CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON SB 291
July 1, 2003 Hearing Room D
9:00 AM/ 2:00 PM Tapes 1
- 4
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Frank Shields, Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Rep. Elizabeth Beyer
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Jeff Kropf
STAFF PRESENT: Judith
Callens, Committee Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURE HEARD: SB
291 A – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents, please
refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 1, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Shields |
Calls the conference
committee to order at 9:12 a.m. States that knowing people have come to talk
about SB 291A, Chair will allow invited testimony. |
|
SB 291 A – INVITED TESTIMONY |
||
|
034 |
Roy Elicker |
Deputy Director, Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW). Explains that the issue is why the
grandfathering position is necessary. Provides background on game-bird
preserve land use, (EXHIBIT A). |
|
076 |
Chair Shields |
Asks when did ODFW
discover that conditional uses needed to be permitted under the county. |
|
080 |
Elicker |
Answers late 2001 early
2002. Explains that due to time and expense, there is concern that the
process will prevent the preserves from operating this season. |
|
083 |
Elicker |
Clarifies it was September
2002 when ODFW became aware of this. |
|
085 |
Chair Shields |
Confirms that this will be
the first season since this issue arose and reiterates the reason for the
grandfathering. |
|
091 |
Elicker |
Explains that ODFW and the
Department of Land Conservation and Development, (DLCD) will jointly send
detailed notification of this bill to the counties, hunting preserves, and
the neighbors surrounding the hunting preserves. |
|
120 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks how many hunting
preserves are being grandfathered. |
|
122 |
Elicker |
Answers that ODFW is aware
of 28 out of 70 that were operating without a county use permit, currently
there is approximately 25. |
|
124 |
John Jinnings |
Regional Representative
for Central and Eastern Oregon, DLCD. Explains this is an emerging land use
and affirms the need for fairness. Refers to the correspondence from Ronald
Eber, (EXHIBIT B) |
|
167 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Notes that (EXHIBIT B) demonstrates that ODFW
and DLCD were in agreement of the House version. |
|
199 |
Jinnings |
Responds that he was referring
to a letter dated July 1. |
|
205 |
Judith Callens |
Reviews SB 291A. Clarifies
the differences between the –A8 amendments (EXHIBIT C) and the –A9 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
257 |
Callens |
Outlines the complaint
process and location on each amendment. Discusses the fiscal impact. |
|
280 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Notes there are three
versions; the existing House bill does the grandfathering and the distance
requirement; the -A8 amendments create a new standard of complaint and has a
higher threshold (explains); and the A-9 amendments version. |
|
337 |
Jim Welsh |
Representing the Land
Owners from multiple counties. |
|
376 |
Jeff Wilkenson |
Attorney for Buck and
Lavelle Underhill. Supports the –A9 amendments. Notes that the original bill
changed the concentration of the hunting preserves. Discusses out-right use
and conditional use. |
|
TAPE 2, A |
||
|
023 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Discusses with Mr.
Wilkenson the status of the adjacent land owner and his conditional permit. |
|
066 |
Lavelle Underhill |
Farm and Property Manger.
Expresses concern regarding long-term ownership; disturbance of big game
habitant, and the impact on the farm land. Adds the safety issue and length
of the season. |
|
111 |
Underhill |
Concludes that these
issues need to be addressed at the county level. |
|
151 |
John Hefley |
Polk County Farmers. States
support for the -A9 amendments. Supports mitigation on a county level. |
|
163 |
Richard Dale |
Wasco County Property
Owner, The Dalles. Supports the -A9 amendments. Explains his concerns
regarding his cattle operation. Agrees with Mrs. Underhill’s testimony. |
|
184 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks how long he has
farmed and raised cattle. |
|
186 |
Dale |
Responds all his life. |
|
187 |
Chair Shields |
Asks how long ago did the
preserve arrive and how has it affected his operation. |
|
190 |
Dale |
Answers it was permitted
last fall. States that cattle are sensitive to people on foot and the pasture
comes right up to the fence. |
|
214 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if he was noticed
beforehand. |
|
216 |
Dale |
Answers affirmatively and
states that the planning use committee agreed with the hunting preserve and
dismissed his arguments. |
|
228 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Notes, relative to the
safety discussion, that current statute prohibits using a firearm in a way
that it endangers a neighbor. |
|
261 |
Art Schlack |
Association of Oregon
Counties. Explains exclusive farm use statutes and conditional use permits.
