SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
June 02, 2003 Hearing Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes 146-147
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Joseph, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3370A Work Session
HB 2986A Work Session
SB 100 Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 146,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:20 a.m. and opens a work
session on HB 3370A that consolidates laws governing eminent domain. |
|
HB
3370A WORK SESSION |
||
|
012 |
Sen.
Walker |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
3370 was sent to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Sen. Burdick |
|
114 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
019 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces the -1 amendments to HB 3370A that resolve a conflict (EXHIBIT A). |
|
024 |
Sen.
Walker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3370A-1 amendments dated
5/29/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Burdick |
|
026 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
033 |
Sen.
Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 3370A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Burdick |
|
038 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
040 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 3370A and opens a work
session on HB 2986A. |
|
HB 2986A
WORK SESSION |
||
|
044 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces the –A5 amendments to HB 2986 that provides immunity from
civil liability for physician or health care provider who does not report to
Department of Transportation person’s impairments affecting ability to safely
operate motor vehicle (EXHIBIT B). |
|
049 |
Sen. Walker
|
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which HB
2986A was sent to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Burdick |
|
052 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
054 |
Sen.
Walker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2986A-A5 amendments
dated 5/23/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Burdick |
|
057 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
060 |
Sen.
Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2986A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Burdick |
|
064 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
066 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2986A and opens a work
session on SB 100. |
|
SB 100
WORK SESSION |
||
|
074 |
Andrea Meyer |
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Testifies in opposition to SB 100 that
establishes rules and procedures for transmission of record to court when
petition is filed in circuit court challenging order other than contested
case issued by state agency. |
|
171 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks, with regard to school athletics, if this statute
specifically requires a hearing in the case of a dispute. |
|
187 |
Meyer |
Explains that there is no opportunity to contest a
case hearing. Continues testimony in
opposition to SB 100. |
|
228 |
Sen. Walker |
Refers to prior testimony given and asks about the
cost to the state. |
|
252 |
Meyer |
Explains that this is anything but cost-saving. |
|
278 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if the “Nordon Case” changed existing law. |
|
280 |
Meyer |
Says that while unfamiliar with the practice prior
to “Nordon”, it must have changed existing law. |
|
298 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks for a summary of the objection by the ACLU. |
|
298 |
Meyer |
Summarizes that it alters the standard of review by
the courts to agency decisions and makes it much more difficult for the court
to have any authority. |
|
332 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if counsel is allowed in an administrative
hearing with an agency. |
|
333 |
Meyer |
Says, yes. |
|
323 |
Steve Bushong |
Department of Justice. Testifies in favor of SB 100.
Discusses the case in dispute. |
|
388 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks where in statute the threshold for getting a
contested-case hearing is addressed. |
|
399 |
Bushong |
Says it is in the administrative rules that the
Superintendent has adopted. |
|
428 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for further clarification of determination of a
substantial showing. |
|
431 |
Bushong |
Says that is at the discretion of the Superintendent
of Education. |
|
453 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if the “Nordon Case” changed the construct. |
|
457 |
Bushong |
Explains that it expands the process. |
|
TAPE 147,
A |
||
|
020 |
Philip Schradle |
Department of Justice. Testifies in support of SB 100 and explains that it is
important not to get bogged down with one particular case. |
|
045 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if granting exceptions to automatic contested-case
hearings and discrimination claims would be acceptable to the ACLU. |
|
050 |
Meyer |
Expresses concerns. |
|
077 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if there has been an increase in cases and
costs in the 3 ˝ years since the “Nordon Case.” |
|
081 |
Bushong |
Says the cases he has tried have been very expensive
cases. |
|
091 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if those cases would have gone to a contested-case
hearing anyway. |
|
091 |
Bushong |
Says they would not. |
|
100 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for a definition of substantial showing. |
|
102 |
Bushong |
Says it is determined on a case-by-case basis. |
|
116 |
Chair Minnis |
Explains that his understanding of the
administrative rule allows for appeal of a decision. |
|
123 |
Meyer |
Explains that there is more involved. |
|
180 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if there is an opportunity for discovery if you
don’t have a contested-case hearing. |
|
185 |
Meyer |
Explains that the Freedom of Information Act allows
for certain information, but without representation by counsel, a person
would not know what to ask for. |
|
207 |
Sen. Ringo |
Contends there must be a way to reconcile the
differences. |
|
231 |
Joseph |
Clarifies what the procedure currently is and how it
would be changed by this legislation. |
|
268 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks what the -4 amendments would do (EXHIBIT C). |
|
271 |
Schradle |
Explains how the -4 amendments add a clarification
to assure the circuit court can address the questions whether a person is
entitled to a contested case. |
|
286 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on SB 100 and adjourns the
meeting at 9:30 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3370, -1 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
B
– HB 2986A -A5 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
C
– SB 100, -4 amendments submitted by staff, 5 pp