HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 08, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 pm Tapes 127 - 130
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Taylor, Counsel
Nancy Massee, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 3363 Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2390 Public Hearing
HB 2094 Public Hearing
HB 2620 Public Hearing
HB 2821 Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3167 Public Hearing
HB 3388 Public Hearing
HB 2811 Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3339 Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2733 Public Hearing
HB 2736 Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2034 Work Session
HB 2082 Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 127,
A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Williams |
Opens meeting at 1:08 pm. Opens public hearing on HB
3363. |
|
HB 3363
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
035 |
Nancy Miller |
State Court
Administrator’s Office. Testifies in
support of HB 3363 which allows certain persons to file petition seeking
participation in drug court program, and submits testimony (EXHIBIT A). Explains the entire bill is now the -3
amendments (EXHIBIT B). |
|
072 |
Hon. Deanne Darling |
Judge, Clackamas County Circuit Court. Testifies in
support of HB 3363. Explains how the
drug courts operate. |
|
090 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Discusses the -3 amendments. Asks how the criterion to get into a drug
program is decided. |
|
095 |
Judge Darling |
Responds that there is a handbook laid out by the
district attorney, court, defense, and treatment providers. |
|
121 |
Susan Russell |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (OCDLA).
Testifies in support of HB 3363. |
|
125 |
Stephanie Tuttle |
Oregon District Attorneys Association. Testifies in opposition to HB 3363 as it
was originally written, but supports the -3 amendments. |
|
146 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3363. Opens work session
on HB 3363. |
|
HB 3363
WORK SESSION |
||
|
148 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3363-3 amendments dated
4/7/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
149 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
150 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 3363 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
151 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. BARKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
152 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks where the cost effectiveness information is. |
|
154 |
Miller |
Replies that there were two evaluations done on the
drug court program. The focus was on the outcomes of the program. Offers to
get information on cost effectiveness for Rep. Jenson |
|
170 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 3363. Opens public hearing on HB 2390. |
|
HB 2390
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
230 |
Rep. Mark Hass |
House District 27. Gives background on HB 2390 which
prohibits all restrictions in non-competition agreements in broadcasting
industry other than 30-day restriction on employee’s service in broadcasting
industry after termination of employment, and relates reasons for the bill.
Explains personal experience in broadcasting. Testifies in support of HB 2390
and submits testimony (EXHIBIT C).
|
|
319 |
Jeff Scovel |
Broadcasting industry. Testifies in support of HB 2390 and submits written testimony (EXHIBIT D). Gives personal
experience. |
|
TAPE 128,
A |
||
|
003 |
Scovel |
Continues presentation on reasons why HB 2390 should
pass. |
|
020 |
John Williams |
Portland Radio Personality. Gives personal
experience in broadcasting. Testifies
in support of HB 2390 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT E). |
|
043 |
Williams |
Continues explaining non-competition agreements in broadcasting. |
|
058 |
Nicholas Fish |
Attorney, Meyer and Wyse. States his practice emphasizes labor employment law. Testifies
in support of HB 2390 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT F). |
|
150 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Discusses the type of agreements described by Mr.
