SENATE COMMITTEE ON
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 28, 2003 Hearing
Room HR B
8:00 AM Tapes 75 - 77
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Frank Shields, Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer, Vice-Chair
Sen. Tony Corcoran
Sen. Bill Fisher
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
Patricia Nielsen, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2473A – Public Hearing
HB 3094A – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3013 – Public Hearing
HB 2754 – Public Hearing and Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 75, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Shields |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:10 a.m. Opens public hearing on HB 2473A. |
|
HB
2473A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Rep. Tom Butler |
District 60.
Testifies in support of HB 2473A, which repeals sunset of State
Department of Fish and Wildlife’s aquaculture products purchasing
program. Discusses –A2 amendments
dated 5-13-03 (EXHIBIT A). Submits written materials (EXHIBITS B, C). |
|
075 |
Chair Shields |
Asks about change to sunset provision in amendments. |
|
080 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains and reviews sunset provision. Discusses potential lawsuits. |
|
100 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks about –A2 not covering all issues, and need for
additional amendments. |
|
105 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds and explains concerns over the ten percent
purchase and potential hatchery closure. |
|
130 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks how private providers can raise fish less
expensively than government agency. |
|
135 |
Rep. Butler |
Discusses economics of private hatcheries. |
|
140 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks about proposed amendment. |
|
145 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains the ten percent limit is being addressed in
another amendment. |
|
160 |
Chair Shields |
Closes public hearing on HB 2473A. Opens public hearing on HB 3094A. |
|
HB
3094A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
175 |
Rep. Betsy Johnson |
District 31.
Testifies in support of HB 3094A, which allows State Fish and Wildlife
Commission to establish pilot program for sale of fish at locations away from
vessels participating in nontreaty Columbia River fisheries. |
|
200 |
Sen. Joan Dukes |
District 16.
Testifies in support of HB 3094A.
Discusses assistance to fishermen in difficult economic times. |
|
225 |
Jon Westerholm |
Columbia River Fishermen’s Protective Union. Testifies in support of HB 3094A. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT D). Discusses pricing of fish caught in the
Columbia River. Describes similar
legislation in process in Washington State. |
|
280 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about what species are covered. |
|
285 |
Westerholm |
Responds it covers all fish caught in Columbia. |
|
290 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks how the catches will be tracked. |
|
295 |
Rep. Johnson |
Advises Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
is prepared to draft rules immediately. |
|
325 |
Roy Elicker |
ODFW. Testifies in support of HB 3094A. |
|
340 |
Kay Brown |
ODFW.
Testifies in support of HB 3094A.
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
E). Explains support is partly
because it is a pilot program. |
|
360 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about compliance with Department of Agriculture
(DOA) rules regarding food handling and sales. |
|
370 |
Elicker |
Explains the DOA rules will apply. |
|
385 |
Chair Shields |
Asks about requirements for food handling. |
|
390 |
Elicker |
Responds the DOA will assist ODFW in rulemaking. |
|
400 |
Chair Shields |
Closes public hearing on HB 3094A. Opens work
session on HB 3094A. |
|
HB
3094A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
405 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Discusses fiscal and revenue impacts. |
|
410 |
Sen. Beyer
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3094A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
415 |
Chair Shields |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. DUKES will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
TAPE 76, A |
||
|
010 |
Chair Shields |
Closes work session on HB 3094A. Opens public hearing on HB 3013. |
|
HB 3013
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
015 |
Rep. Johnson |
District 31.
Testifies in opposition to HB 3013, which authorizes issuance of
permit for mining from resource site not included in inventory in
acknowledged comprehensive plan.
Discusses statewide planning Goal 5, regarding surface mining. Asserts mining is necessary but
destructive. |
|
060 |
Chair Shields |
Discusses issue of significant mining sites, and
asks if compromise is possible. |
|
070 |
Rep. Johnson |
Recommends amendment to put sideboards on activities
covered by HB 3013. Expresses concern
about Columbia County, where gravel is plentiful and negative impact on local
residents has been ignored. Offers to
work toward compromise. |
|
095 |
Chair Shields |
Reviews some concerns to be addressed by amendments. |
|
105 |
Rep. Johnson |
Describes appropriate sites between significant and
automatic conditional use permit.
