HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
March 26, 2003 Hearing Room 357
8:30 AM Tapes 58
- 59
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. John Mabrey Vice-Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Cliff Zauner
STAFF PRESENT: Janet
Adkins, Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2986 – Work Session
HB 3522 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3001 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 58, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Brown |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:35 a.m., and opens a
public hearing on HB 2986. |
|
HB 2986
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB 2986,
and presents written testimony regarding HB 2986 from the Oregon Academy of
Ophthalmology (EXHIBIT A), and
from Oregon Optometric Physicians Association (EXHIBIT B). |
|
040 |
Lorna Youngs |
Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Offers written
document: Oregon’s Medically At-Risk Driver Program (EXHIBIT C) regarding HB 2986. |
|
255 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks how disorders which are not evident are
disclosed or reported. |
|
265 |
Youngs |
Explains that this is an issue which is still being
worked out, but discusses the possibilities. |
|
285 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks what the magnitude of the problem is currently. |
|
290 |
Youngs |
Explains that she does not currently have that information,
but guesses that thousands would be affected each year. Discusses the
attempts to phase in the new rule gradually. |
|
335 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks whether the changes proposed by the bill could
be accomplished through rule rather than through legislation. |
|
345 |
Youngs |
Explains that the DMV does not have the authority to
enact such rule. |
|
350 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Clarifies that they could not make if voluntary
rather than compulsory. |
|
352 |
Youngs |
Explains the DMV could not make the rule either way,
and the matter is rather a policy decision for the legislature. |
|
355 |
Rep. Zauner |
Clarifies that currently nobody is reporting under
previous legislation. |
|
360 |
Youngs |
Explains that there is currently no reporting as
such. |
|
370 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether the original bill is mandatory. |
|
375 |
Youngs |
Explains that it is not the intent of the DMV to
make compliance voluntary, but to make it mandatory. |
|
380 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether making compliance voluntary would cause
doctors report. |
|
385 |
Youngs |
Indicates that she does not know, but expresses
concern if this were the case. |
|
400 |
Rep. Beyer |
Expresses constituent concerns that enacting such
regulations would cause those in need of medical attention to not seek help
for fear of losing driving privileges. |
|
405 |
Youngs |
Addresses those concerns of people avoiding medical
attention to avoid loss of driving privileges. |
|
TAPE 59, A |
||
|
015 |
Chair Brown |
Refers to a constituents case where the constituent
lost driving privileges due to loss of consciousness. |
|
025 |
Youngs |
Addresses the specific case and describes how that
case was affected by current regulations. |
|
045 |
Chair Brown |
Refers to another constituents complaint where an
elder gentleman lost driving privileges due to family complaints. |
|
055 |
Youngs |
Explains that this case would fall under the
voluntary reporting options. |
|
065 |
Tim Martinez |
Oregon Medical Association. Offers testimony
regarding HB 2986. |
|
115 |
Grant Higginson |
State Public Health Officer. Offers testimony
regarding HB 2986. |
|
180 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Explains that there are two relevant issues: the
voluntary reporting issue, and the liability issue. Points out that these
issues should not be confused. |
|
200 |
Martinez |
Explains that it would be possible to separate the
two issues, and discusses the difference between the two issues. |
|
215 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Discusses his view that there would be no difference
in reporting whether the it was voluntary or mandatory. |
|
240 |
Higginson |
Addresses the difference between mandatory and
voluntary reporting. |
|
280 |
Martinez |
Points out that this law would apply to everyone in
the medical community, and there are those in the field who should be
afforded some discretion. |
|
300 |
Rep. Gilman |
Asks how much paper work would be required if
reporting were mandatory, and expresses that the burden placed on the doctors
would be great if reporting were mandatory. |
|
320 |
Higginson |
Explains that the Oregon Department of
Transportation would need to address the amount of paperwork required, but
discusses the issues regarding reporting. |
|
370 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks if there are any restrictions as to who can
report to the DMV regarding unsafe driving. |
|
375 |
Youngs |
Discusses who can report, indicating that the DMV
holds all reports confidential. |
|
TAPE 58, B |
||
|
005 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that there will be amendments to the bill.
