HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 16, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 p.m. Tapes 143 – 145
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Taylor, Counsel
Ann Martin, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2069 Reconsideration and Work
Session
HB 2238 Work Session
HB 2711 Work Session
HB 2756 Work Session
HB 2865 Work Session
HB 2647 Work Session
HB 2094 Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 143,
A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Williams |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:10 p.m. Opens a work
session on HB 2069. |
|
HB 2069
WORK SESSION |
||
|
015 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote on HB 2069. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Anderson |
|
017 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
020 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
2069 was sent to the floor with a DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Anderson |
|
021 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
025 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves HB 2069 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means
BE RESCINDED. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Anderson |
|
028 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. ACKERMAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
030 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2069 and opens a work
session on HB 2238. |
|
HB 2238
WORK SESSION |
||
|
035 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2238 which changes
payment of benefits awarded by Public Safety Memorial Fund Board to payment
in lump sum. Discusses the -1 amendments (EXHIBITS
A & B). |
|
057 |
Scott Tighe |
Standards and Certification Director, Department of
Public Safety Standards and Training (DPSST). Discusses bill and amendments. |
|
111 |
Marilyn Lorens
|
Government Liaison, DPSST. Says she is there to
address questions. |
|
113 |
Brian DeLashmutt |
Oregon Council of Police Associations, Association
of Oregon Corrections Employees, Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation
Officers. Discusses bill and -1 amendments. |
|
154 |
Rep. Jenson |
Says that he has a concern with language on page 5,
line 5 of the -1 amendments. |
|
175 |
DeLashmutt |
Says that is the same language as the current
statute. |
|
190 |
Rep. Jenson |
Thinks they should amend the existing statute. |
|
197 |
Rep. Barker |
Asks what “totally disabled” means. |
|
202 |
Tighe |
Says that the definition is “totally permanently
disabled” which means unable to do any work. |
|
209 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks about minor children and their benefits. |
|
229 |
Lorens |
Says that she believes there is a provision in the
bill that addresses his concerns. |
|
241 |
Tighe |
Points out procedures for the board regarding this
issue on Page 10, section 6, line 15, new subsection (1). |
|
255 |
Rep.
Jenson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2238-1 amendments dated
04/16/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
257 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
260 |
Rep.
Jenson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2238 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
267 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. JENSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
275 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2238 and opens a work
session on HB 2711. |
|
HB 2711
WORK SESSION |
||
|
283 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2711 which modifies
provisions relating to collection of child support payments by collection
agencies. Discusses the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
300 |
Ronelle Shankle |
Department of Justice. Testifies in support of HB
2711 and submits testimony (EXHIBITS
D-F). |
|
317 |
Chair Williams |
Says that the committee has the -1 amendments. |
|
324 |
Shankle |
Discusses history of the -1 amendments. |
|
336 |
Chair Williams |
Informs committee about issues of bill. |
|
377 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks who makes the payment of collection fees. |
|
379 |
Shankle |
Explains how child support payments work with
private collection agencies. |
|
TAPE 144,
A |
||
|
013 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Inquires about child support payments that go in
arrears. |
|
029 |
Shankle |
Says that they discussed that problem last session
and explains. |
|
072 |
Rep. Jenson |
States that he is struggling with this and it sounds
like they are getting loan sharks involved. |
|
099 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Expresses his concerns on cutting back on money
going to the Department of Justice. Says we need to take care of the revenue
issues. |
|
112 |
Rep.
Jenson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2711-1 amendments dated 04/11/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
114 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
115 |
Rep.
Jenson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2711 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
120 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. JENSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
123 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2711 and opens a work
session on HB 2756. |
|
HB 2756
WORK SESSION |
||
|
131 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2756 which modifies
provision relating to relief from requirement to report to sex offender based
on juvenile adjudication. Explains that this bill was the product of a work
group. Discusses the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
G). |
|
172 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses history of bill. |
|
176 |
Sarah Morse |
Oregon District Attorneys Association (ODAA). Talks about
the -1 amendments. Says they are consensus amendments. |
|
183 |
Kelly Skye |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association.
