HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WATER
May 08, 2003 Hearing Room B
8:30 AM Tape 85
- 86
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kropf, Vice-Chair
Rep. Linda Flores
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Mike Schaufler
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
STAFF PRESENT: Pete
Test, Committee Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 82A – Work Session
HB 3281 – Work Session
HB 3201 – Work Session
HB 3298 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 85, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls meeting to order at 8:46 a.m. and opens a work
session on SB 82A. |
|
SB 82A
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of SB
82A. |
|
012 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks whether the Committee has all the relevant
amendments. |
|
015 |
Test |
Introduces the proposed -A4 amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
035 |
Jeanette Holman |
Oregon Division of State Lands. Offers a brief
history and description of the bill. |
|
060 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks why these amendments were not amended in the
Senate. |
|
065 |
Holman |
Explains the amendments which were adopted on the
Senate side. |
|
075 |
Adam Sussman |
Oregon Water Resources Department. Offers written
testimony (EXHIBIT B) in support
of the -A4 amendments to SB 82A. |
|
090 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks why, if the bill was amended on the Senate
side, there is a –A4 amendment to the bill before the committee. |
|
100 |
Holman |
Explains the reasoning for the –A4 amendments. |
|
110 |
Sussman |
Further explains the reason for the –A4 amendments,
indicating that Sen. Messerle, who sponsored the bill, is in concurrence with
the proposed amendments. |
|
130 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks if Sen. Messerle was supportive of the rewrite
to the bill. |
|
135 |
Sussman |
Indicates that he did not know of the paragraph in
question when he last talked to Sen. Messerle. |
|
137 |
Holman |
Points out changes requested by the Department. |
|
140 |
Brendan McCarthy |
Legislative Counsel. Discusses the reason for the
changes proposed in the –A4 amendments, explaining that after rereading the
A-engrossed version, he saw need for change. |
|
170 |
Chair Jenson |
Points out the difficulty with the language. |
|
185 |
Jean Wilkinson |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Offers testimony regarding SB 82A,
and the proposed –A4 amendments. |
|
200 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks whether Ms. Wilkinson has seen the –A4
amendments. |
|
205 |
Wilkinson |
Explains that she supports the –A4 amendments. |
|
210 |
Chair Jenson |
Recesses the public hearing on SB 82A. |
|
HB 3281
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
215 |
Chair Jenson |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote on HB 3281. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
220 |
Chair Jenson |
Explains the reasoning for reconsidering the vote on
HB 3281. |
|
225 |
Chair Jenson |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
3281 was sent to the floor with a Do Pass recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
230 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote by which the -1 amendments were adopted to HB 3281. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
235 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which the
-1 amendments were adopted to HB 3281. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
240 |
Chair Jenson |
Opens a work session on HB 3281. |
|
250 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of HB
3281, and the proposed -2 amendments (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
270 |
Adam Sussman |
Oregon Water Resources Department. Offers testimony
regarding HB 3281, and the proposed -2 amendments. |
|
295 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks Mr. Sussman to expand on the issues of concern. |
|
300 |
Sussman |
Further discusses the issues which are addressed in
the -2 amendments, and those issues which are not addressed by the amendments. |
|
340 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks about the issue which is not addressed in the
-2 amendments. |
|
345 |
Sussman |
Further discusses the issue of concern. |
|
350 |
Rep. Kropf |
Asks Mr. Sussman to address specific language which
would be added by the -2 amendments. |
|
370 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Discusses the language in question. |
|
375 |
Rep. Kruse |
Further discusses the language in question. |
|
395 |
Kristina McNitt |
Oregon Water Resources Congress. Offers testimony
regarding the -2 amendments. |
|
400 |
Rep. Kropf |
Asks Ms. McNitt to address the changes from the -1
amendments to the -2 amendments. |
|
405 |
McNitt |
Comments on the relevant changes. |
|
TAPE 86, A |
||
|
015 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks for a clarification of specific wording in the
amendments. |
|
020 |
McNitt |
Clarifies the wording in question. Further discusses
what changes are needed for the -2 amendments. |
|
040 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks what the problem is with the specific changes
in the amendments. |
|
045 |
Sussman |
Explains that the department never saw a need to
change the original wording of the statute in the way which was proposed. |
|
055 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks what the intent of the change was originally. |
|
060 |
McNitt |
Discusses the original intent of the amendments. |
|
065 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments on the need for a conceptual amendment to
correct the problem. |
|
075 |
Brendan McCarthy |
Legislative Counsel (LC). Comments on the problems
with the proposed conceptual amendments, indicating that he has no editorial
ability to change amendments once adopted by the committee. |
|
085 |
Rep. Kruse |
Acknowledges, but clarifies what ability LC has to
renumber sections after a conceptual amendment. |
|
090 |
McCarthy |
Indicates that this ability to renumber would
probably be sufficient. |
|
100 |
Rep. Flores |
Asks about specific wording in the amendments. |
|
105 |
Chair Jenson |
Discusses a possible conceptual amendment. |
|
110 |
McCarthy |
Discusses the concern expressed by Rep. Flores. |
|
135 |
Rep. Flores |
Further questions the wording. |
|
140 |
McCarthy |
Further addresses the concern. |
|
150 |
Chair Jenson |
Expresses his concerns with creating conceptual
amendments, closes the work session on HB 3281. |
|
170 |
Rep. Kruse |
Clarifies that the counties in question were
consulted before drafting of the bill. |
|
175 |
McNitt |
Discusses the language in question, and the issues
regarding the counties involved. |
|
195 |
Rep. Kruse |
Expresses concern for the potential changes
expressed. |
|
200 |
Chair Jenson |
Discusses the role of the Water Resources Department
in deciding the issue. |
|
210 |
Committee |
Discusses the proposed amendments. |
|
225 |
Chair Jenson |
Opens a work session on SB 82 A. |
|
SB 82A
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
230 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 82A-4 amendments dated
05/07/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
235 |
Rep. Kruse |
Clarifies that Sen. Messerle is comfortable with the
amendments. |
|
240 |
Chair Jenson |
Acknowledges that during the recess Sen. Messerle
was contacted, and is fine with the amendments. |
|
245 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves SB 82A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
250 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
255 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves SB 82A be placed on the CONSENT
CALENDAR. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
260 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on SB 82A, and opens a work
session on HB 3201. |
|
HB 3201
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
265 |
Chair Jenson |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote on HB 3201. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
270 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
3201 was sent to the floor with a Do Pass as Amended recommendation. |
|
275 |
Rep.
