|
|
PUBLIC
HEARING HB 3449, HJR 44, HB 2902, HB 2903, HB 2953, |
|
|
TAPE 118,
119, A-B |
APRIL 10,
2003 8:30 AM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Representative Lane Shetterly, Chair
Representative
Wayne Scott, Vice Chair
Representative
Joanne Verger, Vice Chair
Representative
Vicki Berger
Representative
Pat Farr
Representative
Elaine Hopson
Representative
Max Williams
Members Excused: Representative Phil Barnhart
Representative
Mark Hass
Witness Present: Jim Scherzinger, Portland Public
Schools
Ozzie
Rose, Oregon Confederation of School Administrators
Matt
Markee, Equity Steering Committee
Greg
Warnock, Oregon Veteran’s Association
Walter
Crews, Non Commissioned Officers Association of the USA
United Veterans Groups of Oregon
Dennis
Hooyman, Veteran
Representative
Mary Gallegos, District 29
Paula
Brown, Oregon Department of Veteran’s Affairs
Representative
Jeffrey Merkley, District 47
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Steve
Meyer, Legislative Revenue Office
Lizbeth
Martin-Mahar, Legislative Revenue Office
Kathy
Tooley, Committee Assistant
TAPE 118, SIDE A
|
053 |
Chair Shetterly |
Calls meeting to order at 8:35 a.m. |
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING HB 3449
|
055 |
Chair Shetterly |
Stated there were new -3 amendments (Exhibit 1) replacing HB 3449. |
|
060 |
Steve Meyer |
Discussed background of HB 3449 and -3 amendments. |
|
093 |
Jim Scherzinger |
Discussed
Measure 50 debt repayment provisions, (Exhibit 2). Provided description of -3
amendments. |
|
200 |
|
Discussion regarding the effects of Measure 50 and history of gap
bonds as a requirement of membership in the PERS system. Discussed additional administrative debt. |
|
262 |
Rep. Scott |
What effect did restructuring do to the formula positively or
negatively when it first occurred? |
|
267 |
Scherzinger |
At first, Measure 50 set permanent rate at roughly higher than other
school districts; Portland’s contribution was equivalent to others. An
exception was created for desegregation requirements on Portland Public
Schools (PPS). The purpose was to
give more money to PPS which had a desegregation requirement that other
schools did not have. Legislation was
passed with sunset date, PPS will allow sunset to die, allowing $8 million to
go back to state school fund. |
|
294 |
Scherzinger |
Measure 50 did not give Portland more. Portland taxpayers had to repay
gap bond. Measure 50 did not create
distortion; it was created when desegregation regulation was passed 2 years prior. |
|
309 |
Ozzie Rose |
Spoke in support of HB 3449, discussed PERS debt as a special
situation. |
|
350 |
Chair Shetterly |
What about 750 to 15%. |
|
354 380 |
Rose |
Would support. Do not support the local option, unless it is set up
so legislature levies it statewide. This
bill is not an answer to funding crisis. Questions and discussion regarding discussion coming up in the
Senate. |
|
388 |
Matt Markee |
Spoke in opposition to HB 3449.
Refinancing PERS is probably okay, if don’t raise more after 2 years. Concern with the bill is increase in cap
on local option. |
|
412 |
Chair Shetterly |
You are okay with permanent rate vs. PERS, the desegregation and the gap
bonds. |
|
415 |
Markee |
Answered affirmatively. |
|
417 |
Chair Shetterly |
Issue is 750 and 15% on the local option. |
|
420 450 |
Markee Markee |
It’s the biggest concern; represents mid-size districts concerned
about the disparity in funding across state.
Concerned about local option caps and business taxes, disparities would
start to grow again. Discussed Senate
Bills, mid-size school district doesn’t get additional money while helping
special needs. Looking to slow this bill
down and look at as a package to see costs to districts rather than piece by
piece. Position of Equity Committee that every child has equal opportunity
for education. |
|
463 |
Chair Shetterly |
Regarding mid-size schools, not sure how the transportation portion
of the formula and high growth applies to raising the cap? |
|
482 |
Markee |
It probably doesn’t, but opposed to raising cap because of disparities
it brings among districts. |
|
490 |
Rep. Berger |
How do you define mid-size district? |
|
499 |
Markee |
LaPine, Silverton, Woodburn, McMinnville, Newberg, Lincoln County,
Central in Polk County, 5000-6000 students |
TAPE 119, SIDE A
|
035 |
Rose |
Discussed complexities; Silverton School District Superintendent is
the chair of Oregon Confederation of School Administrators and
authorized his earlier testimony. |
|
046 |
Chair Shetterly |
Technical work still necessary on -3 amendment? |
|
050 |
Meyer |
Answered affirmatively, discussed two other school districts with gap
funding. |
|
054 |
Scherzinger |
True, it may make sense to have this apply to districts with higher
rates. Other places where rates are high include Bend, and Sweet Home. Dollar
amounts involved with both of those are small. |
|
068 |
Chair Shetterly |
Need -4 amendment, inclination to move the bill as it fixes bigger
problems for Portland. Will see the
bill again as the Senate is interested in fixing caps. |
|
082 |
Rep. Hopson |
Glad Committee is going to put pieces together, eager to look at big
picture. |
|
094 |
Rep. Scott |
Agreed with that approach.
