HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
May 1, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 pm Tapes 169
- 170
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Joseph, Counsel
Nancy Massee, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2080 Work Session
` HB 2494 Work Session
HB 2498 Work Session
HB 2591 Work Session
HB 3338 Work Session
Introduction of LC 221
SB 37 Work Session
SB 35 Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 169, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Williams |
Opens meeting at 1:10 pm. Opens work session on HB 2080. |
|
HB 2080
WORK SESSION |
||
|
009 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 2080 which provides
that statute of limitations for product liability civil actions commences to
run when plaintiff first discovered, or in exercise of reasonable care should
have discovered, death, injury or damage complained of. |
|
023 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses language and policy choices that need to
be resolved with the parties. |
|
031 |
Richard Lane |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Testifies in
support of HB 2080 and discusses three choices in the -3 and -4 amendments (EXHIBITS A and B). |
|
082 |
Lane |
Continues explaining the -3 and -4 amendments. |
|
100 |
Jim Gardner |
Gardner and Gardner. Explains agreement in principle with modification of the -4
amendments. Explains difference between the -3 and -4 amendments that is
crucial. Wants more time to make the necessary compromises. |
|
178 |
Chair Williams |
Explains his understanding of the bill, and says he
finds two different approaches. |
|
190 |
Lane |
Replies the problem is with the judicial
adjudication on the Gladhart decision. Intent was to resurrect those impacted
by the Gladhart decision but the actual adjudication language was too
focused. |
|
194 |
Chair Williams |
Concern is that it is difficult to define. Supports
the narrower version. |
|
210 |
Chair Williams |
Asks for more discussion. |
|
241 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks about the three considerations. |
|
250 |
Lane |
Responds by giving examples. |
|
270 |
Chair Williams |
Responds by suggesting more discovery language. |
|
300 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Discusses using standards for discovery. |
|
330 |
Lane |
Answers he is not aware of statutes defining
discovery. |
|
363 |
Gardner |
Reads the operative language from HB 2080. Suggests acceptable language on discovery. |
|
390 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Comments on the -4 amendments. |
|
TAPE 170,
A |
||
|
006 |
Gardner |
Responds the language in the -4 was the requestor’s language in the
original version of the bill. |
|
016 |
Lane |
Discusses ORS 30.908 has a three-part test that the
harmed individual needs to know in order to begin a cause of action. |
|
018 |
Gardner |
Wants to take this under evaluation. |
|
022 |
Chair Williams |
Says this bill will be back on the agenda for
Monday, May 5. Closes work session on
HB 2080. Opens work session on HB
2494. |
|
HB 2494
WORK SESSION |
||
|
030 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2494 which requires disclosure of expert witnesses in
civil actions. Explains the -1
amendments (EXHIBIT C) |
|
093 |
Mike Crew |
Cooney and Crew, Portland. Oregon Medical
Association (OMA). Explains their concern with the -1 amendments, page 1,
line 16 and other language. |
|
134 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses adding an expert witness at the last
minute. |
|
170 |
Rich Lane |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Testifies in
opposition to HB 2494. |
|
192 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Refers to the original bill and the same problem of
supplemental disclosure. Says the -1 amendment tracks same as original bill. |
|
200 |
Crew |
Discusses how the amendment relates to the original
bill. |
|
216 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Suggests an effective date is needed. |
|
235 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2494. Opens work session
on HB 2498. |
|
HB 2498
WORK SESSION |
||
|
220 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2498 which sets rate of interest on judgments in civil
actions relating to professional negligence of person licensed by Board of
Medical Examiners or Oregon State Board of Nursing at lesser of five percent
per annum or three percent in excess of discount rate. Explains the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
240 |
Mike Crew |
States OMA supports the -1 amendments. |
|
245 |
Jim Dorigan |
States Pacific NW Physicians support the -1
amendments. |
|
250 |
Lane |
Supports the -1 amendments. |
|
255 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks about the small claims challenge. |
|
306 |
Jim Markee |
Oregon Collectors
Association. States he has not been involved in this negotiation. Wants to
discuss HB 2498 with the courts. |
|
325 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses tying to a federal rate. |
|
360 |
Bradd Swank |
Office of State Court Administrator. Testifies the
court does not advise individuals on interest rates. |
|
TAPE 169,
B |
||
|
003 |
Swank |
Continues discussing that the court will not provide
interest rates. |
|
014 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Discusses a fixed rate in small claims cases. Says
the bill is in the right direction. |
|
015 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2498. Opens work session on HB 2591. |
|
HB 2591
WORK SESSION |
||
|
025 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2591 which requires entry of judgment with installment
payments in certain actions in which $100,000 or more is awarded for losses
that will be incurred by plaintiff after entry of judgment. Submits -1
amendment (EXHIBIT E) |
|
058 |
Mike Crew |
Oregon Medical Association. Explains objections to amendments. |
|
070 |
Jim Dorigan |
Pacific NW Physiciains. Explains the issues with HB 2591
and the -1 amendment. Says this bill
needs a lot of work before they could approve it. |
|
041 |
Lane |
Opposes the -1 amendments. Discusses Section 1(c).
