HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 23, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 PM Tapes 155
- 158
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Taylor, Counsel
Patsy Wood, Office Coordinator
Ann Martin, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3356 Work Session
HB 3338 Public Hearing
HB 2590 Work Session
HB 3344 Work Session
HB 3362 Work Session
HB 2381 Work Session
HB 3296 Work Session
HB 3349 Work Session
HB 3015 Work Session
HB 3520 Work
Session
HB 2342 Work Session
HB 2592 Work Session
HB 3385 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 155,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Williams |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:37 p.m. Announces that the committee will meet
until approximately 3:30 p.m. when they are due back for floor session, and
then reconvene the committee at 6:00 p.m. this evening. Opens a work session on HB 3356 which
includes in intimidation laws crime against gender identity. |
|
HB 3356
WORK SESSION |
||
|
038 |
Roey Thorpe |
Executive Director, Basic Rights Oregon. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 3356 saying this legislation would make Oregon the 8th state
to enforce this type of intimidation legislation (EXHIBIT A). Discusses
the brutal murder of Loni Kai Okaruru in Hillsboro nearly two years ago. |
|
083 |
Det. Brian Grose |
Detective, Portland Police Bureau. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 3356. Discusses police cases he
has investigated dealing with trans gender identity (EXHIBIT B). |
|
128 |
Dennis Mulvihill |
Washington County Government Affairs. Submits and reads testimony of Washington
County District Attorney, Bob Hermann, in support of HB 3356 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
165 |
Amalia Alarcón Gaddie |
Manager, Metropolitan Human Rights Center. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 3356 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
210 |
Rev. David C. Dornack |
Rose City Park Presbyterian Church. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 3356 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
250 |
Damon Woodcock |
Retired Portland Police Officer. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 3356 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
290 |
Lori Buckwalter |
Executive Director, It’s Time, Oregon! Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 3356 (EXHIBIT G). Describes incidents that have happened to
her based on her trans gender identity. |
|
369 |
Andrea Meyer |
American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon (ACLU). Testifies in support of HB 3356. Gives a brief history of the ACLU’s
experience with this type of law. |
|
TAPE 156,
A |
||
|
015 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3356 and opens a
public hearing on HB 3338. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for HB 3356: |
||
|
|
A. Kaelin Bowers |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT EE). |
|
|
Joan Rapkin |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT FF). |
|
|
Dominick Vetri |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT GG). |
|
|
Kimber Nelson |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT HH). |
|
|
Janice Schaefer |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT II). |
|
|
Dr. Randy Blazak |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT JJ). |
|
|
Jennifer Clark |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT KK). |
|
HB 3338
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
026 |
Rep. Jerry Krummel |
House District 26.
Introduces HB 3338 which modifies provisions relating to desertion by
parent in adoption proceedings.
Explains the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
H). |
|
052 |
Michelle Lester |
Private citizen.
Testifies in support of HB 3338 and explains how she has become a
victim in need of this type of legislation. |
|
110 |
Robin Pope |
Attorney at Law.
