CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON HB 2661B
August 12, 2003 Hearing Room E
10:00 AM Tape 1 - 2
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Randy Miller
Sen. Rick Metsger
Sen. Bruce Starr
STAFF PRESENT: Janet
Adkins, Committee Administrator
Ryan Sherlock, Committee Assistant
MEASURE: HB 2661B - Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 1, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Brown |
Calls the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m. and opens a
work session on HB 2661B that allows Department of Transportation to provide
for vehicle to be taken into custody from right of way of certain highways. |
|
HB 2661B
WORK SESSION |
||
|
007 |
Janet Adkins |
Committee Administrator. Offers a description of the
bill and the issues to be addressed by the conference committee. Provides a
section-by-section overview of the -B10 conflict amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
063 |
Adkins |
Offers a description of the –B11 amendments (EXHIBIT B). |
|
085 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks about specific wording in the –B11 amendment
regarding definitions of a school zone. |
|
092 |
Adkins |
Offers an explanation of the wording in question. |
|
096 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Questions if the provisions in this amendment are
exactly the same as they were in SB 179. |
|
102 |
Chair Brown |
Points out that the only change is in the
implementation date. |
|
106 |
Adkins |
Clarifies the language of the conflict amendments. |
|
110 |
Rep.
Miller |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2661-B10 amendments
dated 8/11/03. |
|
113 |
Sen. Metsger |
Confirms his understanding of the –B10 amendments. |
|
120 |
|
VOTE:
5-0 |
|
123 |
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
125 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks that Ms. Schneider address the intent of the
proposed -B11 amendments. |
|
127 |
Susan Schneider |
City of Portland. Offers testimony in support of the
-B11 amendments to HB 2661B. |
|
154 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks for further clarification. |
|
158 |
Schneider |
Explains that flashing lights are not applicable in
this situation. |
|
160 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks about the fine for speeding in a school zone. |
|
161 |
Schneider |
Indicates that she does not know. |
|
165 |
Adkins |
Says that they vary from $75 to $600. |
|
182 |
Rep. Miller |
Asks why there would be double fines for someone
speeding through a school zone in the middle of the night when there are sure
to be no children present. |
|
187 |
Schneider |
Comments that consistency would eliminate the
current difficulty with enforcing the double fines in school zones. |
|
208 |
Rep. Miller |
Asks why the double fine provision could not be
posted in school zones designating certain hours. |
|
219 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Explains the intent is to make fines for speeding in
school zones consistent at all hours.
Believes the double fine issue is completely separate from the
speeding in school zones issue. |
|
268 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks for clarification of the wording required on
signage if the committee does not adopt the -B11 amendments. |
|
279 |
Schneider |
Explains what cities would have to do. |
|
292 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Clarifies that it is not the issue of what the
arresting officer writes down, but how the courts interpret the violation. |
|
303 |
Schneider |
Explains the violation remains the same, but the
fine would be different. |
|
310 |
Adkins |
Clarifies her understanding of the amendment’s
intent. |
|
328 |
Christy Monson |
League of Oregon Cities. Offers an overview of what the work group intended. |
|
340 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks specifically about the double fine. |
|
344 |
Monson |
Explains the double fine is imposed only when children
are present, which is narrowly defined to crosswalks. |
|
368 |
Sen. Metsger |
Comments on the difficulty regarding the issue. |
|
410 |
Rep. Miller |
Points out his preference regarding the issue. |
|
440 |
Sen. Metsger |
Concurs with Rep. Miller’s analysis. |
|
TAPE 2, A |
||
|
009 |
Sen.
Metsger |
MOTION: Moves that the House concur on the Senate
amendments dated 5/28/03 and be further amended and re-passed with the B10
amendments. |
|
022 |
Adkins |
Points out that the B10 amendments could be further
changed by legislative counsel to accomplish the intent of the operative
date. |
|
026 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks that it be made clear for the record that the intent
is to keep the doubling of traffic fines when children are present in a
school zone. |
|
037 |
Adkins |
Points out that this might not be the case. |
|
042 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Clarifies the effects of the bill on statute. |
|
048 |
Adkins |
Further comments on the changes. |
|
051 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Contends that the old definition for the purpose of
fines remains the same. |
|
053 |
Adkins |
Says the old definition has been amended. |
|
056 |
|
VOTE:
5-0 |
|
060 |
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. BROWN will lead discussion on the
House floor SEN. METSGER will lead discussion on
the Senate floor. |
|
062 |
Chair Brown |
Closes the work session on HB 2661B and adjourns the
meeting at 10:40 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2661B, -B10 amendments dated 8/11/03, submitted by staff, 36 pp
B
– HB 2661B, -B11 amendments dated 8/11/03, submitted by staff, 3 pp