HOUSE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
May 13, 2003 Hearing Room E
1:00 PM Tapes 58 - 59
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Dan Doyle, Chair
Rep. Linda Flores, Vice-Chair
Rep. Laurie Monnes Anderson, Vice Chair
Rep. Vic Backlund
Rep. Phil Barnhart
Rep. Betsy L. Close
Rep. Joanne Verger
STAFF PRESENT: Cara
Filsinger, Administrator
Annetta Mullins, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HCR 10 – Public Hearing
HCR 11 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 372 A – Public Hearing and Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 58, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Doyle |
Calls meeting to order at 1:14 p.m., announces order
agenda items will be considered, and opens a public hearing on HCR 10. |
|
HCR 10
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Rep. Karen Minnis |
Speaker of the House, District 49. Testifies in support of HCR 10. Comments on Harmon’s dedication to family,
community and country, her roll as Miss Oregon, as Miss America during a time
of fear in the United States, and her contribution to the fight against
breast cancer. |
|
047 |
Clair Pense |
Gresham.
Testifies in support of HCR 10, noting that Harmon is a member of their
community. |
|
069 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments that the Pense family has been strong
proponents and was responsible for getting the sign in Gresham that says,
“Welcome to Gresham, Home of Miss America 2002.” |
|
083 |
Dr. Dan Bernstine |
President, Portland State University. Testifies in support of HCR 10. Comments on honor brought by Harmon to
Portland State University and Oregon.
|
|
1-4 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the public hearing on HCR 10 and opens a
public hearing on HCR 11. |
|
HCR 11
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
|
Dr. Dan Bernstein |
President, Portland State University. Testifies in support of HCR 11. Comments on working with Dellenback. |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
Chair Doyle |
Recesses the public hearing on HCR 11 and opens a
public hearing on SB 372 A. |
|
SB 372
A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
122 |
Chair Doyle |
Announces that Rep. Greg Smith will be arriving to
testify. |
|
|
Jerry Fredrickson |
Vice-Chair, Morrow County School Board. States that they held a school board
meeting last night and voted to support SB 372 A. Offers to answer questions. |
|
|
Jerry Reitman |
Ione Self-Determination Committee. Explains that Ione was in danger of losing
their high school and they pursued a petition process. Eighty percent of the registered voters in
the affected area of the proposed new school district signed the petition in
a ten day period. They learned that
they need legislation that would allow the district to separate. The board had questions about how to
separate assets and they ended up with a letter of understanding (EXHIBIT A). They have solved
what they can locally, but are asking for a way to allow them to separate off
as a separate community. Comments
they hired a retired superintendent to determine if they could run a school
district based on the flow through of funds from the state. They determined they can operate only on
state funds. States that the
economics for the state are neutral. |
|
178 |
Reitman |
Comments on distance of school bus ride for students
and the parents driving 60 miles to work just to have the kids in Ione
schools. If Ione doesn’t have the
schools, the people will leave. Comments
about a new dairy and other jobs that will open up. Comments that without a school, they don’t have a community. |
|
194 |
Rep. Close |
Asks if they considered being a public charter
school. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds they did explore it, but they do not feel
it is feasible. Explains that the
school district asked them to make significant cuts in their budget. The community came together through a
series of educational meetings, figured out and recommended to the school board
what cuts should be made. In that
process, this process of figuring out another solution came up. They could not find any way other than
dividing themselves off and having their own district. |
|
206 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks how many students would be in the Ione school
district and how many are in the Heppner school district. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds that Heppner is part of the Morrow County
School District. |
|
212 |
Fredrickson |
States there are 2,200 students in Morrow County. |
|
|
Reitman |
States that there would be approximately 160
students in K-12 in the Ione district. |
|
|
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments on history of school consolidations to get
away from more government and to save money.