Submits testimony and testifies in opposition to HB 3338 (EXHIBIT I). Speaks to Section 2, page 1, of the -1
amendments. Advises there should not
be a fiscal impact. |
|
154 |
Kathy Ledesma |
Adoptions Manager, Department of Human
Services. Submits testimony and testifies
in opposition to HB 3338 in its original form (EXHIBIT J). Says she
supports the amendments lines 1-15 (portions regarding minors), but does not
feel qualified to speak to the rest of the bill. |
|
181 |
Chair Williams |
Asks for clarification on her opposition to the bill
with regards to the amendments. |
|
185 |
Ledesma |
Explains she is not in opposition to the amendments
dealing with minors. |
|
197 |
Jason Penney |
Washington County parent. Submits testimony and testifies in opposition to HB 3338, but
says he does support the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
K). |
|
212 |
Scott Adams |
Attorney, Banks, Oregon. Submits testimony and testifies in opposition to HB 3338, but
does support the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
L). |
|
243 |
Chair Williams |
Explains a note from the court needing extra time to
determine if there is a fiscal impact on this bill. Says the bill will be set for another work session early next
week. |
|
260 |
Pope |
Expresses support even with a large fiscal. |
|
274 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3338. Opens a work session on HB 2590. |
|
HB 2590
WORK SESSION |
||
|
280 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2590 which allows principal real estate broker to claim
lien upon commercial real estate that is subject of sale, lease or other
conveyance. Introduces the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
M), -2 amendments (EXHIBIT N),
and -3 amendments (EXHIBITS O). |
|
301 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Offers an explanation of each amendment. |
|
315 |
Jana Jarvis |
Oregon Association of Realtors. Submits “Respective
Durations of Commercial Liens in States Where They Exist” and testifies in
support of HB 2590 (EXHIBIT P). |
|
335 |
Chair Williams |
Points out moving the requirement from 90 to 45 days
would be shorter than most states and execution time would also be shortened. |
|
345 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Discusses his motive for shortening the time
periods. |
|
355 |
Chair Williams |
Comments on the timeframes in Connecticut. |
|
360 |
Jarvis |
Further comments on the state timeframes in her
testimony. |
|
375 |
Gene Bentley |
Commercial Broker, Portland, Oregon. Testifies
regarding HB 2590. |
|
400 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Expresses his concerns about having a balanced
playing field with respect to these liens. |
|
TAPE 155,
B |
||
|
020 |
Bentley |
Responds to Rep. Prozanski’s expressed concerns. |
|
039 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks about the ability to have mandatory arbitration. |
|
041 |
Bentley |
Expresses his experience with arbitration. |
|
054 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Speaks to arbitration versus mediation being two
different worlds. |
|
056 |
Bentley |
Points out the similarities. |
|
062 |
Rep. Barker |
Discusses disputes held by people in opposition to
HB 2590. |
|
070 |
Bentley |
Addresses leases in particular. |
|
088 |
Rep. Barker |
Asks about multiple leaser agents. |
|
090 |
Bentley |
Explains listing agreements in the lease world. |
|
102 |
Jarvis |
Says there is a program to handle these types of
resolution. |
|
105 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Explains that the -1 and -2 amendments try to
shorten time periods. |
|
115 |
Vice Chair
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2590-1 amendments dated
04/21/03. |
|
120 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks for clarification on shortening the time
periods on the liens. |
|
125 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Explains why the times have been shortened. |
|
134 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Feels the shortened time would be a motivator in
this case. |
|
141 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Explains his view of seeing this as a counterpart to
construction liens and feels the shortening of time periods puts us in line
with liens in a construction context. |
|
154 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Explains his reasoning for proposing the amendments. |
|
160 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Agrees with the reasoning for the amendments. |
|
175 |
|
VOTE:
6-3 AYE: 6 -
Ackerman, Barker, Krummel, Macpherson, Shetterly, Williams NAY: 3 - Anderson, Jenson, Prozanski |
|
180 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
185 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2590-2 amendments dated
04/21/03. |
|
190 |
Rep. Krummel |
Further clarifies the reason for the decrease in the
timeframe. |
|
195 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
200 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Questions whether the decrease in timeframe would
actually speed up the process. |
|
205 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Further comments on the effects of the -2
amendments. |
|
207 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
210 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
212 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2590-3 amendments dated
04/21/03. |
|
215 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if the -1 or -2 amendments are included in the
-3 amendments. |
|
225 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Explains page 2, line 14 says something different
than on page 4, line 15. |
|
230 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks for further clarification of the -3 amendments. |
|
235 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Explains why he has submitted separate sets of
amendments. |
|