Explains that compatibility and adequacy of services are considered by the
local governing body in granting a permit. |
|
378 |
Rep. Kropf |
Asks for clarification
that an individual can go before the county and request certain conditions. |
|
397 |
Schlack |
Answers that if a
conditional use is granted there is a process that allows the surrounding
property owner to lodge a complaint that a condition is not being met. |
|
417 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks is there a process
for complaints on grandfathered lands. |
|
423 |
Schlack |
Answers that the -A8
amendments include a complaint process for the preserves being grandfathered
in. |
|
440 |
Schlack |
At the request of the
chair, explains the county’s position on the -A8 and -A9 amendments. |
|
TAPE 1, B |
||
|
013 |
Schlack |
States support for the
existing process for all conditional use permits. Expresses concern about
creating a separate process now and the potential of a new process for each
conditional use in statute. |
|
061 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Explains how the calving
operation would be affected by the -A8 and A9 amendments. Agrees with Mr.
Schlack’s comment about additional uses on the land. |
|
047 |
Chair Shields |
Asks why wouldn’t the
county consider the concerns of the calving operation. |
|
060 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Agrees with Mr. Schlack
that there will be new land uses developing on farm and cattle lands. |
|
092 |
Schlack |
Agrees with comments made
by Senator Ferrioli and notes that the burden is on the applicant. |
|
114 |
Van Conklin |
Rancher in Wasco County.
States that when he went through the county process he was ignored. States
that the game area was given a buffer but he was not. States that there are
no restrictions and enforcement is weak. |
|
177 |
Conklin |
Comments on the frequency
of the shooting and notes that cattle are affected by noise. Supports the
complaint guide in the -A9 amendments. |
|
212 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks what should be done
differently. |
|
226 |
Conklin |
Responds that the permit
was granted on a 11,000 acre ranch and reduced to a 600 acre ranch with a
public road down the middle. |
|
248 |
Schlack |
States that conditional
land use permits are for a particular parcel and are not moveable, however,
another conditional use permit can be applied for. |
|
262 |
Rep. Beyer |
Comments that perhaps this
issue should be before the county commission rather than the state. |
|
281 |
George Dern |
Owner, DK Wildlife Ranch.
Supports the -A8 amendments. Describes his operation on 150 acres. Reads his
prepared testimony, (EXHIBIT E). |
|
TAPE 2, B |
||
|
001 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Explains procedural
concerns and proposes recessing the meeting. States support for the - A8
amendments. |
|
025 |
Rep. Beyer |
Supports the -A8
amendments. |
|
026 |
Rep. Kropf |
Supports the -A8
amendments but does have some concerns. |
|
049 |
Chair Shields |
States he will recesses
the committee until 2 p.m. so the House members can go to chamber. |
|
068 |
Ralph Anderson |
Attorney for Cannon Creek
Game Farms. Supports the –A8 amendments and explains there are planning and
appeal process. |
|
108 |
Chair Shields |
Asks for his opinion on
the –A9 amendments. |
|
111 |
Anderson |
Answers that the “shall”
appears to require the county to take specific action. Believes that current
statutes address these issues. |
|
133 |
Chair Ferrioli |
States that the procedure
described is a lot of due process. |
|
154 |
Chair Shields |
Recesses the meeting at
10:45 a.m. |
|
AFTERNOON TAPE 3, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Shields |
Reconvenes the meeting at
2:33 and outlines proposed changes. Asks for discussion. |
|
055 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Notes senate rule 11-10
Sub 1. Explains that the Senate version reduces the three mile distance to a
half mile; the House version adds the grandfathering clause. Explains that
the conference committee needs to resolve the issue between the committees.
