HOUSE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
February 25, 2003 Hearing Room E
3:00 PM Tape 24
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Mary Nolan
Rep. Dennis Richardson
Rep. Wayne Scott
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Tim Knopp, Chair
Rep. Deborah Kafoury, Vice Chair
Rep. Tom Butler
STAFF PRESENT: Cara
Filsinger, Administrator
Annetta Mullins, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB
2008 – Public Hearing
HB 2020 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 24, A |
||
|
003 |
Vice Chair Brown |
Calls meeting to order at 3:07 p.m. and opens public
hearings on HB 2008 and HB 2020. |
|
HB 2008
AND HB 2020 – PUBLIC HEARINGS |
||
|
018 |
Joe Bauman |
Seattle Office, TIAA-CREF. Presents statement relating to an alternative retirement plan (EXHIBIT A). |
|
075 |
Bauman |
Continues presentation of statement (EXHIBIT A, page 3). |
|
096 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments on portability of employee retirement plans. Ask how an employee is to know how to
choose the proper investment. |
|
|
Bauman |
Comments on advice and assistance provided by their
company. |
|
|
Rep. Barker |
Asks what the guarantee is and how it is different
than PERS. |
|
|
Bauman |
Explains options for employee investments. |
|
140 |
Rep. Richardson |
Asks why it would be better to go with their company
than stay with an in-house administered plan. |
|
|
Bauman |
Comments on enrollment success at Oregon University
System (OUS) and states it could be offered as a choice. |
|
158 |
Rep. Barker |
Asks Bauman to comment on the success at OUS. |
|
|
Bauman |
Comments on percentage of employees at OUS and Oregon
Health and Sciences University (OHSU) enrolled in their plan. |
|
|
Rep. Richardson |
Asks why employees in the TIAA-CREF plan benefited
as compared to those who elected to enroll in PERS. |
|
|
Bauman |
Responds the employees have benefited from the
ability to develop an investment format for themselves based on whether they
want stock, bonds, fixed income—having their own account that they
control. They know if their career
changes and they decide to move on, they can take the account balance with
them. Adds that mobility is something
they are seeing in all categories of employment. |
|
|
Rep. Richardson |
Asks why TIAA-CREF and not some other plan. |
|
|
Bauman |
Responds their rates of return have been within the
range of equity and bonds. They
balance the account with fixed accounts, and they allow employees to make
changes if they need to—transfers between funds are allowed. |
|
203 |
Karen Elinski |
Senior Counsel, TIAA-CREF, Government Relations. Explains their plan is competitively
bid. States they have provided
criteria for a process to select vendors (EXHIBIT
A, pages 5-10). |
|
|
Bauman |
States that TIAA-CREF means Teachers Insurance Annuity
Association-College Retirement Equities Fund. |
|
|
Vice-Chair Brown |
Asks what the performances of the plans have been
over the last five or six years. |
|
|
Bauman |
States they have been in most cases above average
but it depends on the time period.
Currently, it could be different from one month to the next. They have been very competitive through
the years. TIAA has been around since
1918 and CREF since 1952. |
|
247 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks what categories of employees in PERS are eligible under the tax rules to be covered
by a tax sheltered annuity offered by TIAA-CREF. |
|
|
Bauman |
Explains that to be in a tax sheltered annuity, one
must be employed by an educational institution. All other public employees who wish to defer money on their own
and get the tax benefit of putting the money in pre-tax and have it grow tax
deferred, would use the Section 457 plan, which is available in Oregon. |
|
|
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks if the optional retirement plan Bauman is
describing is a 457 plan as well. or only a tax sheltered annuity, called a
403B. |
|
|
Bauman |
Responds that both plans are structured under Internal
Revenue Code (IRC) 4, 1a, the section that is typically used for qualified
retirement plans. States that the 403B
is separate and different. |
|
|
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks what their plans consist of. |
|
|
Bauman |
Responds that they do not care what section of the
IRC the plans are under. States there
are reasons for doing a number of things.
States that 403B plans are always used for voluntary savings for
educational employees. Comments on
history of OUS and OHSU plans. |
|
|
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks if TIAA-CREF could provide an optional
retirement plan to any member of the PERS system, whether they work for an
educational institution or not. |
|
300 |
Bauman |
Responds yes, they can offer their services to any
governmental employee. |
|
|
Elinski |
States they can also offer their services to any
non-profit organization. |
|
310 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments he is really concerned about retirement
benefits of cops, firefighters, and teachers in Oregon and it would take some
convincing for him to think a defined contribution plan would be a good
answer. |
|
|
Bauman |
Responds that defined contribution plans, if funded
at appropriate levels, can do that.
States they work with employees all the time who are retiring and
their defined contribution plan is replacing 75-85 percent of their salary,
and sometimes in excess of 100 percent.
|
|
346 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments he is concerned about pensions and having
everyone retire with dignity and spending ability to keep the economy strong. |
|
|
Bauman |
Comments on information provided and choices by
employees at OHSU and OUS. |
|
390 |
Vice-Chair Brown |
Closes the public hearings on HB 2008 and HB 2020
and adjourns meeting at 3:32 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2008 and HB 2020, prepared statement, Joe Bauman and Karen Elinski, 10 pp