|
|
WORK
SESSION HB 2652 |
|
|
TAPE 189 A |
JUNE 16,
2003 9:30 AM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Representative Lane Shetterly, Chair
Representative
Wayne Scott, Vice Chair
Representative
Joanne Verger, Vice Chair
Representative
Phil Barnhart
Representative
Vicki Berger
Representative
Mark Hass
Representative
Elaine Hopson
Representative
Max Williams
Members Excused: Representative Pat Farr
Witness Present: John Ledger, Associated Oregon Industries,
(AOI)
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Lizbeth
Martin-Mahar, Legislative Revenue Office
Kathy
Tooley, Committee Assistant
TAPE 189 SIDE A
|
004 |
Chair Shetterly |
Calls meeting to order at 9:35 a.m. |
HB 2652
|
006 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Described -12 (Exhibit 1), and -13 amendments, (Exhibit 2). Provided Staff Measure Summary, (Exhibit
3). |
|
010 |
Martin-Mahar |
The -12 amendments which incorporate the conceptual amendment from
the previous meeting, eliminates double-dipping between the pollution control
tax credit and the business energy tax credit; retains current law. |
|
024 |
Martin-Mahar |
The -13 amendments restrict double-dipping between the pollution
control and business energy tax credits.
A choice must be made between the two credits; also a choice must be
made between the pollution control credit and the truck engine tax credit in
the transportation bill. The
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) does not think there are many
instances in which a truck engine would qualify for both credits. |
|
037 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discussed revenue impact (Exhibit 4). |
|
040 |
|
Question and discussion regarding the increase in the business energy
tax credit. |
|
043 |
|
Question and discussion regarding alternative energy devices, and
increases in the residential tax. |
|
040 |
John Ledger |
Discussed tax credits for chippers, which amount to 1-2% of total
credits. DEQ developed the program to
encourage use of chippers due to pollution issues. This was done by rule and
can be changed by rule. |
|
087 |
Rep. Berger |
Discussed pollution control tax credit spreadsheet she had requested
from DEQ, and fact sheet developed by her staff on “’01-’03 PCTC Issued
Certificates”, (Exhibit 5). |
|
105 |
Chair Shetterly |
For the record, 1% of the total amount of value of the credits for a
chipper, 1% for trucks and vehicles
and 5% for vending machines. |
|
108 |
|
Questions, discussion and acknowledgement of mathematical error regarding
total tax liability vs. chippers.
Discussed the percentage noted was the same as Ledger had testified. |
|
126 |
Chair Shetterly |
MOTION: MOVED ADOPTION OF THE
–12 AMENDMENTS INTO HB 2652. ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION,
THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. (ALL MEMBERS PRESENT EXCEPT REP. FARR, EXCUSED). |
|
131 |
Chair Shetterly |
MOTION: MOVED ADOPTION OF THE
–13 AMENDMENTS INTO HB 2652. ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION,
THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. (ALL MEMBERS PRESENT EXCEPT REP. FARR, EXCUSED). |
|
135 |
Chair Shetterly |
MOTION: MOVED HB 2652, AS
AMENDED, TO THE HOUSE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION |
|
138 |
Rep. Hass |
Supported the bill last session as part of a compromise, would like
to honor and uphold. Questioned strategy of giving a major tax credit to
Enron, which paid the minimum Oregon tax of $10, when new jobs are not being
added, and are instead being eliminated.
Cited need to build an Oregon economy that is held together in a
thoughtful manner. |
|
171 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Discussed the history of the tax credit as well understood. Concurred
with Rep. Hass comments. Said the
value and need for this credit has passed. Agreed with need to uphold the
compromise and phase out the tax credit. |
|
199 |
Rep. Williams |
Recognized comments made by Reps. Hass and Barnhart. Haven’t addressed the issue of the substantial
burden for companies to do business in Oregon, maintain employment and increase
revenues. This has been a proven program that has allowed for a cooperative
response for companies and he will support the bill. |
|
227 |
Rep. Berger |
The credit has been a useful tool, that has dealt with the pollution
problem; also useful in dealing with new technology in preventing pollution. Would support keeping it. |
|
245 |
Chair Shetterly |
Enron does not necessarily indict the pollution control tax credit;
there are lots of business tax payers using it fairly and appropriately.
Acknowledged the evolution of the bill that carried pollution control forward
last time. The revenue impact of this
bill comes from the elements in the Governor’s amendments. The Governor suggested that might be a
little rich, but did not propose amendments to reduce the level of energy tax
credit. |
|
262 |
Rep. Hass |
The “Tax Expenditure Report”* notes that this tax credit has not been
effective and may not be achieving its purpose. *NOTE: “2003-2005 Tax Expenditure Report” was
received as a Committee Exhibit on February 3, 2003. |
|
281 |
|
ROLL CALL: MOTION PASSED 6-2-1 REPRESENTATIVES VOTING AYE:
Berger, Farr, Hopson, Scott, Verger, Williams, Chair Shetterly. VOTING
NO: Barnhart, Hass. Rep. Chair Shetterly will carry the bill. |
|
291 |
Chair Shetterly |
Closed the Work Session on HB 2652. |
|
293 |
Chair Shetterly |
Meeting adjourned at 10:05 a.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Kathy Tooley, Committee
Assistant
Exhibit Summary:
1.
Martin-Mahar,
“HB 2652-12 Amendments”, 41 pages
2.
Martin-Mahar,
“HB 2652-13 Amendments”, 1 page
3.
Martin-Mahar,
“Staff Measure Summary HB 2652”, 2 pages
4.
Martin-Mahar,
“Revenue Impact Statement HB 2652”, 1 page
5.
Berger,
“’01-’03 PCTC Issued Certificates”, 1 page