SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
February 19, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
33-34
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 175 Public Hearing
SB 178 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 33, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:12 a.m. and opens a
public hearing on SB 175. |
|
SB 175
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
012 |
Paul Donheffner |
Oregon State Marine Board. Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 175 that
modifies provisions relating to operating a boat under influence of
intoxicants (EXHIBIT A). |
|
045 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if alcohol is the only substance that applies
in this statute. |
|
050 |
Donheffner |
Replies that it is not limited to alcohol. |
|
065 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Provides clarification of underage drivers versus underage boaters (EXHIBIT B). |
|
079 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks how this legislation would interact with
current law prohibiting the possession of alcohol by a minor. |
|
078 |
Prins |
Explains what charges could be made. |
|
090 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if a boat can be impounded. |
|
097 |
Donheffner |
Says there is no provision for impounding a boat. Discusses what might happen to a boat. |
|
121 |
Kelly Skye |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (OCDLA). Testifies in opposition to SB 175. |
|
164 |
Chair Minnis |
Says there would have to be some proof of alcohol
consumption to enforce this statute. |
|
175 |
Skye |
Agrees this to be true under current law, but not if
this statute is enacted. |
|
182 |
Chair Minnis |
Wonders if this law would overturn probable cause. |
|
192 |
Skye |
Says it would not, but concerning minors, reasonable
suspicion would be enough. |
|
205 |
Chair Minnis |
Explains his disagreement. |
|
242 |
Skye |
Discusses the difference between a Driving Under the
Influence of Intoxicants (DUII) and a Boating Under the Influence of
Intoxicants (BUII). Says there is no
diversion program for a BUII. |
|
316 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if a minor in possession has a record for the
rest of his life. |
|
320 |
Skye |
Says, no. |
|
324 |
Prins |
Asks if all boats are covered under this bill. |
|
329 |
Skye |
Says, yes. |
|
342 |
Prins |
Explains what is included under “all boats”
category. |
|
365 |
Sen. Walker |
Wonders about a particular application of this
legislation. |
|
383 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about diversion statutes that might apply to
boating. |
|
390 |
Donheffner |
Says there is no formal statewide program. |
|
405 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if it would be appropriate to create one. |
|
409 |
Donheffner |
Says the Board would be open to discussion. |
|
423 |
Sen. Ringo |
Questions enacting a zero-tolerance law. |
|
435 |
Donheffner |
Explains the definition of zero-tolerance with
regard to minors. |
|
462 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks for clarification of what is being asked by
this legislation. |
|
468 |
Donheffner |
Explains why this legislation is being presented. |
|
492 |
Prins |
Gives a further clarification. |
|
TAPE 34, A |
||
|
032 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks what a comparable penalty in boating would be
to a suspension. |
|
035 |
Donheffner |
Says there is no comparable penalty since there is
no license to revoke. |
|
043 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about charges for minors in possession. |
|
042 |
Donheffner |
Clarifies this charge could be made. |
|
072 |
Sen. Ringo |
Comments that he does not see a deterrent in this
legislation. |
|
088 |
Donheffner |
Says he believes there are deterrents in sending the
message of zero-tolerance. |
|
111 |
Chair Minnis |
Feels this bill would impart a stricter penalty than
driving penalty. |
|
127 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on SB 175 and opens a
public hearing on SB 178. |
|
SB 178 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
141 |
Richard Franklin |
Gresham, Oregon. Testifies in opposition to SB 178
which modifies definition of extreme fighting. Says the statute is over-broad. |
|
223 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks what is not wanted in regulation. |
|
225 |
Franklin |
Explains what is not wanted. |
|
250 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks for some background on Mr. Franklin. |
|
252 |
Franklin |
Gives background. |
|
267 |
Matt Lindland |
Eagle Creek, Oregon. Discusses his experience with
amateur wrestling. Opposes SB 178. |
|
299 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if he is referring to SB 178 or current law
when he says it is overly broad. |
|
278 |
Lindland |
Says he is referring to SB 178. |
|
305 |
Franklin |
Talks about tax on gate receipts. |
|
327 |
Chair Minnis |
Recalls a time when the Boxing and Wrestling
Commission did not sanction any events at all in the state of Oregon. |
|
338 |
Chael Sonnen |
Tualatin, Oregon. Testifies in opposition to SB 178. |
|
376 |
Franklin |
Discusses extreme fighting. Says it is run by strict guidelines and
safety rules, but the State has been trying to shut them down. |
|
426 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for an understanding of extreme fighting. |
|
428 |
Franklin |
Describes what it involves. |
|
TAPE 33, B |
||
|
026 |
Sonnen |
Believes that taxing and regulating is the issue,
and an amateur sport has never been regulated. |
|
050 |
Lindland |
Says this is a mixed marshal arts event with rules
and regulations, and labeling it as extreme fighting is unfair. |
|
084 |
Robert Miller |
Gaming Enforcement Division, Oregon State
Police. Submits testimony and
testifies in support of SB 178 (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
135 |
Roland Iparraguirre |
Department of Justice. Submits testimony and
testifies in support of SB 178 (EXHIBIT
D). |
|
188 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if significant injury is an assumption. |
|
198 |
Iparraguirre |
Says it is hard to know since the state does not
regulate this activity. |
|
202 |
Chair Minnis |
Thinks that there is a need to identify significant
harm. |
|
240 |
Miller |
Says there are stories on the internet about extreme
fighting and grave injuries. |
|
291 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks how this kind of event would be regulated. |
|
294 |
Miller |
Says they would ban these events. |
|
329 |
Chair Minnis |
Contends that a ban is unjustified just because it
is offensive to some. |
|
351 |
Sen. Ringo |
Suggests that there needs to be evidence of physical
harm. Wonders why amateur wrestling
is considered a law enforcement issue. |
|
399 |
Miller |
Explains how the State Police got involved. |
|
407 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Asks for clarification of an amateur event. |
|
418 |
Iparraguirre |
Discusses amateur wrestling and boxing. |
|
475 |
Prins |
Asks if there is an exemption process for private clubs
to host events. |
|
483 |
Miller |
Says consistency is the primary concern. |
|
TAPE 34, B |
||
|
031 |
Chair Minnis |
Inquires about the licensing of a “security officer.” |
|
041 |
Iparraguirre |
Explains his understanding. |
|
056 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks how long this kind of fighting has been going
on. |
|
055 |
Iparraguirre |
Says about 1 1/2 years. |
|
061 |
Chair Minnis |
Maintains that additional justification is needed to
prohibit this kind of fighting. |
|
073 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on SB 178 and adjourns the
meeting at 9:40 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 175, written testimony submitted by Paul Donheffner, 2 pp
B
– SB 178, printed material provided by staff, 1 p
C
– SB 178, written testimony submitted by Robert Miller, 2 pp
D
– SB 178, printed material submitted by Roland Iparraguirre, 28 pp