HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 30, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 p.m. Tapes 167-168
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Taylor, Counsel
Patsy Wood, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2802 Reconsideration and Work
Session
HB 2074 Work Session
HB 2638 Work Session
HB 3119 Work Session
HB 3193 Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 167,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Williams |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:37 p.m. Opens a work session to reconsider HB 2802
which expands crime of arson in first degree. |
|
HB 2802
WORK SESSION |
||
|
010 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of reconsidering the vote on HB 2802. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Jenson, Krummel, Shetterly |
|
012 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
021 |
Chair Williams |
Explains reason that HB 2802 has to go to Ways and
Means – large fiscal impact. |
|
032 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
2802 was sent to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Jenson, Krummel, Shetterly |
|
033 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
035 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Discusses arson situations in his district and feels
this bill would be helpful in that respect. |
|
045 |
Chair Williams |
Agrees the bill is needed, but says the increased
penalties increase the fiscal. |
|
063 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks if there is a way to underfund the bill to keep
it out of Way and Means. |
|
065 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses the possibility of that happening. Encourages Rep. Anderson to testify in Ways
and Means. |
|
085 |
Rep.
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves HB
2802 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation and BE
REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
093 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
094 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2802 and opens a work
session on HB 2074. |
|
HB 2074
WORK SESSION |
||
|
096 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2074 which requires Public Defense Services Commission to
submit report to Legislative Assembly biennially. Discusses the -3 and -4
amendments (EXHIBITS A & B). |
|
170 |
Chair Williams |
Explains the -4 amendments are the efforts of a work
group to look at extraordinary expenses. |
|
190 |
Peter Ozanne |
Director, Office of Public Defense Services. Testifies in support of HB 2074 and the
amendments. |
|
199 |
Chair Williams |
Notes that several Public Defense Services
Commission members have expressed their support of this legislation with the
-4 amendments. |
|
223 |
Ozanne |
Agrees. |
|
234 |
Ann Christian |
Director, Indigent Defense Services. Submits a hand-engrossed version of HB
2074 and a summary of the -3 and -4 amendments (EXHIBITS C & D).
Characterizes -3 amendments as additional housekeeping measure. |
|
292 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks about -4 amendments, page 2, Section 42,
regarding expert witnesses. Expresses
concern about being able to get “expert” witnesses in rural parts of
Oregon. Suggests something is needed
in this bill to clarify this concern. |
|
333 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses options to satisfy this concern about
getting expert witnesses to rural parts of Oregon. |
|
357 |
Rep. Barker |
Expresses concerns that someone might come in with a
low expense to testify, but not be qualified. |
|
364 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks about -4 amendments, page 2, line 27. Wonders
if district attorneys are ruled out. |
|
373 |
Taylor |
Responds that if you have district attorneys on this
panel then constitutional questions would be raised. |
|
379 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks if it is pre-trial or post-trial. |
|
381 |
Chair Williams |
Responds it is on-going. |
|
400 |
Christian |
Comments on how the attorneys will be qualified and
chosen to testify. |
|
418 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Questions the -4 amendments, page 2, line 30. Wonders about rationale for language of the
public to file complaints. |
|
429 |
Taylor |
Says this was a suggestion from the Lane County
District Attorney. |
|
438 |
Chair Williams |
Points out this is a public commission and,
therefore, open to public scrutiny. |
|
474 |
Ozanne |
Says the commission would be welcome to public
response. |
|
TAPE 168,
A |
||
|
030 |
Christian |
Discusses complaints that are currently received and
addressed. |
|
046 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Questions “full disclosure” to the public. |
|
052 |
Christian |
Says that full disclosure is limited, cites the case
State v. Bradley Cunningham, Court
of Appeals. |
|
060 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks what would happen if a public records request
is filed. |
|
062 |
Christian |
Explains how a particular case was handled. |
|
074 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Questions the lack of symmetry in Section 9, page 7
of the -4 amendments. |
|
085 |
Christian |
Explains current procedure regarding full disclosure
at the end of a trial. |
|
095 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies which items are disclosed as expenses. |
|
102 |
Christian |
Agrees it is a lump sum broken down by types of
providers. |
|
111 |
Chair Williams |
Is cognizant of Rep. Jenson’s concerns, but needs to
move the bill forward. |
|
116 |
Rep. Jenson |
Suggests conceptual amendment in the -4 amendments. |
|
129 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Suggests this bill could be amended in the Senate. |
|
133 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Agrees, saying this language could be added in the
Senate. |
|
138 |
Taylor |
Says he will forward this language to Legislative
Counsel. |
|
146 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose of CONCEPTUALLY
AMENDING the -4 amendments to HB 2074. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
147 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
148 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to CONCEPTUALLY AMEND HB 2074-4 amendments, dated 4/28/03,
on page 2, line 21, by inserting "after the word available and before
the semicolon add "or for cost considerations". |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
153 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
156 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2074-3 amendments dated
04/28/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
157 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
158 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2074-4 amendments dated
04/28/03 as CONCEPTUALLY AMENDED. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
159 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
162 |
Chair Williams |
Asks about the fiscal impact. |
|
164 |
Christian |
Says there is no fiscal impact. |
|
170 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves HB 2074 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on
Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
178 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. WILLIAMS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
180 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2074 and opens a work
session on HB 2638. |
|
HB 2638
WORK SESSION |
||
|
181 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 2638 which allows
county or city to retain one-half of traffic offense fines that would otherwise
be paid to state if retained amounts are used solely for purpose of paying
costs and expenses incurred by justice court or municipal court in
prosecuting crimes and conducting contempt and probation violation
proceedings. Explains the -5 amendments (EXHIBIT
E). |
|
210 |
Peter Gartlan |
Office of Public Defense Services. Submits testimony
and testifies in support of HB 2638 (EXHIBIT
F). |
|
243 |
Jim Nass |
Appellate Legal Counsel. Says he is in agreement
with what Mr. Gartlan said. |
|
245 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses what could happen during the interim with
this issue. |
|
262 |
Gartlan |
Agrees that would be fine. |
|
270 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if a person is charged with a crime, how do
they find out about this legislation, and wonders about the expense of filing
with the court of appeals. |
|
283 |
Gartlan |
Says this bill addresses only parolees. Explains what would happen when discussing
this procedure with a parolee. |
|
312 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2638-5 amendments dated
04/30/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
316 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
333 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2638 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on
Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
346 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
350 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 2638 and opens a work
session on HB 3119. |
|
HB 3119
WORK SESSION |
||
|
351 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 3119 which authorizes
court to place probationer under supervision of court. |
|
375 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Expresses concerns about the monthly fee. |
|
388 |
Chair Williams |
Reads letter from Judge Pratt which was given to him
by Rep. Butler (EXHIBIT G). Explains
the mechanics of recovering the fee. |
|
TAPE 167,
B |
||
|
008 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks what happens if the fee is not paid. |
|
010 |
Chair Williams |
Asks Kelly Skye and Ann Christian to explain what
would happen if the fee was not paid. |
|
024 |
Kelly Skye |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (OCDLA).
