hagen |
Responds he does not know. |
|
TAPE 113,
B |
||
|
040 |
Scott Gallant |
Oregon Medical Association (OMA). Discusses the effort
for finding subsidies for liability funding. |
|
052 |
Peggy Anet |
Health Insurance Association of America. Testifies in opposition to HB 3386. |
|
079 |
J. L. Wilson |
National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). Testifies in opposition to HB 3386. |
|
110 |
Lisa Trussell |
Association of Oregon Industries (AOI). Testifies in opposition to HB 3386. Describes it as a direct cost shift. |
|
117 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if .1 percent increase in insurance companies
would equal 10 percent increase in premiums. |
|
120 |
Wilson |
Answers he does not know. |
|
123 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Closes public hearing on HB 3386. Opens public hearing on HB 2080 which
provides that statute of limitations for product liability civil actions
commences to run when plaintiff first discovered, or in exercise of
reasonable care should have discovered, death, injury or damage complained
of. |
|
HB 2080
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
125 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Closes public hearing on HB 2080. Opens public hearing on HB 2637. |
|
HB 2637
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
130 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 2637 which provides
that state agency has burden of proof on all disputed issues in certain
contested case proceeding and that agency must meet burden by clear and
convincing evidence. |
|
176 |
J. L. Wilson |
National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). Testifies
in support of HB 2637 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT D). Gives
examples of where this bill would provide equity. |
|
304 |
Wilson |
Continues presentation on HB 2637. States he is
supporting the concept, and the specifics can be worked on. Explains Oregon
Safety and Health Association (OSHA) has a compliance side for
assistance. Says OSHA is a model in
some respects. |
|
336 |
Jim Nass |
Legal Counsel, Appellate Courts. Testifies in opposition to HB 2637; opposes
subsection 4 of section 2, page 1 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT E). |
|
365 |
Philip Schradle |
Special Counsel to the Attorney General. Introduces David Reese and Christine
Chute. |
|
380 |
Schradle |
Testifies in opposition to HB 2637; explains HB 2637
is overreaching on a system level. It
affects all agencies and all practices. |
|
420 |
David Reese |
Deputy General Counsel, Governor’s Office. Testifies
in opposition to HB 2637 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT F). Explains
that HB 2637 is too broad. |
|
421 |
Staff |
Submits testimony in opposition to HB 2637 from
Oregon Employment Department by Greg Hickman (EXHIBIT G). |
|
422 |
Cindy Hannum |
Administrator, Seniors and People with Disabilities,
Department of Human Services testifies in opposition to HB 2637 and submits
testimony (EXHIBIT H). |
|
425 |
Staff |
Submits testimony in opposition to HB 2637 for the
Board of Medical Examiners by Kathleen Haley (EXHIBIT I). |
|
TAPE 114,
B |
||
|
030 |
Christine Chute |
Department of Justice (DOJ). States she is available to answer
questions. |
|
040 |
Schradle |
Continues further testimony in opposition to HB 2637. |
|
073 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Comments that in his experience it is the
responsibility of the Board of Examiners to prove the licensee guilty. |
|
080 |
Schradle |
Responds the agency would have to prove a violation
has occurred. |
|
100 |
Chair Williams |
Asks about recovering attorney’s fees. |
|
106 |
Chute |
Answers that the Court of Appeals has the authority
to award attorneys fees against agencies. Hearing Officers do not have
authority to award attorney fees. |
|
115 |
Chair Williams |
Asks how often has the Court of Appeals awarded
attorney fees for a determination where there has been no basis by the agency
in law or fact. |
|
122 |
Chute |
Recalls since about 1983, fewer than 5 cases, maybe
3, where agencies act with no basis in fact. |
|
154 |
Schradle |
Comments agencies are held accountable as much as
anybody else. |
|
185 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks if contested case hearings could include those
against an individual who is accused of being an unfit parent. Asks about Ch
183. |
|
192 |
Chair Williams |
Explains most cases are about professional licenses
at issue. Explains Ch 183 is the Administrative Procedures Act of Oregon.. |
|
198 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Refers to OROSHA inspection issues. Asks about the recourse for an individual
when an inspection does not pass. |
|
205 |
Chute |
Answers on different issues. |
|
219 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2637. Opens public hearing on HB 2054 which
allows registered collection agency to appear as party in small claims
proceedings without appearance by attorney for purpose of recovering amount
owing on claim or account assigned to agency for collection. |
|
HB 2054
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
229 |
Jim Markee |
Oregon Collectors Association. Testifies in support
of HB 2054 and submits testimony (EXHIBITJ). Explains lawsuits in other states that
were against collection agencies. Says
the Oregon State Bar supports this bill. |
|
277 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks if there are any other statutes in chapter 43. |
|
285 |
Markee |
Responds he does not believe so. |
|
290 |
Jeff Hasson |
Legal Counsel to Oregon Collectors Association. Testifies