Don’t want to do this in advance of other pieces. |
|
100 |
Chair Shetterly |
The only change in formula is to the good statewide, balance only
affects Portland. Changes begin with
2003-05 biennium. |
|
128 |
Scherzinger |
The only way Portland can get more money is if it uses local option
authority and the voters approve it; no affect statewide. Refinancing can
push things around to affect accrual. |
|
139 |
Chair Shetterly |
Closed Public Hearing on HB 3449. |
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING ON HJR 44
|
142 |
Chair Shetterly |
Closed Public Hearing on HJR 44. |
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING ON HB 2902
|
142 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Provided description of HB 2902 (Exhibit 3). |
|
178 |
Greg Warnock |
Spoke in support of HB 2902. (Exhibit 4) Tax credit for residential
care facilities for disabled veterans would help alleviate financial burden
by providing incentive for care facilities to choose veterans over wealthier
potential residents. |
|
265 |
Walter Crews |
Spoke in support of HB 2902. |
|
261 |
Dennis Hooyman |
Spoke in support of HB 2902, discussed personal experience with 82
year old naval veteran who committed suicide, needed additional care. |
|
323 |
Rep. Verger |
Reiterated difficulty veterans have in finding local residential
health care. |
|
347 |
Chair Shetterly |
Did we look at this last session? |
|
349 |
Warnock |
No. |
|
354 |
Chair Shetterly |
Closed Public Hearing HB 2902 |
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING ON HB 2903
|
363 |
Martin-Mahar |
Provided description of HB 2903 (Exhibit 5). |
|
379 |
Warnock |
Spoke in support of HB 2903 (Exhibit 6) as an additional $200 credit
for military veterans who may be more likely to require long-term care at a
younger age; cited dangerous and hostile work environment. |
|
430 |
Crews |
Spoke in support of HB 2903. |
|
440 |
Hooyman |
Spoke in support of HB 2903, discussed personal experience with petty
officer, who spent most of his money on medication and insurance policies. |
|
462 |
Chair Shetterly |
Closed Public Hearing on HB 2903. |
OPENED PUBLIC HEARING ON HB 2953
TAPE 118, SIDE B
|
038 |
Lizbeth |
Provided background and description of HB 2953, (Exhibit 7). |
|
060 |
|
Discussion regarding Oregon Tax Return form (Exhibit 8). |
|
090 123 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Spoke in support of HB 2953, (Exhibit 9) would like to see the
Veteran’s check off on the front sheet of the tax return. Discussion regarding Oregon Veterans Home appearance on the House
floor. |
|
126 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Answered affirmatively. |
|
130 |
Warnock |
Spoke in support of HB 2953, (Exhibit 10). Provided background on the Oregon’s Veteran’s Home, citing near
depletion of existing funds. |
|
170 |
Crews |
Spoke in support of HB 2953.
Described history of the Oregon Veterans Home. |
|
189 |
Hooyman |
Spoke in support of HB 2953.
Relayed personal childhood experience with well-funded veteran’s home
in Wisconsin. |
|
200 |
Paula Brown |
Spoke in support of HB 2953. Discussed Oregon Veterans Home which does not receive general
fund dollars. |
|
260 |
Chair |
It took legislation to get the Veterans Home in the book because the
home is not a 501C3 organization?
Received nods of affirmation from Rep. Merkley and representatives of
the Revenue Department. |
|
265 |
Brown |
Answered affirmatively. In
order to be listed in the booklet, required to have 10,000 signatures. There were over 14,000 signatures
collected. |
|
275 |
Chair Shetterly |
Questions and discussion about preliminary 2002 contribution figures. |
|
293 |
Chair Shetterly |
Closed Public Hearing on HB 2953 |
|
|
|
|
REOPENED PUBLIC HEARING ON HJR 44
|
306 |
Martin-Mahar |
Provides description of HJR 44.
Amends constitution. |
|
287 |
Rep. Jeffrey Merkley |
Spoke in support of HJR 44 as a way to contribute to conversation on
tax expenditures and credits. This is an effort to put a handle on tax
credits, or regularly review them. This
bill, requires each tax credit be reviewed when it sunsets, limited to 6 years
or less. Another approach is similar to Individual Development Account tax
credits which limits amounts disbursed. |
|
361 |
Chair Shetterly |
Having tax expenditure book has started to focus to issues regarding
tax expenditures as corollary to appropriations in Ways and Means process. |
|
374 |
Chair Shetterly |
Closed Public Hearing on HJR 44. |
|
387 |
Chair Shetterly |
Meeting adjourned at 9:55 a.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Kathy Tooley, Committee
Assistant Reviewed by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1.
Chair
Shetterly, “HB 3449-3 Amendment”, 12 pages.
2.
Scherzinger,
“Portland Public Schools Summary of Financial Effect of Debt Restructuring HB
3449”, 1 page
3.
Martin-Mahar,
“Staff Measure Summary HB 2902”, 1 page
4.
Warnock,
“Testimony HB 2902”, 2 pages
5.
Martin-Mahar,
“Staff Measure Summary HB 2903”, 1 page
6.
Warnock,
“Testimony HB 2903”, 1 page
7.
Martin-Mahar,
“Staff Measure Summary HB 2953”, 2 pages
8.
Phillips,
“Oregon Individual Income Tax Return, Form 40”, 2 pages
9.
Rep.
Gallegos, “Testimony HB 2953”, 2 pages
10.
Martin-Mahar,
“Staff Measure Summary HJR 44”, 1 page