Dingfelder |
Recalls
that the Committee had sent HB 3201 to the Committee on Ways and Means. |
|
280 |
Rep.
Kruse |
Amends
his previous motion to include the subsequent referral to Ways and Means. |
|
285 |
Chair
Jenson |
Clarifies
the amended motion, and comments on the reason for reconsidering the bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
290 |
Rep. Kropf
|
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote by which the committee adopted the -2 amendments to
HB 3201. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
295 |
Rep. Kropf
|
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which the
committee adopted the -2 amendments to HB 3201. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
300 |
Chair Jenson |
Opens a work session on HB 3201. |
|
315 |
Kristina McNitt |
Oregon Water Resources Congress. Offers testimony in
support of HB 3201 and the proposed -3 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
325 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks why there appears to be more changes in the -3
amendments than mentioned by Ms. McNitt. |
|
330 |
McNitt |
Comments on the relatively simple change which
appears large. |
|
340 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3201-3 amendments dated
05/06/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
345 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3201 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means
by prior reference. |
|
350 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
360 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3201, and opens a
work session on HB 3298. |
|
HB 3298
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
365 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks Rep. Flores to present the amendments to HB
3298. |
|
370 |
Rep. Flores |
Offers a description of the issue, and introduces
the proposed -2 amendments (EXHIBIT E). |
|
395 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks about the effect of the -2 amendments. |
|
400 |
Rep. Flores |
Further comments on the effects of the proposed -2
amendments. |
|
TAPE 85, B |
||
|
005 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Clarifies the limitation of the bill imposed by the
-2 amendments. |
|
007 |
Rep. Flores |
Acknowledges. |
|
010 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks the Department to address the amendments. |
|
015 |
Adam Sussman |
Oregon Water Resources Department. Discusses the
proposed -2 amendments, indicating that the department is still uneasy with
the bill. |
|
050 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Clarifies the Department’s interpretation of the
bill. |
|
055 |
Sussman |
Further discusses the Department’s understanding of
the effects of the bill. |
|
065 |
Rep. Kruse |
Expresses concerns with some of the possible effects
of the bill. |
|
070 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments on the forecasts mentioned by Mr. Sussman. |
|
075 |
Rep. Flores |
Discusses the work which has been done on the issue
during the last several days. Enters into record submitted memo (EXHIBIT F) from the Oregon Cranberry
Farmers’ Alliance. |
|
095 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks Mr. McCarthy about specific wording in the -2
amendments. |
|
100 |
Brendan McCarthy |
Legislative Counsel. Explains the ways in which
amendments are drafted. |
|
115 |
Rep. Kropf |
Refers to the original language of the bill, and
asks about language in the -2 amendments. |
|
125 |
McCarthy |
Comments on the substantive effects of the -2
amendments. |
|
145 |
Rep. Kropf |
Clarifies that an irrigation could purchase land
with water rights, and then be considered an owner as defined by the bill
with the -2 amendments. |
|
150 |
McCarthy |
Acknowledges. |
|
155 |
Rep. Kropf |
Further clarifies the language in question, and the
concerns with that language. |
|
165 |
McCarthy |
Comments on those concerns. |
|
175 |
Rep. Kropf |
Asks whether there is a conflict in not allowing a
water district to be an owner would somehow limits its responsibility to
deliver water. |
|
180 |
McCarthy |
Restates his lack of concern for there being a
possible conflict. |
|
190 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3298-2 amendments dated
05/08/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
195 |
Rep.
Flores |
MOTION: Moves HB 3298 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
200 |
|
VOTE:
6-1 AYE: 6 - Flores, Kropf, Kruse, Schaufler, Tomei, Jenson NAY: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. FLORES will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
215 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on 3298, and adjourns the
meeting at 9:57 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 82A, -A4 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
B
– SB 82A, written testimony, Adam Sussman, 2 pp.
C
– HB 3281, -2 amendments, Staff, 18 pp.
D
– HB 3201, -3 amendments, Staff, 9 pp.
E
– HB 3298, -2 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
F
– HB 3298, submitted testimony from Carol Russell, Rep. Flores, 1 p.