SENATE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
March 19, 2003 Hearing
Room B
3:00 p.m. Tapes
25-26
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Tony Corcoran, Chair
Sen. John Minnis, Vice-Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Mark Ellsworth, Committee
Administrator
Heather Gravelle, Committee
Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 724 – Public Hearing
HB 2004 –Public
Hearing
SB 692 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 25, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Corcoran |
Calls meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Opens public hearing on SB 724. |
|
SB 724
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
015 |
Mark Ellsworth |
Committee Administrator provides overview of SB 724. |
|
025 |
Jon Stubenvoll |
Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC). Testifies in support of 724 provides
written testimony and history of the bill (EXHIBIT A). |
|
045 |
Art Hendricks |
Crime Prevention Manager, City of Portland. Testifies
in support of SB 724 provides written testimony and explains the need for extending
the application process for liquor licenses from thirty to sixty days (EXHIBIT B). |
|
135 |
Chair Corcoran |
Offers an example of most recent problem with the
thirty day limit licensing in a high risk area. |
|
140 |
Hendricks |
Explains the sixty day time period will allow the
city enough time to give notification to neighborhoods and for them to
respond. |
|
173 |
Chair Corcoran |
States a manager at the time of application was legitimate
but his brother became involved in the business and had crime issues asks
would the sixty days make a difference. |
|
175 |
Hendricks |
Answers and explains and notes the neighborhoods are
holding us accountable. |
|
195 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks what is it that you are supporting. |
|
200 |
Hendricks |
Answers in support of the bill that sixty days would
be best that forty-five would not solve the problem. |
|
205 |
Christy Monson |
League of Oregon Cities. Testifies in support of SB
724 and explains the concern of creating a good working relationship and
states it takes more than thirty days to investigate a complaint (EXHIBIT C). |
|
240 |
Sen. Starr |
Notes the verbiage change is not just new license
but includes renewals. |
|
255 |
Chair Corcoran |
Points out and clarifies intent of bill. |
|
260 |
Sen. Morrisette |
District 6.
Testifies in support of SB 724 and explains that thirty days may be
alright for the smaller cities but for the larger ones the sixty days is a
reasonable request. |
|
325 |
Chair Corcoran |
Closes public hearing on SB 724. Opens public
hearing on HB 2004 A. |
|
HB 2004
A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
335 |
Gregory Hartman |
PERS Coalition. Testifies and provides information
on actuarial equivalencies contract issues and explains the findings of Judge
Lipscomb’s in HB 2003 and HB 2004 and states it is too early to know what
PERS is going to do (EXHIBIT D). |
|
TAPE 26, A |
||
|
001 |
Hartman |
Continues to explain this is a very complex issue. |
|
030 |
Chair Corcoran |
Asks Minnis if he is comfortable with Hartman’s
explanation. |
|
040 |
Sen. Minnis |
Agrees and states Mr. Hartman encapsulates the
difficulty. |
|
050 |
Hartman |
Responds and mentions what can be done while the
appeal moves forward. |
|
070 |
Sen. Minnis |
States there are no stays in place currently and
asks what does the Legislature contribute to the decision at this time. |
|
085 |
Hartman |
Asks do we want to put something in place and wait
until we see what happens with the Lipscomb decision. |
|
090 |
Sen. Minnis |
Notes the Legislature did this when they enacted the
existing statute. |
|
095 |
Chair Corcoran |
Notes it raises the issue of what will happen after
it gets moved up to the Supreme Court. |
|
110 |
Hartman |
Responds and provides information as to where the
case is in the system and states hoping to have it all before the court at
the same time. |
|
125 |
Sen. Walker |
Indicates there are too many hands in the pot and
states the PERS board has been limited as to what they can do. |
|
135 |
Hartman |
Responds in agreement and notes the legislature was
differing what the Board wanted to do. |
|
145 |
Chair Corcoran |
States the board is in transition. |
|
155 |
Sen. Minnis |
Asks do you simply ignore Lipscomb’s decision. |
|
160 |
Hartman |
Answers no matter what the legislature does lawsuits
will follow. |
|
170 |
Sen. Minnis |
Notes the contract issue but the legal argument is
what will be presented. |
|
175 |
Hartman |
Answers not necessarily and describes the multiple
segment approach and the accrued benefit approach and states both are
consistent with contract rights. |
|
300 |
Sen. Minnis |
Asks if we are not defending what Lipscomb said. |
|
315 |
Hartman |
