HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
February 10, 2003 Hearing Room 357
8:30 a.m. Tapes 19
- 20
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. John Mabrey Vice-Chair
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Cliff Zauner
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Jackie Dingfelder
STAFF PRESENT: Janet
Adkins, Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2221 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2038 – Public Hearing and Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 19, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Brown |
Calls meeting to order at 8:34 a.m., and opens
public hearing on HB 2221. |
|
HB 2221
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
005 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers description of HB
2221. |
|
020 |
Gretchen McKenzie |
Governor’s Advisory Committee on DUII, Legislative
Analyst. Introduces Teresa Douglas. |
|
025 |
Teresa Douglas |
Alcohol and Drug Evaluation Specialist; Governor’s
Advisory Committee on DUII, Member. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT A) in support of HB 2221. |
|
085 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Asks about the use of Bench Probation, and its
effectiveness. |
|
095 |
Douglas |
Explains that in Clackamas County it is only used
for people who are out of state, and it is not used often. |
|
100 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if the proposed fee covers the total cost of
the service, or whether there are still unmet costs. |
|
102 |
Douglas |
Explains that the costs are different for public vs.
private providers, but in her experience the costs are about $125 to $130. |
|
105 |
Rep. Gilman |
Asks for the studies which justify the costs. |
|
110 |
Douglas |
Refers to a formal study done by Multnomah County,
but indicates her figures come from her own experience. |
|
113 |
Rep. Gilman |
Expresses his desire to see numbers which justify
the fee increase. |
|
115 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks if illegal aliens enter into the same program. |
|
120 |
Douglas |
Explains that the treatment programs have no way of
knowing whether those enrolled are illegal aliens or not. |
|
122 |
Zauner |
Clarifies that when an individual is referred to a
program, that the individual already has a conviction. |
|
124 |
Douglas |
Explains that those enrolled have a conviction, or
are on a diversion program. |
|
125 |
Zauner |
Asks about drug treatment and deportation of illegal
aliens. |
|
130 |
Douglas |
Explains that she is unaware of any deportations
from a treatment program in Oregon. |
|
132 |
Serena Cruz |
Multnomah County Commissioner. Offers written
testimony (EXHIBIT B) in support
of HB 2221. Address the use of Bench Warrants to prosecute repeat DUII’s. |
|
180 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks why HB 2221 does not address the full cost,
estimated at $150, of these programs. |
|
185 |
Cruz |
Explains that she was not involved in drafting the
bill, but indicates that the proponents would appreciate more flexibility in
deciding these fees. |
|
190 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Clarifies that the HB 2221 does not cost the state
any more, but allows the treatment programs to recover the full costs of
treatment. |
|
195 |
Cruz |
Concurs. |
|
200 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that the private contractors of treatment
programs charge an individual referred to the program $90, and the county was
making up the difference between that charge and the true cost of the
program. |
|
202 |
Cruz |
States that her county directly funds about $250,000
a year, which was cut in the midyear rebalance. |
|
205 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks about the disparity in cost between Clackamas
County ($130) and Portland ($150). |
|
210 |
Cruz |
Indicates she is unsure as to the reason for the
cost disparity. |
|
225 |
Chair Brown |
Asks why the fee is controlled by statute. |
|
230 |
Douglas |
Indicates the fee was intended to be uniform state
wide. |
|
235 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Asks whether the $130 comes closer to recovering the
true cost, or is an arbitrary number. |
|
240 |
Douglas |
Explains that $130 was the initial number which came
from an average figure for the state. |
|
245 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks whether those referred to treatment programs
pay the full cost of that program. |
|
250 |
Cruz |
Observes that they do pay the full cost of treatment. |
|
265 |
Adkins |
Explains that the $130 figure is an average that
came from surveying programs from around the state. |
|
270 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2221, and opens a
work session on HB 2221. |
|
HB 2221
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
275 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Questions the number of fees assessed and the
limitation of fees within the statute. Suggests an amendment allowing
flexibility in deciding the fee for the screening interview. |
|
290 |
Chair Brown |
Recalls that the witnesses who have testified
mentioned the reason for the fee being the desire for uniformity across the
state. |
|
295 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Observes that there is not uniformity in the cost of
the treatment program which is the largest cost. |
|
305 |
Rep. Beyer |
Refers to testimony requesting an emergency clause,
and asks whether the committee should ask for an amendment introducing an
emergency clause. |
|
315 |
Adkins |
Explains the bill would take effect January 1st,
2004 as currently written. |
|
320 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Expresses his desire to see an emergency clause. |
|
325 |
Rep. Beyer |
Observes that this increase is not necessarily
linked to inflation, but linked to the extra service which was added into the
statute. |
|
340 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on H 2221, and opens a
public hearing on HB 2038. |
|
HB 2038
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
345 |
Adkins |
Offers a description of HB 2038, and the -2
amendment. |
|
395 |
Chair Brown |
Indicates his intention to amend HB 2038 with the -2
amendment (EXHIBIT C), and offers
his reasons for doing so. |
|
TAPE 20, A |
||
|
002 |
Jim Botwinis |
Oregon State Police Officers’ Association. Offers
written testimony (EXHIBIT D) in
support of HB 2038. |
|
055 |
Chair Brown |
Asks what the cost is to retrain one officer for
full operation. |
|
060 |
Botwinis |
Indicates the department is working on the numbers,
but observes the total number is around $106,000, and for training only
(eliminating the officers salary for the first twelve months) the cost is
about $50-$60 thousand dollars. |
|
