HOUSE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
May 20, 2003 Hearing Room E
1:00 PM Tapes 62 - 63
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Dan Doyle, Chair
Rep. Linda Flores, Vice-Chair
Rep. Laurie Monnes Anderson, Vice Chair
Rep. Vic Backlund
Rep. Phil Barnhart
Rep. Betsy L. Close
Rep. Joanne Verger
STAFF PRESENT: Cara
Filsinger, Administrator
Annetta Mullins, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HCR 10 – Work Session
SB 516 B – Work Session
SB 419 A – Pubic Hearing and Work
Session
These minutes are in compliance
with Senate and House Rules. Only
text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the
tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
|
|
Tape 62, A |
|
|||
|
004 |
Chair Doyle |
Calls meeting to order at 1:38 p.m., announces order
agenda items will be considered, and opens a work session on HCR 10. |
|
|
|
HCR 10
– WORK SESSION |
|
|||
|
014 |
Bruce Anderson |
Office of Speaker Minnis. Presents and explains the HCR 10-3 amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
|
|
045 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HCR 10-3 amendments dated
5/15/03. |
|
|
|
050 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Rep. Monnes Anderson |
|
|
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
054 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks that the committee stand at ease at 1:43 p.m.
while staff completes a conference call to Rep. Monnes Anderson. |
|
Stand at ease at 1:43. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Reconvenes the meeting at 1:44 p.m. and continues
work session on HCR 10. |
|
|
|
056 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves HCR 10 be sent to the floor with a
BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
062 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. SPEAKER MINNIS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
063 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on HCR 10 and asks that the
committee stand at ease. |
|
|
|
068 |
Chair Doyle |
Reconvenes the meeting and opens a public hearing on
SB 419 A. |
|
|
|
SB 419
A – PUBLIC HEARING |
|
|||
|
073 |
Cindy Robert |
Oregon Dry Cleaners Association. Reviews history of legislation in previous
sessions. Explains provisions of SB 419 A. |
|
|
|
133 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if they have discussed what DEQ will do when a
spill is found and whether the dry cleaners will be charged for the testing. |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
Responds that a program is followed by DEQ and Danko
can respond. |
|
|
|
153 |
Bob Danko |
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Comments that the program is voluntary on
the part of the dry cleaners. DEQ
works with the dry cleaners and agree on how to go through the cleanup. States that the result of the cleanup is a
“no further action” letter from DEQ which means the contamination has been
addressed and the dry cleaner is free. |
|
|
|
169 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if they DEQ would go back in a year and check. |
|
|
|
|
Danko |
States that a no action letter is just that. |
|
|
|
|
Rep. Verger |
Asks what their concern is when there is a contamination. |
|
|
|
|
Danko |
States the concern may be different at different
sites. The cleanup process is based
on risk. They first identify the risk
and then address the risk. Comments
on various cleanup scenarios. |
|
|
|
199 |
Rep. Flores |
Asks if this is focused on accidental spills. |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
Responds that they would like to think all spills
are accidental, but that does not come into play under this liability. States that this bill not only gives the
liability relief, it also sets forth new requirements when it comes to education
to dry cleaners on how to run their business and make it environmentally
friendly mechanically, and details solvent change rules. |
|
|
|
218 |
Rep. Close |
Asks what piece of this bill was in SB 463 during
the 2001 session. |
|
|
|
|
Danko |
Explains SB 463 in the 2001 session. |
|
|
|
244 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks about the new language in Section 5(1) imposing
new fees, the exemption in (2)(a), and what would trigger the credits in
(2)(b). |
|
|
|
|
Danko |
Explains that the “may” in line 26 is a “shall” to
the DEQ. |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
Explains (2) is the letter after an assessment. State that the reason for the “may” is
that some facilities may choose to not be exempted for various reasons and
may choose to continue paying into the fund in case a spill is found later. |
|
|
|
273 |
Chair Doyle |
Comments that his understanding is that the only
time “may” equals “shall” is when it is followed by the word “not.” |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
Comments that this says “may” because it is the
choice of the dry cleaner. |
|
|
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Asks how the dry cleaners can get the $1,000 credit. |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
Explains that a dry cleaner may have asked for an
assessment and be found to be clean and not want the liability insurance any
more. They may have paid for a number
of years. This language says they may
apply to DEQ to have a refund. |
|
|
|
330 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks if Section 5(3) is an annual fee that is one
percent of gross revenue to be paid by every dry cleaner. |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
Responds affirmatively. Explains all the fees involved. |
|
|
|
344 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks if there is average gross revenue and how much this
would generate. |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
States that stores that made a minimum opted
out. Some make $25,000 and others are
making hundreds of thousands.
