HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
April 16, 2003 Hearing Room D
1:00 PM Tapes 45 - 46
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Patti Smith, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mary Gallegos, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mark Hass
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Steve March
Rep. Dennis Richardson
STAFF PRESENT: Kimberly
A. Medford, Committee Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURE HEARD: HB
2296 Work Session
HB 3613 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 45, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Smith |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:05 p.m. and opens a
work session on HB 2296. |
|
HB 2296
WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Rep.
Gallegos |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2296-1 amendments dated
04/14/03, (EXHBIT A). |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
|
Chair Smith |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
009 |
Rep.
Gallegos |
MOTION: Moves HB 2296 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Revenue. |
|
014 |
Rep. March |
Reiterates the possibility of watering down the
system. |
|
018 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 – Hass |
|
|
Chair Smith |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
024 |
Chair Smith |
Closes the work session on HB 2296 and opens the
public hearing on HB 3613. |
|
HB 3613
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
026 |
Sen. Bruce Starr |
Senate District 15. Testifies in support of HB 3613.
States that currently the unemployment rate is 7.6% with154,000 Oregonians
unemployed. Adds that Oregon is also losing businesses. |
|
047 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Reviews the benefits of HB 3613 and acknowledges and
responds to the Treasurer’s opposition to the Legislature directing the
practices of the Oregon Investment Council, (OIC). Urges passage of HB 3613. |
|
089 |
Rep. Richardson |
Expresses concern about “$100 million must be
invested” and explains that emerging growth businesses do not have a track
record and this involves retirement trust money. |
|
097 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Acknowledges Rep. Richardson’s concern and states
interest in finding the language that will provide full support of the bill. |
|
104 |
Rep. Mitch Greenlick |
House District 33. States that rational investment
policy needs to consider not only the return on investment but also the
social use of that capital. States
the intention of this bill is for the OIC to look first at the ability to
partner with venture capitalist in supporting emerging Oregon industries and
define the risk calculation in a broader term considering the social benefit
the investment makes. |
|
148 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Addresses the concern of forcing the OIC and
Treasurer into investing in bad investments but rather to have up to 1% but
not force the Treasurer into an uncomfortable investment. |
|
173 |
Rep. March |
Refers to his conceptual amendments, (EXHIBIT B). Asks if he is
comfortable with these proposed amendments. |
|
180 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
181 |
Rep. Hunt |
Comments on other states that have programs for
investing state funds and ask are those programs similar. |
|
191 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Responds to his knowledge it is basically this type
of model. |
|
197 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks is it necessary for the Legislature to instruct
the OIC. |
|
208 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Responds by detailing instances where social screen
overlays have been used before. |
|
235 |
Randall Edwards |
State Treasurer. Submits (EXHIBIT C). Supports the intent of the bill. Refers to the
investments in bio-science at Oregon Health Sciences University and a seed capital fund for early
stage investing. Explains that his concern with this bill is that it changes
how the Treasurer and OIC manage trusts and other moneys not owned by the
state. |
|
287 |
Edwards |
Expresses conflicts with the prudent investors’
standard. Examples the PERS fund and the Common School Fund. |
|
307 |
Edwards |
Reads from the OIC policy statement. Assures that
Oregon opportunities are looked at. Refers to the creation of the Oregon
Growth Account which is funded by the lottery. |
|
339 |
Edwards |
Concludes that the bill is good but forces money
into Oregon. Refers to the letter from the OIC, (EXHIBIT D) |
|
400 |
Ron Schmitz |
Director, Investment Division of the Treasurer’s
Office. Clarifies that the OIC has an open door policy for investment
options. Provides perspective on the venture capital industry. |
|
TAPE 46, A |
||
|
024 |
Linda Hagland |
Deputy State Treasurer. Comments on Olympic Venture
Partners and quality transactions. Comments on the Smart Forest investment.
Concludes there is money in the marketplace but good transactions are not
present. |
|
052 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks for clarification regarding the difference
between Oregon Growth Account money being okay as a goal to raise revenue for
the Education Stability Fund but not okay to use Common School Fund dollars. |
|
069 |
Edwards |
Responds that lottery moneys funded the Education
Endowment Fund and a percentage is taken to invest; the Common School Fund is
a trust that was established when the state was created. |
|
076 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks what the concerns are. |
|
090 |
Edwards |
Responds that the fundamental concern is mandating
investment policy for the OIC. |
|
100 |
Rep. Richardson |
Asks are funds invested directly or transferred to
limited partnerships. |
|
110 |
Drummond |
Responds through partnership arrangements. |
|
127 |
Rep. Richardson |
Suggests the possibility of a vehicle that allows
for smaller investment blocks. |
|
130 |
Drummond |
Responds that the scale is difficult relative to the
size of opportunities available in Oregon. The Oregon Growth Account is a
scale that is practical for the purposes being discussed. |
|
143 |
Rep. Richardson |
Offers that if the parameters are too large emerging
businesses would not benefit from the program. |
|
153 |
Edwards |
Acknowledges and shares concern about growing
technology and making sure research and development stay in Oregon. Further
expresses concern if there will be any money for the next two years. |
|
182 |
Pat West |
President Oregon State Firefighters Council. States
concern relative to PERS noting that the -1 amendments allow discretion.