065 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that by keeping troopers on the road keeps
the state from paying this training fee. |
|
070 |
Botwinis |
Agrees, observing that the state has already lost
some officers to other agencies and states. |
|
075 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether some of the officers have retired. |
|
078 |
Botwinis |
Discusses officer retirement. |
|
080 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether any administration personnel have been
cut. |
|
085 |
Botwinis |
Explains that the department has a plan in place to
reduce its administration. |
|
090 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Clarifies that HB 2038 is a one time fix, and refers
to a proposal offered by House Speaker Minnis to further fund the state
police, questioning the ability to retain these troopers after the one time
funding is depleted. |
|
115 |
Botwinis |
Discusses the difficulty presented to the
legislature in deciding funding for the Oregon State Police, underlining the
importance of funding state police long term. |
|
130 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Clarifies that this bill just buys time. |
|
135 |
Botwinis |
Concurs. |
|
140 |
Rep. Beyer |
Clarifies that the Speakers bill does not have a
funding mechanism for the reinstated troopers and questions whether some
money being discussed in HB 2038 could be found for the original purpose of
funding tire recycling. |
|
160 |
Botwinis |
Disagrees, stating that the Speakers bill does fund
the rehired troopers, and the funding from HB 2038 is in addition to the
Speakers funding. |
|
165 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that HB 2038 does have a referral to Ways
and Means. |
|
168 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Indicates that he does have some questions regarding
the bill. |
|
175 |
Bob Danko |
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Offers
written testimony (EXHIBIT E)
regarding HB 2038. |
|
245 |
Chair Brown |
Indicates that he does not see any reference to the
West Nile Virus in the original bill. |
|
247 |
Danko |
Acknowledges the point, refers to the DEQ’s mandate
to keep waste tires out of the environment. |
|
250 |
Chair Brown |
Asks whether at the time of the scrap tire bill
there was another bill which limited those who could keep scrap tires. |
|
255 |
Danko |
Explains that there was one all inclusive tire bill
in 1987, and discusses who can accumulate tires. |
|
275 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks how the tires are disposed. |
|
280 |
Danko |
Discusses the disposal of waste tires received by
the DEQ. |
|
295 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks which state the tires go to. |
|
297 |
Danko |
Explains that Oregon is a net importer of waste
tires. |
|
300 |
Rep. Zauner |
Mentions an organization in McMinnville which takes
old tires. |
|
310 |
Danko |
Discusses the function of the McMinnville company
and how they recycle waste tires, and import large quantities. |
|
325 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks for clarification regarding the West Nile Virus
problem, and what proportion of the mosquito problem breeds in waste tires. |
|
330 |
Danko |
Recommends specific answers regarding the West Nile
Virus be obtained from the Department of Health. |
|
345 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if chipped tires eliminate the purposed
problem. |
|
348 |
Danko |
Affirms that chipped tires cannot hold water,
eliminating the West Nile problem from waste tires. |
|
350 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Asks whether there are still attempts to use chip
tires in road construction. |
|
355 |
Danko |
Discusses the use of chip tires in roadways. |
|
370 |
Doug Riggs |
Metro. Offers testimony regarding HB 2038. |
|
TAPE 19, B |
||
|
035 |
Chair Brown |
Explains the -2 amendment. |
|
045 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks why recycling of waste tires has dropped. |
|
050 |
Riggs |
Discusses the general decline in waste tire
recycling, mentioning the problems posed by importing waste tires to Oregon. |
|
065 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether the reason for importing tires is
money. |
|
070 |
Riggs |
Discusses the trend in other states to implement
scrap tire recycling. |
|
080 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2038, and opens a
work session on HB 2038. |
|
HB 2038
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
085 |
Rep.
Gilman |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2038-2 amendments dated
02/10/03. |
|
095 |
Rep. Beyer |
Indicates her intent to vote AYE for the bill, but discusses
her concerns regarding the bill. |
|
105 |
Rep. Gilman |
Discusses his vote in 1987 for the tire bill, and
his continued support for that program, but also indicates his desire to fund
the state police avoiding projected cuts. |
|
110 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Questions whether the bill should be referred to the
Special Budget Committee rather than Ways and Means. |
|
125 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that he inquired with the Speakers Office
regarding the subsequent referral, and was directed to send the bill to Ways
and Means. |
|
130 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Clarifies his belief that the tire waste program is
extremely important, but is subordinate to the current need to fund the
Oregon State Police. |
|
135 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
140 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves HB 2038 with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior
reference. |
|
165 |
Chair Brown |
Discusses the tire industry’s historic support for
waste tire clean-up, and expresses concern for the amount of junk tires which
are imported to Oregon. |
|
175 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
185 |
Chair Brown |
Noting the absence of those who wished to testify
regarding HB 2384, suggests that it will be heard at the next meeting. |
|
195 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if the committee could address how tires are
imported into Oregon without any fee. |
|
200 |
Chair Brown |
Indicates that there are measures coming to the
committee regarding this issue. |
|
205 |
Adkins |
Explains that there are two other bills which were
introduced by the Task Force on Tire Recycling, but were not referred to the
Transportation Committee. |
|
210 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 2038, and adjourns the
meeting. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2221, written testimony, Teresa Douglas, 2 pp.
B
– HB 2221, written testimony, Serena Cruz, 1 p.
C
– HB 2038, -2 amendment, Staff, 1 p.
D
– HB 2038, written testimony, Jim Botwinis, 1 p.
E
– HB 2038, written testimony, Bob Danko, 1 p.