in support of HB 2054. |
|
295 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if the judges from Jackson County supported
that ORS 46.415 sub 5 would rule in your clients’ behalf. |
|
299 |
Markee |
Answers that is correct. |
|
300 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2054. Opens work session HB 2054. |
|
HB 2054
WORK SESSION |
||
|
301 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 2054 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Anderson, Barker, Macpherson |
|
302 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. KRUMMEL will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
321 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2054. Opens public hearing on HB 2060 which
directs trustee foreclosing trust deed by sale to file affidavit in county
records describing entire amount that must be paid or performance required to
cure default. |
|
HB 2060
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
325 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2060. |
|
TAPE 115, A |
||
|
042 |
Chair Williams |
At 3:30 pm, recesses meeting until 5:30. Reconvenes meeting at 5:40 pm. Opens public hearing on HB 2761. |
|
HB 2761
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
065 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains that HB 2761 requires that certain motions and responsive
pleadings be filed within 15 days after service of pleading moved against or
after service of pleading to which responsive pleading is directed. Explains
the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT K).
Explains this is an attorneys’ bill; it is a gut and stuff. This issue was
brought forth by the Oregon State Bar, Appellate Section. |
|
121 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2761. Opens work session
on HB 2761. |
|
HB 2761
WORK SESSION |
||
|
135 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2761-1 amendments dated
3/27/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Barker, Shetterly |
|
136 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
138 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2761 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Barker, Shetterly |
|
139 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
140 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2761 and opens public
hearing on HB 3177. |
|
HB 3177
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
179 |
Scott Harra |
Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS).
Explains HB 3177 which allows DCBS to
issue warrants for collection of debts owed to department. Testifies in support of HB 3177. |
|
186 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks why there is a 30-day limit. |
|
189 |
Harra |
Responds that the 30 days start after the employer
has gone through all the appeals processes. It is standard. |
|
199 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks about the appeals process. |
|
215 |
Chair Williams |
Expresses his opinion that there is concern about
the agencies having expansive authority by issuing warrants and
administrative garnishments. Closes
public hearing on HB 3177. Opens work session on HB 3177. |
|
HB 3177
WORK SESSION |
||
|
335 |
Rep.
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves HB 3177 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation and BE
REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior reference. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Barker, Shetterly |
|
336 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
337 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3177. Opens public
hearing on HB 3329. |
|
HB 3329
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
340 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice (DOJ).
Explains HB 3329 which authorizes Department of Justice to initiate and
participate in efforts to prepare for, and to assist in, delivery of services
to individuals traumatized by acts of mass violence. Refers to the Thurston
High School massacre in Springfield, Oregon that would be relevant to this
bill. |
|
377 |
Rep. Jenson |
Expresses concern about lack of focus of the bill.
Asks if these services are defined in the crime victims assistance program. |
|
380 |
Shepherd |
Responds that the term “services” in this bill are
different. Does not think this language would be so broad as to override any
practice act. |
|
402 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if DOJ can initiate these services without the
bill. |
|
405 |
Shepherd |
Responds to subsection 1 of section 2, delivery of
services. Explains the funding for
the crime victims assistance program is derived from funds allocated for
expenditure as described in Chapter 147. The program is limited to delivery
of services to victims of crime. That
stops short of individuals who are not injured or killed in the event. |
|
TAPE 116,
A |
||
|
043 |
Shepherd |
Explains DOJ does not anticipate the bill having a
fiscal impact or additional resources. |
|
054 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if any other statutory language mirrors this
bill. |
|
061 |
Shepherd |
Refers to Chapter 147, victims of crimes. Offers to get descriptions of services
already rendered. |
|
080 |
Rep. Krummel |
Says he would like to see those services. |
|
092 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3329. Opens public hearing on HB 3330. |
|
HB 3330
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
096 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy Attorney General, DOJ. Testifies in support of HB 3330 and submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT L).
