SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH POLICY
March 6, 2003 Hearing
Room B
1:00 PM Tapes
31 - 32
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Bill Morrisette, Chair
Sen. Bill Fisher, Vice-Chair
Sen. John Minnis
Sen. Frank Shields
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Marjorie Taylor, Administrator
Saranelle Allen, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 435 - Public Hearing
SB 434 – Public
Hearing and Work Session
SB 436 - Public Hearing and Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 31, A |
||
|
008 |
Chair Morrisette |
Convenes meeting at 1:11 p.m. Explains that the previously scheduled
informational meeting will be rescheduled.
Opens a public hearing on SB 435 . |
|
SB 435
- PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
|
Marjorie Taylor |
Administrator.
Explains bill and submits letters from Stephen McConnel and John
McCulley in opposition to SB 435 (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
023 |
Rep. Phil Barnhart |
District 11.
Testifies in support of SB 435.
Reviews pain treatment and scope of practice issues. |
|
|
Dr. Allan Chino |
Clinical Health Psychologist. Testifies in favor of SB 435. States that an email in opposition was received
today from John McCulley, Oregon Psychiatric Association |
|
|
Sen. Walker |
Asks questions on content of the email and asks that
it be submitted as record (EXHIBIT B). |
|
097 |
Rep. Barnhart |
States further clarification on treatment methods. |
|
|
Rep. Barnhart |
Replies concerning medical care without their
certified scope of practice. |
|
|
Chino |
States type of diagnosis which could occur and place
a person in a mental illness classification. |
|
|
Sen. Fisher |
Raises question on wording on the bill as to
interpretation of ‘medical care’. |
|
217 |
Chino |
Replies on treatment outside scope of practice. |
|
|
Sen. Fisher |
States the wording may leave scope clarification
open for interpretation. |
|
|
Rep. Barnhart |
Gives additional testimony on treatment. |
|
|
Chino |
Relates a concern on how treatment by psychological
physician puts a tag on the individual as having mental problems, when it’s
actually pain care that is required. |
|
|
Sen. Fisher |
Expresses concerns that bill is too open to interpretation. |
|
353 |
Chino |
Explains the need for legislation to care for people
with chronic pain problems. |
|
|
Sen. Shields |
States his understanding on the intent of the bill. |
|
|
Sen. Fisher |
Asks for clarification on the wording of the bill to
fit the need. |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
Asks if it’s a problem to change the wording on the
bill in an amendment. |
|
435 |
Chino |
Feels that wording could be developed and fine tuned
to suit all concerns. |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
Asks Sen. Fisher if he has a recommendation in the
language. |
|
|
Sen. Fisher |
Suggests limiting it to referred medical conditions
that the diagnosing physician would send.
Asks question of Chino. |
|
Tape 32, A |
||
|
008 |
Chino |
States he rarely receives referrals from psychiatrists;
mostly come from other physicians. The
reason is due to his field being the chronic pain area. |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
Closes the public hearing. Suggests a combined effort with Sen. Fisher to develop the
wording and return for a work session. |
|
SB 434
- PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
022 |
Chair Morrisette |
Opens public hearing on SB 434. |
|
|
Sen. Shields |
Introduces United Methodist visitors in the audience. |
|
030 |
Marjorie Taylor |
Administrator.
Explains the bill. |
|
|
Sen. Joan Dukes |
District 16.
Testifies for a -1 amendment to SB 434 (EXHIBIT C). Gives
explanation of the amendment. |
|
|
Kathy Hahn |
Doctor of Pharmacy and Chair, Oregon Pain Management
Commission. Testifies in support of
SB 434. |
|
065 |
Bruce Johnson |
Assistant Executive Director, Board of Medical
Examiners. Submits written testimony from
Kathleen Haley, Executive Director of the Board of Medical Examiners in
support of SB 434 (EXHIBIT D). Gives additional information on what their
board is doing to meet the requirements of the proposed legislation. |
|
129 |
Glenda Walton |
RN.
Testifies as a chronic pain patient.
Expresses support of the bill and explains how the treatment program classifies
you as a drug user. |
|
|
Dr. Allan Chino |
Clinical Health Psychologist. Explains he is a co-author of a book recently
published on chronic pain and the cover-up by the pain management field. Explains the problems of access. |
|
233 |
Chair Morrisette |
Closes public hearing, and opens a work session |
|
SB –
434 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
234 |
Sen.
Fisher |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 434-1 amendments dated
3/4/03 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
238 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
240 |
Sen.
Fisher |
MOTION: Moves SB 434 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
243 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 Aye.
In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. DUKES will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
Closes work session on SB 434. |
|
SB 436
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
310 |
Chair Morrisette |
Opens public hearing on SB 436. |
|
|
Marjorie Taylor |
Administrator.
Explains bill, and submits correspondence received from Dr. Paul
Stull, Dr. Joseph Dunn, and Dr. Donna Morgan in support of SB 436 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
|
Sen. Joan Dukes |
District 16.
Explains bill, and talks about the changes, and the requirement for a
second opinion for intractable pain. Submits
written testimony from Dr. Harry Rinehart, MD (EXHIBIT F). |
|
|
Kathy Hahn |
Doctor of Pharmacy.
Available for any questions. |
|
|
Sen. Fisher |
Asks Hahn if referrals come from her practice or
prescription patterns. |
|
|
Sen. Dukes |
Advises that this is the only condition for which
the law mandates in statute a second opinion; no other condition requires
this level of opinion. |
|
|
Sen. Minnis |
Suggests restoring language in current law, but give
specific authorization to a physician for a number of days for pain, and the
physician then could make a referral.
Suggests placing a prohibition on refilling the prescription until
criteria met. |
|
|
Sen. Dukes |
Restates the intent of the proposed amendment to the
bill. Explains time loss and extended
costs of care. |
|
|
Sen. Minnis |
Reviews his intent to accommodate both sides. |
|
Tape 31, B |
||
|
005 |
Hahn |
Relates concern for people who are chronic pain
sufferers, and should not be judged as drug addicts. |
|
020 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks how medical profession would feel about
continued education in taking a refresher course in pain management. |
|
|
Hahn |
Reviews that the Wisconsin Pain and Policy group
would like to come to Oregon again and implement a retraining. |
|
|
Sen. Shields |
Supports the bill, and asks how our restrictions compare
to other states. |
|
|
Hahn |
Gives details, and more specifically the ‘second
opinion’ issue. |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
Closes public hearing and opens a work session |
|
SB 436
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
056 |
Sen.
Fisher |
MOTION: Moves SB 436 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
057 |
|
VOTE:
5-1 AYE: 5 - Fisher, Shields, C. Starr, Walker, Morrisette NAY: 1 - Minnis |
|
|
Chair Morrisette |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. DUKES will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
070 |
Chair Morrisette |
Adjourns the meeting at 2:16 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 435, written testimony, Stephen S. McConnel, 2 pp.
B
– SB 435, email copy, Allen Chino, 1 p.
C
– SB 434-1, proposed amendment, Senator Joan Dukes, 1 p.
D
– SB 434, written testimony, Bruce Johnson, 1 p.
E
– SB 436, written testimony, Dr. Paul Stull, J. Dunn, D. Morgan, 2 pp.
F
– SB 436, written testimony, Senator Joan Dukes, 5 pp.