Fish. Asks if there is a legitimate
interest within the industry for the branding of personalities for
non-competition agreements. |
|
155 |
Fish |
Explains the practice of “branding” in the
broadcasting industry. |
|
198 |
Chair Williams |
Comments on the two-year non-compete within a 125-mile
radius. |
|
292 |
Fish |
Explains how cases proceed for employees with
limited resources. |
|
301 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks about national talent. Asks why the local
broadcasters have the non-competition agreements and high-priced broadcasters
do not. |
|
316 |
Fish |
Explains how highly compensated personalities have
more leverage. Smaller markets with
modest salaries do not have leverage to force an employer to back-off on
these agreements. Explains other contractual provisions. |
|
388 |
Scovel |
Comments on two-year non-competes. Describes what
banding together will do. |
|
400 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks what is unique about broadcasting industry. |
|
425 |
Fish |
Gives example of no compete incident, highly
compensated. |
|
TAPE 127,
B |
||
|
051 |
Sen. Rick Metsger |
Senate District 26. Comments there is a major
difference in broadcasting within Federal Communications Commission. Supports
HB 2390. |
|
060 |
Dan Gardner |
Commissioner, Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI). Testifies in support of HB 2390 and
submits testimony and the -1 amendments (EXHIBITS
G & H). |
|
090 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if there is opposition. |
|
092 |
Gardner |
Replies it is a friendly amendment. |
|
100 |
Dave Fiskum |
Oregon Association of Broadcasters. Opposes HB 2390. Introduces Ron Carter,
David Lippoff. Mike Cheney. |
|
178 |
Ron Carter |
KWJJ. Testifies in opposition of HB 2390 and submits
testimony (EXHIBIT I). Explains the huge investments made to
promote airtime shows. |
|
273 |
David Lippoff |
KOIN. Gives
background in broadcasting. Testifies
in opposition of HB 2390 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT J). |
|
377 |
Mike Cheney |
Manager of Bend radio stations. Testifies in opposition of HB 2390 and
submits testimony (EXHIBIT K). |
|
TAPE 128,
B |
||
|
020 |
Cheney |
Continues presentation of smaller markets in
broadcasting. |
|
050 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments about non-competes. |
|
093 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks if it is the person that is kept from competing,
or is it the voice, the face, or the branding. |
|
098 |
Cheney |
Answers the contracts are with individuals. |
|
127 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks if he supports the part of the bill where the
employee is laid off. |
|
136 |
Cheney |
Discusses “laid off” versus ending an employment
arrangement. |
|
145 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if any employees refuse to sign contracts based
on the non-compete agreement presented to them. |
|
163 |
Carter |
Replies they do not get the protection of the contract
if they do not sign them; he does not believe there is a standard. |
|
171 |
Cheney |
States the non-compete clauses are for six months to
one year. |
|
180 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Gives example of professional athletes. |
|
200 |
Carter |
Answers that when the professionals change they go
to another market place. This is a
different kind of thing. |
|
218 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks what is a reasonable time for non-competes. |
|
220 |
Lippoff |
Answers reasonable non-competes are six months to
one year. |
|
231 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks about two-year non-competes. |
|
242 |
Fiskum |
Explains two-year agreements are negotiations
between employee and employer. |
|
249 |
Staff |
Submits testimony in support of HB 2390 by Wendi
Weiss for the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (EXHIBIT L), and supporting testimony
by Ron Pivo (EXHIBIT M). |
|
250 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2390. Opens public
hearing on HB 2094. |
|
HB 2094
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
282 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy, Attorney General, Department of
Justice. Explains HB 2094 requires
tobacco product manufacturers to report certain information to Attorney
General. Explains this bill needs further work and there will be policy
choices for the committee. |
|
300 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2094. Opens public hearing on HB 2620. |
|
HB 2620
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
321 |
Susan Russell |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (OCDLA). Testifies in opposition to HB 2620 which
provides that third offense of driving while under the influence of
intoxicants is felony under specified circumstances. |
|
350 |
Staff |
Submits testimony (EXHIBIT N) from Governor’s Advisory Committee on DUII. |
|
355 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2620. Opens public hearing on HB 2821. |
|
HB 2821
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
391 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 2821 which clarifies
authority of sheriff to use such force as is necessary to enter into building
or enclosure and take personal property when court has ordered sheriff to
take property into custody at specific premises. |
|
400 |
Rob Bovett |
Assistant County Counsel, Lincoln County. Testifies in support of HB 2821 and
submits testimony (EXHIBIT O) |
|
425 |
Marshall Ross |
Senior Deputy, Multnomah County. Testifies in support of HB 2821 and
submits testimony (EXHIBIT P). |
|
TAPE 129,
A |
||
|
048 |
Brian Wallace |
Civil Deputy, Polk County. Testifies in support of HB 2821 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT Q). |
|
149 |
John Powell |
Oregon State Sheriffs Association. Describes the -1
amendments (EXHIBIT R). |
|
154 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2821. Opens work session
on HB 2821. |
