HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
March 3, 2003 Hearing Room 357
8:30 AM Tapes 37
- 40
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. John Mabrey Vice-Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Cliff Zauner
STAFF PRESENT: Janet
Adkins, Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2514 – PUBLIC HEARING
HB 2518 – PUBLIC HEARING
HB 2501 – PUBLIC HEARING
LC 3392 – WORK SESSION
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 37, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Brown |
Calls meeting to order at 8:35 a.m., and opens a public
hearing on HB 2514. |
|
HB 2514
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
005 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
2514. |
|
010 |
Chair Brown |
Opens a public hearing on HB 2518. |
|
HB
2514, HB 2518 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
015 |
Rep. Kruse |
State Representative, District 7. Offers a brief
history of HB 2514 & HB 2518, and testimony in support of HB 2514 &
HB 2518. Offers proposed amendment to HB 2514 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
100 |
Rep. Zauner |
Refers to a bill from last session which was
eventually vetoed for its lack of consideration regarding speed differential
between cars and trucks. |
|
105 |
Rep. Kruse |
Recalls that there are several bills this session
which may have or could have that provision. |
|
110 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks why emergency vehicles were excluded from the
bill. |
|
115 |
Rep. Kruse |
Explains the purpose of excluding emergency vehicles
from the bill. |
|
120 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if the exclusion is still in the bill after the
amendments. |
|
125 |
Rep. Kruse |
Recalls that the exclusion is still in the bill. |
|
140 |
Kelly Skye |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association,
Legislative Director. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT B) in opposition of HB 2514. Indicates that some of her
concerns may be addressed by the amendment proposed by Rep. Kruse. |
|
200 |
Rep. Zauner |
Clarifies that as currently written, if a motorist
is driving thirty miles per hour over the speed limit, but under control, it
is classed as reckless driving. |
|
205 |
Skye |
Addresses the link between high speed and reckless
driving. |
|
220 |
Rep. Zauner |
Clarifies that there is an exemption when driving
below the seventy mph speed limit. |
|
225 |
Skye |
Explains that the bill does not create a specific
exemption. |
|
235 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether passing the bill would decrease the
number of jury trials. |
|
240 |
Skye |
Responds that she is unsure as to whether the bill
would affect the number of jury trials. Comments on the affects of the bill
on the trial process. |
|
270 |
Janet Adkins |
Refers to the proposed amendment, and asks Ms. Skye
about specific language in the amendment. |
|
280 |
Skye |
Addresses the language in the bill and the possible
changes proposed. |
|
300 |
Jim Botwinis |
Oregon State Police Officers’ Association,
President. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT
C) in opposition to HB 2514 as written. Indicates his group’s possible
support for the proposed amendment to the bill. |
|
365 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2514. |
|
HB 2518
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
375 |
Dr. Frederick Hakkinen |
Meridian Park Hospital. Offers testimony in
opposition to HB 2518, including his personal experience driving the Autobahn
in Germany. |
|
TAPE 38, A
|
||
|
020 |
Rep. Zauner |
Comments on his personal experience driving the Autobahn,
indicating speed differential was the primary safety concern. |
|
030 |
Hakkinen |
Explains that the Autobahn has recently been limited
in speed, and further comments on the dangers of the Autobahn. |
|
035 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether Mr. Hakkinen thinks there are more
accidents now with a speed limit on the Autobahn. |
|
040 |
Hakkinen |
Explains that he thinks there are now fewer
accidents. |
|
045 |
Janet Adkins |
Offers a description of HB 2518. |
|
060 |
Bob Russell |
Oregon Trucking Associations, President. Offers
written testimony (EXHIBIT D)
regarding HB 2518. |
|
090 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks what the fuel difference would be for trucks if
the speed were increased ten miles per hour. |
|
095 |
Russell |
States that the increase is hard to measure and not
substantial. |
|
100 |
Rep. Beyer |
Clarifies that currently there is a ten mph speed
differential, and that Mr. Russell’s group has not tried to change the
current differential. |
|
105 |
Russell |