245 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies the purpose of the -3 amendments. |
|
250 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Further offers his interpretation of the issue. |
|
260 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Outlines the committee’s options in adopting the various amendments. |
|
265 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Questions whether the -3 amendments need to conform
with -1 and -2 amendments previously adopted. Amends
previous motion to include the conceptual amendments which conform the -3
amendments to the -1 and -2 amendments. |
|
270 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies the conceptual amendments for the record. |
|
280 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Offers his interpretation of, and support for, the
-3 amendments. |
|
285 |
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Shetterly |
|
290 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
300 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
MOTION:
Moves HB 2590 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
305 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Indicates his support for the bill, but interest in
further talking with the proponents and opponents of the bill. |
|
310 |
Rep. Barker |
Indicates his support, but expresses his continued
concerns regarding the issue. |
|
312 |
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Shetterly |
|
315 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. ACKERMAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
320 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2590 and opens a work
session on HB 3344. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for HB 2590: |
||
|
|
Kingsley Click |
Trail Court Administrator, Judicial Department. Submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT LL). |
|
HB 3344
WORK SESSION |
||
|
330 |
Rep. Macpherson |
House District 38. Introduces HB 3344 which changes
number of years that intangible personal property must be held in fiduciary
capacity before being presumed abandoned from five to two. |
|
355 |
Jack Munro |
Oregon Land Title Association. Testifies in support
of HB 3344. |
|
375 |
Craig Chisholm |
Oregon Land Title Association. Discusses funds in
escrow accounts that would benefit the state. |
|
380 |
Munro |
Explains the -1 amendments to HB 3344 (EXHIBIT Q). |
|
396 |
Chisholm |
Says this would speed up the turnover of the money. |
|
400 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks about the letter from Legislative Counsel (EXHIBIT R). |
|
|
Chisholm |
Does not feel there is a constitutional issue here. |
|
437 |
Jeanette Holman |
Division of State Lands. Testifies in support of HB 3344 and the -1 amendments. Indicates
she does not believe there is a constitutional issue. |
|
TAPE 156,
B |
||
|
038 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks if this relates to bank accounts. |
|
040 |
Holman |
Explains the banking institutions have their own
statutes. |
|
042 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Points out that he could not identify any constitutional concerns with
the bill. |
|
049 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Comments on the contract liability issue. |
|
056 |
Joseph |
Explains the property goes to the Common School Fund
even if someone is waiting for the property. |
|
061 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Explains how a change beautifies the statute. |
|
075 |
Rep.
Macpherson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3344-1 amendments dated
04/23/03. |
|
077 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
|
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
080 |
Rep.
Macpherson |
MOTION: Moves HB 3344 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
085 |
Rep. Krummel |
Explains a previous disapproval to the amendments. |
|
090 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies that there should not be problems with the
bill. |
|
106 |
Rep. Jenson |
Expresses his opinion with professional people and
their opinions. |
|
118 |
Chair Williams |
Says the letter from LC is just a “heads up” for the
committee. |
|
130 |
|
VOTE:
8-1 AYE: 8 - Ackerman, Anderson, Barker, Krummel,
Macpherson, Prozanski, Shetterly, Williams NAY: 1 - Jenson |
|
135 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. MACPHERSON will lead discussion
on the floor. |
|
140 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3344 and opens a work
session on HB 3362 which provides that if insurance coverage is not
sufficient to satisfy all medical services liens, insurer must prorate
amounts available under limits of insurance and pay hospital or physicians in
proportion to amount due each for services rendered. |
|
HB 3362
WORK SESSION |
||
|
145 |
Chair Williams |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
3362 was passed to the floor. |
|
150 |
Chair Williams |
Explains the purpose for the reconsideration. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
155 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
165 |
David Madigan |
General Counsel, Oregon Medical Association. Introduces panel to tell experience with
physician lien law. |
|
165 |
Shirley Hagg |
Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) Medical
Group. Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 3362 (EXHIBIT S). |
|
230 |
Tammy Lusaro |
Representing Physician Groups. Testifies in support of HB 3362. |
|
365 |
John Powell |
State Farm Insurance Company. Testifies in opposition of HB 3362. |
|
305 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Clarifies Mr. Powell’s testimony. |
|
315 |
Powell |
Responds, discusses the problem with the system. Does not believe that this legislation is
the answer. Recommends allowing
parties who have filed legitimate claims to work out a pro rata sharing of
the value after the payments have been made.
