HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WATER
April 22, 2003 Hearing Room B
8:30 AM Tape 73
- 74
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kropf, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Linda Flores
Rep. Mike Schaufler
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
STAFF PRESENT: Pete
Test, Committee Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3047 – Work Session
HB 2991 – Work Session
HB 3215 – Work Session
HB 3217 – Work Session
HB 3220 – Work Session
HB 3616 – Work Session
HB 3519 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 73, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls meeting to order at 8:10 a.m., and discusses
the agenda for the day. Opens a work session on HB 3047. |
|
HB 3047
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
010 |
Chair Jenson |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of reconsidering the vote on HB 3047. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
015 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB 3047 was sent Do Pass
as Amended to the floor. |
|
015 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Explains the reason for reconsidering the measure. |
|
025 |
Rep. Kruse |
Thanks Rep. Dingfelder for her work on the bill. |
|
030 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
035 |
Chair Jenson |
Explains that the HB 3047 will be heard at the
Committee’s next meeting, closes the work session on HB 3047, and opens a
work session on HB 2991. |
|
HB 2991
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
040 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote on HB 2991. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
045 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
2991 was sent Do Pass as Amended to the floor. |
|
050 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Explains the reason for
reconsidering the vote on HB 2991. |
|
055 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Kropf |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
060 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2991 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Revenue by
prior reference. |
|
065 |
Chair Jenson |
Points out the bill was amended at the last meeting. |
|
070 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Kropf |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
075 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on HB 2991, and opens a work
session on HB 3215. |
|
HB 3215
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
080 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
3215, and introduces the proposed -3 amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
090 |
Doug Riggs |
Central Oregon Cities Organization. Offers a written
description (EXHIBIT B) of the -3
amendments to HB 3215. |
|
120 |
Chair Jenson |
Recalls that the committee heard the measure in a
previous meeting. Clarifies that all the interested parties are happy with
the -3 amendments. |
|
125 |
Riggs |
Explains that he cannot speak for the other parties
directly, but points out that the -3 amendments are a compromise among all
the parties. |
|
135 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks about specific language in the amendments. |
|
145 |
Riggs |
Comments on the wording in question. |
|
155 |
Rep. Kruse |
Further clarifies the issue of primacy in the
amendments and the bill. |
|
160 |
Riggs |
Acknowledges, and further discusses the issue of
primacy. |
|
170 |
Kimberly Priestley |
WaterWatch. Offers testimony outlining her groups
concerns with the measure including the -3 amendments. |
|
195 |
Rep. Kruse |
Points out that in most cases in-stream water rights
take precedence over junior water rights. |
|
200 |
Priestley |
Discusses the issue of water rights precedence. |
|
210 |
Anita Winkler |
Oregon Water Resources Congress. Offers testimony
regarding HB 3215 and the proposed -3 amendments. |
|
220 |
Paul Cleary |
Oregon Water Resources Department. Offers written
testimony (EXHIBIT C) regarding HB
3215, and the proposed -3 amendments. |
|
250 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks whether the Department was involved in the
formulation of the -3 amendments. |
|
255 |
Cleary |
Comments on the discussions which created the -3 amendments. |
|
275 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks what date in-stream water rights have precedence
over other water rights. |
|
280 |
Cleary |
Explains that the in-stream water right law was
passed in 1987, and further discusses the issue of in-stream water rights. |
|
295 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments on the priority rights issue. |
|
300 |
Cleary |
Acknowledges, and expresses his interest in
continuing discussion on this issue. |
|
310 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks the involved parties to meet at 3:00 in the
afternoon to discuss the issue. |
|
312 |
Cleary |
Indicates that 3:00 p.m. would be fine for him. |
|
315 |
Riggs |
Indicates that he too would be available at 3:00,
but expresses concern for the work imposed on Legislative Counsel. |
|
320 |
Chair Jenson |
Expresses his wish to see these issues worked out
before 3:00 today. Closes the work session on HB 3215, and opens a work
session on HB 3217. |
|
HB 3217
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
355 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
3217. |
|
365 |
Doug Riggs |
Central Oregon Cities Organization. Offers testimony
outlining HB 3217, and the proposed -3 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
400 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Comments on the increase in water efficiency. |
|
410 |
Riggs |
Recognizes that efficiency increase and further
comments on the issue. |
|
TAPE 74, A |
||
|
005 |
Paul Cleary |
