HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
April 14, 2003 Hearing Room 357
8:30 Tapes 80 - 81
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. John Mabrey Vice-Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Cliff Zauner
STAFF PRESENT: Janet
Adkins, Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3240 – Work Session
HB 3135 – Public Hearing
HB 2578 – Work Session
HB 2670 – Work Session
HB 2954 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 80, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Brown |
Calls meeting to order at 8:33 a.m., and opens a work
session on HB 3240. |
|
HB 3240
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB 3240,
and the proposed -3 amendments (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
030 |
Susan Schneider |
City of Portland. Offers testimony in support of HB
3240 with the proposed -3 amendment. |
|
045 |
Bradd Swank |
Oregon State Court Administrators Office. Offers
testimony in opposition to HB 3240 and the proposed -3 amendments. |
|
130 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks how much the assessment is currently. |
|
135 |
Swank |
Discusses where the current assessment is spent. |
|
140 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Clarifies his earlier question. |
|
145 |
Swank |
Discusses what assessments are collected. |
|
160 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks how much the current unitary assessment is, and
how is it being spent. |
|
170 |
Swank |
Explains that the current assessment is $35, and
discusses the variations of that fee. Discusses how those assessments are
used. |
|
190 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Asks Mr. Swank how he would fix the collection
process. |
|
195 |
Swank |
Discusses how the assessment could be better
collected, including increasing the assessment, or increasing the violation
fee. |
|
220 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Clarifies the suggestion of increasing the unitary
assessment. |
|
225 |
Swank |
Discusses the possibility of increasing the unitary
assessment. |
|
250 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Clarifies that the legislature allocates a
percentage. |
|
252 |
Swank |
Acknowledges. |
|
255 |
Rep. Brown |
Discusses how the unitary assessment funds are
allocated. |
|
260 |
Rep. Zauner |
Asks whether more fines could be assessed for moving
violations. |
|
265 |
Swank |
Explains that it would be more problematic to
increase only certain assessments. Further discusses the issue of assessment
increases. |
|
295 |
Schneider |
Discusses the problems with the collection tools
being discussed, explaining that these means have been discussed but deemed
inadequate. |
|
335 |
Scott Bricker |
Oregon Transportation Safety Coalition. Offers
testimony regarding the assessment process, and concerns with the unitary
assessment. |
|
365 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks whether, if the bill went to Ways and Means and
they chose to add the fee would Ms. Schneider’s group, and Ms. Bricker’s
group be happy. |
|
370 |
Schneider |
Defers to Mr. Bricker. |
|
375 |
Bricker |
Discusses his wish to see a dedicated fund. |
|
390 |
Schneider |
Indicates that the proposed bill is patterned off of
a similar assessment process in Colorado. |
|
400 |
Swank |
Comments on the collection process, and the failures
in that process. |
|
TAPE 81, A |
||
|
030 |
Mark Lear |
City of Portland. Discusses the model for the
assessment in the state of Colorado. |
|
040 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Offers a hypothetical situation, and asks for
clarification of the assessment process. |
|
055 |
Swank |
Comments on the hypothetical situation, outlining
the process from when the ticket is written by the officer to when it is
assessed by the judge. Further outlines the legislative history of the issue. |
|
095 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks whether Colorado has a unitary assessment
program. |
|
100 |
Lear |
Indicates that he does not know. |
|
105 |
Swank |
Explains that Oregon is the first state to implement
such a program. |
|
115 |
Lear |
Explains that it is difficult to allocate the funds
collected by the assessment. |
|
125 |
Chair Brown |
Discusses the need for a referral to Ways and Means. |
|
130 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3240-3 amendments dated
04/11/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
140 |
Rep. Gilman |
Expresses his support for traffic education, but his
reluctant support for the bill. |
|
145 |
Rep.
