HOUSE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
August 5, 2003 Hearing Room E
1:30 PM Tapes 108 - 109
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Dan Doyle, Chair
Rep. Linda Flores, Vice-Chair
Rep. Laurie Monnes Anderson, Vice Chair
Rep. Vic Backlund
Rep. Phil Barnhart
Rep. Betsy L. Close
Rep. Joanne Verger
STAFF PRESENT: Cara
Filsinger, Administrator
Janet Adkins, Administrator
Annetta Mullins, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SCR 8 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
SB 666 A – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 906 A – Public Hearing and Work
Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 108,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Doyle |
Calls meeting to order at 1:34 p.m., announces order
agenda items will be considered, and opens a public hearing on SCR 8. |
|
SCR 8 –
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
014 |
Major General Dave Ferre |
Director of Installations, Oregon Military
Department. Introduces Brigadier
General Staryl Austin, Retired. |
|
019 |
Staryl Austin, Brigadier General, Retired |
Comments on working with Major General Anderson
during crises in Oregon and the development of the emergency command center. Describes the new emergency management
center and comments on recognition by federal agencies of Oregon’s advanced
system. Explains that naming the new
center after Major General Donald N. Anderson is fitting. |
|
083 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments on his new realization of services that
protect him and the public. |
|
073 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session
on SCR 8. |
|
SCR 8 –
WORK SESSION |
||
|
102 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves SCR 8 be sent to the floor with a BE ADOPTED
recommendation. |
|
105 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. REP. FLORES will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
110 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on SCR 8 and opens a public
hearing on SB 666 A. |
|
SB 666
A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
105 |
Chair Doyle |
Notes that the committee has received the SB 666-A2
amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
123 |
Sen. Joan Dukes |
District 16.
Comments on constituents who regularly transport older veterans from
Clatsop County to the Veterans Hospital in Portland. Explains that the group asked permission from ODOT to continue
to use their studded tires past the deadline for removal of studded
tires. Nothing in state law allows
ODOT to make that kind of exemption.
Comments on accident on Highway 26.
This bill would allow regularly scheduled medical transport services
an exemption on studded tires; ODOT will adopt administrative rules to allow
the transporters to use their discretion.
Adds there are several exemptions in the statute and this would be
added to the list of exemptions. |
|
147 |
Rep. Vic Backlund |
District 25.
Presents the SB 666-A2 amendments (EXHIBIT
A). Explains that the amendments
are designed to solve a problem with statewide implications and at the same
time allow cities the leeway to fix the problem. Explains that golfers drive their carts on the residential
streets to the golf course. ORS
810.070 says the local road authority, typically the city council, has to
pass an ordinance permitting this practice.
The 10 cities in the Mid-Willamette Valley have not adopted ordinances
and are asking what the amendments would provide (EXHIBIT B). States that
a number of people live more than one-half mile from their golf course and
the Keizer City Council would prefer a legislative fix. States that the council has had a public
hearing on the issue and their Transportation Committee has dealt with it
three different times. The local golf
course also made a presentation to the city council to solve this dilemma. States the council has not passed an
ordinance because there is a problem of determining what really constitutes
the one-half mile limit. |
|
216 |
Rep. Backlund |
Explains that the SB 666-A2 amendments (EXHIBIT A) do what the mayors of the
10 Mid-Willamette Valley cities have asked him to bring forward. |
|
223 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if golf carts have a slow-moving vehicle sign
on them. |
|
|
Rep. Backlund |
Responds they do not and thinks owners will
voluntarily put something on their carts, but it is not required. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Asks if the warning signs would also be decided by
the local councils. |
|
|
Backlund |
Responds it is something they could include in the
ordinances. |
|
248 |
Rep.
Barnhart |
Asks
if councils could restrict the carts to day time or good weather. |
|
258 |
Rep.
Backlund |
States
he presumes the city councils could consider any restriction. |
|
|
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Ask if ODOT decided it would be up to individuals to
use studded tires. |
|
|
Sen. Dukes |
Responds that if a transport vehicle is in regularly
scheduled medical transport, they would have the option. |
|
272 |
Rep. Verger |
Comments she believes there is a safety concern when
carts are driven where they cannot be seen.
