HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
April 14, 2003 Hearing Room D
1:00 PM Tapes 43 - 44
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Patti Smith, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mary Gallegos, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mark Hass
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Steve March
Rep. Dennis Richardson
STAFF PRESENT: Kimberly
A. Medford, Committee Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2296 Public Hearing
HB 2302 Public Hearing and Work
Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
|
TAPE 43, A |
|||
|
004 |
Chair Smith |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:10 pm and opens the
public hearing on HB 2296. |
|
|
HB 2296
PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
009 |
Rep. Allen Brown |
House District 10. Explains that bills similar to HB
2296 have been presented in past sessions. Provides a brief explanation of
what Enterprise Zones are. |
|
|
027 |
Chris Chandler DiTorrice |
Head of the Central Coast Economic Development
Alliance. Submits (EXHIBIT A) in
favor of HB 2296. States that there is only one Enterprise Zone in the Depoe
Bay area. Supports HB 2296 and explains that the cost of doing business in
rural areas is usually high and provides examples. |
|
|
090 |
Rep. March |
Clarifies that they would compete for an additional
Enterprise Zone. |
|
|
094 |
Rep. Hass |
Expresses concern about diluting the existing
Enterprise Zones. |
|
|
101 |
Rep. Brown |
Responds that each area can craft the Enterprise
Zone to the type of industry that is acceptable for that area. |
|
|
111 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks if there are Enterprise Zones on the coast. |
|
|
113 |
Rep. Brown |
Responds there are Enterprise Zones in the southern
part of Lincoln county but not in the Lincoln City area. |
|
|
131 |
Rep. March |
Asks can an existing Enterprise Zone boundary’s be
changed. |
|
|
134 |
Tetores |
Answers yes to a point. The existing zones are 30
miles apart. Adds that the current zone allows a property tax exemption for
new hotels and motels noting that Lincoln City already has over 2,000 rooms. |
|
|
144 |
Chair Smith |
Ask Rep. Brown if he has any comments about the -1
amendments. |
|
|
146 |
Rep. Brown |
Responds that he does not oppose or advocate the
amendments. |
|
|
143 |
Hasina Squires |
Special Districts. Explains why Special Districts
have presented the -1 amendments. Explains it would allow taxing districts
listed in ORS 198 to opt out of the five new zones, (EXHIBIT B). |
|
|
192 |
John Pascone |
President of Albany/Millersburg Economic Development
Corporation. Supports HB 2296 because it incentives businesses to invest and
create jobs. |
|
|
206 |
Pascone |
Proposes the -2 amendments, (EXHIBIT C). Explains
that Pacific Cast Technology invested $11 million in an Enterprise Zone, now
the company’s numbers have dropped due to national events and the company
risks meeting their first year requirements. |
|
|
258 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks what successes have there been to date and what
the potential of adding five more is. |
|
|
265 |
Mike Burton |
Assistant Director, Economic and Community
Development Department. Responds that (EXHIBIT
D) details the transactions over the last tax-year. Reviews the pros and
cons of Enterprise Zone incentives. |
|
|
325 |
Rep. Hass |
Refers to charts 5 and 6. Reiterates a concern about
removing strategic advantages from existing sites. |
|
|
341 |
Burton |
Responds there is an eligibility criterion of
distress. |
|
|
354 |
Rep. March |
Notes there are multiple zones in Josephine County. |
|
|
363 |
Burton |
Responds that Josephine County, except for Grants
Pass, is an Enterprise Community, (a federal status). |
|
|
375 |
Burton |
Discusses other counties with multiple Enterprise
Zones. |
|
|
385 |
Rep. March |
Asks if there are counties without Enterprise Zones |
|
|
390 |
Burton |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
|
395 |
Rep. March |
Asks how are the applicants selected. |
|
|
396 |
Burton |
Answers the applicant need to be experiencing some
level of distress to meet the criteria. Discusses HB 2299 that allows for
different determination across a zone. |
|
|
436 |
Chair Smith |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2296 and opens the
public hearing on HB 2302. |
|
|
HB 2302
PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
TAPE 44, A |
|||
|
001 |
Kimberly Medford |
Administrator. Explains that the amendments (EXHIBIT E) affect how HB 2302 is
administered and funded. |
|
|
010 |
Jess Carreon |
President Portland Community College. Reads prepared testimony in support of
community colleges being the provider of workforce training, (EXHIBIT F). |
|
|
072 |
Rep. Berger |
Clarifies the testimony is in support of the -2
amendments. |
|
|
078 |
Carreon |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
|
091 |
Matt Hennessee |
Co-Chair, Work Force Training and Development Task
