SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 21, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
102-103
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen.
Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Bill Joseph, Counsel
Craig Prins, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2061A Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2054 Public
Hearing and Work Session
HB 2087 Public
Hearing and Work Session
HB 2269A Public
Hearing and Work Session
HB 2049A Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 102,
A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:15 a.m. as a
sub-committee and opens a public hearing on HB 2061A. |
|
HB
2061A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
007 |
Rich Parker |
Attorney, Portland, OR. Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2061A that
modifies law relating to property that is exempt from execution for purpose
of application against debt (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
019 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for clarification of the technical corrections. |
|
026 |
Parker |
Explains where the technical corrections are found in
the bill. |
|
048 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2061A and opens a
public hearing on HB 2054. |
|
HB 2054
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
058 |
Jim Markee |
Oregon Collectors Association. Testifies in support
of HB 2054 that allows registered collection agency to appear as party in
small claims proceedings without appearance by attorney for purpose of
recovering amount owing on claim or account assigned to agency for
collection. |
|
089 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if the Oregon State Bar agrees with this bill. |
|
091 |
Markee |
Says, yes. |
|
092 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about small claim court issues. |
|
098 |
Markee |
Says the majority of claims are defaults. |
|
116 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2054 and opens a
work session. |
|
HB 2054
WORK SESSION |
||
|
119 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2054 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Walker, Sen. Ferrioli |
|
122 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. STARR will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
124 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2054 and opens a work
session on HB 2061A. |
|
HB
2061A WORK SESSION |
||
|
128 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Reviews HB 2061A that modifies law relating to property that is exempt
from execution for purpose of application against debt. |
|
155 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about the wild card exemption. |
|
157 |
Sen. Ringo |
Explains how the wild card exemption is used. |
|
188 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2061A to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Walker, Sen. Ferrioli |
|
192 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
199 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2061A and opens a
public hearing on HB 2087. |
|
HB 2087
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
201 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2087 that modifies
procedures for promulgation, amendment or repeal of rule of civil procedure
by Council on Court Procedures. |
|
206 |
Stuart Brown |
Oregon State Bar.
Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2087 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
239 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about the rules timeline. |
|
246 |
Brown |
Explains the procedure. |
|
255 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2087 and opens a
work session. |
|
HB 2087
WORK SESSION |
||
|
258 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2087 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Walker, Sen. Ferrioli |
|
262 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
276 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2087 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2269A. |
|
HB
2269A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
280 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2269A that establishes rules governing operation of non-testamentary
trusts. |
|
283 |
Chris Cline |
Oregon State Bar.
Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2269A (EXHIBIT C). |
|
321 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks for a section-by-section review of the bill. |
|
329 |
Cline |
Explains the bill by section. Explains that it makes the laws on wills
and trusts consistent. |
|
359 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about the continuation of a gift as part of the
property settlement. |
|
368 |
Cline |
Says this bill would not interfere with that.
Discusses the remainder of the sections. |
|
445 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about childrens’ inheritance. |
|
450 |
Cline |
Explains how the children are treated within a
trust. |
|
TAPE 103,
A |
||
|
010 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about splitting an inheritance between
children. |
|
018 |
Cline |
Clarifies how the inheritance would be shared.
Continues discussing the remaining sections of the bill. |
|
108 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2269A and opens a
work session. |
|
HB
2269A WORK SESSION |
||
|
110 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2269A to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Walker |
|
114 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. MINNIS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
121 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2269A and recesses the
meeting at 8:50 a.m. |
|
123 |
Chair Minnis |
Reconvenes the meeting at 9:04 a.m. as a
sub-committee and opens a public hearing on HB 2049A. |
|
HB
2049A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
126 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 2049A that requires
that motion to amend pleading to assert claim for punitive damages be filed
and served not less than 60 days before date set for trial, and testifies in
support of the bill on behalf of Bullivant, Houser, Bailey law firm. |
|
175 |
Sen. Ringo |
Wonders about postponements. |
|
178 |
Joseph |
Explains that a court can always postpone the trial
date. |
|
192 |
Sen. Ringo |
Expresses concern about the notice of claim for
punitive damages. |
|
208 |
Joseph |
Responds that this concern was not discussed in the
House. |
|
230 |
Sen. Ringo |
Believes that a motion to amend could be denied. |
|
234 |
Chair Minnis |
Discusses his understanding of the bill regarding
punitive damages. |
|
245 |
Sen. Ringo |
Reviews the process previously followed. |
|
287 |
Joseph |
Says there is no limitation in the statute to
bringing a motion to amend for punitive damages. |
|
330 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if most discovery is complete before the 60-day
time period. |
|
332 |
Joseph |
Says, yes. |
|
333 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about new evidence introduced on discovery. |
|
345 |
Joseph |
Explains that there is a provision in the bill that
would allow the courts to modify the dates. |
|
394 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if the deadline might inadvertently create an
incentive to tack on punitive damages. |
|
400 |
Joseph |
Says the motion to amend requires a showing. |
|
419 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if there is a limitation to how many times you
can amend a motion. |
|
432 |
Joseph |
Explains there are potentially two opportunities to
amend a motion. |
|
TAPE 102,
B |
||
|
023 |
Sen. Ringo |
Expresses his belief that the 60 days is too much
time. |
|
053 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks why a motion should not come up during trial. |
|
071 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses the difficulties involved. |
|
082 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks why the number of days was increased. |
|
083 |
Chair Minnis |
Explains that it coincides with the motion for
summary judgment. |
|
125 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if this bill prevents amendment of pleadings at
trial. |
|
132 |
Joseph |
Says, no. |
|
151 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about the ability to appeal. |
|
156 |
Joseph |
Says there would be two opportunities to appeal. |
|
180 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Expresses a concern with what the bill is trying to
do. |
|
189 |
Joseph |
Discusses punitive damages. |
|
202 |
Chair Minnis |
Wonders if it is unfair that punitive damages can be
amended into a complaint at the last minute. |
|
205 |
Sen. Ringo |
Explains that if it were unfair, the judge would
deny the motion. |
|
218 |
Susan Grabe |
Oregon State Bar.
Explains where the savings clause language came from. |
|
226 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for more time to consider the bill. |
|
230 |
Joseph |
Says he would be happy to work with Sen. Ringo and
Sen. Burdick on their concerns. |
|
263 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2049A and adjourns
the meeting at 9:40 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2061A, written testimony submitted by Rich Parker, 1 p
B
– HB 2087, written testimony submitted by Stuart Brown, 1 p
C
– HB 2269A, written testimony submitted by Christopher Cline, 1 p