HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
March 10, 2003 Hearing Room 357
8:30 AM Tapes 45
- 46
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. John Mabrey Vice-Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Cliff Zauner
MEMBER EXCUSED:
STAFF PRESENT: Janet
Adkins, Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2398 – WORK SESSION
HB 2542 – WORK SESSION
HB 2428 – WORK SESSION
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
These minutes are in compliance
with Senate and House Rules. Only
text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the
tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 45, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Brown |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:31 a.m., and opens a
work session on HB 2398. |
|
HB 2398
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
2398, and the proposed -1 amendment (EXHIBIT
A) to HB 2398, and the possible need for a -2 amendment. |
|
030 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 2398, and opens a work
session on HB 2542. |
|
HB 2542
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
035 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB 2542
and the proposed -1 amendment (EXHIBIT
B) to HB 2542. |
|
065 |
Kelly Taylor |
Oregon Department of Transportation. Offers
testimony explaining the need for the -1 amendment. |
|
105 |
Adkins |
Asks if Ms. Taylor knows how many people register
after the 60 days. |
|
110 |
Taylor |
Explains that it is extremely difficult for the
Department to track these transactions. |
|
115 |
Adkins |
Clarifies specific language in the amendment. |
|
120 |
Taylor |
Offers an explanation for the language in the
amendment. |
|
130 |
Rep. Brown
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2542-1 amendments dated
03/05/03. |
|
135 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
140 |
Rep. Beyer
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2542 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
145 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
145 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2542 be placed on the CONSENT
CALENDAR. |
|
145 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
150 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 2542, and opens a work
session on HB 2428. |
|
HB 2428
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
155 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB 2428
and the proposed -2 amendment (EXHIBIT
C) to HB 2428. |
|
185 |
Kelly Taylor |
Oregon Department of Transportation. Offers
testimony explaining the -2 amendment to HB 2428 |
|
235 |
Monty King |
Oregon Independent Auto Dealers. Offers testimony in
support of HB 2428. |
|
250 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2428-2 amendments dated
03/07/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
255 |
Rep. Greenlick
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2428 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
285 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 2428, and opens an
informational meeting: Innovative Finance Advisory Committee Report |
|
INFORMATIONAL
MEETING |
||
|
295 |
Jim Whitty |
Oregon Department of Transportation. Offers written
overview (EXHIBIT D) of the Innovative
Finance Advisory Committee, with reference to the committee’s final report:
Public-Private Partnerships for Oregon Transportation Projects (EXHIBIT E). |
|
TAPE 46, A |
||
|
001 |
John Carter |
Innovative Finance Advisory Committee, Member. Offers
summary points (EXHIBIT F) to the
actions and recommendations of the committee. |
|
110 |
Whitty |
Introduces Mr. Walsh. |
|
115 |
Tom Walsh |
Innovative Finance Advisory Committee (IFAC), Member.
Offers testimony regarding the history and future of public-private joint
ventures in Oregon. |
|
205 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Indicates his interest in the Airport Max, but
expresses concerns for the two stops preceding the airport and the lack of
investment at those stops. |
|
215 |
Carter |
Explains that those stops fell victim to the recent
economic downturn, and discusses the general problem. |
|
245 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if there is room for other kinds of commercial
investments, and asks what other commercial investments were considered by
the committee. |
|
260 |
Whitty |
Explains that the possibilities and varieties of
public-private partnerships are vast, and the committee only looked at a few
without excluding the possibility of others. |
|
275 |
Carter |
Further describes some of the particular
pubic-private partnerships which were considered by the committee. |
|
315 |
Walsh |
Addresses Rep. Greenlick’s question, explaining the
example of Intel regarding the Airport Max and Washington County. |
|
360 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks Mr. Whitty whether the committee considered any
private-public ability to alleviate congestion. |
|
370 |
Whitty |
Discusses the consideration of private-public
ventures to address these problems. |
|
405 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks whether there is a market in Oregon for toll
based roadways. |
|
420 |
Whitty |
Explains that the IFAC was not tasked with market
research, but the road user fee task force looked at previous data regarding
toll funded roadways. |
|
TAPE 45, B |
||
|
020 |
Rep. Zauner |
Refers to New Zealand’s ability to make
private-public partnerships work, and asks Mr. Carter if he has any personal
experience with that example. |
|
025 |
Carter |
Explains that he has been to New Zealand and has
been involved in some of those public-private partnerships, and further
discusses his experience. |
|
060 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks how the private sector identifies possible
public projects. |
|
070 |
Whitty |
Offers an explanation for how projects are chosen,
defers to Mr. Carter. |
|
075 |
Carter |
Discusses the various ways in which the private
sector becomes involved in projects. |
|
120 |
Chair Brown |
Asks when the private sector becomes involve in
transportation improvement projects. |
|
125 |
Carter |
Discusses the ways in which projects are identified,
including what sized projects are considered. |
|
160 |
Whitty |
Discusses the solicited proposals, and how those
projects are considered. |
|
185 |
Carter |
Explains that it is important to the private sector
that they see the considered projects add value. |
|
240 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks how the culture of the institution is altered
to support these private-public joint projects, and come up with innovative
ideas in this area. |
|
250 |
Whitty |
States the importance of the topic and asks if Mr.
Walsh and Mr. Carter would comment on the importance of and difficulties
regarding culture. |
|
265 |
Walsh |
Explains that lack of time is a major factor and
further discusses the issue of culture. |
|
330 |
Carter |
Comments on what is needed to change culture in any
organization, and recalls the difficulty in valuing time. Discusses the
difference in culture between the private sector and the public. |
|
TAPE 46, B |
||
|
005 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Points out the value of unsolicited proposals. Comments
on the mindset it takes on both the public and private sector to come
together. |
|
025 |
Walsh |
Comments on how the private sectors ideas are able
to be incorporated by ODOT. |
|
045 |
Chair Brown |
Thanks the witnesses, closes the informational
hearing and adjourns the meeting. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2398, -1 Amendment, Staff, 5 pp.
B
– HB 2542, -1 Amendment, Staff, 2 pp.
C
– HB 2428, -2 Amendment, Staff, 1 p.
D
– Informational, Innovative Finance Advisory Committee Overview, Jim Whitty, 3
pp.
E – Informational, Public-Private
Partnerships for Oregon Transportation Projects, Jim Whitty, 40 pp.
F
– Informational, Innovative Finance Advisory Committee Summary, John Carter, 5
pp.