Explains HB 3330 which authorizes Governor to proclaim that act of war,
terrorism or sabotage has caused death of unknown persons on specific date at
specific place. |
|
177 |
Chair Williams |
Asks about natural disaster events that are more
likely in Oregon. |
|
190 |
Shepherd |
Explains the purpose of the law relates to
deficiency in Oregon law for catastrophic events such as the September 11th
disaster. |
|
216 |
Chair Williams |
Compares the World Trade Towers disaster of
September 11, 2001 and the natural disaster events that can occur in the
Pacific Northwest with volcanoes, floods, and earthquakes. |
|
223 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Has questions about HB 3330. Comments on coordinating
this bill with Chapter 117. Asks if the geographical limitation is necessary.
|
|
231 |
Shepherd |
Agrees it has not been well coordinated. |
|
240 |
Chair Williams |
Asks the parties to confer with the Estates Section
of the Oregon State Bar and Rep. Shetterly.
Will keep the bill for further input. |
|
278 |
Rep. Krummel |
Agrees a catastrophic natural event is likely in
Oregon. |
|
282 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3330. Opens public hearing on HB 3370. |
|
HB 3370
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
323 |
Chair Williams |
Gives background on the relating Oregon Law
Commission bills HB 3370, HB 3371, and HB 3371. |
|
334 |
Wendy Johnson |
Oregon Law Commission. Explains HB 3370 which consolidates laws governing eminent
domain. Testifies in support of HB
3370 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT M). Describes the work group on
eminent domain bills. |
|
340 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing. Opens work session on HB 3370. |
|
HB 3370
WORK SESSION |
||
|
341 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 3370 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ackerman, Barker |
|
342 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. SHETTERLY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
342 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 3370. Opens public hearing on HB 3371. |
|
HB 3371
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
345 |
Wendy Johnson |
Oregon Law Commission. Explains HB 3371 which
requires that condemner make offer for property at least 40 days before
commencing condemnation action, instead of 20 days. Testifies in support of
HB 3371 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT
N). Gives background on work
group. Says this is a consensus bill. |
|
454 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks for an example of an emergency where there is a
need to condemn property. |
|
TAPE 115,
B |
||
|
040 |
Chair Williams |
Explains that the road authority is taken out if
determined an emergency exists. |
|
050 |
Johnson |
States condemner is defined in ORS 35.215 subsection
1. |
|
055 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3371. Opens work session
on HB 3371. |
|
HB 3371
WORK SESSION |
||
|
059 |
Rep. Krummel |
Says he does not understand section 3, what kind of
a threat would be posed that would create an emergency that a condemner
should not have to wait the 40 days. Says for that reason he opposes the
bill. |
|
065 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Explains the work group would be able to give
numerous examples and explanations. |
|
068 |
Dennis Weigel |
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). States ODOT supports HB 3371. Gives
example of when a highway slide occurs. The language in the bill expands the
authority to other condemners. |
|
070 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB
3371 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 7-1-1 No –
Krummel Excused –
Barker MOTION IS
CARRIED. REP.
SHETTERLY will lead discussion on the
Floor. |
|
072 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 3371. Opens public hearing on HB 3372. |
|
HB 3372
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
194 |
Wendy Johnson |
Oregon law Commission. Explains HB 3372 which provides standard procedure for entry
upon and examination, survey, testing and sampling of real property before
commencement of condemnation action. Testifies in support of HB 3372 and
submits testimony (EXHIBIT O).
Explains -1 amendments (EXHIBIT P). |
|
188 |
Chair Williams |
Asks about the -1 amendments on judicial discretion.
Closes public hearing on HB 3372.
Opens work session on HB 3372. |
|
HB 3372
WORK SESSION |
||
|
190 |
Rep. Shetterly
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3372-1 amendments dated
3/18/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
191 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
192 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 3372 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
193 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. SHETTERLY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
194 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 3372. Opens work session
on HB 2057. |
|
HB 2057
WORK SESSION |
||
|
214 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 2057 which provides
that election not be held for position on Board of Governors of Oregon State
Bar, or for position in house of delegates of Oregon State Bar, for which
only single candidate has been nominated. Submits HB 2057-1 amendments (EXHIBIT Q). |
|
213 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Discusses that the -1 amendments replace sections 1
and 2 entirely of the bill. |
|
215 |
Susan Grabe |
Oregon State Bar. Testifies in support of HB 2057.
Explains HB 2057-1 amendments facilitate electronic voting. Says both sides
agree. |
|
220 |
Rep.
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2057-1 amendments dated
3/10/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
221 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
223 |
Rep.