Explains that due to the prohibitive cost of
changing every speed limit sign posted in the state, his group has not
pursued changing the current speed differential. However, if the signs were
to be changed under HB 2518, his group supports fixing the speed differential
problem. |
|
115 |
Chair Brown |
Thanks Mr. Russell for his testimony and opens a
public hearing on HB 2501. |
|
HB
2518, HB 2501 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
120 |
Rep. Randy Miller |
House District 37. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT E) in support of HB 2501. |
|
270 |
Senator Gary George |
Senate District 12. Offers testimony in support of
HB 2501. |
|
355 |
Rep. Miller |
Comments on the validity of statistics which may be
presented in opposition to HB 2501. |
|
385 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that the speed differential between cars
and trucks would be ten mph, and asks if it
would be reasonable to raise the truck speed to seventy mph,
decreasing the speed differential to five mph. |
|
395 |
Rep. Miller |
Defers to the judgment of Oregon Department of
Transportation. |
|
TAPE 37, B |
||
|
010 |
Sen. George |
Comments that the relating clause could be amended
to change the speed differential. |
|
020 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that the bill would only apply to the
interstate system. |
|
025 |
Rep. Miller |
Explains that he will offer amendments which would
apply the bill to other roadways in the state, but reiterates the continued
use of the Basic Rule. |
|
040 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Asks for a clarification regarding the statistics of
which states have which speed differentials. |
|
055 |
Rep. Miller |
Points out that ODOT would have control over those
decisions. |
|
065 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if HB 2501 has similar language to bills
proposed during previous sessions. |
|
070 |
Rep. Miller |
Explains that the language is consistent. |
|
080 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks what Rep. Millers feelings would be if the
speed was not increased when referred to the Oregon Department of
Transportation. |
|
085 |
Rep. Miller |
Comments on what may happen if the authority to
increase speed was given to Oregon Department of Transportation. |
|
100 |
Sen. George |
Comments on the modern safety of trucks and
automobiles compared to the past. |
|
130 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Comments on the modern lack of common sense in
modern drivers, and asks how that behavior would change with an increased
speed limit. |
|
150 |
Rep. Miller |
Explains that he does not think the average speed
would increase greatly due to higher speed limits. |
|
180 |
Sen. George |
Offers personal experience of driving in other
states where the speed limit was greater than that of Oregon. |
|
200 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Expresses her concerns regarding the ability of the
State Police to enforce an increased speed limit, and questions the timing of
this particular measure. |
|
220 |
Rep. Miller |
Explains that since HB 2501 just passes authority to
the Oregon Department of Transportation, that would be an issue for that
department to address. |
|
260 |
Dr. John Tongue |
Oregon Transportation Safety Committee, Chair.
Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT F)
in opposition to HB 2501. |
|
TAPE 38, B |
||
|
005 |
Chair Brown |
Asks about Mr. Tongue’s involvement on the Oregon
Speed Zone Improvement Panel. |
|
010 |
Tongue |
Outlines the mandate of the Oregon Speed Zone
Improvement Panel. |
|
015 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Refers to statistics presented by Dr. Tongue, and
asks how he would think the behavior of motorists would change if the speed
were increased. |
|
017 |
Tongue |
Remarks that he thinks the average speed would
increase substantially. |
|
040 |
Rep. Zauner |
Clarifies that the bill only gives authority to
increase speed to ODOT, and asks if Dr. Tongue is uneasy with ODOT authority. |
|
045 |
Tongue |
Points out that ODOT is opposed to the bill and the
authority that would come with it, and that the majority of the people in the
state are opposed to increasing speed in the state. |
|
085 |
Dr. Frederick Hakkinen |
Meridian Park Hospital. Comments on the durability
of the Autobahn roadway in Germany, and the average speed of automobiles on
I-5. |
|
115 |
Chair Brown |
Expresses his concerns for the costs of building the
Autobahn, and comments on the history of I-5. |
|
130 |
Adkins |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT G) from the Oregon Environmental Council in opposition
to HB 2501. |
|
140 |
