HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
January 29, 2003 Hearing Room 357
8:30 am Tapes 11
- 12
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Terry Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Cliff Zauner
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. John Mabrey, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Janet
Adkins, Committee Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: LC DRAFTS – Work Session
INFORMATIONAL MEETING – City Street
System Overview
County Road System Overview
HB 2176 – Public Hearing
HB 2216 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 11, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair
Alan Brown |
Calls
the meeting to order at 8:33 a.m., and opens work session for possible
introduction of committee measures. |
|
LC DRAFTS – WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Rep. Beyer |
MOTION:
Moves LC 1527, LC 1529, LC 1531 BE INTRODUCED as committee bills. |
|
015 |
Monty
King |
Oregon
Independent Auto Dealers Association, Executive Director. Offers testimony
explaining proposed committee measures:
|
|
075 |
Rep.
Cliff Zauner |
In
reference to LC 1531asks how many transfer fees are missed due to lack of accountability. |
|
080 |
King |
States
that he is not sure if there are any state wide figures, but indicates that
members of his organization sometimes see 4-6 missed fees on some titles. |
|
085 |
Rep.
Mitch Greenlick |
Asks
what the process is for LC drafts that come to the committee to be introduced
as committee bills. |
|
090 |
Chair
Brown |
Gives
explanation as to the process of introducing committee bills. |
|
092 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Mabrey |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
095 |
Chair
Brown |
Closes
the work session and opens an informational meeting. |
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
100 |
Jim
Torrey |
League
of Oregon Cities (LOC), Chair Transportation Committee; and; City of Eugene,
Mayor. Offers written testimony and presentation (EXHIBIT D) outlining the LOC’s goals and activities:
|
|
250 |
Jim
Torrey |
|
|
345 |
Chair
Brown |
Describes
personal knowledge of traffic problems associated with a specific section of
Beltline Road in Eugene. |
|
360 |
Torrey |
Discusses
the problems of congestion on Beltline Highway in regards to public safety
and emergency response time. |
|
380 |
Chair
Brown |
Asks
about possible improvements to West 11th in Eugene. |
|
385 |
Torrey |
Responds
regarding the proposed West Eugene Parkway and the difficulties in initiating
the project. |
|
450 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Asks
about specific testimony regarding federal money for cities; how much the
three percent represents, and if the state is required to match those monies. |
|
460 |
Torrey |
Defers
to Andrea Fogue. |
|
470 |
Andrea
Fogue |
League
of Oregon Cities Senior Staff Associate. Recommends that she come back to the
committee with more detail on those numbers when she has it. |
|
TAPE 12, A |
||
|
035 |
Laura
Pryor |
Association
of Oregon Counties, County Judge. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT E) and presentation
regarding Oregon County Road System:
Defers
to Bill Penhollow. |
|
140 |
Bill
Penhollow |
Association
of Oregon Counties, Representative. Offers testimony in reference to Exhibit
E.