Force. Seeks support for the Strategic Workforce Training Fund. The task
force is recommending a timely system that anticipates the economic needs for
communities and meets the changing needs of business and labor including
skill gaps |
|
|
186 |
Tim Nesbitt |
President, AFL-CIO. Co-chair Work Force Training and
Development Task Force. States that the primary conclusion was that programs
have not been focused on economic development and lack coordination. |
|
|
211 |
Nesbitt |
Refers to the report, (EXHIBIT D) page 9 regarding regional teams. |
|
|
220 |
Nesbitt |
Notes for the record that the recommendation for
enhancing coordination at the state level is not intended to imply himself
but rather is intended to have a representative of statewide labor. |
|
|
232 |
Nesbitt |
Discusses the Strategic Training Fund, (EXHIBIT G). |
|
|
254 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Refers to page 2 Section 3, asks what moneys from
the community colleges would go into this separate fund. |
|
|
243 |
Hennessee |
Defers the answer to the next witness. |
|
|
267 |
Rep. Hunt |
Clarifies that the base bill was a place holder and the
-2 amendment is the bill. |
|
|
321 |
Rep. March |
Clarifies that this uses the existing Education and
Work Force Policy Committee. |
|
|
333 |
Nesbitt |
Notes that the intention is to get more flexibility
in the work group; refers to page 9 of (EXHIBIT
D). |
|
|
344 |
Eric Johnson |
State Workforce Investment Board speaking on behalf
of himself. Supports HB 2302 and expresses his personal commitment that the
program is implemented prudently. |
|
|
360 |
Julie Branois |
Associated Oregon Industries, (AOI). Comments in
support of HB 2302 noting the need to be able to quickly tap into funds. |
|
|
438 |
Rep. March |
Confirms that AOI, the community colleges and
AFL-CIO are in agreement with this bill. |
|
|
TAPE 43, B |
|||
|
005 |
Margaret Hallock |
Office of the Governor, Policy Advisor on Workforce,
Revenue and Labor issues. Notes that the state has not developed a leadership
role. Employers need to have access to flexible funds for upgrading the
current workforce. |
|
|
037 |
Hallock |
Explains Workforce Integrated Network Teams, a
first-response team for businesses. |
|
|
067 |
Cam Proisbrauling |
Commissioner of Department of Community Colleges and
Workforce Development. Explains that
the fund is necessary to provide for more training needs. Discusses the
public/private partnership. |
|
|
113 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks how the funding fits together. |
|
|
121 |
Hallock |
Responds by recommending that Oregon direct more
federal funds to these programs, $5 million rather than $2 million. Notes the
key is to create the vehicle to redirect and add funds. |
|
|
154 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Asks will this create a greater need of general fund
dollars for community colleges. |
|
|
161 |
Proisbrauling |
Answers no because the resource is federal workforce
dollars and community colleges have had access to the $2 million set aside.
It is not anticipated that the community college support fund will be added
to this fund. |
|
|
178 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Refers to page 1, Section 2, item #4 “to reduce the
needs of public assistance”. Asks for clarification. |
|
|
182 |
Hallock |
Responds that these are the intent statements.
Education and training is one way to enhance the ability of attaining a
family wage job. |
|
|
191 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Asks what are the incentives for existing
businesses. |
|
|
194 |
Hallock |
Answers the hope is that the fund will be available
for businesses that are expanding. |
|
|
218 |
Chair Smith |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2302 and opens the
work session on HB 2302. |
|
|
HB 2302
WORK SESSION |
|||
|
221 |
Rep. March
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2302-2 amendments dated
04/14/03. |
|
|
223 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
|
Chair Smith |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
230 |
Rep. Berger
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2302 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior
reference. |
|
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
|
Chair Smith |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
|
240 |
Chair Smith |
Closes the work session on HB 2302 and adjourns the
meeting at 2:30 p.m. |
|
|
Written
testimony submitted without public testimony, (EXHIBIT H) |
|||
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. HB 2296 written testimony, Chris Chandler
DiTorrice, 2 pp
B. HB 2296-1 amendments dated 4/14/03, Hasina
Squires, 4 pp
C. HB 2296-2 amendments dated 4/14/03, John
Pascone, 2 pp
D. HB 2296, Report, Mike Burton, 20 pp
E. HB 2302-2 amendments dated 4/14/03, staff, 7
pp
F. HB 2302, prepared testimony, Jesus Carreon,
2 pp
G.
HB 2302, The Oregon Strategic Workforce Training Fund, Tim Nesbitt, 2 pp
H.
HB 2302, written testimony, Dan Gardner, 2 pp