Comments on statement from the Secretary of State saying schools that
have 500 or fewer student, spent an average of $5,500 per student, and for
Morrow County it would be $4,200. |
|
|
Reitman |
States they are now one. That won’t change as a separate district. |
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments they will have more overhead and cost per
student. Asks if they have looked at
the revenue. |
|
|
Reitman |
Comments on hiring a retired superintendent from
Pendleton and explains how the dollars will be charged back. Ione is about
seven percent of the student population and there is a 7.34 percent division
of assets. It is basically the tax
base for their area for the proposed Ione school district. |
|
294 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if they have presented the question to the
voters. |
|
|
Reitman |
Explains the process they have been through and
states they are confident they have the community support. |
|
286 |
Chair Doyle |
Comments that the Revenue Impact Statement (EXHIBIT B) shows a loss of $187,000
from Morrow County because Heppner High School would no longer be considered
a small school. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds that he has heard that but does not know
why Heppner would lose its status. Adds
that he does not believe the large transportation costs were taken into
consideration. They are not sure
where the figures came from. |
|
336 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks why they need to make a change. |
|
|
Frederickson |
States that the decline of revenues is a concern to
everyone and the people want to protect their schools. |
|
|
Reitman |
States that since this came up they have had people
come to Ione looking to move there but went elsewhere because of the
uncertainty. Comments on new diary
operating in the area, and they need certainty to have progress. |
|
358 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if the school board signing onto the proposed division
is recognition that they cannot trust themselves to not close the school, or
that there needs to be a separate organization. |
|
|
Frederickson |
States they do not know what the funding from the
state will be. The board has said it
is fine if Ione wants to do this.
Comments on growth in certain areas.
The board’s position has been to let Ione do this but protect the rest
of the district. |
|
400 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments that it sounds like they are satisfied with
the division of assets and liabilities and the board is willing to let Ione
to take the risk. Asks if that is a fair
statement. |
|
|
Frederickson |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
410 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if it would be more advantageous to be part of
a bigger district. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds that he understands the advantage of a
large school but also understands the advantage of a small school; the
community will fill those gaps. |
|
460 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if they offer free lunches and breakfasts. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds they researched all of that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederickson |
States that he does not know how many students in
Morrow County qualify for the lunch and breakfast program. |
|
TAPE 59, A |
||
|
046 |
Chair Doyle |
References the language in n the last line of the
first page and on page 2 of the bill and asks if they have disagreement on
the division of assets. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds that he hopes they can come to agreement
and does not believe they will place a large burden on anybody. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Asks who would be the designee of the Superintendent
of Public Instruction. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds that they believe it would be anybody the superintendent
appoints. |
|
067 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if the facilities are adequate and whether they
anticipate capital construction or maintenance needs in the future. |
|
|
Reitman |
Responds the Ione community has a new elementary
school being built by a county-wide bond, the high school was built in the
late 1950s and is in excellent condition.
They are assuming they have good facilities for a long time. |
|
082 |
Rep. Greg Smith |
District 57, including all of Morrow County. Testifies in support of SB 372 A. Comments that the proposed Ione School
District is economic development. The
school is the heart of the community and garners the support and rallies the
troops. The community supports the
kids and that is why the bill is before the committee. |
|
112 |
Rep. Verger |
Comments on mail received from Ione and the
thoughtfulness they have given to this project. |
|
120 |
Rep. Flores |
Asks if there is support or discontent within the
community. |
|
|
Rep. Smith |
Comments on email from Irrigon asking for support
for Ione. The community understands
how important the Ione school is to the community. |
|
141 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks what his response is to knowing that the cost
per student is more than in a large school. |
|
|
Rep. Smith |
Responds that the creation of the new district is
revenue neutral. States their schools
are struggling. Rural Oregon, as the
rest of the state, is concerned about their schools. |
|
161 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks what percentage of the school funds come from
property tax in Morrow County. |
|
|
Rep. Smith |
Responds he does not know. |
|
169 |
Sen. Ginny Burdick |
District 18.
Testifies in support of SB 372 A.