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
F). |
|
125 |
Cliff Kenagy |
Farmer, Benton County. Testifies in opposition to HB 3013. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
G). |
|
135 |
Bruce Chapin |
Oregon Farm Bureau Federation Aggregate
Committee. Testifies in opposition to
HB 3013. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT H). Discusses Goal 5 requirements. |
|
225 |
Art Schlack |
Association of Oregon Counties (AOC). Testifies in support of HB 3013. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT I). Discusses process of locating quarries. |
|
270 |
Chair Shields |
Asks about balance between small sites which cannot
afford to go through the Goal 5 process and other potential approaches. |
|
280 |
Schlack |
Acknowledges there are other possibilities. |
|
285 |
Chair Shields |
Asks about alternatives and compromise. |
|
295 |
Schlack |
Discusses history of permitting process and
possibilities. |
|
310 |
Doug Tindall |
State Maintenance Engineer, Oregon Department of
Transportation (ODOT). Submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT J). Describes ODOT processes for operation of
small sites for road-building. Explains
some pits do not qualify for conditional use permits, which makes permitting
more complicated and expensive. |
|
370 |
Chair Shields |
Asks for clarification and alternatives. |
|
380 |
Tindall |
Defers to land use experts at Department of Land
Conservation and Development (DLCD) for suggesting language. |
|
395 |
Chair Shields |
Asks about work group discussions on compromise. |
|
TAPE 75, B |
||
|
005 |
Tindall |
Explains some sites are used, then not used so
permit lapses, and then re-permitted, so need language to cover that
actuality. Expresses concern that
companies will not invest in producing aggregate to fulfill road-building
contracts. |
|
025 |
Liz Frenkel |
League of Women Voters. Testifies in opposition to HB 3013. Discusses alternatives and expresses concern over agricultural
rights. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT K). |
|
075 |
Frank Parisi |
Attorney.
Testifies in support of HB 3013.
Discusses alternative language to reach the goal for changing
conditional use permit process.
Describes isolated markets and areas with unusual geology which need
access to the conditional use permit process. |
130 |
Mike Crennen |
Roseburg Paving, Beaver State Sand and Gravel. Testifies in support of HB 3013. Discusses attempts to excavate a Douglas
County site with a conditional use permit.
Explains the Goal 5 rules are incomplete and are focused only on the
Willamette Valley. |
|
235 |
Rich Angstrom |
President, Oregon Concrete and Aggregate Producers
Association (OCAPA). Testifies in
support of HB 3013. Submits written
testimony (EXHIBIT L). Discusses rights of landowners to exploit
mineral resources on their property. Asserts
the conditional use process is far less costly and lengthy than the Goal 5
process. Describes 1996 agreement
between farm bureau and aggregate producers (EXHIBIT M). Offers to
work during the interim on specific compromise. |
|
400 |
Chair Shields |
Asks whether the measure puts back the system in
place before the Beaver Creek case, or does more. |
|
405 |
Angstrom |
Discusses other possible language to reach a
compromise. Discusses review by OCAPA
membership for possible collateral effects and intent for a return to status
quo. |
|
TAPE 76, B |
||
|
020 |
Chair Shields |
Comments on importance of aggregate to state
building projects. Asks about effect
of proposed amendments on aggregate industry. |
|
040 |
Angstrom |
Responds and offers to enter into discussions. Discusses increased costs to
transportation and building projects without some change. |
|
085 |
Gary Lynch |
Assistant Director, Department of Geology and
Mineral Industries (DOGAMI). Explains
Goal 5 process is effective, but expensive and cumbersome. Recommends some type of conditional use
process for small sites. Pledges
support to interim discussions. |
|
115 |
Bob Rindy |
DLCD.
Testifies in support of HB 3013.
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
N). Offers support for interim
discussions. Explains the measure is
intended to return the system to the status quo. Acknowledges potential effects outside the intent. |
|
155 |
Chair Shields |
Clarifies the measure does not exactly restore the
status quo and further discussions are needed. |
|
165 |
Rindy |
Confirms.
Communicates agreement from Governor’s office to work on amendments. |
|
200 |
Carrie MacLaren |
1000 Friends of Oregon. Testifies in opposition to HB 3013. Discusses Beaver State case decision and requirement for
inventory on significant sites.
Describes importance of agriculture industry. Refers to amendments in process. Offers to work toward better balance in
statute and to participate in discussions.
|
|
265 |
Don Schellenberg |
Oregon Farm Bureau.
