HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
June 02, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 p.m. Tapes 211
- 213
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Bob Jenson
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Craig
Prins, Counsel
Ann Martin, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 808A Reconsideration and Work
Session
HB 3630 Work Session
SB 880A Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 211,
A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Williams |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:08 p.m. Opens a work
session on SB 808A. |
|
SB 808A
RECONSIDERATION AND WORK SESSION |
||
|
014 |
Vice-Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote on SB 808A. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Barker, Prozanski, Shetterly |
|
015 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
016 |
Vice-Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which SB
808A was sent to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Barker, Prozanski, Shetterly |
|
017 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
019 |
Vice-Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 808A-A4 amendments dated
05/30/03 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Barker, Prozanski, Shetterly |
|
022 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
029 |
Vice Chair
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves SB 808A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Barker, Prozanksi, Shetterly |
|
037 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. ACKERMAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
039 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on SB 808A and opens a work
session on HB 3630. |
|
HB 3630
WORK SESSION |
||
|
040 |
Chair Williams |
Introduces HB 3630 which provides that physician is
agent of Department of Human Services under Oregon Tort Claims Act for
purpose of medical services provided to person enrolled in Oregon Health
Plan. Discusses the -4 amendments (EXHIBIT
B). |
|
074 |
Cory Streisinger |
Director, Department of Consumer and Business
Services. Testifies in support of HB 3630 and the -4 amendments. |
|
163 |
Scott Gallant |
Oregon Medical Association (OMA). Testifies in
support of HB 3630. |
|
193 |
Richard Lane |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Supports the –4
amendments. |
|
210 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks about Section 10, page 7 of the -4 amendments.
Wonders who will be available to be on this panel. |
|
225 |
Streisinger |
Says that at least half of the panel should consist
of people that have expertise in gathering or applying research data. |
|
236 |
Gallant |
Discusses who should be on the professional panel. |
|
253 |
Chair Williams |
Explains the purpose of the panel in subsection 3,
page 7 of the -4 amendments. |
|
289 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Says that he doesn’t want the panel to be partisan. |
|
295 |
Chair Williams |
Thinks this panel should not include legislators. |
|
328 |
Bruce Bishop |
Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems.
Testifies in support of the amendments to HB 3630. |
|
337 |
Lauren Rhodes |
Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems.
Testifies in support of the amendments to HB 3630. |
|
381 |
Streisinger |
Discusses the conceptual amendments (EXHIBITS C & D). |
|
409 |
Chair Williams |
Talks about conceptual amendments. |
|
TAPE 212,
A |
||
|
007 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks about the two percent credited to the State
Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF). |
|
011 |
Chair Williams |
Answers that it is within the 10 million dollar
provision of the bill. |
|
020 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if it is a one-time cost. |
|
023 |
Streisinger |
Answers that it would be a one-time cost. |
|
031 |
Charlie Cheek |
Legislative Counsel, drafter. Discusses the
conceptual amendments. |
|
032 |
Streisinger |
Talks about 2nd conceptual amendment (Exhibit D). |
|
040 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks about providers that could get their premiums
reduced. |
|
048 |
Streisinger |
Answers that a physician may choose to carry between
1 and 3 million dollar aggregate limits to have their premiums reduced. |
|
055 |
Rep. Krummel |
Inquires about the average aggregate limit for
physicians. |
|
062 |
Gallant |
Says that most physicians carry a minimum of one million
to three million. |
|
071 |
Chair Williams |
Discusses capping the aggregate amount of the
medical liability insurance. Asks Charlie Cheek if he is satisfied with the
conceptual amendments. |
|
106 |
Charlie Cheek |
Drafter, Legislative Counsel. Answers yes, and gives
suggestions on amendments. |
|
121 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Introduces the -5 amendments to HB 3630 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
122 |
Rep.
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3630-5 amendments dated
06/02/03. |
|
166 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Questions the relating clause. |
|
177 |
Chair Williams |
Says that the relating clause is broad enough to
assume the -5 amendments. |
|
197 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Thinks that they are discussing two separate policy
issues. |
|
216 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Discusses bill. Says that he thinks medical
malpractice should be addressed in a different way. |
|
229 |
Rep. Krummel |
States that this is an opportunity to give SAIF a new
public purpose. Says he supports the -4 amendments, but not the -5 amendments. |
|
283 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Discusses the bill and explains that he sees two
separate policies. |
|
309 |
Chair Williams |
Informs the committee that he does not support the
-5 amendments. |
|
375 |
Vice Chair
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3630-5 amendments dated
06/02/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
3-6 AYE: 3 - Anderson, Jenson, Macpherson NAY: 6 -
Ackerman, Barker, Krummel, Prozanski, Shetterly, Williams |
|
390 |
Chair
Williams |
The motion
FAILS. |
|
391 |
Chair Williams
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT THE CONCEPTUAL AMENDMENTS
TO HB 3630-4 amendments dated 06/02/03, by inserting on page 9, after line
11:"(3) The costs of the services of the consultant hired under section
11 of this 2003 Act shall be paid by the State Accident Insurance Fund
Corporation from the amount available for credit to the annual assessment
owing by the State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation under this section.
