HOUSE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
July 08, 2003 Hearing Room E
1:30 PM Tape 95
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Dan Doyle, Chair
Rep. Linda Flores, Vice-Chair
Rep. Laurie Monnes Anderson, Vice Chair
Rep. Vic Backlund
Rep. Phil Barnhart
Rep. Betsy L. Close
Rep. Joanne Verger
STAFF PRESENT: Cara
Filsinger, Administrator
Janet Adkins, Administrator
Annetta Mullins, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3646 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3645 – Public Hearing and Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 95, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Doyle |
Calls meeting to order at 1:33 p.m., announces order
in which agenda items will be considered, and opens a public hearing on HB
3646. |
|
HB 3646
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
014 |
Larry Campbell |
Magna Entertainment. Explains they have responsibility for Portland Meadows (PM) and
Multnomah Greyhound Park (MGP). Testifies
in support of HB 3646 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
039 |
Dave Nelson |
Magna Entertainment. Notes the race dates listed in their statement (EXHIBIT A). States that the 20-day race meet at the State Fair does not
exist and they are trying to replace those racing days. |
|
048 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks why the gap exists. |
|
050 |
Campbell |
Explains that there were separate ownerships and
they did not want to compete. States
they did have some concern about competing with county fairs. John McCulley is here to speak for the
fairs. States those races are
protected and there will be no competition. |
|
055 |
John McCulley |
Oregon Fairs Association. States their primary interest is to make sure that the small
summer non-profit race meets do have protection; that is accomplished in (7)
on page 2 of the bill. With the
provision added, they support HB 3646. |
|
067 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if the same people go to dog and horse races. |
|
|
Nelson |
Explains that some fans are the same, but most are
different fans. |
|
076 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks what Chapter 462 is. |
|
|
Nelson |
Explains there are three sections to the racing law.
Explains the relevant statutes to the
specific races. |
|
082 |
Rep. Barnhart |
States the commercial races cannot conflict with a
non-profit event. |
|
|
Nelson |
Explains they cannot conflict without permission of
the non-profits. |
|
101 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session
on HB 3646. |
|
HB 3646
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
108 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves HB 3646 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
111 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
116 |
Rep. Doyle
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3646 be placed on the CONSENT
CALENDAR. |
|
116 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion
CARRIED. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on HB 3646 and opens a
public hearing on HB 3645. |
|
HB 3645
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
1 |
Mike Dewey |
Waste Management, Inc. Introduces John Haagensen and testifies in support of HB
3645. Explains that HB 3123 (2001)
dealt with this subject and was passed and signed by the Governor. It had a sunset of January 1, 2004. They are asking the sunset be extended to
January 1, 2006. HB 3265 (2003) dealt
with the expansion of the Hillsboro landfill and is caught in the Senate. Thanks Rep. Mabry for his help by using a
priority bill. |
|
150 |
Dewey |
Explains the first part of the bill deals with
expansion of the Hillsboro landfill, a nonputrescible land fill that takes
special waste, construction waste, and demolition waste. Explains that the Hillsboro land fill has
planned for years to expand. Comments
on decision in the Oregon Court of Appeals relating to a golf course in
Southern Oregon that wanted to expand from nine to 18 holes. In order for the golf course to expand, it
had to be wholly within a EFU zone.
The Hillsboro land fill is Rural Residential 9 and EFU. Because of the Southern Oregon
interpretation, it would be difficult for them to expand. States they have worked with Land
Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC), talked to the Farm Bureau,
and 1000 Friends to make sure they had everyone on board. The neighbors recognized the land fill
would expand. It is in the best interest
for the landfill to expand because if it does not and closes, the residents
and hauling operations will have to go further to other landfills. When they expand, they will continue to
mitigate. They are still trying to
reach agreement with some of the neighbors on the expansion. |
|
181 |
Dewey |
States there is no opposition to the bill. |
|
188 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks why LCDC or Metro cannot solve this. |
|
|
Dewey |
Explains they would have to be wholly in the EFU
zone according to the court case. |
|
|
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if there could be a rule change. |
|
|
Dewey |
States they are not sure they can go through the
exception process based on the court interpretation. |
|
204 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if the issue has been presented to Metro or
LCDC. |
|
|
Dewey |
Responds affirmatively. Adds that he believes the landfill is outside the Metro boundary
and that they have had discussion with LCDC and that LCDC has no problem with
the bill. |
|
213 |
Dewey |
Explains that Waste Management operates another
landfill, a putrescible landfill in Gilliam County. It receives waste by rail from Metro and the Seattle. They believe they do not have a level
playing field with competitors in Washington and Oregon. They have the opportunity to bid on significant
tons of dredge sediments in Puget Sound.