|
|
190 |
Chair
Brown |
Asks
whether the county road needs is for new construction or maintenance. |
|
195 |
Penhollow |
Responds
that the county road needs is for all costs including new construction and
maintenance. Continues with presentation:
Concludes
and defers to Laura Pryor. |
|
230 |
Pryor |
Illustrates
how the economic needs of the state ride on the road system:
|
|
350 |
Pryor |
Discusses
the problems caused by the lack of railroad system in the state, the need for
maintenance and preservation, and concludes. |
|
380 |
Chair
Brown |
Asks
whether the counties are experiencing a bridge problem similar to that of the
state highway system. |
|
390 |
Penhollow |
Indicates
that the problem is similar, and discusses the counties bridge problem. |
|
400 |
Chair
Brown |
Asks
if the county is placing weight restrictions on any of its bridges. |
|
405 |
Penhollow |
Responds
affirmatively. |
|
410 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Recalls
Judge Pryor’s earlier reference to the counties use of gravel, and asks Judge
Pryor if the counties could use any state help. |
|
415 |
Pryor |
Explains
that the counties are not lacking in amount of rock to crush, but rather need
the money required to crush and transport this rock. |
|
430 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Expresses
concerns regarding the LC draft 1529, and whether it would be appropriate to
address those concerns before the LC was adopted by the committee as a
committee measure. |
|
435 |
Janet
Adkins |
Explains
that it would be appropriate to address those concerns. |
|
TAPE 11, B |
||
|
030 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Asks
if the committee could hold LC 1529 and readdress before sending over to
legislative counsel. |
|
033 |
Chair
Brown |
Responds
that the committee would have to reconsider the vote, and suspend the rules. |
|
040 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Makes
a motion to suspend the rules for reconsider of previous vote. |
|
|
Committee
|
Discusses
the process for committee measure introduction. |
|
050 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Withdraws
the motion to suspend the rules. |
|
055 |
Chair
Brown |
Closes
the informational meeting, and opens public hearing on HB 2176. |
|
HB 2176 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
060 |
Adkins |
Offers
description of HB 2176. |
|
090 |
Adkins |
Provides
the committee with written testimony (EXHIBIT
F) in favor of HB 2176 from Jason Heuser, Intergovernmental Relations
Manager for the City of Eugene. |
|
100 |
Curt
Curtis |
Oregon
State Police, Sergeant. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT G) in support of HB 2176. |
|
200 |
Rep.
Beyer |
Asks
how enforcement would occur for the situations as described in HB 2176. |
|
215 |
Curtis |
Acknowledges
that enforcement would be difficult, and discusses how the law would be
enforced. |
|
220 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Asks
whether the Basic Rule would already apply to the situations which HB 2176
addresses. |
|
225 |
Curtis |
Explains
the difficulties with using the Basic Rule to address this situation, and
states that the Basic Rule would not offer the public an indication for what
they should do. |
|
240 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Asks
about public education regarding the law and enforcement. |
|
245 |
Curtis |
Discusses
the efforts that would be taken to educate the public in regards to the new
law. |
|
265 |
Chair
Brown |
Clarifies
the need for an amendment to make HB 2176 effect single lane, two way
streets. |
|
270 |
Curtis |
Concurs
with the need for an amendment to address this problem. |
|
275 |
Bill
Laird |
Canby
Fire/Rescue Clackamas County, offers written testimony (EXHIBIT H) with reference to offered report; Response and
Operations Safety at Roadside Incidents: An Approach to Mitigate Unnecessary
Firefighter Casualties (EXHIBIT I). |
|
TAPE 12, B |
||
|
010 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Expresses
concern for the penalties proposed in HB 2176. |
|
015 |
Curtis |
Discusses
the penalties as proposed in the measure. |
|
030 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Recognizes
Mr. Curtis’s comments, but reiterates his concerns. |
|
035 |
Laird |
Points
out that the penalties as proposed are light when compared with those of
other states. |
|
045 |
Rep.
Gilman |
Asks
why current reckless driving restrictions wouldn’t address this problem, and
whether there has been consideration for educating the public without a
change in the law. |
|
050 |
Laird |
Responds,
discussing how reckless driving would in some cases not address the situation.
|
|
065 |
Curtis |
Discusses
the difficulty in using reckless driving as a deterrent currently. |
|
075 |
Rep.
Gilman |
Asks
about the advertising regarding enforcement of the proposed law. |
|
080 |
Curtis |
Indicates
that he is unsure whether there has been any effort to educate the public
thus far, but observes the difficulties with these efforts. |
|
090 |
Jim
Botwinis |
Oregon
State Police Officers’ Association, Executive Director. Offers written
testimony (EXHIBIT J) in support
of HB 2176. |
|
120 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
Questions
whether the concerns expressed could be added to DMV training for new
drivers, and expresses her concern for the lack of state police on the road
due to recent budget cuts. |
|
135 |
Rep.