|
|
144 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks, how do defendants get to determine how to pay
damages to the plaintiff. |
|
150 |
Jim Dorigan |
Replies the periodic payments are designed to mirror
the ongoing needs of the injured party. |
|
154 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if the plaintiff dies prior to full payment,
are you limiting what type of payments are not recoverable. |
|
155 |
Dorigan |
Responds the California statute allows for continued
payment of potential lost wages, but if there is an economic lost damage that
deals with medical care, then that portion ends. |
|
158 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Reiterates that economic damages are determined by
medical needs that would be paid if the person was alive. |
|
165 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks if the inquiry is limited to the person, or is
it the vehicle to make payments such as a trust fund. |
|
175 |
Dorigan |
Answers generally an annuity is purchased and
guaranteed by another insurance company. |
|
182 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Comments on installment payment plan is
constitutionally challenged. |
|
200 |
Stuart Brown |
Oregon State Bar Procedures and Practices Committee.
Agrees that reduction of present value and gross amount needs to be
addressed. Asks that subsection 7 be
conditioned on property security. |
|
230 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on HB 2591. Opens work session
on HB 3338. |
|
HB 3338
WORK SESSION |
||
|
234 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 3338 which modifies provisions relating to desertion by
parent in adoption proceedings. Submits the -2 amendments (EXHIBIT F). |
|
254 |
Kathy Ledesma |
Department of Human Services (DHS). Says changes to
the -1 amendments have been agreed upon. Refers to page 2, line 13. Page 2, delete last sentence. Summarizes
HB 3338 as to what it does. |
|
250 |
Rep.
Krummel |
MOTION: Moves to conceptually AMEND HB 3338 on
page 2, in line 13, delete "or" and change to "and." On
page 2, delete the last sentence. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Ackerman |
|
251 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
252 |
Rep.
Krummel |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3338-2 amendments dated
5/1/03 as conceptually amended. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Ackerman |
|
253 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
254 |
Rep.
Krummel |
MOTION: Moves HB 3338 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED and CONCEPTUALLY AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Ackerman |
|
255 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. KRUMMEL will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
256 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session. Moves to introduce measure
(EXHIBIT H). |
|
INTRODUCTION
OF LC 221 |
||
|
257 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves LC 221 BE INTRODUCED as a committee
bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
258 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
259 |
Chair Williams |
Opens work session on SB 37. |
|
SB 37
WORK SESSION |
||
|
260 |
Bill
Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Explains SB 37 which modifies
Elderly and Disabled Person Abuse Prevention Act to allow guardian or
guardian ad litem to file petition on behalf of elderly or disabled person
and submits the -1 amendment (EXHIBIT
I). |
|
261 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 37-1 amendments dated
4/30/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
261 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
262 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves SB 37 to the floor with a DO PASS AS
AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
263 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
264 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on SB 37. Opens work session on SB 35. |
|
SB 35
WORK SESSION |
||
|
280 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains SB 35 which requires prior court approval for payment of
compensation to persons employed by fiduciary to provide direct services to
protected person or services to fiduciary that directly affect protected
person when fiduciary has pecuniary or financial interest in person employed.
Submits SB 35-1 amendment (EXHIBIT G). |
|
TAPE 170,
B |
||
|
030 |
Susan Grabe |
Oregon State Bar. Explains SB 35 -1 amendment
clarifies the bill to ensure the court approves payment for compensation to
persons employed by the fiduciary before the services are provided. |
|
043 |
Professor Jennifer Wright |
Willamette University School of Law. Supports the -1
amendment. Introduces Joanna Harbor. |
|
040 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks about “significant others” and other terms in
the bill. |
|
050 |
Wright |
Explains the language was discussed by the committee
and interested parties and was worked out with the real estate commission. |
|
070 |
Tim Martinez |
Oregon Bankers Association. Testifies that banks and
trust companies should be exempt.
Supports SB 35 with the -1 amendments. |
|
072 |
Holly Robinson |
Legislative Counsel. Explains ORS 125.242 that had a specific exemption for
financial institutions and trust companies.
|
|
075 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 35-1 amendments dated
5/1/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
077 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
079 |
Rep.
Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves SB 35 to the floor with a DO PASS AS
AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
080 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. MACPHERSON will lead discussion
on the floor. |
|
082 |
Chair Williams |
Closes work session on SB 35 and adjourns meeting at
2:40 pm |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2080-3 amendment, staff, 2 pp
B
– HB 2080-4 amendment, staff, 2 pp
C
– HB 2494-1 amendment, staff, 2 pp
D
– HB 2498-1 amendment, staff, 1 p
E
– HB 2591-1 amendment, staff, 2 pp
F
– HB 3338-2 amendment, staff, 4 pp
G
– SB 35-1 amendment, staff, 1 p
H
-
LC 221, staff, 1 p
I
– SB 37-1 amendment, staff, 26 pp