|
|
355 |
Steve Morrow |
State Farm Insurance. Concurs with Mr. Powell’s understanding of the bill. |
|
375 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks for clarification on the issues of health
providers if the health insurance kicks in when the PIP is exhausted. |
|
385 |
Powell |
Explains when the health insurance would kick in. |
|
365 |
Rep. Krummel |
Clarifies that hospitals and providers want to get
paid for services. |
|
370 |
Powell |
Acknowledges. |
|
375 |
Rep. Krummel |
Clarifies that hospitals would request payment. |
|
400 |
Powell |
Acknowledges that they would request that letter. |
|
405 |
Rep. Krummel |
If the PIP benefit is exhausted, why does it make a
difference. |
|
410 |
Powell |
Explains that it matters to which providers get
which part of the PIP benefit. |
|
425 |
Rep. Krummel |
Clarifies how the providers are paid. |
|
330 |
Powell |
Comments on the PIP pay rate. |
|
435 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks if the statute is currently being ignored. |
|
440 |
Powell |
Discusses Subsection 3, page 1, of the bill. |
|
TAPE 157,
A |
||
|
040 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Seems this is a fairness doctrine when liens should
be paid out. |
|
045 |
Madigan |
Says that this is what the OMA wants – all liens
collected and distributed fairly after 30 days. |
|
055 |
Bruce Bishop |
Association of Hospitals and Health Systems. Says current law allows a fair share of
the pie. Has no objection to current
statutory scheme or proposed amendments that have not surfaced yet. |
|
075 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3362. Recesses the committee at 3:30 p.m. |
|
RECESS |
||
|
090 |
Chair Williams |
Reconvenes the meeting at 6:11 p.m. and opens the
work session on HB 2381. |
|
HB 2381
WORK SESSION |
||
|
095 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2381 which allows immediate transfer of person sentenced
to confinement in Department of Corrections institution unless court orders
retention at place of original custody to prepare appeal. Explains -1 amendments (EXHIBIT T). |
|
110 |
John Powell |
Oregon State Sheriffs Association. Submits Notice of Waiver and testifies in
support of HB 2381 and the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
U) |
|
140 |
Scott Taylor |
Department of Correction, (DOC). Submits testimony and testifies in support
of HB 2381 and the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
V). |
|
155 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2381-1 amendments dated
03/24/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
157 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
160 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 2381 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
165 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. ANDERSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
170 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2381 and opens a work
session on HB 3296. |
|
HB 3296
WORK SESSION |
||
|
175 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 3296 which creates crime of unlawful possession of
personal identification device. |
|
180 |
Tim Martinez |
Oregon Bankers Association. Testifies in support of HB 3296. |
|
195 |
Chair Williams |
Speaks to the lack of fiscal impact. Clarifies that
the bill would keep Oregon in line with Washington State. |
|
200 |
Martinez |
Acknowledges. |
|
205 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Questions line 15 on page one concerning
“fictitious” persons. |
|
210 |
Taylor |
Says it may have been copied from Washington State. |
|
220 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 3296 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
225 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. BARKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
230 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3296 and opens a work
session on HB 3349. |
|
HB 3349
WORK SESSION |
||
|
240 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 3349 which allows required inspections of local
correctional facilities, lockups, temporary holds and juvenile facilities to
be done by entities other than Department of Corrections pursuant to
agreements with department. |
|
255 |
John Powell |
Oregon State Sheriffs Association. Testifies in support of HB 3349. Explains why there are no amendments to
the bill. |
|
275 |
Scott Taylor |
Department of Corrections. Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 3349 (EXHIBIT W). |
|
285 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the correction facilities which are
affected by the bill. |
|
290 |
Taylor |
Comments on those corrections facilities which would
be affected. |
|
295 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks whether there is an accreditation process for
the individuals which would be contracted. |
|
300 |
Taylor |
Explains what standards they are held to. |
|
305 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if certified state officers within the state of
Oregon would have preference. |
|
310 |
Taylor |
Acknowledges. |
|
315 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments on discussions in the PERS committee which
may affect the ability to hire retirees. |
|
320 |
Rep.
Jenson |
MOTION: Moves HB 3349 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
325 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. JENSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
330 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3349 and opens a work
session on HB 3015. |
|
HB 3015
WORK SESSION |
||
|
335 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 3015 which requires presiding judge of each judicial district
to establish procedures to protect confidentiality of Social Security numbers
required in certain domestic relations proceedings, and the -3 amendments (EXHIBIT X). |
|
350 |
Bradd Swank |
Oregon Judicial Department. Offers testimony in
support of HB 3015 and the -3 amendments. |
|
370 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Clarifies that specific language in the amendment
may conflict with another bill. |
|
375 |
Swank |
Comments on the possibility of a conflict, and
points out the possible need for conflict amendments. |
|
380 |
Chair Williams |
Concurs that there will probably have to be conflict
amendments. |
|
385 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Clarifies language in the bill. |
|
360 |
Swank |
Outlines who the bill applies to. |
|
374 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Further clarifies who this bill is trying to
protect. |
|
420 |
Swank |
Explains this bill is intended to protect everyone
in the dissolution proceeding. |
|
422 |
Rep.