Oregon Water Resources Department. Points out the
programs which the Department has implemented which increase the efficiency
of water use. |
|
010 |
Rep. Kropf |
Asks whether the statutes mentioned by Mr. Cleary
are in conflict. |
|
015 |
Cleary |
Comments on those statutes, indicating that there
are no conflicts. Continues with testimony regarding the bill. |
|
025 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks how notice is currently served by the
department. |
|
030 |
Cleary |
Explains the means in which those interested are
notified. |
|
020 |
Kimberley Priestley |
WaterWatch. Offers testimony regarding HB 3217,
including her groups concerns with the intent of the bill. |
|
050 |
Aubrey Russell |
Oregon Trout. Offers testimony in opposition to HB
3217. |
|
065 |
Anita Winkler |
Oregon Water Resources Congress. Offers testimony in
opposition to HB 3217 as currently written. |
|
085 |
Chair Jenson |
Explains that he would like to meet with all of the
interested parties at 3:00 today, where a decision will be made regarding the
future of the bill. Closes the work session on HB 3217, and opens a work
session on 3220. |
|
HB 3220
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
105 |
Chair Jenson |
Explains that the committee is waiting for an
amendment which would limit the scope of the bill to the Deschutes River
Basin, but introduces the -3 amendments (EXHIBIT
E). |
|
115 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of the
proposed -3 amendments. |
|
120 |
Chair Jenson |
Outlines his intentions regarding the future of HB
3220. Closes the work session on HB 3220, and opens a work session on HB
3616. |
|
HB 3616
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
150 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
3616, and introduces the proposed -2 amendments (EXHIBIT F). |
|
170 |
Andrew Bowman |
Defenders of Wildlife. Offers testimony in support
of HB 3616, and offers an explanation of the -2 amendments. Introduces
possible conceptual amendments to the -2 amendments. |
|
200 |
Katie Fast |
Oregon Cattleman’s Association. Offers testimony in
support of the -2 amendments with the proposed conceptual amendments. |
|
215 |
Chair Jenson |
Clarifies the intent of the conceptual amendments. |
|
220 |
Fast |
Acknowledges the clarification. |
|
225 |
Chair Jenson |
Clarifies that everyone involved is happy with the
-2 amendments and the proposed conceptual amendments. Indicates that the
Committee would like to hear from Legislative Counsel before continueing, and
recesses the meeting. |
|
RECESS |
||
|
226 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls meeting back to order, and outlines the proposed
conceptual amendment. |
|
230 |
Brendan McCarthy |
Legislative Council. Comments on the proposed
conceptual amendment, indicating that he does not see a problem with the
change. |
|
235 |
Chair Jenson |
Clarifies that “shall” would be more mandatory than
“may.” |
|
240 |
McCarthy |
Acknowledges, and further discusses the wording. |
|
250 |
Chair Jenson |
Enters into the record submitted testimony (EXHIBIT G) from Karen Lewotsky of
the Oregon Environmental Council. |
|
255 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
MOTION: Moves to AMEND the HB 3616 -2 amendments
on page 2, in line 28, changing "may" to "shall". |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0 EXCUSED: 2 - Kropf, Kruse |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
265 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3616-2 amendments dated 04/17/03 as CONCEPTUALLY
AMENDED. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0 EXCUSED: 2 - Kropf, Kruse |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
275 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
MOTION: Moves HB 3616 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Revenue by
prior reference. |
|
285 |
|
VOTE:
5-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Kropf, Kruse |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
290 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on HB 3616, and opens a work
session on HB 3519. |
|
HB 3519
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
300 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of the
bill, and points out the efforts to draft amendments to the bill beyond the
current -3 (EXHIBIT H) , -4 (EXHIBIT I) , -5 (EXHIBIT J) , -6 (EXHIBIT
K) , and -7 (EXHIBIT L)
amendments. |
|
320 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks which groups are attempting to amend the bill. |
|
325 |
Test |
Identifies those groups which are interested in
amending the bill, and further discusses the possible amendments. |
|
340 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks why those groups are not in attendance at the
current meeting. |
|
345 |
Test |
Indicates that he does not know why these groups are
not in attendance. |
|
355 |
Chair Jenson |
Expresses his perplexity regarding the abstention of
those groups involved in HB 3519. Comments on the future of the bill. Closes
the work session on HB 3519, and adjourns the meeting at 9:40 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3215, -3 amendments, Staff, 7 pp.
B
– HB 3215, amendment description, Doug Riggs, 1 p.
C
– HB 3215, written testimony, Paul Cleary, 1 p.
D
– HB 3217, -3 amendments, Doug Riggs, 9 pp.
E
– HB 3220, -3 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
F
– HB 3616, -2 amendments, Staff, 12 pp.
G
– HB 3616, submitted testimony from Karen Lewotsky, Staff, 1 p.
H
– HB 3519, -3 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
I
– HB 3519, -4 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
J
– HB 3519, -5 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
K
– HB 3519, -6 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
L
– HB 3519, -7 amendments, Staff, 41 pp.