|
HB 2821
WORK SESSION |
||
|
155 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2821-1 amendments dated
4/9/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Barker, Macpherson |
|
156 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
157 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2821 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Barker, Macpherson |
|
158 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. ANDERSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
159 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2821. Opens public hearing
on HB 3167. |
|
HB 3167
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
210 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3167. Opens public hearing on HB 3388. |
|
HB 3388
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
215 |
Jim Main |
Sheriff Douglas County. Testifies in support of HB 3388 which allows city or county to
charge booking fee to person committed to local correctional facility, and
submits testimony (EXHIBIT S). |
|
220 |
John Powell |
Oregon State Sheriffs Association. Testifies in
support of HB 3388. |
|
233 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if these fees will be applied to everyone, or
just those who do not have the ability to pay. |
|
240 |
Main |
Describes charging of fees. |
|
245 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks how much the county would gross. |
|
382 |
Main |
Replies that booking fees would bring about 30
percent collection rate. Possibly
$40,000 a year to go into other programs. |
|
TAPE 130,
A |
||
|
050 |
Susan Russell |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. Testifies in opposition to HB 3388. |
|
075 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3388. Recesses meeting at 3:30 pm. To reconvene at 5:30 pm. |
|
090 |
Chair Williams |
Reconvenes the meeting at 5:37 p.m. Opens a public hearing on HB 2811. |
|
HB 2811
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
111 |
Kelly Peterson |
Humane Society of United States. Testifies in support of HB 2811 which expands
definition of minimum care with regard to non-ambulatory livestock animals
for purposes of certain criminal statutes.
Discusses work group efforts that lead to this legislation. Clarifies the intent of the bill on how a
non-ambulatory animal should be handled. |
|
147 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Oregon Cattleman’s Association. Testifies in support
of HB 2811 and the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
T). |
|
155 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Signifies that the -1 amendments delete “veterinary”
and insert “ongoing.” |
|
168 |
Marcia Keith |
Oregon Veterinary Medical Association. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 2811 and the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
U). |
|
172 |
Bruce Anderson |
Eugene Livestock Auction. Supports the -1
amendments. |
|
184 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Thanks Ms. Peterson and Mr. Stonebrink for their
efforts in getting this legislation to this point. |
|
200 |
Lt. Randy Covey |
Support Enforcement for Humane Society. Testifies in support of HB 2811 and -1
amendments. |
|
204 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2811 and opens work
session. |
|
HB 2811
WORK SESSION |
||
|
205 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2811-1 amendments dated
3/6/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
206 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
207 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 2811 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
208 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. SHETTERLY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
209 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2811 and opens a
public hearing on HB 3339. |
|
HB 3339
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
240 |
Kelly Peterson |
Humane Society of United States. Testifies in support of HB 3339 which
creates crime of trading in non-ambulatory livestock. Discusses work group
efforts that lead to this legislation.
|
|
245 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Oregon Cattleman’s Association. Testifies in support of HB 3339 and the -1
amendments (EXHIBIT V). Discusses why “knowingly delivers” is of
importance in this legislation. |
|
265 |
Marcia Keith |
Oregon Veterinary Medical Association. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 3339 (EXHIBIT W) |
|
279 |
Bruce Anderson |
Eugene Livestock Auction. Supports HB 3339. |
|
280 |
Lt. Randy Covey |
Support Enforcement for Humane Society. Supports HB
3339. |
|
305 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Commends panel on work done to produce this
legislation. |
|
344 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if “pot shots” can be taken to load animals. |
|
351 |
Stonebrink |
Replies he is not sure, but thinks that would bruise
the animal and diminish the quality of the meat. |
|
360 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if that is a cattle prod. |
|
365 |
Stonebrink |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
370 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 3339 and opens a work
session on HB 3339. |
|
HB 3339
WORK SESSION |
||
|
371 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3339-1 amendments dated
3/24/03. |
|
372 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
373 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
374 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 3339 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
376 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. SHETTERLY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
378 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3339 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2733. |
|
HB 2733
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
410 |
Rep. Floyd Prozanski |
House District 8.