Barker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3015-3 amendments dated
04/23/03. |
|
425 |
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Rep. Krummel |
|
455 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
460 |
Rep.
Barker |
MOTION: Moves HB 3015 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
465 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. SHETTERLY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
480 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3015 and opens a work
session on HB 3520. |
|
TAPE 158,
A |
||
|
HB 3520
WORK SESSION |
||
|
030 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
House District 3.
Introduces HB 3520 which requires court that offers traffic school and
subsequent dismissal of citation to offer option to persons who plead not
guilty and are convicted. |
|
050 |
Carl Myers |
Oregon Justice of the Peace Association. Indicates his concerns with the bill as
originally written, but points out these concerns are addressed by the -1
amendments (EXHIBIT Y). |
|
060 |
Bradd Swank |
Oregon Judicial Department. Discusses where seat belt infractions fall
as an infraction in the state.
Discusses the possible loss of revenue with fewer citations being
written. |
|
094 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Questions language in the bill stating “may” rather
than “shall” in the bill. |
|
105 |
Myers |
Responds that the Justice of the Peace Association
is ok with the language in question. |
|
115 |
Swank |
Says not every court has traffic school. |
|
120 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Worries about the discretion of the court to dismiss
fees or not. |
|
125 |
Myers |
Explains why he wanted this legislation to be
discretionary for the court. |
|
137 |
Chair Williams |
Offers his personal experience in dealing with
traffic courts. |
|
151 |
Myers |
Discusses how judges are observed in court. |
|
170 |
Rep.
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3520-1 amendments dated
04/23/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
172 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
175 |
Rep.
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves HB 3520 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
180 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. ANDERSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
185 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 3520 and opens a work
session on HB 2342. |
|
HB 2342
WORK SESSION |
||
|
190 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2342 which allows
claim to be made against estate of decedent at any time after personal
representative is appointed. Introduces -1 amendment (EXHIBIT Z) and -2 amendments (EXHIBIT AA). |
|
205 |
Rick Mills |
Department of Human Services. Explains the purpose
and effect of the amendments. |
|
225 |
Chair Williams |
Says there was concern regarding Section 3 of the
bill. Clarifies the amendments correct this concern. |
|
230 |
Mills |
Clarifies the committee’s concerns and says the
Oregon State Bar has no objection to this bill. |
|
255 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Describes his conversation with Prof. Bernie Vail
and the consensus they arrived at. |
|
270 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies how the amendment will read into the bill. |
|
275 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Offers his interpretation of the changes created by
the amendments. |
|
285 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Agrees with the interpretation, and further
clarifies the effects on the bill. |
|
295 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2342-1 amendments dated
03/19/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
297 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
300 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2342-2 amendments dated
04/15/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
305 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
307 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2342 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
312 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
315 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2342 and opens a work
session on HB 2592. |
|
HB 2592
WORK SESSION |
||
|
325 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2592 which authorizes assignment of judgments from
justice court to Department of Revenue for collection, and the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT BB). |
|
335 |
Chair Williams |
Reads letter from Judge Jad Lemhouse expressing his
desire to pass the bill in its original form. |
|
355 |
Carl Myers |
Oregon Justice of the Peace Association. Testifies in support of HB 2592, but in
opposition to the proposed -1 amendments. |
|
350 |
Jim Markee |
Oregon Collectors Association. Explains how the Department of Revenue
collects “other debts owed” throughout the state. Feels this bill would put the Department of Revenue in
competition with private collection agencies and therefore he is proposing
the -1 amendments which would eliminate this competition. |
|
435 |
Chair Williams |
Shares his concerns with the impact of this bill on
the Criminal Fines and Assessment Account (CFAA). Asks why the local government wouldn’t want to go with a
private collection agency. |
|
465 |
Myers |
Responds that judges would simply like the option to
