SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
May 05, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
118-119
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Bill Taylor, Counsel
Bill Joseph, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3339A Work Session
HB 2177A Work Session
SB 655 Public Hearing
HB 2064 Public
Hearing and Work Session
HB 2063A Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 118,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:20 a.m. and opens a
work session on HB 3339A that creates crime of trading in non-ambulatory
livestock. |
|
HB
3339A WORK SESSION |
||
|
006 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 3339A to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Ferrioli, Sen. Ringo |
|
011 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
015 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 3339A and opens a work
session on HB 2177A. |
|
HB 2177A
WORK SESSION |
||
|
017 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2177A that provides that inmates and others may not
bring criminal or civil stalking action against parole and probation officer
or officer, employee or agent of Department of Corrections, law enforcement
unit or Oregon Youth Authority for official conduct of officer, employee or
agent , and the –A8 amendments (EXHIBIT
A) and –A9 amendments (EXHIBIT B). |
|
072 |
Kelly Skye |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. Testifies in support of HB 2177A. Discusses the amendments. |
|
091 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about a false statement being made. |
|
094 |
Skye |
Explains that a good attorney would move to suppress
the statements. |
|
117 |
Prins |
Talks about the potential for perjury. |
|
144 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2177A-A8 amendments
dated 4/28/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Ferrioli, Sen. Ringo |
|
148 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
150 |
Stephanie Tuttle |
Oregon District Attorneys Association. Testifies in
opposition to the –A8 amendments to HB 2177A. |
|
179 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about obtaining an indictment for perjury if
the statements were false. |
|
182 |
Tuttle |
Explains that it could be done but is difficult to
prove. |
|
194 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if a court appointed attorney would be
available. |
|
197 |
Tuttle |
Replies that she does not know. |
|
200 |
Prins |
Says that stalking is not a criminal proceeding, so
a court-appointed attorney would not be available. |
|
232 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if the Miranda rights would be read. |
|
234 |
Prins |
Says, no. |
|
259 |
Chair Minnis |
Believes that statements should be admissible if a
person is represented by counsel. |
|
262 |
Tuttle |
Explains when testimony might be allowed for
impeachment. |
|
282 |
Skye |
Explains why statements should not be able to be
used. |
|
315 |
Prins |
States that orders are for an indefinite period
allowing the courts to use their discretion on the amount of time needed. |
|
335 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about problems that might arise from having different
ground rules. |
|
342 |
Skye |
Explains that just because a person brings in an
attorney their statements should not be treated differently. |
|
384 |
Chair Minnis |
Says he is still troubled by the impeachment process
and would like to have an amendment taking the impeachment part out of the
bill. |
|
400 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2177A and opens a
public hearing on SB 655. |
|
SB 655
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
405 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces SB 655 that creates crime of unlawful trafficking in
communication or access devices. |
|
443 |
Ted Hughes |
Motion Picture Association of America. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of SB 655 (EXHIBIT C). Says the proposed amendments would
substantially change the existing bill (EXHIBIT
D). |
|
TAPE 119,
A |
||
|
030 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Says she does not have a copy of the amendments and
would like to know what they do. |
|
045 |
Prins |
Explains that the amendments expand the application
by adding communications services and communications devices to the current
bill. Says that the bill is technical
in nature. |
|
064 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if it would include music swapping and DVD
copying. |
|
066 |
Prins |
Says, yes, plus it would deal with Internet swapping
and data transmission. Says the bill
would prohibit the use of unlawful access devices. |
|
112 |
Hughes |
Says the Motion Picture Association drafted this
model bill and has introduced it around the country because the age of
digital cinema is on the horizon. |
|
136 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Wonders why copyright law wouldn’t apply. |
|
145 |
Chair Minnis |
Says the copyright laws are probably enforceable,
but much more complex. Asks if
defrauding a cable company is what is being addressed in this bill. |
|
154 |
Hughes |
Says that defrauding is in current law. Explains
that the bill is directed toward satellite and digital motion pictures. |
|
212 |
Jim Craven |
American Electronics Association. Submits testimony and testifies in
opposition to SB 655 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
237 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks what the concern is in this legislation. |
|
239 |
Craven |
Explains the major unintended consequences of this
legislation. Says the definition of devices needs to be clarified. |
|
281 |
Chair Minnis |
Contends that it is not the actual device, but the
abuse of its use that is the issue. |
|
289 |
Craven |
Agrees. Also,
expresses concern about the appropriateness of penalties. |
|
348 |
Chair Minnis |
Believes that this issue might be similar to
identity theft. |
|
356 |
Craven |
Says that it is currently a very big issue of
national debate. |
|
378 |
Sen. Walker |
Talks about an email she received about firewall
software. |
|
389 |
Craven |
Explains that is one of the criticisms of the model
bill. |
|
426 |
Bill Barry |
Self-employed Database Consultant, Benton County,
Oregon. Submits testimony and
testifies in opposition to SB 655 (EXHIBIT
F). |
|
TAPE 118,
B |
||
|
050 |
Chair Minnis |
Gives an example of having a silencer on a gun and
wonders if there is a parallel. |
|
060 |
Barry |
Believes there is no parallel. |
|
074 |
Kelly Skye |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. Testifies in opposition to SB 655. Says
the bill is overly broad as written, but has not had a chance to review the
proposed amendments. |
|
092 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if the penalties are too severe. |
|
095 |
Skye |
Says, yes. |
|
130 |
Julie Brandis |
Associated Oregon Industries. Testifies in opposition to SB 655. Says the states that have adopted this
legislation have concerns. |
|
171 |
Nan Heim |
Oregon Library Association. Testifies in opposition to SB 655. Is concerned about the responsibilities of
a librarian copying information off the Internet. |
|
190 |
Prins |
Explains that the federal act excludes librarians. |
|
201 |
Hughes |
Concludes that the amendments will resolve the
concerns of those who are in opposition. |
|
217 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on SB 655 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2064. |
|
HB 2064
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
221 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2064 that creates declaration under penalty of perjury
as alternative to affidavit under Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure. |
|
245 |
Everett Jack |
Oregon State Bar.
Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2064 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
258 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if this is in compliance with the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure. |
|
260 |
Jack |
Says, yes. |
|
276 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2064 and opens a
work session. |
|
HB 2064
WORK SESSION |
||
|
277 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2064 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Ferrioli, Sen. Ringo |
|
270 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
298 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2064 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2063A. |
|
HB
2063A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
300 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2063A that enacts 1997 Uniform Principal and Income Act. |
|
325 |
Chris Cline |
Oregon State Bar.
Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2063A (EXHIBIT H). Explains the reason for the amendments in
the House. |
|
TAPE 119,
B |
||
|
021 |
Joseph |
Asks that a section-by-section analysis be sent to
him for review. |
|
031 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2063A and adjourns
the meeting at 9:45 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2177, -A8 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
B
– HB 2177, -A9 amendments submitted by staff, 5 pp
C
– SB 655, written testimony submitted by Ted Hughes, 2 pp
D
– SB 655, proposed amendments submitted by Ted Hughes, 12 pp
E
– SB 655, written testimony submitted by Jim Craven, 7 pp
F
– SB 655, written testimony submitted by Bill Barry, 1 p
G
– HB 2064, written testimony submitted by Everett Jack, 1 p
H
– HB 2063A, written testimony submitted by Chris Cline, 2 pp