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves HB 2057 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
223 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. ACKERMAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
225 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2057. Opens work session on HB 2059. |
|
HB 2059
WORK SESSION |
||
|
230 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2059 which sets procedure for filing bond or depositing
money when possessory chattel lien is claimed for storage of chattel. Explains this refers to automobile
storage. Submits HB 2059-1 amendments (EXHIBIT
R). |
|
423 |
Mark Comstock |
Oregon State Bar. Explains HB 2059 which sets
procedure for filing bond or depositing money when possessory chattel lien is
claimed for storage of chattel. Testifies in support of HB 2059 and the -1
amendments. |
|
TAPE 116,
B |
||
|
022 |
Comstock |
Continues explaining why HB 2059 is needed. States
the bill would assist both sides. |
|
065 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks if attorney fees are awarded in a foreclosure
under that authority. |
|
070 |
Comstock |
Believes attorney fees are allowed in a separate
provision in chapter 87. |
|
072 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Refers to section 2, page 1. Estimates a bond would be close to $3,000
in a case of this nature. |
|
085 |
Comstock |
Explains bonds in certain situations. Discusses
construction lien procedures. |
|
115 |
Chair Williams |
States the issue is accruing storage charges while a
dispute of owing is undergone. Says
the -1 amendments deal with smaller cases. |
|
143 |
Deborah Elkins |
Director, Northwest Automotive Trades Association. Discusses the -1 amendments. Explains she
contacted bonding companies about issuing bonds in credit risk situation.
Suggests the lien process. |
|
185 |
Chair Williams |
Asks about smaller disputes with mechanics, for
example, about storage costs. |
|
220 |
Elkins |
Answers the average repair facility is small and
does not deal with attorneys. |
|
240 |
Chair Williams |
Comments on arbitration cases. States the issue is the overwhelming superior
negotiating power of the party in possession of the vehicle. |
|
260 |
Al Elkins |
Oregon Tow Truck Association. Describes the processing
of about 40,000 vehicles a year through lien processing. Agrees that the bill needs some more
language work. |
|
279 |
Chair Williams |
Refers to January 22 hearing and says this language should have been resolved by
now. |
|
280 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2059-1 amendments dated
3/26/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
271 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion
CARRIED. |
|
272 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 2059 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
273 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. WILLIAMS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
274 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Explains reservations about the bill. |
|
275 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2059. Opens work session on HB 2060. |
|
HB 2060
WORK SESSION |
||
|
320 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2060 which directs trustee foreclosing trust deed by sale
to file affidavit in county records describing entire amount that must be
paid or performance required to cure default. |
|
357 |
Mark Comstock |
Oregon State Bar. Testifies in support of HB 2060
and explains how HB 2060 directs trustee. Mentions the objections to this
bill. Mentions those parties supporting the amendments. |
|
TAPE 117,
A |
||
|
004 |
Comstock |
Explains support for the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT S ). |
|
014 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Relates his concerns about HB 2060. Suggests a change in wording. |
|
021 |
Chair Williams |
Comments that “personal delivery” is not used in the
usual sense. |
|
031 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Refers to “date” on page 2, section 3, subsection a.
Asks if that means date of sale. |
|
037 |
Comstock |
Explains the language. |
|
038 |
Rep. Shetterly
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2060-1 amendments dated
4/1/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
039 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
040 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 2060 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Barker |
|
041 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. JENSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
042 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2060 and adjourns
meeting at 7:40 pm. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3341, 3386, written testimony, Michael Alexander, 10 pp
B
– HB 3341, written testimony, Dr. James Dorigan, 2 pp
C
– HB 3386, written testimony, Leonard Hagen, 1 p
D
– HB 2637, written testimony, J. L. Wilson, 2 pp
E
– HB 2637, written testimony, Jim Nass, 1 p
F
– HB 2637, written testimony, David Reese, 2 pp
G
– HB 2637, written testimony, Greg Hickman, 2 pp
H
– HB 2637, written testimony, Cindy Hannum, 4 pp
I - HB
2637, written testimony, Kathleen Haley, 1 p
J
- HB 2054, written testimony, Jim
Markee, 11 pp
K
– HB 2761-1 amendments, staff, 2 pp
L
- HB 3330, written testimony (chart),
Pete Shepherd, 6 pp
M
– HB 3370, written testimony, Wendy Johnson, 2 pp
N
– HB 3371, written testimony, Wendy Johnson, 3 pp
O
– HB 3372, written testimony, Wendy Johnson, 5 pp
P
– HB 3372-1 amendments, staff, 1 p
Q
– HB 2057-1 amendments, staff, 3 pp
R
– HB 2059-1 amendments, staff, 1 p
S
– HB 2060-1 amendments, staff, 3 pp