Comments on prudent decisions. |
|
221 |
Wayne Embree |
Managing Partner of Cascadia Partners. Submits (EXHIBIT E) and provides a background
on his qualifications. |
|
282 |
Embree |
Refers to page three, and states that seed and early
stage investing consistently deliver the highest returns to its investors. |
|
283 |
Embree |
Reviews page four, notes the name recognition of the
companies and states this is the time to invest in emerging companies. Favors
the principal of the bill and acknowledges the concerns of the Treasurer. |
|
350 |
Embree |
Comments on the resistance of out-of-state venture
capitalist to explore opportunities outside of the Portland area. Comments on
the lack of emerging headquarter companies in Oregon. Supports passage of the
bill. |
|
363 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks was the money that British Columbia allocated
for investment mandated or voluntary. |
|
410 |
Embree |
Answers the money was from the sale of public
assets, it was the investment manager’s decision, not parliamentary. |
|
430 |
Keith Barnes |
Former Chairman and CEO Integrated Measurement
Systems. States that in 1995 a study was commissioned that looked at the
venture capital requirement for Oregon. Notes that during 1983 to 1988 over
$500 million invested in Oregon spawned companies; Integrated Measurements
Systems, Mentor Graphics Corp., Sequent Computer, In Focus Systems and
others. Adds that investment in venture capital dropped to under $50 million
in1988-1993. States that currently there is a requirement in excess of $100
million a year. |
|
TAPE 45, B |
||
|
065 |
Barnes |
Discusses the Oregon Growth Account. |
|
126 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if he is suggesting more resources in the
Oregon Growth Account and utilize the additional capacity of investments. |
|
128 |
Barnes |
Responds that the issue is how much needs to be put
in and what kind of return can be expected. Adds that $100 million is a valid
number. |
|
150 |
Rep. Richardson |
Asks about shortfalls in investment. |
|
159 |
Barnes |
Answers that the valuations go down but the return
will be at a higher rate. Notes there is a relation between the capital
available and the quality of the deal. |
|
192 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks where the $500 million came from. |
|
196 |
Barnes |
Answers from a variety of venture partners. Explains
in the following five year period the amount of venture capitol for local
funds dropped to almost nothing. |
|
210 |
Scott Gibson |
Chairman of Radysis Corp., Co-founder and Former
President of Sequent; Capitol Formation Chair of Oregon Council for Knowledge
and Economic Development, (OCKED). States only those with a tract record will
be able to raise money in this environment. Stresses that Oregon does not have
bioscience venture capitalist. Stresses that capitalist are interested in top
tier returns. Recommends removing the mandate and replacing it with “best
efforts”. |
|
341 |
Gibson |
Concludes testimony and urges support of the bill. |
|
373 |
Melissa Unger |
Legislative Director for Oregon Student Association.
Submits and reads (EXHIBIT F) in
support of HB 3613. |
|
390 |
Tricia Smith |
Oregon School Employees Association. Expresses
concerns about Section 2 that appears to add language of what the OIC should
consider to the prudent person rule. Comments on language regarding the
investment being good for the state as a whole. |
|
TAPE 46, B |
||
|
026 |
Harvey Mathews |
Submits correspondence, (EXHIBIT G) on behalf of Joseph Cortright, former advisor to the
legislature on economic issues. Submits that HB 3613 is good, needed, and prudent. |
|
084 |
Harvey Mathews |
For Association of Oregon Industries. Reviews points
made from the previous testimony. |
|
120 |
Mathews |
Notes the $100 million stated in the bill is 4/10ths
of one-percent of the entire OIC funds. Recognizes that this is a political
directive for public policy and fiscal policy. |
|
156 |
Rep. Richardson |
Asks how to accomplish this when the investments are
$25 million and up. |
|
168 |
Harvey |
Responds that the Oregon Growth Account would be an
avenue to manage these funds. |
|
204 |
Rep. Richardson |
Reiterates it requires a comfort level and interest
and the head of the Oregon Growth Account does not appear interested. Asks
how would this be accomplished. |
|
210 |
Matthews |
Responds that both Keith Barnes and Scott Gibson sit
on the Oregon Growth Account and are supportive of the bill. |
|
226 |
Chair Smith |
Momentarily recesses the meeting. Adjourns the
public hearing at 2:35 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. HB 2296-1 amendments dated 4/14/03, staff, 4
pp
B. HB 3613, HB 3613 conceptual amendment, Rep.
March, 1 p
C. HB 3613, prepared testimony, Randall
Edwards, 2 pp
D. HB 3613, prepared testimony, Gerald K.
Drummond, 1 p
E. HB 3613, prepared testimony, Wayne Embree, 5
pp
F. HB 3613, prepared testimony, Melissa Unger,
1 p
G.
HB 3613, correspondence, Harvey Matthews, 2 pp