Reiterates the –A8 amendments. |
|
089 |
Chair Shields |
Responds that testimony
has emphasized grandfathering and mitigation. Notes the committee’s options. |
|
132 |
Rep. Kropf |
Comments on the concerns
expressed by the testimony and states that mitigation is needed to express to
the counties that they need to listen to the people. |
|
156 |
Sen. Shields |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of consideration of amendments outside the scope of the issue between the
houses. |
|
144 |
Chair Shields |
Explains his concerns and
the time restrictions. Comments on original use and conditional use. |
|
173 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Explains a permitted use
is not subservient to other land uses that are allowed. Notes there is a
compliant resolution process. |
|
197 |
Chair Shields |
Responds that a
conditional use permit can be lost if the parameters under which the permit
was granted are not honored. |
|
202 |
Jerod Broadfoot |
Oregon Chapters of Safari
Club International. Expresses concern about
grandfathering the hunters. |
|
Recesses momentarily |
||
|
318 |
Harrison Connely |
Deputy Legislative
Counsel. Reads the proposed new language. Subsection 3; if a use considered
for approval is a private hunting preserve licensed under ORS 497.248 the
local governing body or its designee shall consider imposing conditions to
mitigate conflicts with accepted farm or forest practices on surrounding
lands devoted to farm or forest use that are identified by the county. |
|
345 |
Broadfoot |
Asks why the term
“imposing” was added. |
|
348 |
Connelly |
Explains it is to use the
same verb in Section 2 and Section 3. |
|
376 |
Chair Shields |
Withdraws motion to suspend rules. |
|
416 |
Callens |
Clarifies that if there is
unanimous agreement to move forward on something it is not necessary to
suspend the rules. |
|
430 |
Rep. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 291-A 8 amendments dated
07/0103/03. |
|
432 |
Rep. Beyer |
Explains why she supports
the –A8 amendments. |
|
434 |
Rep. Gillman |
Seconds the motion. |
|
456 |
Rep. Kropf |
States that he does not
want to vote against the –A8 but would like to see compromise legislation. |
|
475 |
Chair Shields |
States that there needs to
be compromise. Recesses momentarily. |
|
TAPE 4, A |
||
|
026 |
Chair Shields |
States that there is a
motion on the table and the –A10 compromise is before the committee, (EXHIBIT F) |
|
037 |
|
VOTE: 4-1 AYE: 4 - Sen. Ferrioli, Rep. Beyer,
Rep. Gillman, Rep. Kropf NAY: 1 – Sen. Shields |
|
042 |
Chair
Shields |
The motion
Fails. |
|
048 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Requests information from
the counties regarding the –A10 amendments, specifically regarding increased
involvement of the legislature in conditional land uses. |
|
051 |
Art Schlack |
Responds there are a
number of conditional uses which are evaluated. The criteria is established
in statute and by the local governing body. Opposes the -A10 amendments.
Favors these decisions being addressed locally. |
|
107 |
Chair Shields |
Responds the language is
asking for the “consideration” of establishing conditions. |
|
136 |
Rep. Kropf |
Clarifies that it is Mr.
Schlack’s belief that the -A10 amendments will invite conditional use
legislation requests. |
|
148 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Discusses the options
available. |
|
166 |
Chair Shields |
Responds that every option
results in a delay unless the chair yields. |
|
180 |
Rep. Beyer |
States that the -A8
amendments provide a complaint process and are a good comprise. |
|
191 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Explains that it may not
possible to meet everyone’s principled position. Offers that another option
is to concur with the House version of
the bill. |
|
229 |
Chair Shields |
Reiterates that this is
“shall consider” clause and explains his position. |
|
262 |
Jinnings |
Comments that the issue of
conditional use could be taken under the consideration of a priority bill. |
|
300 |
Rep. Kropf |
Offers to use his last
priority bill and expresses his concerns. |
|
360 |
Chair Shields |
Adjourns the meeting at
3:45 p.m. |
|
The following prepared
testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony for SB 291A: |
||
|
|
Sen. Ferrioli |
Senate District 30.
Submits written testimony for Canyon Creek Game Farm (EXHIBIT G). |
|
|
Carrie McLaren |
1000 Friends of Oregon.
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT H). |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A.
SB 291A, Background Information, Roy Elicker, 2 pp
B.
SB 291A, correspondence, Roy Elicker and John Jinnings, 2 pp
C.
SB 291-A8 amendments dated 7/1/01, staff, 4 pp
D.
SB 291-A9 amendments dated 7/1/03, staff,
5 pp
E.
SB 291A, written testimony, Clint and Alesha Dern, 1 p
F.
SB 291-A10 amendments dated 7/1/03, staff, 4 pp
TESTIMONY
SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD
G.
SB 291A, written testimony from Canyon Creek Game Farm, Sen. Ted Ferrioli, 5 pp
H.
SB 291A, written testimony, 1000 Friends of Oregon - Carrie MacLaren, 1 p