SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
February 04, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
15 - 16
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 59 Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 52 Public Hearing
SB 65 Public Hearing
and Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 15, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:10 a.m. Opens a public hearing on SB 59. |
|
SB 59 –
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Erin Olson |
Multnomah County District Attorneys Office. Testifies in support of SB 59 that extends
period during which forfeiture counsel must file criminal information or
indictment for criminal forfeiture. |
|
022 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on SB 59 and opens a work
session. |
|
SB 59 –
WORK SESSION |
||
|
023 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves SB 59 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
028 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
035 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on SB 59 and opens a public
hearing on SB 52. |
|
SB 52 –
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
050 |
Pat Callahan |
Multnomah County District Attorney. Testifies in support of SB 52 which
creates crime of aggravated identity theft.
Explains the purpose for the task force. |
|
160 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for example of identity theft. |
|
163 |
Callahan |
Explains how identity theft takes place. |
|
170 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks difference between mail theft and identity
theft. |
|
173 |
Callahan |
Talks about when mail theft becomes identity theft. |
|
181 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses the degree of theft involved. |
|
195 |
Callahan |
Offers further clarification. |
|
200 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks definition of a class B felony. |
|
230 |
Callahan |
Explains crime seriousness. |
|
260 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Wonders how the 180-day time period was chosen. |
|
279 |
Callahan |
Discusses the time period. |
|
296 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks about first offense prosecution. |
|
305 |
Callahan |
Explains first offense. |
|
325 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about crime classification. |
|
338 |
Callahan |
Explains an aggravated theft. |
|
386 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks for comparable offense definition. |
|
398 |
Callahan |
Says it is defined case by case. |
|
TAPE 16 A |
||
|
024 |
Susan Russell |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. Submits testimony and testifies in
opposition to SB 52. Says it is based
on pre-existing identity theft statute (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
064 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for clarification of a particular act of
identify theft. |
|
066 |
Russell |
Explains the intent to deceive. |
|
068 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks about criminal intent. |
|
075 |
Russell |
Agrees that there is a burden of proof. |
|
085 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks about using an alias without criminal intent. |
|
089 |
Russell |
Gives examples of intent to deceive. |
|
100 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Wonders about telephone solicitation when someone
uses a name not their own, and if this could be criminalized under this
statute. |
|
114 |
Russell |
Replies that it depends on certain circumstances. |
|
147 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Says telemarketing cannot be prosecuted under current law. |
|
164 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks about other bills being presented during this
session. |
|
172 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Wonders if there are opportunities to consider the
other bills. |
|
186 |
Sen. Ringo |
Expresses some concern about SB 52 as written. |
|
205 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks how “intent” is defined. |
|
210 |
Russell |
Provides a definition. |
|
258 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks about giving false information. |
|
264 |
Prins |
Explains attempt to allude. |
|
280 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks under what statute the example given would be
prosecuted. |
|
288 |
Prins |
Talks about his experience in prosecuting these
kinds of cases. |
|
340 |
Tim Martinez |
Oregon Bankers Association. Talks about how identity theft has become
such a large issue. Expresses a
desire to be involved in a task force. |
|
380 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Inquires about the other bills being considered. |
|
388 |
Martinez |
Says they are currently in the House for
consideration. |
|
423 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on SB 52 and opens a
public hearing on SB 65. |
|
SB 65 –
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
006 |
Deena Clark |
Portland Police Bureau. Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 65 that
modifies crime of sexual assault of animals (EXHIBIT B). |
|
041 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on SB 65 and opens a work
session. |
|
SB 65 –
WORK SESSION |
||
|
042 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves SB 65 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
050 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
051 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. RINGO will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
056 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on SB 65. |
|
058 |
Prins |
Introduces LC 2051 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
066 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves LC 2051 BE INTRODUCED as a committee
bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
069 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
070 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on SB 65 and adjourns the
meeting at 9:10 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 52, written testimony submitted by Susan Russell, 2 pp
B
– SB 65, written testimony submitted by Deena Clark, 7 pp
C
– LC 2051, submitted by staff, 3 pp