Comments on her impression of the community when she participated in
Cycle Oregon and stayed in the Ione school yard overnight. Reads email from coordinator of Cycle
Oregon about the extreme cooperation they received from the Ione community. |
|
228 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments this bill starts a precedence and other
school districts could make the same requests. Asks why they want to start such a precedence. |
|
|
Sen. Burdick |
States there is already precedence on consolidation
and thinks the people in Ione have gone to great lengths to make this revenue
neutral. Believes they have done
everything possible. Adds that she
does not believe they can guarantee it will be revenue neutral, but believes
it will be. |
|
268 |
Chuck Bennett |
Confederation of Oregon School Administrators (COSA). Submits packet of information including
letter to Speaker Minnis, talking points on SB 372, information from a
candidate forum, and copies of local news articles (EXHIBIT C). Testifies in
opposition to SB 372 A. This
legislation is being brought because a school board talked about how to deal
with the failure of the state to provide enough money for education in Morrow
County and other parts of the state as they see their spending patterns. Comments that the question was not a vote
on whether to close Ione High School; this is perspective. Hopes the record will be clear that this
bill is sort of idiosyncratic, specific enough to Ione that you are not
reversing years of policy direction in efficiency, consolidation when
appropriate, and changing directions. |
|
|
Bennett |
Thinks it is unfortunate this bill is not in the thorough
review of the Education Committee to look at the educational impact. Their expectation is that by creating this
very small district, you are cutting programs by about $1,800 per student,
and hopes they are being honest with themselves about what the program cuts
will be and that they are prepared for the change they are going into. States the districts could, if necessary,
go back to the present situation of being one district. Comments on a proposal for $6 billion for
school support this session. Asks
for intent that this is a one-time situation. |
|
420 |
Rep. Verger |
Comments that a decline in enrollment is creating
small schools and cites the merger of school districts in her area. |
|
470 |
Bennett |
Responds this is about Ione; it is very
specific. They are not talking about
demographic changes, and keeping this confined is very important. |
|
|
Bennett |
Adds that a bigger problem is the problem of stable
and adequate funding. |
|
Tape 58, B |
||
|
015 |
Bennett |
Comments on HB 3171 that came out of the House
Education Committee and was referred to Ways and Means setting up a task
force addressing the issue in this bill.
The task force would look at the organization of school districts
around the state. |
|
028 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks what the division of property taxes and state funding
is in Morrow County. |
|
|
Bennett |
Responds that he does not know. |
|
|
Rep. Flores |
Asks if Bennett was involved in the dialogue on this
bill in the Senate and whether he was supportive. |
|
|
Bennett |
Responds he gave similar testimony and was not
supportive. Comments he thought there
had been a vote by the school board to close the school. Comments on other legislation relating to
school districts. |
|
058 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks if Bennett made the statement that this bill
was a product of something that the OEA was involved in, as opposed to the
community members. |
|
|
Bennett |
Responds negatively. |
|
062 |
Steve Novick |
Legislative Coordinator, Oregon Department of
Education (DOE) introduces Brian Reeder and explains why they did not testify
in the Senate. Comments on the issue
of the inability to agree on a division of assets. States the Superintendent does not want to do that job and
believes DOE would hire an accountant for $10,000 to $20,000. Asks that that sentence be deleted. |
|
|
Novick |
States that the Superintendent does not take a
position on the bill but offers a word of caution. States there are higher overhead costs in smaller
districts. Although the superintendent
is sympathetic to Ione and the neighborhoods in Portland that are losing
their schools, she wants the committee to be aware there are economies of scale
in larger districts. |
|
118 |
Brian Reeder |
Oregon Department of Education. Comments on costs asked about by Rep.
Barnhart on the share of revenue coming to Morrow County School
District. They raise slightly over $4
million locally and get slightly under $10 million from the state. |
|
|
|
Explains research on costs related to the size of
schools versus size of districts.