Greenlick |
MOTION: Moves HB 3240 to floor with a DO PASS AS
AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by
prior reference. |
|
155 |
Rep. Beyer |
Points out that she supports the issue. |
|
160 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Discusses his constituents interest in the bill. |
|
170 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
175 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 3240, and opens a
public hearing on HB 3135. |
|
HB 3135
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
180 |
Rep. Zauner |
Discusses his intentions for sponsoring HB 3135,
with reference to the proposed -1 amendments (EXHIBIT B). |
|
200 |
Scott Bricker |
Bicycle Transportation Alliance. Offers testimony regarding
HB 3135. |
|
250 |
Chair Brown |
Asks how many bicycles are in the state of Oregon. |
|
255 |
Bricker |
Explains that around 250,000 bikes are sold a year
in Oregon, with 175,00 being sold in large chain stores, and around 50,000
being sold in specialty stores. Further discusses bike sales in Oregon. |
|
280 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks how much money this bill would generate. |
|
285 |
Bricker |
Discusses the difficulty of collecting these fees,
and the concerns of the biking community regarding the cost of assessing such
a fee. |
|
300 |
Rep. Zauner |
Refers to Rep. Dingfelder’s question, and discusses
his vision of how bikes would be registered. |
|
320 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks whether there would be any type of enforcement. |
|
325 |
Rep. Zauner |
Discusses the enforcement issue with reference to
the example of Hawaii. |
|
340 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3135, and opens a
work session on HB 2578. |
|
HB 2578
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
355 |
Chair Brown |
Discusses his intent to send the bill to the House
Judiciary Committee. |
|
365 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves HB 2578 to the floor WITHOUT
RECOMMENDATION as to passage and BE REFERRED to the committee on Judiciary. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
380 |
Chair Brown |
Recesses the meeting at 9:28 a.m. |
|
RECESS |
||
|
382 |
Chair Brown |
Calls meeting to order and recesses the committee
until 9:45 a.m. |
|
RECESS
UNTIL 9:45 a.m. |
||
|
385 |
Chair Brown |
Calls meeting to order and opens a work session on
HB 2670. |
|
HB 2670
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
390 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
2670, and the proposed -4 amendments (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
TAPE 80, B |
||
|
020 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks how similar the proposed agreement is to that between
car manufacturers and dealers. |
|
025 |
Adkins |
Explains that there are issues which differentiate recreational
vehicles and automobiles. |
|
030 |
Shawn Miller |
Oregon Recreational Dealers Association. Offers
testimony in support of the -4 amendments to HB 2670. |
|
045 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if the problem is conceptual. |
|
050 |
Miller |
Indicates the problem in question is conceptual. |
|
060 |
John Brenneman |
Recreational Vehicle Industry Association. Offers
testimony in support of the -4 amendments to HB 2670. |
|
080 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks about specific language in the amendment and
its intent. |
|
085 |
Miller |
Explains the language in question. |
|
095 |
Adkins |
Points out that Marathon Coach is grandfathered by
the bill to operate as a dealer. |
|
100 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks whether the grandfathered exemption is lost if
the company changes hands. |
|
105 |
Miller |
Indicates that the grandfathered exemption would
then be lost. |
|
110 |
Brenneman |
Discusses the case of Marathon Coach. |
|
120 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2670-4 amendments dated
04/14/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
125 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves HB 2670 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
130 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. GREENLICK will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
135 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves HB 2670 be placed on the CONSENT
CALENDAR. |
|
140 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Indicates his wish to discuss the bill on the floor. |
|
145 |
Rep.
Zauner |
Rescinds
motion to place HB 2670 on the consent calendar. |
|
150 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 2670 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2954. |
|
HB 2954
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
155 |
Chair Brown |
Asks if anyone has any testimony to offer regarding
HB 2954. Seeing none, closes the public hearing on HB 2954. |
|
160 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Discusses the upcoming
schedule for the committee. |
|
165 |
Chair |
Adjourns the meeting at 10:19 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3240, -3 amendments, Staff, 4 pp.
B
– HB 3135, -1 amendments, Staff, 5 pp.
C
– HB 2670, -4 amendments, Staff, 16 pp.