SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
June 12, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 AM Tapes
162 – 163
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Bill Joseph, Counsel
Bill Taylor, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2049A Work Session
SB 620 Work
Session
HB 2235A Public
Hearing and Work Session
HB 2770A Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3330A Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2696A Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 297 Work
Session
HB 3329B Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the
tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 162,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:15 a.m. and opens a
work session on HB 2049A. |
|
HB
2049A WORK SESSION |
||
|
008 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2049A that requires that motion to amend pleading to
assert claim for punitive damages be filed and served not less than 60 days
before date set for trial, and the –A5 amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
023 |
Sen. Ringo |
Thanks the Committee Counsel for his work on these
amendments. Clarifies the function of
the –A5 amendments. |
|
033 |
Joseph |
Concurs with Sen. Ringo’s clarification, and further
discusses. |
|
040 |
Sen. Ringo
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2049A-A5 amendments
dated 06/10/03. |
|
041 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks if Rep. Ackerman was aware of the change to the
bill. |
|
045 |
Joseph |
Indicates that he did not consult Rep. Ackerman on
the bill, and comments on the discussions which have occurred after the bill
left the House Judiciary Committee. |
|
050 |
Committee |
Discusses the procedure for concurring with the
House on the –A5 amendments. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
065 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
070 |
Sen. Ringo
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2049A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
075 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
077 |
Chair
Minnis |
Closes
the work session on HB 2049A and opens a work session on SB 620. |
|
SB 620
WORK SESSION |
||
|
080 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces SB 620 that requires agency employing police or corrections
officer to reimburse officer for attorney fees incurred as result of criminal
prosecutions and investigations against officer under specified
circumstances. Introduces the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT B). |
|
085 |
Sen. Walker |
Comments on the issue addressed by the bill. |
|
095 |
Sen.
Walker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 620-1 amendments dated
06/04/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
100 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
105 |
Sen.
Walker |
MOTION: Moves SB 620 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
110 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
115 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on SB 620, and opens a
public hearing on HB 2235A. |
|
HB 2235A
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
120 |
Chair Minnis |
Clarifies that the bill is a technical fix to a
statute which passed last session (2001). |
|
125 |
Scott Tighe |
Department of Public Safety Standards and Training
(DPSST). Acknowledges, submits
testimony, and testifies in support of HB 2235A (EXHIBIT C). |
|
190 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if security companies have to be licensed and
certified by the state. |
|
195 |
Tighe |
Indicates security companies are required to be
licensed. |
|
197 |
Sen. Ringo |
Further clarifies the licensing requirements. |
|
200 |
Tighe |
Further outlines the requirements. |
|
205 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about the training requirements. |
|
207 |
Tighe |
Discusses the training requirements. |
|
210 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2235A and opens a
work session. |
|
HB
2235A WORK SESSION |
||
|
215 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2235A to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
217 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. C STARR will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
220 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2235A, and opens a
public hearing on HB 2770A. |
|
HB
2770A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
225 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2770A that creates crime of strangulation, and the –A13
amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
265 |
Sen. Walker |
Clarifies an issue in the amendments. |
|
270 |
Prins |
Explains the issue, and continues with the
description of the bill. |
|
325 |
Committee |
Discusses the breadth of the bill. |
|
313 |
Rep. Floyd Prozanski |
House District 8.
Testifies in support of HB 2770A. |
|
326 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks why strangulation is being created as a crime. |
|
330 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments on the risk of strangulation to women in
particular. |
|
354 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if strangulation isn’t already an assault. |
|
360 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Provides that strangulation is an assault only if it
causes an injury. |
|
395 |
Sen. Ringo |
Further questions the injuries caused by
strangulation. |
|
370 |
Jean Kunkle |
Marion County District Attorney. Explains what is considered an injury in
strangulation. |
|
395 |
Sen. Ringo |
Further questions the need to define “strangulation”
specifically as a crime. |
|
397 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Further comments on why the law is needed. |
|
400 |
Chair Minnis |
Comments on the use of reasonable doubt in trials,
in relation to the bill. Closes the public hearing on HB 2770A and opens a
work session. |
|
HB
2770A WORK SESSION |
||
|
410 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2770A-A13 amendments
dated 06/11/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
415 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
420 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2770A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
425 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. MINNIS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
435 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2770A, and opens a
public hearing on HB 3330A. |
|
TAPE 163,
A |
||
|
HB
3330A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
035 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 3330A that authorizes Governor to proclaim that natural
disaster or act of war, terrorism or sabotage has caused death of unknown
persons on specific date at specific place, and the –A4 amendments (EXHIBIT E). |
|
045 |
Committee |
Discusses the bill. |
|
045 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3330A and opens a
work session. |
|
HB
3330A WORK SESSION |
||
|
050 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3330A-A4 amendments
dated 05/16/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
055 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
057 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 3330A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
060 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. FERIOLI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
065 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 3330A and opens a
public hearing on HB 2696A. |
|
HB
2696A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
070 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2696A that provides right to hearing when Department of
Human Services proposes to refuse, suspend, revoke or terminate support
service payment used to support participation in job opportunity and basic
skills program, and the –A3 amendments (EXHIBIT
F). |
|
080 |
Martin Taylor |
Oregon Law Center.