The cost of the services shall not exceed two percent of the amount credited
to the State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation for 2004.” |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
395 |
Chair Wiliams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
398 |
Rep.
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT THE CONCEPTUAL AMENDMENTS
TO HB 3630-4 amendments dated 06/02/03, by inserting on page 3, after line
17: “(c) Premium reductions shall be a percentage of the actual premium
charged for medical professional liability insurance in the market of
authorized insurers for limits purchased of up to $1 million per occurrence
and $3 million annual aggregate.” |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
400 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
409 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3630-4 amendments dated
06/02/03 AS CONCEPTUALLY AMENDED. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
417 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
430 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 3630 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
438 |
Rep. Jenson |
Responds to the issue of a legislative oversight
committee. |
|
450 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Agrees. |
|
459 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Says that he feels very strongly that this is a bill
that we need. |
|
475 |
|
VOTE:
9-0 |
|
480 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. WILLIAMS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
TAPE 211,
B |
||
|
029 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the work session on HB 3630 and opens a
public hearing on SB 880A. |
|
SB 880A
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
033 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel. Introduces SB 880A which
establishes amount of supersedeas undertaking required for stay of certain
judgments if judgment is against tobacco product manufacturer or affiliate or
successor of tobacco product manufacturer that is making payments to state
under Master Settlement Agreement or related legislation. Discusses -5
amendments and hand-engrossed bill (EXHIBITS
F & G). |
|
055 |
Jim Gardner |
Philip Morris. Submits testimony and testifies in
support of SB 880A (EXHIBIT H). |
|
165 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks about Section 2, subsection 1, line 17, page 1
of the hand-engrossed bill (Exhibit H).
Wonders why they need the reference to $1 million on line 23, page 1. |
|
187 |
Gardner |
Says he would need to consult with Legislative
Counsel, but could probably take it out. |
|
195 |
Bill Linden |
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Testifies in support
of SB 880A. |
|
259 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks about the proposed amendments. |
|
269 |
Gardner |
Says that the whole objective of this is to have the
legislature create one small island of relative certainty in a sea of fiscal
uncertainty. |
|
298 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks Mr. Gardner how diversified are the obligations
under the Master Settlement Agreement. |
|
304 |
Gardner |
Answers that he believes that Phillip Morris’s share
is roughly 50 percent of the industry total. |
|
311 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks how many total companies there are. |
|
313 |
Linden |
Says that the next highest share is R.J. Reynolds
Tobacco. |
|
322 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks about the pattern in the tobacco litigation. |
|
329 |
Gardner |
Answers that it really varies. |
|
339 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks about a judgment in the case of two
manufacturers. |
|
349 |
Linden |
Says that how it is apportioned among the defendants
is up to them. |
|
359 |
Gardner |
Believes that it would be the judgment upon which
the bond limitation applies. Says that the supersedeas would suspend the
operation of that judgment pending appeal. |
|
377 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks about judgments. |
|
385 |
Linden |
Gives answer regarding judgments and multiple
defendants. |
|
420 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy Attorney General. Submits testimony and
testifies in opposition to SB 880A and the –A5 amendments (EXHIBIT I). |
|
TAPE 212,
B |
||
|
012 |
Shepherd |
Continues his testimony in opposition to SB 880A. |
|
157 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if he took a position on this bill in the
Senate. |
|
159 |
Shepherd |
Says they did and they testified that $100 million
was not sufficient. |
|
163 |
Chuck Tauman |
Trial Lawyer, Portland. Submits testimony and
testifies in opposition to SB 880A (EXHIBIT
J). Shows video of Dr. Schwartz whose wife died of lung cancer. |
|
287 |
Tauman |
Continues his testimony in opposition to SB 880A.
Thinks that Philip Morris is asking for special privileges. |
|
445 |
Tauman |
Continues his testimony in opposition to SB 880A. |
|
TAPE 213,
A |
||
|
030 |
Tauman |
Continues his testimony in opposition to SB 880A. |
|
097 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if the bill was in effect, would the tobacco
company have to post a bond of $15 million instead of $100 million. |
|
131 |
Tauman |
Answers, actually less than that. Explains that it
would allow the tobacco companies to stop the running of the judgment. |
|
130 |
Chair Williams |
Closes the public hearing on SB 880A. Adjourns the
meeting at 3:05 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 808A, -A4 amendments, submitted by staff, dated 5/30/03, 7 pgs.
B
– HB 3630, -4 amendments, submitted by staff, dated 6/2/03, 10 pgs.
C
– HB 3630, conceptual amendments to -4 amendments, 1 pg.
D
– HB 3630, 2nd set of conceptual amendments to -4 amendments, 1 pg.
E
– HB 3630, -5 amendments, submitted by Rep. Anderson, dated 6/20/03, 11 pgs.
F
– SB 880A, -A5 amendments, submitted by staff, dated 5/28/03, 1 pg.
G
– SB 880A, hand-engrossed bill with the -5 amendments, submitted by staff, 3
pgs.
H
– SB 880, written testimony, submitted by Jim Gardner, 1 pg.
I
– SB 880A, conceptual amendment, submitted by Pete Shepherd, 1 pg.
J
– SB 880, written testimony of Richard G. Schwarz, M.D., submitted by Chuck
Tauman, 2 pgs.