Troy Costales |
Oregon Department of Transportation, Safety
Division. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT
H) regarding HB 2518. |
|
210 |
Costales |
Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT I) regarding HB 2501, including which roadways would be
affected and which would not. |
|
250 |
Chair Brown |
Asks whether inferior equipment could account for
some of the data indicating high accident statistics in the past. |
|
255 |
Costales |
Acknowledges that equipment improvements have
lessoned the number of accidents, and points out the number of automobiles on
the road has tripled since 1961 to today. Continues with presentation. |
|
375 |
Rep. Beyer |
Clarifies that Mr. Costales’ believes that Oregon
Department of Transportation would be required to review all speed limits. |
|
385 |
Costales |
Explains that speed limit reviews would be done at
the request of a citizen or local government. |
|
395 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks whether the speed limit reviews would be
conducted by the Speed Zone Review Panel, or the Oregon Department of
Transportation. |
|
400 |
Costales |
Explains that the task would have to be designated
to that group through rule. |
|
TAPE 39, A |
||
|
005 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether those respondents who oppose the
increase in speed limit were asked how fast they drive. |
|
010 |
Costales |
Indicates that the question was not asked, but that
there are speed monitoring devices in the pavement which indicate the average
speed. |
|
020 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether the respondents would be willing to pay
the fines for speeding. |
|
025 |
Chair Brown |
Asks if Mr. Costales would support the change in
speed differential from ten mph to five mph. |
|
027 |
Costales |
Discusses the increase in safety between speed
differentials, but points out the impact on the infrastructure caused by the
increased speed coupled with the large weight of trucks. |
|
035 |
Gail Shibley |
Oregon Department of Human Services. Offers written
testimony (EXHIBIT J) in
opposition to HB 2501. |
|
135 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks if the speed limits increased, yet the behavior
and speed of the drivers remained the same, would the number and severity of
accidents increase. |
|
140 |
Shibley |
Expresses concern for engaging in hypothetical
questions, and reiterates concerns regarding the cost accidents have on the
healthcare system. |
|
145 |
Rep. Zauner |
Refers to his personal experience and restates his
question. |
|
150 |
Shibley |
Reiterates concerns based on healthcare costs. |
|
155 |
Eugene Lubinsky |
Portland, Oregon. Offers testimony in support of HB
2501. |
|
360 |
Jeff Boly |
National Motorists Association. Offers written
testimony (EXHIBIT K) in support
of HB 2501. |
|
TAPE 40, A |
||
|
001 |
Boly |
Continues with testimony in support of HB 2501. |
|
120 |
Ken Ray |
Clackamas, Oregon. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT L) in support of HB 2501. |
|
150 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2501, and opens a
work session to consider committee bills: LC 3392 (EXHIBIT M). |
|
LC 3392
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
160 |
Chair
Brown |
MOTION: Moves LC 3392 BE INTRODUCED as a committee
bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0 EXCUSED: 2 - Dingfelder, Greenlick |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
165 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session to consider committee bills,
and adjourns the meeting at 10:52 a.m. |
|
The following exhibits are submitted for the record
without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Staff |
Submits State Maximum Speed Limits for Passenger
Vehicles (EXHIBIT N) regarding HB
2501. Submits proposed statute repeal (EXHIBIT O) regarding HB 2501. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2514, conceptual amendment, Rep. Kruse, 1 p.
B
– HB 2514, written testimony, Kelly Skye, 1 p.
C
– HB 2514, written testimony, Jim Botwinis, 1 p.
D
– HB 2501, written testimony, Bob Russell, 1 p.
E
– HB 2501, written testimony, Rep. Miller, 5 pp.
F
– HB 2501, written testimony, John Tongue, 15 pp.
G
– HB 2501, written testimony, Staff, 1p.
H
– HB 2518, written testimony, Troy Costales, 2 pp.
I
– HB 2501, written testimony, Troy Costales, 16 pp.
J
– HB 2501, written testimony, Gail Shibley, 3 pp.
K
– HB 2501, written testimony, Jeff Boly, 2 pp.
L
– HB 2501, written testimony, Ken Ray, 4 pp.
M
– LC 3392, committee measure, Staff, 2 p.
EXHIBITS
RECEIVED OUTSIDE MEETING
N
– HB 2501, State Maximum Speed Limits for Passenger Vehicles, Staff, 2 pp.
O
– HB 2501, Repeal, Staff, 1 p.