Discusses the reasons for introducing HB 2733 which reorganizes
provisions relating to venue in violation cases. |
|
TAPE 129,
B |
||
|
028 |
Vice-Chair Ackerman |
Asks for clarification on the geographic lines in
Lane County. |
|
035 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Replies he isn’t sure where the geographic lines are
drawn, but explains where particular courts might be located in the county. |
|
040 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Says the justice courts geographic limits are
prescribed by ordinance less than what the county is. |
|
047 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments that is true, the same thing is in Florence
Justice Court and Oakridge Justice Court; all are Justice of Peace courts
within Lane County and have geographic location. |
|
051 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks if this bill expands the jurisdictional limit
of the justice court in a particular county. |
|
060 |
Vice-Chair Ackerman |
Asks for clarification on the intent of the bill. |
|
069 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains the intent of HB 2733 is not to change what
is already geographically marked but to make clear the options are limited to
what was previously based in the statute and making certain municipal courts’
jurisdiction is limited to their city limits. Describes the jurisdictional
limitations within the legislation. |
|
074 |
Rep. Anderson |
Asks for specific jurisdiction in Coburg and
Harrisburg. |
|
080 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains which court might have jurisdiction based
on the current statutes. Says this
does not limit the municipal court. |
|
085 |
Chair Williams |
Summarizes the intent of the bill. |
|
095 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Agrees with his summation. Explains the only times the municipal court would have
jurisdiction. |
|
119 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if this new wording would avoid “poaching” by a
city policeman. |
|
129 |
Rep. Krummel |
Wonders if an interstate highway would limit the
jurisdiction of city officials. |
|
135 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains who would have jurisdiction if an
interstate highway passed within a city. |
|
153 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks for clarification concerning where a violation
would be heard. |
|
160 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies where the violation could be heard by
giving an example. |
|
179 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel.
Notes that the bill is difficult to comprehend and tries to clarify
the legislation by using an example. |
|
195 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Appreciates the clarification. |
|
201 |
Carl Myers |
Oregon Municipal Judges Association. Adds further clarification to the
legislation by using an example of being stopped within the city limits of
Salem, but in Polk County. Says this
bill does not change overlapping jurisdiction. |
|
225 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if that was Rep. Prozanski’s intent in this
bill. |
|
231 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Agrees. |
|
234 |
Rep. Barker |
Suggests an amendment that municipal courts have
jurisdiction only within city limits. |
|
239 |
Chair Williams |
Comments that “poaching” should be avoided. |
|
245 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Wonders about amending Chapter 221. |
|
294 |
Myers |
Still need language in Chapter 153 which has been
misinterpreted. Feels venue for
handling a case can only be if the violation occurred within the boundaries
of that jurisdiction. Says Chapter
221 could be amended, but 153 has to be, as well. |
|
300 |
Taylor |
Suggests amendments. |
|
303 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Suggests a way of amending the legislation. |
|
305 |
Chair Williams |
Agrees that the legislation should be less
complicated. |
|
307 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2733. Opens a public hearing on HB 2736. |
|
HB 2736
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
350 |
Rep. Floyd Prozanski |
House District 8.
Introduces and testifies in support of HB 2736 which creates crime of
interfering with firefighter or emergency medical technician. Describes situations which lead to
introduction of this bill. |
|
393 |
Rep. Jenson |
Wonders if other crimes could be prosecuted when
interfering with a firefighter. |
|
404 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Says it depends on what actually happens on the
scene and gives examples of various violations that could occur. |
|
TAPE 130,
B |
||
|
025 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks about more serious crimes that could be
prosecuted. |
|
030 |
Rep. Barker |
Asks for clarification on the intent of the bill. |
|
035 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Describes intent is to give them the protection they
need. Before citing an individual,
that notice would be given. The individual would have to have the knowledge
they are interfering with the person doing their job. |
|
040 |
Rep. Barker |
Asks what would be done in a particular situation in
Portland. |
|
045 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains how law enforcement would handle this
situation. |
|
055 |
Vice-Chair Anderson |
Asks if volunteers would be covered as well. |
|
058 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Answers no, and clarifies who would be covered by
this legislation. |
|
072 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies that this legislation is for a firefighter
or emergency medical technician. |
|
069 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if it would include a volunteer firefighter. |
|
072 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Wonders if it covers volunteer police. |
|
076 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Says that is covered under volunteer police officer. |
|
090 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if there might be a fiscal involved in creating
a new crime. |
|
093 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Feels it will not be used that often to impact the
state. |
|
106 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2736 and opens a
work session on HB 2736. |
|
HB 2736
WORK SESSION |
||
|
107 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2736 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
108 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
110 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2736. Opens work session on HB 2034. |
|
HB 2034
WORK SESSION |
||
|
112 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel.
