CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON HB 2368C
August 25, 2003 Hearing Room
9:00 AM Tapes 1 - 2
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Betsy Close, Chair
Rep. Rob Patridge
Rep. Joanne Verger
Sen. Kate Brown
Sen. John Minnis
STAFF PRESENT: Marjorie
Taylor, Committee Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURE HEARD: HB
2368 Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents, please
refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 1, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Close |
Calls the conference
committee on HB 2368 to order at 9:08 a.m. |
|
HB 2368 WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Marjorie Taylor |
Committee Administrator.
Explains that HB 2368 makes technical changes to the cigarette and tobacco
product taxes. Introduces HB 2368C -39 through -C42 amendments, (EXHIBIT A) and -C43 amendments (EXHIBIT
B), and -C44 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
021 |
Chair Close |
Refers to the state
comparison chart, (EXHIBIT D). |
|
030 |
Pete Shepard |
Deputy Attorney General.
Presents testimony in favor of HB 2368C-43 amendments. Discusses HB 2094, the
non-participating manufacturers statute currently awaiting the Governor’s
consideration. |
|
055 |
Sen. Brown |
Asks if it can assumed
that the Governor will not veto the bill with the --C43 amendments. |
|
065 |
Shepard |
Responds that he can only
speak for the Attorney General but he has no reason to see why the Attorney
Genera’s office would recommend a veto. States that they have expressed their
policy position regarding the cap question in the -C44 amendments and adds
that the Attorney General would not recommend a veto on the -C44 amendments. |
|
077 |
Rep. Verger |
Clarifies that the -C44
amendments does not state a cap. |
|
081 |
Shepard |
Responds that the Attorney
General’s office does not support the -C44 because it is not consistent with
their policy position, however, they would not recommend a veto if the -C44
became part of the bill. |
|
094 |
Jim Garner |
Attorney, for Garner and
Garner, appearing for Phillip Morris. Testifies in support in of the -C43
amendments. Discusses the -C44 amendments cap at $150 million |
|
124 |
Sen. Brown |
Asks why the state of
Washington is not on the list, (EXHIBIT
D). |
|
127 |
Garner |
Answers that the issue
needs to be addressed by court rule amendment. There is a proposal before the
Washington Supreme Court for $100 million. |
|
134 |
Sen. Brown |
Request a response to
concerns regarding issues of harassment. |
|
140 |
Garner |
Responds it is an
essential element similar to the Private Right of Action that is present in
similar statutes. Explains that the Attorney General is limited in terms of
how much enforcement they can bring and some problems arise in foreign
venues. |
|
150 |
Garner |
States for the record that
there is no intention to use this tool as a harassment device but rather to
ensure adequate enforcement of the law. Notes 40% of all cigarettes consumed
in Oregon are illegitimate |
|
162 |
Rep. Verger |
Expresses there is a
concern of trust. |
|
168 |
Garner |
Responds there are ample
court remedies to address harassment issues. |
|
179 |
Sen. Minnis |
Opposes the Attorney
General using outside counsel on contingency fee agreements. Asks if it would
be a problem if non-participating manufacturers were harassed. |
|
211 |
Garner |
Responds affirmatively
that efforts continue to be coordinated in a responsible manner. |
|
222 |
Sen. Brown |
Confirms that current laws
are adequate. |
|
224 |
Garner |
Affirmative. |
|
230 |
Marshall Coba |
Council of Independent
Tobacco Manufacturers of America, (CITMA). Testifies in support of the –C39
amendments and discusses (EXHIBIT E). States these are
fairness amendments, notes specifically;
|
|
332 |
Coba |
Discusses the Master
Settlement Agreement, (MSA) payments. |
|
360 |
Sen. Minnis |
States that these
arguments were presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee and rejected. |
|
378 |
Coba |
Responds that the reason
is to maintain a presence in the market rather than being removed from the
market. |
|
387 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if he has seen the
position paper from the Department of Justice. |
|
388 |
Coba |
Answers no. Continues with
testimony. |
|
410 |
Mark Nelson |
Representing RJ Reynolds
Tobacco. Submits and reviews (EXHIBIT F). Discusses HB 2094. |
|
TAPE 2, A |
||
|
037 |
Sen. Brown |
Asks if the Oregon Rules
of Civil Procedure and Oregon Statues are adequate to prevent frivolous
lawsuits. |
|
045 |
Nelson |
Answers it is his
understanding that they will provide the protection that Mr. Coba is
concerned about. |
|
044 |
Sen. Brown |
Asks when is a deal a
deal. |
|
048 |
Nelson |
Responds that it is his
understanding that the non participating manufacturers were invited to
participate. Agreements were made between the National Association of
Attorney General and the participating providers, but, non-participating
manufacturers can join and be a participating provider and pay into the
master settlement agreement. Notes he is unsure if there is a deadline to
apply. |
|
059 |
Rep. Verger |
Refers to Sections 72 and
82 regarding delivery to minors. Notes that as Oregon works to enforce
prevention of supply to minors, asks that there not be any back door efforts
to undermine these efforts. |
|
084 |
Nelson |
Responds that they are in
support of HB 2368 and HB 2094 as a enforcement tool to recover a loss of
almost $100 million a year and prevent the sale to minors. |
|
083 |
Chair Close |
Concludes invited
testimony. |
|
092 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2368C-43 amendments
dated 8/18/03. |
|
095 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Close |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
096 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2368C-44 amendments
dated 8/23/03. |
|
097 |
Rep. Patridge |
Comments that it is his
opinion that the bonding amount is too high. |
|
112 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Close |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
119 |
Rep.
Patridge |
MOTION:
Moves HB 2368C to the floor with the recommendation that the Senate
CONCUR in House amendments dated 07/24/03 and that the bill be FURTHER
AMENDED by the –C43 and –C44 amendments and the measure be REPASSED. |
|
121 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Close |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
|
|
PATRIDGE will lead discussion on the House floor. MINNIS will lead discussion on the Senate floor. |
|
130 |
Chair Close |
Adjourns the meeting at
9:48 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A.
HB 2368C-39 amendments dated 8/13/03, HB 2368C-40 amendments dated 8/18/03 and
correspondence, HB 2368C-41 amendments dated 8/18/03, and HB 2368C-42
amendments dated 8/18/03, staff, 25 pp
B.
HB 2368C-43 amendments dated 8/18/03, Pete Shepard, 3 pp
C.
HB 2368C-44 amendments dated 8/18/03, Senator Minnis, 5 pp
D.
State comparison chart, Rep. Betsy Close, 3 pp
E.
HB 2368C, written testimony, Marshall Coba, 13 pp
F.
HB 2368C, written testimony, Mark Nelson, 4 pp