Agrees with the $1,800 additional to education a student in the new
smaller school district. Ione will
not get more money but they will have higher costs. |
|
160 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks if Reeder can address the loss of $187,000 to
Heppner because it will no longer be a classified small school. |
|
|
Reeder |
Responds that he thinks that is misinformation. Heppner is now a small school and will continue
to be a small school if Ione splits off.
If this bill does not pass and Ione does not become an independent
district, and the two high schools merge, they will become a larger high
school. They will still get small
school money but they will get less than they are getting now; a combined
school will get less than the sum of the two schools. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Reads the Legislative Revenue Statement (EXHIBIT A). |
|
193 |
Reeder |
Responds that the Legislative Revenue Statement is
correct. Explains that the combined
school will still get the small school correction, but they will get a
smaller one, by $187,000. |
|
182 |
Rep. Close |
Asks if DOE considered salary and benefits in their
cost study. |
|
|
Reeder |
Responds that they did. |
|
|
Rep. Close |
Asks if it is true that salaries and benefits for
school districts average between 84 and 86 percent of the budgets. |
|
|
Reeder |
Responds that 80 percent is the rule of thumb they
use because it does vary from district to district. |
|
|
Rep. Close |
Asks if costs of 75 percent for salaries and
benefits would allow them to put money in other places. |
|
|
Reeder |
Responds that districts can spend their money just
about anyway they choose. |
|
|
Rep. Close |
Asks if the bigger districts are paying higher
salaries. |
|
208 |
Reeder |
States that districts can attempt to cut their costs
wherever they can but there is a labor market and if they cut their salaries
too much they have a very difficult time attracting teachers. |
|
226 |
John Osburn |
Attorney for Ione Self-Determination Committee. (A letter from John Osburn and the SB
372-A11 amendments are hereby made a part of these minutes (EXHIBIT D). Explains that he is an attorney practicing
in school law. Comments on the need
to consider each situation. Opposes the deletion of language relating to the
appointment by the Superintendent of a person to settle any disagreement. Comments on support of the community. |
|
261 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks what a budget for 160 students would be. |
|
371 |
Lisa Reitman |
Explains that she has worked on the
Self-Determination Committee for several months. The budget drafted by retired superintendents from Umatilla
County was approximately $1.2 million. |
|
|
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments that she is not convinced that this will be
revenue neutral. |
|
|
Lisa Reitman |
Responds that the percentage of students is
approximately seven percent. The
percentage of the ADMw is 8.9 percent.
|
|
|
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments that would be a reflection of the small
school grant. |
|
427 |
Rep. Close |
Asks how the Morrow County School Board concluded it
was no longer cost effective to operate the high school program in Ione. |
|
|
Osburn |
Responds there were numerous public hearings in
which that was the clear sentiment of the board. States he does not think there was a resolution but that was
clearly the direction in which the board was looking. This bill makes it unnecessary for them to
make that decision. |
|
TAPE 59, B |
||
|
001 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Comments on willingness and determination of
community members to support the school.
|
|
021 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session
on SB 372 A. |
|
SB 372
A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
024 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves SB 372 A to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
028 |
Rep. Monnes Anders0n |
Advises the committee that she had an amendment
drafted after DOE called her regarding their concern. The amendment would delete one sentence
and the liabilities/assets issue would not then be a decision of DOE but
would be at the local level. Feels
strongly that the committee should include the amendment (EXHIBIT E). |
|
|
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Explains that she has had the amendment drafted and
has shared it with the proponents, lobbyist, and Chair Doyle. |
|
046 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments he believes a motion to amend is in
order. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Responds that he would rule the motion out of
order. Explains that the committee
has heard testimony that there are other alternatives available for the
superintendent to designate someone to make the decision and they could find
volunteers. States there is also a
timeline of getting the measure signed by the governor by May 20 so the
division will be final by July 1, 2003, so the boundary board can have 30
days to negotiate the division, and if there is a problem making the
decision, the superintendent would have to make the decision. |
|
066 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments on parliamentary procedure. |
|
079 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks Rep. Monnes Anderson if the problem would be
solved by adding “or a local designee” of the superintendent. |
|
|
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Responds that Legislative Counsel had some issues
regarding designating someone to make a decision like this. States that the provision in the amendment
may be the best way for them to resolve the issue even if the amendment is
not adopted (EXHIBIT E). |
|
107 |
Rep. Close |
Comments that she believes the Morrow County School
District concluded it was no longer cost effective to continue to operate the
high school program in Ione. States
that if school districts are having problems, they should be allowed
creativity and innovation by those in the local districts to try new options
and alternative, and let local control go forward. |
|
117 |
Rep. Close |
Comments on school operating costs, and moves the
previous question. |
|
123 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks that the committee stand at ease at 3:50 p.m. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Reconvenes the meeting at 4:05 p.m. and resumes the
work session on SB 372 A. |
|
127 |
Rep.