Hopes that each city looks at the safety issues before they write the
ordinance. |
|
301 |
Rep. Backlund |
States to his knowledge there have been no accidents
on residential streets. Believes the
city councils will address the safety issues. |
|
285 |
Chair
Doyle |
Closes
the public hearing and opens a work session on SB 666 A. |
|
SB 666
A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
314 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 666-A2 amendments dated 7/7/03. |
|
326 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if the language in Section 2(3) means that a
city ordinance could not require the carts to have lights or a slow-moving
vehicle, etc. |
|
336 |
Doug Tindall |
State Maintenance Engineer, Oregon Department of
Transportation. Responds that the
vehicle equipment requirements are extensive and include windshields,
etc. States he would not interpret
this to mean they could not ask for any of the requirements; they just could
not ask that the vehicle be street legal.
|
|
346 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments that the language does not say the city
councils do not have the option to require some things. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
358 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves SB 666 A to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation. |
|
361 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
368 |
Chair
Doyle |
MOTION: Moves SB 666 A be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
368 |
|
VOTE:
7-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Doyle |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
371 |
Chair Doyle |
Closes the work session on SB 666 A and opens
a public hearing on SB 906 A. |
|
SB 906
A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
388 |
John DiLorenzo |
Hoyt Street Properties. Explains that SB 906 A encompasses a number of bills, which all
originated in the House and were in House Business, Labor and Consumer
Affairs Committee and all passed overwhelmingly. The bills were referred to a Senate committee. SB 906 A includes further consensus amendments
that satisfy all interests, including the agencies’. |
|
429 |
DiLorenzo |
Summarizes statement (EXHIBIT C, pages 4-8) in support of Sections 68-77 of SB 906 A. |
|
TAPE 109,
A |
||
|
028 |
Shawn Miller |
Associated Builders and Contractors and Independent
Electrical Contractors. Testifies in
support of Sections 54-60 of SB 906 A (EXHIBIT
D). |
|
078 |
Jerod Broadfoot |
PacWest Communications, representing the National
Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) and the International Brotherhood
of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Plumbing and Mechanical Contractors
Association, and United Association of Plumbers and Steamfitters Local
290. Testifies in support of Sections
61-67 of SB 906 A and sections dealing with the Residential Structures Board
and the Mechanical Board. |
|
091 |
Broadfoot |
Comments on the requirement for wearing
identification and the exemption that says if there is a danger to the
worker’s or the public’s health, they would not have to wear it, requirements
and restrictions on advertising, and the ability of the Building Codes
Division to write rules to establish a conflict of interest for individuals
who act not only as electrical inspectors, but as electrical contractors as
well. Explains problems they have had
with a person inspecting his own work and inspecting their competitor’s
work. |
|
111 |
Boardfoot |
Explains that the establishment of the Residential
Structures Board and the Mechanical Board came from two sessions of
work. Speaks in opposition to the SB
906-A7 amendment (EXHIBIT F) that
would replace the public member on the board with a mechanical engineer. Adds that they are concerned that any
amendment would cause the bill to die this late in session. |
|
133 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if anything in the original four bills has
changed. |
|
141 |
DiLorenzo |
Responds that every single concern the Construction
Contractors Board had on licensed developers has been addressed in SB 906 A. Explains
changes. |
|
150 |
Miller |
Responds there were three changes on the sections
relating to prompt payments; it is the owner’s responsibility and liability
to provide notice of alternative billing cycle. Originally, the bill dealt with public contracts, but public
contracting has its own prompt payment provisions in current law and local
governments think that is working well.
Language on page 36 in line 34 excludes the public contracts. |
|
175 |
Miller |
Explains that the changes in lines 35-37 on page 36
on low income housing have been made because this involves federal money,
they had to make the exception because it would be confusing. |
|
195 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if this would cause a conflict with public
entities doing their own contracting. |
|
200 |
DiLorenzo |
Responds that public entities do not develop
property for resale, and he does not believe they would be required to obtain
a construction contractor’s license. |
|
200 |
Marshall Coba |
American Council of Engineering Companies of
Oregon. Presents a prepared statement
(EXHIBIT E) in support of SB 906 A
with the SB 906 A7 amendments (EXHIBIT
F. Comments on engineers being on
other boards listed in SB 906 A. |
|
266 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if it is possible that a member of the board
might have a mechanical engineer background. |
|
273 |
Coba |
Responds that he does not know what background a
municipal inspector would be required to have. The public member would not be someone who would be working in
the field on a daily basis, making decisions, staying abreast of the latest
technology and continuing to work toward maintaining public health and
safety. |
|
286 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if someone from the board is present and can
provide information about whether there is anyone on the board that is a
mechanical engineer. |
|
296 |
Coba |
Comments they are seeking a licensed mechanical
engineering on the Mechanical Board. |
|
303 |
Mark Long |
Administrator, Building Codes Division. States he does not know if there is a
mechanical inspector that has an engineering background, but suspects there
is someone in the larger jurisdictions.