Closes the public hearing on HB 2986, and opens a public hearing on HB 3522. |
|
HB 3522
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
3522. |
|
020 |
Rep. Johnson |
House District 31. Offers testimony in support of HB
5322, and defers to Mr. Loring. |
|
040 |
Martin Loring |
Oregon Department of Transportation, Public Transit
Division. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT
D) in support of HB 3522. |
|
090 |
Rep. Johnson |
Concurs with Mr. Loring’s take on the bill, and
points out that the bill would create a tool for the Oregon Department of
Transportation to work with local governments regarding elder transportation. |
|
100 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that once the money gets to the county
there is opportunity to use it for another purpose. |
|
105 |
Rep. Johnson |
Refers to a situation in Columbia County where this
seemed to be an issue. |
|
125 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether anyone would be opposed to the bill. |
|
130 |
Rep. Johnson |
Explains that she is unaware of any opposition to
the bill, but she is willing to work with any of those groups which may have
concerns. |
|
135 |
Mary Lou Ritter |
Area Agency on Aging and Disability in Washington
County. Offers testimony regarding HB 3522. |
|
185 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3522, and opens a
work session on HB 3522. |
|
HB 3522
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
190 |
Rep. Beyer
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3522 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior
reference. |
|
195 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
200 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 3522, and opens a work
session on HB 3001. |
|
HB 3001
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
215 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB 3001,
the proposed -1 amendment (EXHIBIT E),
and the proposed -3 amendment (EXHIBIT
F) . |
|
350 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Clarifies specific wording in the bill and in the
amendments. |
|
355 |
Adkins |
Discusses the reason for that language. |
|
270 |
Chair Brown |
Clarifies that ODOT would have authority over any
and all of the corridors. |
|
275 |
Troy Costales |
Oregon Department of Transportation. Offers
testimony explaining the proposed -3 amendments. |
|
285 |
Chair Brown |
Asks how ODOT would decide which corridors to double
fine. |
|
290 |
Costales |
Explains the process for deciding such corridors. |
|
300 |
Chair Brown |
Asks whether the bill with the amendments would
allow ODOT to alter the existing double fine corridors. |
|
305 |
Costales |
Explains it is his perception of the amendments that
it would not require the department to change those already designated
corridors. |
|
310 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks whether by allowing ODOT this option, a revenue
impact would occur. |
|
315 |
Costales |
Explains that there would be little potential fiscal
impact and explains that the cost of signage would run around $15,000, but
there would be no fiscal impact statement issued because the bill would not
mandate action to ODOT but allow ODOT to have the option. |
|
340 |
Chair Brown |
Asks if Mr. Costales has an idea of which corridors
the ODOT would alter under this bill. |
|
345 |
Costales |
Points out that he will leave a report (EXHIBIT G) with committee staff
regarding the state of current safety corridors. |
|
450 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3001-3 amendments dated
03/25/03. |
|
455 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
460 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
MOTION: Moves HB 3001 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
470 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. GREENLICK will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
480 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 3001. |
|
485 |
Committee |
Discusses the upcoming schedule for the committee. |
|
490 |
Chair Brown |
Adjourns the meeting at 10:01 a.m. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for HB 3001. |
||
|
|
Larry Christianson |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT H). |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2986, written testimony, Staff, 1 p.
B
– HB 2986, written testimony, Staff, 1 p.
C
– HB 2986, Oregon’s medically At-Risk Driver Program, Lorna Youngs, 9 pp.
D
– HB 3522, written testimony, Martin Loring, 2 pp.
E
– HB 3001, -1 amendment, Staff, 1 p.
F
– HB 3001, -3 amendment, Staff, 2pp.
G
– HB 3001, Salem to Woodburn Safety Corridor, Troy Costales, 1 p.
H
– HB 3001, written testimony, Larry Christianson, 17 pp.