Responds Lipscomb was not very clear and his opinion
is not helpful in giving direction in what is the right thing to do and adds
the PERS Board has studied this issue extensively. |
|
400 |
Chair Corcoran |
States PERS has not shared the same opinion as the Attorney
General and asks how do we ask the PERS Board for specific information. |
|
430 |
Voytko |
Answers request the information and he will work
with Attorney General to convey to the members and notes that the Legislature
is part of the governing body of the pension system. |
|
452 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Indicates consider the request made. |
|
TAPE 25, B |
||
|
030 |
Sen. Minnis |
Asks if we have presentation as to what the stock
market would do to the fifteen million dollar gap. |
|
045 |
Voytko |
Responds to the financial health of the pension
system and to Lipscomb’s point of view and states the Legislative action
could define the course. |
|
075 |
Sen. Minnis |
Asks to what extent would the management personnel
issues in the government and market changes affect the fifteen million dollar
problem. |
|
080 |
Voytko |
Notes the willingness to do a presentation on the
issues addressed. |
|
081 |
Sen. Minnis |
Asks what is it we are trying to solve and notes the
focus should be on identifying the problem. |
|
085 |
Chair Corcoran |
Closes public hearing on HB 2004 and re-opens public
hearing on SB 724. |
|
SB 724
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
090 |
Bill Perry |
Oregon Restaurant Association. Testifies in favor of
SB 724 only with the – 1 amendments and explains if needed an extension for
application process may be requested that they haven’t been approved in a
timely manner. |
|
140 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if OLCC addressed the delay in licensing. |
|
145 |
Stubenvoll |
Responds the thirty day goal has had delays due to budget
cuts and employee shortages and states currently it is about 90 days. |
|
160 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if the -1 amendment were addressed. |
|
165 |
Subenvboll |
Responds the amendment is no problem they state it impacts
local government and improves the relationship between local governments and
the states in the liquor licensing process. |
|
180 |
Chair Corcoran |
Notes the complexity of a multi state restaurant
chain with multiple owners and asks if there could be a different criteria
for each. |
|
195 |
Perry |
Responds the issue is getting license in a timely manner
and there is nothing showing me the time line will move up. |
|
220 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the wording in the amendment changing the
licensee to person. |
|
225 |
Stubenvoll |
Answers it is just a clean up of the statute that a
licensee is a person. |
|
235 |
Perry |
Clarifies the bills intent. |
|
255 |
Chair Corcoran |
Recommends the two parties discuss and come back
before the committee after they have resolved the issues. Closes public hearing on SB 724 and opens public
hearing on SB 692. |
|
SB 692
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
260 |
Mark Ellsworth |
Committee Administrator. Summarizes SB 692. |
|
265 |
Gerald Kubiak |
Washington County Government Affairs. Testifies in support of SB 692 provides
written testimony and explains the bill will authorize the governing body of
the district to perform treasury functions (EXHIBIT E). |
|
275 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks for an explanation of what the amendments do. |
|
320 |
Kubiak |
Describes the changes clarify the consent of the
county treasurer to make the change only if they are an elected treasurer and
an officer of the district to assume treasurers responsibilities. |
|
352 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Closes public hearing on SB 692 and opens a work
session on SB 692. |
|
SB 692
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
0353 |
Sen.
Minnis |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 692-1 amendments dated
03/17/03. |
|
354 |
|
VOTE:
4-0 |
|
|
Chair Corcoran |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
354 |
Sen. Minnis |
MOTION: Moves SB 692A to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation. |
|
355 |
|
VOTE:
4-0 |
|
|
Chair Corcoran |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. STARR will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
367 |
Sen. Walker |
Notes not having enough explanation of the bill |
|
368 |
Chair Corcoran |
Closes
work session on SB 692 A and adjourns committee meeting at 5:45 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 724, written testimony, Jon Stubenvoll, 2 pp
B
– SB 724, written testimony, Art Hendricks, 3 pp
C
– SB 724, written testimony, Christy Monson, 2 pp
D
– HB 2004, written testimony, Gregory A. Hartman, 2 pp
E
– SB 692, written testimony, Gerald Kubiak, 1 p