The sediments will have water or liquids. They would like to bid on the projects but believe the law is
unclear whether they can add liquid to the landfill. States they would have
to get approval from DEQ for engineering, etc. They have worked on the language and DEQ supports the
language. Notes positive aspects of a
landfill. |
|
253 |
Dewey |
States that DEQ would have to go through a process
and they are working on a process so they can get approval if this bill
should pass. The bill has an
emergency clause because the bids are fairly significant. There is a potential for four million tons
of waste. Most of it would be
disposed of—would not be covered—and that means $1.24 per ton to DEQ. Gilliam County also gets a host fee. Waste Management will spend about $6
million for infrastructure and there are additional employment
opportunities. |
|
268 |
Dewey |
Comments that the representative from Metro wanted
to make sure that the nonputrescible land fill in Hillsboro would not become
a putrescible landfill. DEQ would
have to approve that, and they would not approve it unless the engineering
was significant; Waste Management has no desire to do that and there are
constraints. |
|
285 |
Dewey |
Adds that the sediment would be shipped in specially
built train cars. States that the
Willamette River and cleanup of the Columbia are opportunities. |
|
297 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if this would apply to anyone using this type
of liquid, and if it could expand any other kind of liquid. |
|
|
Don Haagensen |
Attorney for Waste Management, Inc. Explains that the waste stream they would
be allowed to land dispose would be approved by the department as part of the
permit modification process. In the
application Waste Management would file with DEQ, they would describe dredge
sediments, for example, as the waste stream. |
|
318 |
Haagensen |
States the bill is confusing in the reference to the
“paint filter liquids test.” Explains
the language describes what a liquid waste is. It defines the difference between a solid waste and a liquid
waste. States that if any water seeps
through the paint filter within five minutes, it is a liquid waste. If no water seeps through in five minutes,
it is a solid waste. The
authorization would allow them to take waste streams that would be liquid under
the definition but they would describe in their permit application what type
of waste streams they would take.
Principally, it will be focused on dredge sediments. |
|
345 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments this has nothing to do with paint or paint
thinner. |
|
|
Haagensen |
Responds it is just a test that EPA and DEQ has
adopted; it has nothing to do with paint wastes. |
|
354 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if this is water. |
|
|
Haagensen |
Explains that their application for a permit
modification will include sediments that has water. It would allow them to recirculate leachate that is collected
back into the landfill to add water to the waste to cause it to decompose
faster. It would also allow them, if
they request to do so, to use surface water runoff to enhance decomposition It
will depend on how they describe it in their application and what DEQ
approves. The principle focus is the
sediment but they do want to add water to the waste so the waste decomposes
faster. |
|
379 |
Chair Doyle |
Asks why there is a distinction between liquid and
solid wastes in a landfill. |
|
|
Haagensen |
Explains complications with ground water
contamination by landfills prior to landfills being engineered. Comments on bi-product of gas used to
generate electricity. |
|
433 |
Doug Riggs |
Metro. Explains
that Metro is responsible for monitoring solid waste disposal in the Portland
Metropolitan area. They do not oppose
the bill and strongly supports the second part of the bill. States their understanding of the intent
of the bill is with regard to disposal.
Based on their discussions with proponents of the bill as well as with
DEQ, they understand the intent is to not allow waste to be disposed of in
landfills designed or currently permitted solely for acceptance of dry or
demolition waste, and that is the case with the Hillsboro landfill. They strongly support the disposal of wet
waste at the Columbia Ridge landfill in Gilliam County and believe it will
derive significant economic development opportunities for Gilliam County. |
|
462 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session
on HB 3645. |
|
HB 3645
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
466 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves HB 3645 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
472 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments she is surprised there is not an exception
process, but hears there is a bill this session that would take care of this. |
|
486 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call
vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
|
|
|
|
492 |
Rep. Doyle
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3645 be placed on the CONSENT
CALENDAR. |
|
493 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
503 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on HB 3645, announces that
the committee will meet next on Thursday, and adjourns the meeting at 2:03
p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3646, prepared statement, Larry Campbell and Dave Nelson, 1 p