SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
March 13, 2003 Hearing
Room HR 343
8:00 A.M. Tapes
57 - 58
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Vicki Walker
Sen. Peter Courtney, ex
officio
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Bill Joseph, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 397 Public Hearing
SB 466 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 57, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:15 a.m. and opens a
public hearing on SB 397. |
|
SB 397 PUBLIC
HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Shawn Miller |
Oregon Grocery Association. Submits testimony and
testifies in support of SB 397 that establishes three-year statute of
limitation for civil action based on shoplifting or taking of agricultural
produce (EXHIBIT A). |
|
032 |
Shannon Poe |
Winco Foods.
Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 397 (EXHIBIT B). Talks about the length of time it takes to
track some shoplifters down and collect on debts incurred. |
|
060 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks what statute applied in the example given. |
|
063 |
Miller |
Says it was ORS 12.130, a law that was created in
the late 1800’s. |
|
115 |
Chair Minnis |
Expresses concern about the retroactive portion of
the bill. |
|
122 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Advises that getting rid of that
portion would eliminate any potential problem. Asks if there is a problem with eliminating that part of the
bill. |
|
134 |
Miller |
Says it is not a problem. |
|
137 |
Sen. Ringo |
Comments about the statute of limitation on conversion
already being six years. |
|
144 |
Chair Minnis |
Considers the options. |
|
155 |
Miller |
Says he would be very supportive of a
cross-reference in the statutes. |
|
164 |
Joseph |
Advises the need to look into the issue further. |
|
172 |
Chair Minnis |
Suggests getting rid of the retro section. Closes the public hearing on SB 397 and
opens a public hearing on SB 466. |
|
SB 466
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
181 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Explains that SB 466 creates crimes of unlawful use of theft detection
shielding device and unlawful use of theft detection device deactivator or
remover. |
|
190 |
Julie Brandis |
Associated Oregon Industries. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of SB 466 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
274 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the manufacture of detection shielding
devices. |
|
287 |
Brandis |
Replies that she is not sure if there is intentional
manufacture of such a product. |
|
321 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Wonders about creating a crime of intent instead of
enhancing the penalty. |
|
341 |
Brandis |
Replies that this legislation is modeled after what
other states have done. |
|
376 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks for clarification from committee counsel of
intent to shoplift. |
|
386 |
Prins |
Explains what would be considered intent by a
prosecutor. |
|
416 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Explains
that she would like to review other approaches used in last session’s bills. |
|
444 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks when SB 739, relating to a similar crime, will
be heard. |
|
448 |
Brandis |
Says SB 739 will be heard on March 17 in the
Business and Labor Committee. |
|
452 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks for an understanding of “electronic” devices. |
|
485 |
Shannon Poe |
Winco Foods. Explains what electronic devices are. |
|
TAPE 58, A |
||
|
035 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks if one can be screened from a video camera as
well. |
|
040 |
Poe |
Replies that being invisible to a video camera is
impossible. |
|
043 |
Chair Minnis |
Talks about making the electronic devices
inoperable. |
|
057 |
Poe |
Says in 12 years, he has only seen that happen once. |
|
069 |
Brandis |
Talks about the increase is shoplifting in Oregon. |
|
078 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if Winco’s camera system in accessible through
the internet. |
|
089 |
Poe |
Says, no. |
|
092 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if this law has been successful in the 20 other
states having such a law. |
|
093 |
Brandis |
Explains it may be an overstatement. |
|
111 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if this version is the same as adopted by 20 other
states. |
|
113 |
Brandis |
Explains that the model was modified by legislative
counsel to fit Oregon statute. |
|
125 |
Poe |
Talks about a baby formula theft ring in Oregon. |
|
143 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks counsel about other statutes that use the word
“intent.” |
|
146 |
Prins |
Clarifies that theft is a specific intent crime
already. Suggests that the Oregon District
Attorneys Association (ODAA) look at this bill. |
|
179 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if there is a crime of intending to commit
theft. |
|
182 |
Prins |
Explains it is possible, but not likely. |
|
207 |
Chair Minnis |
Notes there is a crime of possessing equipment for
the purpose of theft. |
|
210 |
Prins |
Clarifies this type of crime. |
|
233 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if conspiracy is prosecutable. |
|
234 |
Prins |
Explains that conspiracy is usually applied when the
crime is not committed. |
|
253 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says he believes this bill does not get far enough
into the problem. |
|
262 |
Susan Russell |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (OCDLA). Testifies as neutral on SB 466. Suggests modifications. |
|
280 |
Chair Minnis |
Talks about a personal experience with a “booster.”
Asks Sen. Burdick and Sen. Ringo to work with Julie Brandis and Susan Russell
on amendments to SB 466. |
|
321 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on SB 466 and adjourns the
meeting at 9:10 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 397, written testimony submitted by Shawn Miller, 1 p
B
– SB 397, written testimony submitted by Shannon Poe, 1 p
C
– SB 466, written testimony submitted by Julie Brandis, 3 p