Discusses conditional use process and Goal 5 process. Offers to work toward compromise: ·
Maintain inventory
requirement but add language to provide for non-significant sites and grandfather
in sites already in existence ·
Allow mining on
farmland under certain circumstances ·
Allow small parcel
exemption for mining permit ·
Add sunset provision
to allow further discussion |
|
330 |
Chair Shields |
Asks whether all the proposed amendments are
necessary to return to the status quo. |
|
335 |
Schellenberg |
Responds probably not. |
|
340 |
Chair Shields |
Comments the Governor’s office wants a week to work
on amendments. Recommends finding a
compromise measure and continuing discussions during the interim. |
|
380 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks about conducting an inventory at the county
level. |
|
TAPE 77, A |
||
|
005 |
Schellenberg |
Explains the county should be doing an inventory
under Goal 5. |
|
010 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks how to get small parcels on some type of
inventory. |
|
015 |
Schellenberg |
Recommends a case by case basis. Describes how an owner brings a parcel to
county’s attention and asks for parcel to be put on inventory, which might be
mined right away or later. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for HB 3013: |
||
|
|
Mark Tipperman |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT O). |
|
020 |
Chair Shields |
Closes public hearing on HB 3013. Reopens public hearing on HB 2473A. |
|
HB
2473A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
025 |
Chair Shields |
Advises amendments are not ready. |
|
030 |
Joe Rohleder |
Representing Desert Springs Trout Farm. Testifies in support of HB 2473A. Discusses amendments proposed after the
measure passed the house, in connection with proposed –A2 amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
080 |
Tom MacDonald |
Desert Springs Trout Farm. Testifies in support of HB 2473A. Submits photographs and letter from Steve Koch (EXHIBITS P, Q). Discusses trout-raising operation. |
|
110 |
Chair Shields |
Asks about Diamond Lake tui chub problem. |
|
115 |
MacDonald |
Advises a larger trout can eat the chub. |
|
120 |
Chair Shields |
Asks about cost of stocking larger fish versus
poisoning the chub. |
|
125 |
MacDonald |
Responds about $100,000 to $150,000 per year. Continues the warmer water in his area
causes the fish to grow much faster. |
|
140 |
Chair Shields |
Advises amendments are coming, Closes public hearing on HB 2473A. Opens public hearing on HB 2754. |
|
HB 2754
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
150 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Presents overview of HB 2754, which allows soil and water
conservation district to acquire conservation easement and highway scenic
preservation easement. |
|
165 |
John McDonald |
Oregon Association of Conservation Districts;
Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District. Testifies in support of HB 2754. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
R). |
|
180 |
Chair Shields |
Closes public hearing on HB 2754. Opens work session on HB 2754. |
|
HB 2754
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
185 |
Sen. Beyer
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2754 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. |
|
190 |
Chair Shields |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. BEYER
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
195 |
Chair Shields |
Closes work session on HB 2754. Adjourns the meeting at 10:15 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2473A, -A2 amendment (5-13-03), staff, 2 pp
B
– HB 2473A, written testimony, Rep. Tom Butler, 1 p
C
– HB 2473A, written testimony, Rep. Tom Butler, 16 pp
D
– HB 3094A, written testimony, Jon Westerholm, 1 p
E
– HB 3094A, written testimony, Kay Brown, 1 p
F
– HB 3013, written testimony, Rep. Betsy Johnson, 2 pp
G
– HB 3013, written testimony, Clif Kenagy, 1 p
H
– HB 3013, written testimony, Bruce Chapin, 8 pp
I
– HB 3013, written testimony, Art Schlack, 1 p
J
– HB 3013, written testimony, Doug Tindall, 1 p
K
– HB 3013, written testimony, Liz Frenkel, 1 p
L
– HB 3013, written testimony, Rich Angstrom, 2 pp
M
– HB 3013, written agreement, Rich Angstrom, 3 pp
N
– HB 3013, written testimony, Bob Rindy, 1 p
O
– HB 3013, written testimony, Mark Tipperman, 2 pp
P
– HB 2473A, photographs, Tom MacDonald, 3 pp
Q
– HB 2473A, letter from Steve Koch, Tom MacDonald, 1 p
R
– HB 2754, written testimony, John McDonald, 4 pp