HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WATER
May 15, 2003 Hearing Room B
8:30 AM Tape 89
- 90
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kropf, Vice-Chair
Rep. Linda Flores
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Mike Schaufler
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
STAFF PRESENT: Pete
Test, Committee Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB
820A – Public Hearing and Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 89, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls meeting to order at 8:43 a.m. and opens the
public hearing on SB 820A. |
|
SB 820A
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
005 |
Pete Test |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of SB
820A, and introduces the proposed -A6 amendments (EXHIBIT A) , -A8 amendments (EXHIBIT
B), and -A9 amendments (EXHIBIT C). |
|
040 |
Senator David Nelson |
Senate District 29. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT D) regarding SB 820A. |
|
135 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks whether anyone has priority on the water right
permits in question. |
|
140 |
Sen. Nelson |
Indicates he doesn’t know, but further addresses the
issue of priority with permits. |
|
165 |
Rep. Kropf |
Asks whether either Sen. Nelson or Sen. Ferrioli
have seen the –A9 amendments, and outlines the effects of those amendments. |
|
175 |
Sen. Nelson |
Comments on the effects of the –A9 amendments. |
|
180 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Clarifies Sen. Nelson’s interpretation of the –A9 amendments,
that the increased flow allowed by the amendments would be above and beyond
that allowed by the original bill. |
|
185 |
Sen. Nelson |
Acknowledges. |
|
190 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments on possibly coming conceptual amendments. |
|
200 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks whether there are any predictions on what
production might come from creating these reserves. |
|
205 |
Sen. Nelson |
Comments on the productivity of the land when
irrigated. |
|
210 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks how many acres of land would be put into
production if this bill were passed. |
|
215 |
Sen. Nelson |
Indicates that there would be close to 80,000 acres. |
|
220 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Clarifies that this would not be marginal land, but
arable and productive acres. |
|
225 |
Sen. Nelson |
Acknowledges that this would be good, productive
land. |
|
230 |
Chair Jenson |
Points out that the proposed reserve is not
necessarily for agriculture, but for “beneficial use.” |
|
240 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks how much water would be needed for 80,000 acres
to go into production. |
|
245 |
Sen. Nelson |
Responds that 80,000 would need around 240,000 acre
feet. |
|
250 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks for a clarification of the legality regarding
water rights upon a river which crosses differing jurisdictions. |
|
255 |
Sen. Nelson |
Points out that the state has the right to reserve
water, and further discusses the legality issue. |
|
Sound
equipment malfunction |
||
|
265 |
Rep. Tomei |
Further clarifies her legality question. |
|
270 |
Sen. Nelson |
Further comments on the legality issue. |
|
285 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Senate District 30. Offers testimony in support of
SB 820A. |
|
TAPE 90, A |
||
|
001 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Continues with testimony in support of SB 820A, with
comments on the multiple amendments to the bill. |
|
055 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks how Oregon originally received the rights to
the 30 million acre feet from the Columbia. |
|
060 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Discusses the means in which state water rights are
decided. |
|
070 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks when the intergovernmental agreement was
reached. |
|
075 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Explains the agreement was reached in about 1985,
and points out those agreements were created before endangered species
legislation. |
|
090 |
Rep. Tomei |
Clarifies the intent of her question was to better
outline the legality of the issue. |
|
095 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Acknowledges and continues testimony. |
|
100 |
Rep. Kruse |
Indicates his support for the measure, but expresses
his concern that this bill still leaves Oregon well below the amount diverted
by Washington state. |
|
110 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Comments on the work which has gone into the bill
and the reasoning behind the 259,000 square miles figure. |
|
140 |
Rep. Kruse |
Points out that the issue will need to be
readdressed in the future. Comments on the agricultural use of the water in
Washington State. Offers the committee an update on Rep. Westlund’s health.
Continues with comments on water use from the Columbia. |
|
170 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Agrees, and further discusses the need to not dwell
on the percentage use, but the efficient use of the water. |
|
190 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks what percentage the proposed increase would
make for Oregon usage. |
|
195 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Indicates that he does not know, but points out the
need to look at efficiency rather than percentage. |
|
200 |
Vice-Chair Dingfelder |
Asks whether there are any limitations on the Water
Resources Department from currently issuing water rights under existing laws. |
|
210 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Comments on the limitations imposed on the
Department. |
|
215 |
Rep. Kropf |
Clarifies that the proposed 250,000 acre feet figure
is the maximum water which would be needed. |
|
220 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Points out that the 250,000 figure is a cap. |
|
230 |
Martha Pagel |
Eastern Oregon Irrigation Association. Comments on
the percentages of the original bill. |
|
240 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Thanks the committee for their time. |
|
245 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks Ms. Pagel what percentage of total Columbia
flow the 250,000 acre feet would bring the state up too. |
|
250 |
Pagel |
Discusses the percentage use of total Columbia flow.
Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT E)
regarding SB 820A. |
|
290 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Expresses concern for implementing an interim goal,
and the practical effect of such a goal. |
|
300 |
Pagel |
Explains that there is an important policy
implication of putting Oregon on par with Washington regarding consumption of
the Columbia’s flow. |
|
320 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Further questions the interim goals. |
|
330 |
Pagel |
Comments on the evolution of the bill, and further
discusses the interim goals. Offers a description of the –A9 amendments. |
|
340 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Asks why the intent of the –A9 amendments could not
be accomplished by changing the amount in the A-engrossed bill. |
|
350 |
Pagel |
Further comments on the –A9 amendments in effect and
implementation. |
|
TAPE 89, B |
||
|
025 |
Rep. Flores |
Clarifies that 1.42 million acre-feet would bring
Oregon to one percent diversion, and further clarifies the differing
percentages. |
|
030 |
Pagel |
Comments on the percentage of future developments. |
|
035 |
Chair Jenson |
Points out that the 250,000 is not the total amount
withdrawn on the Oregon side. |
|
045 |
Bill Quaempts |
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian
Reservation. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT
F) regarding SB 820A. |
|
160 |
Chair Jenson |
Thanks Mr. Quaempts for his testimony. |
|
180 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Indicates his sympathy for Mr. Quaempts concerns,
but asks the witness to better explains in which passage of this bill would
cause harm to the Tribes fishing abilities. |
|
190 |
Quaempts |
Discusses the ways in which policy changes regarding
the Columbia River affect the Umatilla Tribes fishing rights. |
|
230 |
Rick George |
Department of Natural Resources. Offers testimony
regarding SB 820A. |
|
265 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks whether the 160,000 acre-feet figure would
address the tribes concerns. |
|
270 |
George |
Comments on the critical nature of the number. |
|
285 |
Chair Jenson |
Clarifies that Mr. George would be more in support
of the proposed conceptual amendments. |
|
290 |
George |
Acknowledges. |
|
295 |
Michael Mason |
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation
of Oregon. Offers written testimony (EXHIBIT
G) from Louis Pitt regarding SB 820A. |
|
370 |
Rep. Tomei |
Claries that the tribe would only agree to the bill
if the -6 amendments were included. |
|
375 |
Mason |
Explains that this is the directive of his tribal
council. |
|
TAPE 90, B |
||
|
001 |
Paul Cleary |
Oregon Water Resources Department. Offers written
testimony (EXHIBIT H) support of
SB 820A. |
|
060 |
Rep. Tomei |
Clarifies specific language in the bill. Expresses
concern for the possible effects on fish runs. |
|
070 |
Cleary |
Comments on the permitting process in context to
Rep. Tomei’s concerns. |
|
085 |
Rep. Tomei |
Restates her concerns regarding effects on the fish
runs in drought years. |
|
090 |
Cleary |
Explains that there is protection through the water
right, and discusses other means in which fish runs are protected in low-flow
years. |
|
100 |
Rep. Kruse |
Closes the public hearing on SB 820A, and opens a
work session on SB 820A. |
|
SB 820A
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
105 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 820A-9 amendments dated
05/15/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
110 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 820A-10 amendments dated
05/15/03, (EXHIBIT I). |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
115 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves SB 820A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
120 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks why there is no representative from the
environmental community present at the meeting. |
|
125 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments on the posting of the meeting agenda. |
|
130 |
Doug Meyers |
WaterWatch. Indicates his groups opposition to the
bill. |
|
150 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks Ms. Wilkinson to address the bill. |
|
155 |
Jean Wilkinson |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Offers testimony in support of
SB 820A. |
|
180 |
Martha Pagel |
Points out the need for conceptual amendments. |
|
185 |
Rep. Kruse |
Withdraws
his motion to send SB 820A to the floor with a Do Pass as Amended
recommendation. |
|
190 |
Chair Jenson |
Thanks Rep. Kruse for withdrawing his motion, and
comments on the situation the bill is in. Comments on the economic incentives
of the bill. Indicates his intention to move the bill with the –A9 and –A10
amendments, but to convene a conference committee with the Senate side
regarding the issue. Clarifies the wording of the conceptual amendments. |
|
290 |
Pagel |
Clarifies the wording of the conceptual amendments. |
|
295 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of RECONSIDERING the vote by which the –A9 amendments were adopted to SB
820A. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
300 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which the
–A9 amendments were adopted to SB 820A. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
305 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of Conceptually amend the -A9 amendments to SB 820A. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
310 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to AMEND the –A9 amendments to SB
820A on page 1, in line 11, delete "160,000" and insert
"amount". |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
315 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 820A-9 amendments dated
05/15/03 as Conceptually Amended. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
320 |
Rep. Kruse
|
MOTION: Moves SB 820A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
325 |
Rep. Tomei |
Clarifies whether there will be any representatives
from the environmental community in the proposed work group. |
|
330 |
Chair Jenson |
Points out the inability to place the bill on the
consent calendar. |
|
340 |
|
VOTE:
5-1 AYE: 5 - Flores, Kropf, Kruse, Schaufler, Jenson NAY: 1 - Tomei EXCUSED: 1 - Dingfelder |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. CHAIR JENSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
350 |
Chair Jenson |
Enters into the record submitted testimony (EXHIBIT J) from Chuck Craig from the
Oregon Department of Agriculture. Closes the work session on SB 820A, and
adjourns the meeting at 10:34 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– 820A, -A6 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
B
– 820A, -A8 amendments, Staff, 2 pp.
C
– 820A, -A9 amendments, Staff, 2 pp.
D
– 820A, written testimony, Sen. Nelson, 4 pp.
E
– 820A, written testimony, Martha Pagel, 3 pp.
F
– 820A, written testimony, Bill Quaempts, 3 pp.
G
– 820A, submitted written testimony from Louis Pitt, Michael Mason, 1 p.
H
– 820A, written testimony, Paul Cleary, 2 pp.
I
– 820A, -A10 amendments, Staff, 1 p.
J
– 820A, submitted written testimony from Chuck Craig, Staff, 1 p.