Explains -6 amendments to HB 2034 which modifies definition of iodine
matrix (EXHIBIT X). |
|
135 |
Chair Williams |
Addresses concerns about minors, which was
withdrawn, and the idea of putting the items behind the counter. |
|
140 |
Taylor |
Describes how that was withdrawn. |
|
145 |
Chair Williams |
Refers to previous issues by veterinarians which have
been resolved. |
|
150 |
Marcia Keith |
Oregon Veterinary Medical Association. Testifies in support of the -6 amendments. |
|
171 |
Vice-Chair Anderson |
Asks for clarification on the retailers’ issue of
not wanting to lock up this medication. |
|
185 |
Chair Williams |
Describes how the amendments satisfy previous
concerns of retailers. |
|
189 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks for clarification on which parts of the bill have
been deleted. |
|
192 |
Rep.
Macpherson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2034-6 amendments dated
4/1/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
195 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
196 |
Rep.
Macpherson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2034 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
197 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. MACPHERSON will lead discussion
on the floor. |
|
199 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2034. Opens a work session
on HB 2082. |
|
HB 2082
WORK SESSION |
||
|
235 |
Jim McCloud |
Manager for Quality Assurance, Office of Mental
Health & Addiction Services.
Testifies in opposition to HB 2082 which allows investigator in civil
commitment proceeding access to Law Enforcement Data System and submits
testimony (EXHIBIT Y). Gives specific reasons for his opposition. |
|
260 |
McCloud |
Testifies in support of the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT Z). |
|
266 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies when the -1 amendments are in effect, but
is not sure that these will be the only amendments to the bill. |
|
280 |
Rep. Jenson |
Expresses his opposition to HB 2082. States there is
the issue of protecting the mentally ill. |
|
290 |
Staff |
Submits written testimony by Philip Chadsey in
support of HB 2082 for National Association for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) (EXHIBIT AA). |
|
300 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses the reception of previous legislation to
this effect. |
|
302 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2082 and adjourns the
meeting at 6:52 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3363, written testimony, Nancy Miller, 4 pp
B
– HB 3363-3 amendments, staff, 2 pp
C
– HB 2390, written testimony, Rep. Mark Hass, (notebook)
D
– HB 2390, written testimony, Jeff Scovel, 1 p
E
– HB 2390, written testimony, John Williams, 1 p
F
- HB 2390, written testimony, Nicholas
Fish, 6 pp
G
– HB 2390, written testimony, Dan Gardner, 2 pp
H
– HB 2390-1 amendment, staff, 3 pp
I
- HB 2390, written testimony, Ron
Carter, 2 pp
J
- HB 2390, written testimony, David Lippoff,
3 pp
K
– HB 2390, written testimony, Mike Cheney, 2 pp
L
– HB 2390, written testimony, Wendi Weiss, 4 pp
M
– HB 2390, written testimony, Ron Pivo, 1 p
N
– HB 2390, written testimony, Gretchen McKenzie, 1 p
O
– HB 2821, written testimony, Rob Bovett, 1 p
P
– HB 2821, written testimony, Marshall Ross, 1 p
Q
– HB 2821, written testimony, Brian Wallace, 1 p
R
– HB 2821-1 amendment, Staff, 1 p
S
– HB 3388, written testimony, Jim Main, 1 p
T
– HB 2811-1 amendment, staff, 1 p
U
– HB 2811, written testimony, Marcia Keith, 1 p
V
– HB 3339-1 amendment, staff, 1 p
W
– HB 3339, written testimony, Marcia Keith, 1 p
X
– HB 2034-6 amendment, staff, 1 p
Y
– HB 2082, written testimony, Jim MacLeod, 2 pp
Z
– HB 2082-1 amendment, staff, 1 p
AA
– HB 2082, written testimony, Philip Chadsey (NAMI), p 1