use the Department of Revenue for collections. |
|
TAPE 157,
B |
||
|
020 |
Chair Williams |
Informs the committee that it is their option to
decide the policy. |
|
025 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Remembers Judge Lemhouse indicating that by using
the Department of Revenue local governments would net more money than by
using private companies. |
|
030 |
Myers |
Acknowledges that there could be a net increase, and
discusses the possibility of this increase. |
|
040 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies how the private collection option would
collect their fees. |
|
045 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Clarifies that there is no opportunity to put a fee
on when the collection is done by Department of Revenue. |
|
048 |
Markee |
Remembers Judge Lemhouse saying “tools” were
available to Revenue that are not available to private agencies, and agrees
this is true in some cases. |
|
060 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks if the -1 amendments give the court a choice of
which collection tool to use. |
|
075 |
Markee |
Responds that private collection agencies are doing
many collections for state agencies as well as Revenue, and further discusses
the collection assignment process. |
|
080 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks if this applies to traffic offense fines. |
|
085 |
Markee |
Thinks criminal action would include traffic
offenses, except parking tickets. |
|
095 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if local governments would have the option
without passing the -1 amendments. |
|
105 |
Markee |
Says this bill only deals with justice courts and
they could utilize the offset. |
|
110 |
Rep.
Jenson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2592-1 amendments dated
04/23/03. |
|
115 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Indicates that he cannot support the -1 amendments. |
|
120 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Indicates his continued confusion regarding the -1
amendments. |
|
125 |
Chair Williams |
Comments on who can make these collections currently
and under the -1 amendments. |
|
130 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Further clarifies the affects of the -1 amendments. |
|
135 |
Chair Williams |
Acknowledges the clarification. |
|
145 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments that Revenue might have been used
originally because they charge less than a private collection agency. |
|
155 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Indicates his intent to vote No on the -1
amendments. |
|
157 |
|
VOTE: 6-2-1 AYE: 6 - Ackerman, Anderson, Barker, Jenson,
Macpherson, Williams NAY: 2 - Prozanski, Shetterly EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
160 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
165 |
Rep.
Jenson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2592 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Krummel |
|
170 |
Chair Williams |
The motion CARRIES. REP. JENSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
175 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2592 and opens a public
hearing on HB 3385. |
|
HB 3385
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
180 |
Rich Vial |
Vial Fotheringham LLP. Introduces HB 3385 which
modifies provisions regulating planned unit developments and the -2
amendments (EXHIBIT CC).
References submitted articles and written testimony (EXHIBIT DD). |
|
260 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Refers to an example offered by Mr. Vial, asks if
the new owners would have to reverse the architectural design back to the original
code. |
|
265 |
Vial |
Responds affirmatively. Continues testimony in support of HB 3385. |
|
285 |
Vial |
Points out the -2 amendments were not delivered
until today, so errors do remain in the amendments. Cites the problems with Section 17 on page 42, and Section 36
on page 88. |
|
335 |
Vial |
Proposes that on page 43 line 15 there should be a change
from may to shall. |
|
410 |
Vial |
Discusses Section 15 page 40, indicating there could
be a conflict with another bill. |
|
460 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks Mr. Vial to address language on page 88 and 91
in relation to land sales contracts. |
|
TAPE 158,
B |
||
|
028 |
Vial |
Responds to the issues and the inconsistencies in
the bill’s language. Believes that
home owners associations should be able to collect fees like a local
municipality or county. |
|
070 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Indicates his interest to have everyone treated the
same way, and clarifies that there is case law which addresses this issue. |
|
075 |
Vial |
Acknowledges that the courts have already addressed
the issue. |
|
080 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Speaks to architectural violations and asks if
handicapped individuals can be denied access. |
|
085 |
Vial |
Says the association would need to give reasonable accommodations
to those handicapped individuals. |
|
095 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Speaks to the increase in the lien amount, and
wonders if it has a cap. |
|
100 |
Vial |
Explains that there is no limitation, and comments
on where the lien fees could come from. |
|
105 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Interpreted it to include legal fees which could
exceed the amount of the unpaid assessment.