Explains what might happen if the bench probation fee is not paid. Says it varies widely based upon the
judge. |
|
045 |
Ann Christian |
Director, Indigent Defense Services. Discusses what happens in these cases from
her standpoint. Testifies in support
of HB 3119. |
|
079 |
Skye |
Suggests placing non-person felonies on bench
probation. |
|
094 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Discusses the fines in Lane County and what the
judge might take into consideration based upon a person’s ability to pay. |
|
118 |
Chair Williams |
Speaks about his discussions with the Ways and Means
people in this area of public safety. |
|
144 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 3119 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the Committee on Ways and Means BY PRIOR
REFERENCE. |
|
161 |
Rep. Jenson |
Talks about nicknaming this bill – like the
revenue-shift bill. |
|
180 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
182 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
183 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 3119 and opens a work
session on HB 3193. |
|
HB 3193
WORK SESSION |
||
|
184 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 3193 which
reclassifies certain crimes against animal to double maximum fine when crime
is committed as part of single criminal episode involving eight or more
animals, with each animal being subjected to one or more of certain crimes.
Discusses the -3 amendments (EXHIBIT
H). |
|
190 |
Rep. Brad Avakian |
House District 34.
Testifies in support of HB 3193 and explains the -3 amendments. |
|
205 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains the statute. |
|
213 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Questions the fine amount of $200,000 penalty. |
|
222 |
Rep. Avakian |
Explains where that amount applies. |
|
226 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies where this amount applies on page 2, section
3, subsection 4 of the original bill. |
|
237 |
Rep. Avakian |
Says the premises definition is the only thing
changed. |
|
241 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Reads definition of premises in statute. |
|
254 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Still questions the $200,000 fine. |
|
258 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies where the penalty would apply. |
|
274 |
Rep. Avakian |
Restates where the violations might occur. |
|
276 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks for examples. |
|
278 |
Rep. Avakian |
Gives examples of where this type of animal abuse
might occur. |
|
292 |
Rep. Jenson |
Says he does not see that this is in the law. |
|
297 |
Chair Williams |
States this is in the original bill, but not yet in
statute. |
|
303 |
Rep. Avakian |
Explains where this legislation would affect current
law. |
|
308 |
Taylor |
Reads the statutes that this legislation would apply
to. |
|
320 |
Chair Williams |
Explains why the penalty is being increased. |
|
330 |
Rep. Jenson |
Still questions the discretion in the $200,000 fine
– does not see “not to exceed” in the bill. |
|
346 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Suggests conceptually amending the bill to read “not
to exceed.” |
|
360 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies how a conceptual amendment might read in
this regard. |
|
374 |
Rep. Avakian |
Agrees with the conceptual amendment. |
|
376 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Questions an animal being considered a “victim” in
the -3 amendments. |
|
404 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Suggests adding the word “animal” after the word
victim. |
|
422 |
Chair Williams |
Clarifies the bill being conceptually amended to
address the fine, but not the animal being a victim. |
|
455 |
Rep.
Macpherson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3193-3 amendments dated
04/29/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
457 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
464 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to CONCEPTUALLY AMEND HB 3193 by
inserting “not exceeding” in front of the numerical number and deleting “of” on
page 1, line 16; page 2, line 16; page 2, line 23; page 2, line 42; page 3, line
9; page 3, line 22; page 3, line 33; and on page 4, line 2. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
470 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
517 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 3193 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
TAPE 168,
B |
||
|
045 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks about a fiscal. |
|
048 |
Chair Williams |
Explains there should not be a significant fiscal
impact. |
|
051 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
052 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. AVAKIAN will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
059 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3193 and adjourns the
meeting at 3:00 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2074, -3 amendments, dated 4/28/03, 2 pgs.
B
– HB 2074, -4 amendments, dated 4/28/03, 18 pgs.
C
– HB 2074, hand-engrossed bill and -4 amendments, 44 pgs.
D
– HB 2074, written testimony submitted by Ann Christian, 1 pg.
E
– HB 2638, -5 amendments, dated 4/30/03, 1 pg.
F
– HB 2638, written testimony submitted by Peter Gartlan, 2 pgs.
G
– HB 3119, letter from Judge Burdette Pratt, emailed from Judge Pratt to Rep.
Butler, submitted by Rep. Max Williams, 1 pg.
H
– HB 3193, -3 amendments, submitted by staff, dated 4/29/03, 2 pgs.