Beyer |
Mentions
the earlier suggestion that the committee could amend the measure to include
two lane roads, and asks Mr. Botwinis if he would support such an amendment. |
|
140 |
Botwinis |
Responds
affirmatively with discussion as to the lack of safety on two lane roads. |
|
145 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
Concurs
with Representative Beyer in her support for such an amendment. |
|
150 |
Chair
Brown |
Indicates
that he intends to ask for such an amendment. |
|
155 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Remarks
that this issue needs to be addressed in the drivers education manuals
produced by the Division of Motor Vehicles. |
|
160 |
Chair
Brown |
Clarifies
that in the current bill there is no mention to a specific speed. |
|
165 |
Botwinis |
Confirms
that there is no mention to a specific speed, due to the difficulty of
determining a passing motorist’s speed in the given situation. |
|
170 |
Chair
Brown |
Thanks
the witnesses, and indicates his desire to have legislative counsel draft an
amendment addressing the need to expand the measure to two lane roads. |
|
175 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Concurs
with Chair Brown about the need to expand the measure with an amendment, and
discusses the courage of the officers involved. |
|
200 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
Asks
for clarification of the amendment. |
|
210 |
Chair
Brown |
Asks
Mr. Botwinis to step back up to the witness table and address the amendment. |
|
215 |
Botwinis |
Discusses
the proposed amendment. |
|
225 |
Chair
Brown |
Closes
the public hearing on HB 2167, and opens a public hearing on HB 2216. |
|
HB 2216 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
240 |
Janet
Adkins |
Offers
an explanation of HB 2216. |
|
260 |
Kelly Taylor |
Oregon
Department of Transportation Representative. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT K) in support of HB 2216. |
|
290 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
Asks
how often “title washing” happens in Oregon. |
|
295 |
Taylor |
Gives
explanation for “title washing” and discusses the proposed measures role in
stopping the practice. |
|
300 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Asks
how car titles become “junk titles.” |
|
305 |
Taylor |
Gives
explanation of “junk titles,” and points out that Oregon does not issue junk
titles. |
|
325 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Asks
whether someone from another state who is in a bad enough accident, holds the
original title. |
|
330 |
Taylor |
Explains
that someone in this example does not keep the original title, but rather is
issued a junk title. |
|
335 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
Clarifies
the process for receiving a junk title. |
|
337 |
Taylor |
Clarifies
the processes. |
|
340 |
Adkins |
Asks
whether there would be a similar process for junk titles as there is for a
salvage title, where the salvage can be restored into a rebuilt or
reconstructed title. |
|
350 |
Taylor |
Responds
that there is no program such as this in Oregon, and anyone wanting to
restore a vehicle would need to return to the original state in which the
junk title was issued. |
|
355 |
Chair
Brown |
Clarifies
that a vehicle with a junk title is usually not safe for the streets even if
rebuilt. |
|
360 |
Taylor |
Concurs
with Chair Brown. |
|
370 |
Chair
Brown |
Closes
the public hearing on HB 2216, and opens a work session on HB 2216. |
|
HB 2216 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
395 |
Rep. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves HB 2216 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
400 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Mabrey |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. ZAUNER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
405 |
Adkins |
Discusses
the upcoming field trip scheduled for the committee. |
|
455 |
Chair
Brown |
Closes
the work session on HB 2216, and adjourns the meeting at 10:22 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– LC 1527, draft, Staff, 2 pp.
B
– LC 1529, draft, Staff, 2 pp.
C
– LC 1531, draft, Staff, 1 p.
D
– Informational testimony, Jim Torrey, 9 pp.
E
– Informational testimony, Laura Pryor, 10 pp.
F
– HB 2176, written testimony, Jason Heuser, 1 p.
G
– HB 2176, written testimony, Curt Curtis, 3 pp.
H
– HB 2176, written testimony, Bill Laird, 4 pp.
I – HB 2176, Response and Operations Safety
at Roadside Incidents: An Approach to Mitigate Unnecessary firefighter
Casualties, Bill Laird, 63 pp.
J
– HB 2176, written testimony, Jim Botwinis, 1 p.
K
– HB 2216, written testimony, Kelly Taylor, 1 p.