Discusses bill. |
|
222 |
Rep. Barker |
Asks about Measure 11 crimes. |
|
224 |
Morse |
Answers that it depends on what the negotiation is
with the County District Attorney. |
|
240 |
Dan Malin |
Oregon State Police. Sex Offenders Registration
Unit. Testifies in support of HB 2756. |
|
270 |
Taylor |
Provides history of bill. |
|
286 |
Timothy Travis |
Oregon Judicial Department. Testifies in opposition
to HB 2756. Says that the courts were not part of the work group. Discusses fiscal
and problems with bill. |
|
390 |
Taylor |
Comments on the right to counsel being taken out of
the bill. |
|
419 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2756 and opens a work
session on HB 2865. |
|
HB 2865
WORK SESSION |
||
|
402 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2865 which allows
district attorney to treat certain felonies as Class A misdemeanors.
Discusses -2, -3 and -4 amendments (EXHIBITS
H-J). |
|
TAPE 143,
B |
||
|
048 |
Rep.
Barker |
MOTION: Moves to RESCIND 2865 -1 amendments dated
04/14/03 ADOPTED ON 4/14/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
044 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
051 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Discusses the -2, -3 and -4 amendments. |
|
055 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Comments on “chain of custody” in the amendments. |
|
069 |
Chair Williams |
Explains the differences in the amendments. |
|
074 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks what the effect of the -3 amendments are. |
|
076 |
Chair Williams |
Says that you get sections 1 and 3 of the bill and
not section 2 in the -3 amendments. |
|
079 |
Rep. Macpherson |
States that he is in favor of the -4 amendments. |
|
081 |
Rep. Barker |
Asks about the differences in amendments and
advising defendants of their rights. |
|
107 |
Chair Williams |
Says that it’s between the -2 and -4 amendments. |
|
117 |
Taylor |
Explains current law and the -2 and -4 amendments. |
|
137 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Talks about the standard of a grand jury proceeding.
Says he supports the -2 amendments. |
|
148 |
Rep.
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2865-2 amendments dated
04/15/03. |
|
163 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks how an investigative officer responds to
hearsay in a grand jury. |
|
172 |
Rep. Barker |
Says that the grand jury can bring in the other
officer if necessary. |
|
188 |
Chair Williams |
Explains the -2 and -4 amendments to Rep. Anderson. |
|
219 |
|
VOTE:
7-1-1 AYE: 7 - Ackerman, Anderson, Barker, Jenson, Prozanski,
Shetterly, Williams NAY: 1 - Macpherson EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
220 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
233 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2865 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
237 |
Rep. Jenson |
Says that he is going to vote aye in the committee,
but he may vote no on the floor. |
|
260 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
262 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. BARKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
270 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2865 and opens a work
session on HB 2647. |
|
HB 2647
WORK SESSION |
||
|
273 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2647 which deletes
requirement that special alternative incarceration program be based on
military basic training model. Discusses the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT K). |
|
297 |
Scott Taylor |
Oregon Department of Corrections. Testifies in
support of HB 2647. Submits testimony (EXHIBIT
L). |
|
375 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks Scott Taylor what Section 2, subsection 3 of
the -1 amendment entails. |
|
378 |
S. Taylor |
Describes the alternative incarceration addiction
program. |
|
400 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks how this program is different from the military
model. |
|
TAPE 144,
B |
||
|
003 |
Chair Williams |
Explains the bill and its objective. |
|
022 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks Mr. Taylor what the recidivism rate is at
Shutter Creek. |
|
024 |
S. Taylor |
Answers that a control group is 29% and this
particular population is 23%. |
|
029 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Comments on a “junior marines” program in Jackson
County. |
|
041 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks Mr. Taylor if the program at Shutter Creek is a
one-strike program. |
|
050 |
S. Taylor |
Answers that if an inmate makes a violation then