Believes their legislative chair who worked on this bill is paying
about $2,000 a year prior to this bill and he will pay approximately $5,000 a
year. States that the members of the
Oregon Dry Cleaners Association and the Alliance of Dry Cleaners did vote to
tax themselves. |
|
|
|
399 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks what a “dry” store is. |
|
|
|
|
Robert |
Explains that they do not do dry cleaning on the
premise. |
|
|
|
417 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks Danko if they are treating everyone fairly and
equitably. |
|
|
|
|
Danko |
Explains that DEQ stepped back to let the dry
cleaners rearrange the fees. |
|
|
|
455 |
Robert |
Comments on agreement by the work group that the
gross receipts tax was the fairest way so they would not burden some of the
smaller dry cleaners, especially those in rural areas. Adds that the fees will be from $1,800 to
$4,000. |
|
|
|
TAPE 63, A |
|
|||
|
014 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session
on SB 419 A. |
|
|
|
SB 419
A – WORK SESSION |
|
|||
|
018 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves SB 419 A to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
|
Rep. Verger |
Comments that she does not like the bill but if the
dry cleaners want to do it to themselves, then one cannot argue with that. |
|
|
|
026 |
Rep. Flores |
Comments she concurs with Rep. Verger and if the
players want to have the fees to raise the funds, that is better than having
to impose it on them. |
|
|
|
|
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments he thinks they are trying to manage a
certain risk and liability and they have come up with a fund for managing it. |
|
|
|
034 |
Chair Doyle |
Comments he defers to Sen. Harper and there is
obviously justification for this, but reserves the right to vote against it
on the floor. |
|
|
|
044 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Rep. Monnes Anderson |
|
|
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
|
|
049 |
Rep. Doyle
|
MOTION: Moves SB 419 A be placed on the CONSENT
CALENDAR. |
|
|
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Rep. Monnes Anderson |
|
|
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
051 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on SB 419 A and opens a work
session on SB 516 B. |
|
|
|
SB 516
B – WORK SESSION |
|
|||
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Advises members they have the SB 516 B8 amendments (EXHIBIT B). |
|
|
|
063 |
Harlan Levy |
Staff Attorney, Oregon Association of Realtors. Explains that after the House Water
Committee sent the bill to the floor they noticed there were a couple of
scribbler errors that are being fixed by lines 1-3 of the SB 516 B8
amendments. Explains the conflict
amendments contained in the SB 516 B8 amendments (EXHIBIT B), and explains the provisions of the measure. |
|
|
|
097 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if there is a process where the landowner has
any say. |
|
|
|
|
Levy |
Explains that the landowner will be notified and can
show up at the public hearing. This
bill front loads the notification to the landowner to allow participation in
the process. |
|
|
|
|
Rep. Verger |
Comments that is a big improvement in the
process. |
|
|
|
122 |
Rep. Close |
Notes the deleted language on page 2 of the SB 516
B8 amendments, and asked if the problem was reducing the value of the
property. |
|
|
|
127 |
Levy |
Explains they have changed the language because
there are situations where rezoning does not result in a reduction; it may
result in an appreciation of property value.
They think the word “change” is more accurate than “reduce.” |
|
|
|
143 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 516-B8 amendments dated
5/19/03. |
|
|
|
143 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Rep. Monnes Anderson |
|
|
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
146 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves SB 516 B to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
|
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments that he will vote for the motion but there
is a lot about this bill he doesn’t understand very well. Notes that another committee has already
had review of the bill, .and he will be deferring to the other committee when
he votes yes. |
|
|
|
159 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Rep. Monnes Anderson |
|
|
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. REP. RICHARDSON will lead discussion
on the floor. |
|
|
|
154 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on SB 516 B and adjourns the
meeting at 2:19 p.m. |
|
|
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HCR 10, HCR 10-3 amendments, Bruce Anderson, 1 p
B
– SB 516, SB 516-B8 amendments, Harlan Levy, 4 pp