Flores |
Withdraws her
motion to pass SB 372 A to the floor. |
|
127 |
Rep.
Monnes Anderson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 372-A12 amendments dated
5/13/03. |
|
137 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Explains that she took to heart the testimony that
the Superintendent or a designee making the decisions to divide the assets
and liabilities and feels it should be a local decision. Comments on division of a school district
in the Gresham-Barlow area. |
|
156 |
|
VOTE:
2-5-0 AYE: 2 - Monnes Anderson, Verger NAY: 5 - Backlund, Barnhart, Close, Flores, Doyle |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion FAILS. |
|
162 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves SB 372 A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
165 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments on consolidations of school districts, and
realities of voting either way on the bill. |
|
195 |
Rep. Backlund |
Comments on previous comments of this being
precedent setting and the success of small schools. |
|
213 |
Rep. Verger |
Comments on discussions about school consolidations
in her district and the district budget in Morrow County, and states that
education in Ione is priceless. |
|
298 |
Rep. Flores |
Explains her vote on the bill. |
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Explains her vote on the bill. |
|
253 |
Chair Doyle |
Enters into the record a letter from Cindy Hunt,
Legislative Counsel (EXHIBIT F). |
|
281 |
Chair Doyle |
Comments that there has been adequate time to air
the issue on the Senate side and believes the Superintendent of Public
Instruction will be able to designate a decision maker or makers. States he is also concerned with the
timeline. |
|
295 |
|
VOTE:
6-1-0 AYE: 6 - Backlund, Barnhart, Close, Flores, Verger,
Doyle NAY: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. REP. G. SMITH will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
302 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on SB 372 A and reopens the
public hearing on HCR 11. |
|
HCR 11
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
309 |
Nan Heim |
Testifies in support of HCR 11 for people who worked
for John Dellenback. Introduces members
of the Dellenback family and talks about family and accomplishes of
Dellenback. |
|
343 |
Sheryl Perrin |
Testifies in support of HCR 11. Comments on working for Dellenback. |
|
368 |
Rep. Verger |
Comments that John Dellenback is always remembered
as being an important person to their area. |
|
373 |
Rep. George Gillman |
District 55.
Testifies in support of HCR 11.
Comments on personal acquaintance and friendship with Dellenback. |
|
393 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session
on HCR 11. |
|
HCR 11
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
431 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves HCR 11 be sent to the floor with a
BE ADOPTED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
440 |
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. REP. GILLMAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
444 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on HCR 11 and adjourns meeting
at 3:24 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 372 – Letter of Understanding, Jerry Reitman, 5 pp
B
– SB 372 – Legislative Revenue Statement, staff, 1 p
C
– SB 372, talking points on SB 372, information from a candidate forum, and
copies of local news articles, Chuck Bennett, 13 pp
D – SB 372, letter and SB 372-A11 amendments, John
Osburn, 5 pp
E – SB 372, SB 372-A12 amendments, Rep. Monnes
Anderson, 1 p
F – SB 372, letter, Cindy Hunt, 1 p