they have to go through a review process. |
|
063 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks how “walk-aways” are dealt with at Shutter
Creek. |
|
072 |
S. Taylor |
Explains that the “walk-aways” are treated as
escapes. |
|
082 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks about the level of expense for these facilities
and if it is more costly. |
|
087 |
S. Taylor |
Responds that the initial cost is higher for the
Summit Program, but when the time cut and transitional leave are factored in
there is an average savings of $23,000-24,000 per inmate per year. |
|
105 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Says that it sounds like the savings includes the
early release. Wonders whether they are duplicating the experimental
facilities in hopes of saving by early release. |
|
127 |
S. Taylor |
Says that they have been running the Summit Program
for nine years and believes that it will be successful. |
|
145 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2647-1 amendments dated
04/14/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
146 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
148 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2647 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
150 |
Rep. Jenson |
Comments on evaluation of programs. |
|
185 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Says he supports the bill, but has concerns. |
|
210 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if the bill needs to go to Ways and Means. |
|
212 |
B. Taylor |
Says that it does not have a fiscal impact, but
needs to be a part of the Department of Corrections budget. |
|
225 |
Chair Williams |
Suggests that they deal with it on the Senate side. |
|
233 |
Rep. Krummel |
Comments on boot camp program and new program
discussed in the bill. |
|
254 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
260 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. ANDERSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
268 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2647 and opens a work
session on HB 2094. |
|
HB 2094
WORK SESSION |
||
|
272 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy Attorney General. Discusses bill which
requires tobacco product manufacturers to report certain information to
Attorney General. Discusses the -2 amendments (EXHIBIT M). |
|
311 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if they could strike the words “in this state”
on page 11, line 15, of the -2 amendments. |
|
314 |
Shepherd |
Says that frames the policy issue and the Department
of Justice would support that, but some people want those words kept in. |
|
335 |
Chair Williams |
Explains bill to committee. |
|
384 |
Shepherd |
Discusses what the bill does. |
|
430 |
Chair Williams |
Says that they are going to set the bill for Friday’s
committee with new amendments. |
|
TAPE 145,
A |
||
|
012 |
Marshall Coba |
Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of
America. Supports HB 2094 and the -2 amendments. |
|
029 |
David Redmond |
President, Carolina Tobacco Companies. Testifies in
support of HB 2094 and the -2 amendments. |
|
066 |
Jim Gardner |
Philip Morris Tobacco Company. Submits testimony and
testifies on HB 2094 and states what the intent of the Attorney General is (EXHIBIT N). |
|
086 |
Bill Linden |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Says that the
language “in this state” on page 11 of the -2 amendments needs to be removed. |
|
103 |
Gardner |
Explains why “in this state” needs to be removed. |
|
116 |
Redmond |
Comments on the impact of removing the language “in
this state” in the -2 amendments. |
|
154 |
Gardner |
Discusses the broadness of the language in the -2
amendments. |
|
164 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Says that it sounds like there is an interstate
commerce problem. |
|
206 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses the bill. Closes the work session on HB
2094 and adjourns the meeting at 3:10 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2238, -1 amendments, submitted by staff, dated 4/16/03, 13 pgs.
B
– HB 2238, explanation of -1 amendments, submitted by staff, 1 pg.
C
– HB 2711, -1 amendments, submitted by staff, dated 4/11/03, 2 pgs.
D
– HB 2711, hand-engrossed bill, submitted by Ronelle Shankle, 7 pgs.
E
– HB 2711, written testimony submitted by Ronelle Shankle, 7 pgs.
F
– HB 2711, written testimony of David Conder, Child Support Enforcement
Council, submitted by Ronelle Shankle, 3 pgs.
G
– HB 2756, -1 amendments, submitted by staff, dated 4/15/03, 3 pgs.