|
|
115 |
Vial |
Says they are bound by the “reasonableness” in each
case and gives an example of how the legal fees can exceed the assessment. |
|
150 |
Jim Markee |
Oregon Mortgage Lenders Association. Discusses attempts to amend these statutes
each session and the problems created by this type of legislation. Does not feel the amendments correct his
concerns. |
|
185 |
Vial |
Acknowledges that the proposed amendments offer a
lot of information to digest on short notice. Says he will sit down with the opposition to sort out issues. |
|
195 |
Chair Williams |
Agrees it is a large amendment that needs further
exploration. Asks for indication of
where this issue is early next week. |
|
205 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks if there is a certain amount that meets
foreclosure criteria. |
|
210 |
Vial |
Indicates that no one has indicated a minimum, but
describes a case in Texas which dealt with this issue. |
|
225 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Further clarifies specific affects of the bill. |
|
230 |
Vial |
Comments on those specific affects of the bill. |
|
235 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks about foreclosure liens, and whether there is a
limit on foreclosure of homesteads. |
|
245 |
Markee |
Comments on the homestead exemption. |
|
250 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3385 and adjourns
the meeting at 7:42 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3356, written testimony, Roey Thorpe, 6 pp.
B – HB 3356, written testimony, Det.
Brian Grose, 1 p.
C
– HB 3356, written testimony of Bob Hermann, submitted by Dennis Mulvihill,
1 p.
D
– HB 3356, written testimony, Amalia Alarcón Gaddie, 1 p.
E
– HB 3356, written testimony, Rev. David C. Dornack, 1 p.
F
– HB 3356, written testimony, Damon Woodcock, 1 p.
G
– HB 3356, written testimony, Lori Buckwalter, 2 pp.
H
– HB 3338, -1 amendments, Rep. Jerry Krummel, 4 pp.
I
– HB 3338, written testimony, Robin Pope, 1 p.
J
– HB 3338, written testimony, Kathy Ledesma, 2 pp.
K
– HB 3338, written testimony, D. Jason Penney, 1 p.
L
– HB 3338, written testimony, Scott Adams, 1 p.
M
– HB 2590, -1 amendments, Rep. Ackerman, 1 p.
N
– HB 2590, -2 amendments, Rep. Ackerman, 1 p.
O
– HB 2590, -3 amendments, Rep. Ackerman, 8 pp.
P – HB 2590, Oregon Association of
Realtors: Respective Durations of Commercial Liens in States Where They Exist,
Jana Jarvis, 1 p.
Q – HB 3344, -1 amendments, staff, 1 p.
R – HB 3344, letter from Legislative
Counsel, staff, 1 p.
S – HB 3362, written testimony, Shirley
Hagg, 14 pp.
T – HB 2381, -1 amendments, staff, 1 p.
U – HB 2381, Notice of Waiver, John Powell,
1 p.
V – HB 2381, written testimony, Scott
Taylor, 1 p.
W – HB 3349, written testimony, Scott
Taylor, 1 p.
X – HB 3015, -3 amendments, staff, 20 pp.
Y – HB 3520, -1 amendments, Rep. Anderson,
2 p.
Z – HB 2342, -1 amendments, staff, 1 p.
AA – HB 2342, -2 amendments, staff, 1 p.
BB – HB 2592, -1 amendments, staff, 2 pp.
CC – HB 3385, -2 amendments, Rich Vial, 108
pp.
DD – HB 3385, written testimony, Rich Vial,
15 pp.
The
following exhibits are listed out of order in the body of the tape log:
EE
– HB 3356, written testimony, A. Kaelin Bowers, 2 pp.
FF
– HB 3356, written testimony, Joan Rapkin, 1 p.
GG – HB 3356, written testimony, Dominic Vetri, 1 p.
HH
– HB 3356, written testimony, Kimber Nelson, 1 p.
II
– HB 3356, written testimony, Janice Schaefer, 2 pp.
JJ
– HB 3356, written testimony, Dr. Randy Blazak, 1 p.
KK
– HB 3356, written testimony, Jennifer Clark, 1 p.
LL
– HB 2590, written testimony, Kingsley Click, 1 p.