It is not a requirement to get the certification. Adds that other members may have an
engineering background. States they
are not uncomfortable with working with Coba to put preference for a
mechanical engineer in one of the board positions. |
|
304 |
Ron Murray |
United Association of Plumbers and Steamfitters
Local 290, and the American Society of Sanitary Engineers. Explains that he sits
on the Tri-County Industry Advisory Board, which has a mechanical
subcommittee where people from the industry, installers, contractors, etc.,
bring questions to the committee to ensure code consistency and conformity
throughout the entire tri-county area.
The individual the HVAC contractors select is a mechanical
engineer. Almost any of the positions
on the Mechanical Board could be filled by a mechanical engineer. States they are not opposed to having a mechanical
engineer on the board but would like to see the bill move forward in its
present form. |
|
363 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if there is a reason for excluding a public
member from this board. |
|
|
Coba |
Responds there is no reason. States they have had discussions and the
agency likes the nine members on the board.
|
|
386 |
Rep. Verger |
Comments she would not want to remove a public
member. Thinks it looks like a bill
that has had a great deal of work and time spent on it. Four bills have been put into one. Believes there has been time in the process
to get the mechanical engineer on before now. If there is some leeway in one of the positions, they can bring
on a mechanical engineer when the term is up and she is eager to move the
bill today. |
|
409 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments this is a new board and perhaps the issue
could be dealt with upfront at the time of appointment. |
|
415 |
Coba |
Notes that two public members are being removed from
the Building Codes Structures Board. |
|
426 |
Rep. Verger |
Responds that she believes they wanted the public
member to be a person who represents disabilities. |
|
431 |
Rep. Backlund |
States there is nothing in the bill that would
include a person being a mechanical engineer. |
|
443 |
Coba |
Responds that we need someone who is working on a
daily basis to ensure public health and safety. |
|
468 |
Vice Chair Flores |
Enters into the record a letter dated August 5, 2003
from Oregon Rural Electric Cooperative Association (EXHIBIT G). |
|
472 |
Vice-Chair Flores |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session
on SB 906 A. |
|
TAPE 108,
B |
||
|
SB 906
A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
002 |
Rep.
Backlund |
MOTION: Moves SB 906 A be sent to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
006 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments she thinks those involved with the new
mechanical board probably have taken an interest and will consider this in
the appointment. Believes the makeup
of the board is extremely important. |
|
014 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Comments he thinks Coba has made a good case for
inclusion of a mechanical engineer on the board and under different circumstances
would support that as an amendment.
Also thinks it is important to have a public member on the board. Adds that he is concerned about the
removal of the public members from the Building Codes Structural Board. Believes at least one public member should
have been retained. |
|
038 |
Rep. Backlund |
Comments that he will support the bill without the
amendment. |
|
050 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Rep. Doyle |
|
055 |
Vice Chair Flores |
The motion CARRIES. REP. CLOSE will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
057 |
Vice-Chair Flores |
Closes the work session on SB 906 A and adjourns the
meeting at 2:36 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 666, SB 666-A2 amendments, Rep. Backlund, 2 pp
B
– SB 666, letter signed by Valley mayors, Rep. Backlund, 2 pp
C
– SB 906, prepared statement, John DiLorenzo, 14 pp
D
– SB 906, prepared statement, Shawn Miller, 1 p
E
– SB 906, prepared statement, Marshall Coba, 1 p
F
– SB 906, SB 906-A7 amendment, Marshall Coba, 1 p
G
– SB 906, Oregon Rural Electric Cooperative Association letter, staff, 1 p