Testifies in support of HB 2696A. |
|
105 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2696A and opens a
work session. |
|
HB
2696A WORK SESSION |
||
|
107 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2696A-A3 amendments
dated 06/03/03. |
|
112 |
Sen. Walker |
Points out this bill would fix the Huckstor case. |
|
115 |
Martin Taylor |
Oregon Law Center. Comments on the bills relation to
the Huckstor case. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
125 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
127 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2696A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
130 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
135 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2696A, and opens a
work session on HB 297. |
|
SB 297
WORK SESSION |
||
|
137 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces SB 297 that creates presumption that certain clauses in
consumer contract on standardized printed form are void, and the -4
amendments (EXHIBIT G). |
|
185 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks whether there are sanctions imposed for failure
to disclose an insurance policy. |
|
188 |
Joseph |
Points out that this issue is addressed on page 7,
line 20. Further comments on the sanctions. |
|
206 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if there are sanctions if the insurer fails to
disclose. |
|
211 |
Joseph |
Says it would be at least contempt of court. |
|
232 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Clarifies that the -4 amendments are a result of the
various interested parties getting together to agree. |
|
245 |
Chair Minnis |
Indicates the -4 amendments are such a compromise. |
|
249 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Indicates her support of the -4 amendments. |
|
260 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 297-4 amendments dated
06/12/03. |
|
265 |
Sen. Walker |
Comments on the chain of command regarding courts,
in the bill. |
|
270 |
Sen. Ringo |
Expresses his opinion regarding how the bill has
changed. |
|
275 |
Sen. Walker |
Comments on the wording in the bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
285 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
290 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Thanks Legislative Counsel for their work on the
bill. |
|
295 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
MOTION: Moves SB 297 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
305 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. MINNIS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
310 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on SB 297, and opens a
public hearing on HB 3329B. |
|
HB 3329B
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
315 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 3329B that authorizes Department of Justice to initiate
and participate in efforts to prepare for, and to assist in, delivery of
services to individuals traumatized by acts of mass violence, and introduces
the –B6 amendments (EXHIBIT H),
-B7 amendments (EXHIBIT I), -B8
amendments (EXHIBIT J), and –B9
amendments (EXHIBIT K). |
|
347 |
Hardy Myers |
Oregon Attorney General. Testifies in support of HB 3329B. |
|
TAPE 162,
B |
||
|
068 |
Sen. Walker |
Questions whether, due to the federal registry,
there is a need for the state registry. Asks about the deadline for getting a
name on the list. |
|
076 |
Myers |
Outlines the deadline. |
|
086 |
Cheryl Pellegrini |
Assistant Attorney General. Submits written
testimony (EXHIBIT L) and further
comments on the deadline in question. Points out that until the bill passes,
there is no link between the federal and state lists. |
|
103 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks why state law is pre-empted by the federal
list. |
|
111 |
Myers |
Clarifies the relationship between the federal and
state lists. |
|
121 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if we are losing income from compiling the
state list. |
|
129 |
Myers |
Indicates the income would be lost, but money will
be saved by ending the Oregon program. |
|
140 |
Sen. Walker |
Points out she has serious concerns about the
federal government’s involvement. |
|
146 |
Myers |
Expresses his concerns with the involvement of the
federal government, but responds that the creation of a national list is a
positive step forward. |
|
157 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Questions where the income from the Oregon no-call
list goes. |
|
164 |
Pellegrini |
Explains that the funds collected are used to pay
for the registration process, not enforcement. |
|
187 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks for clarification of how enforcement is funded. |
|
192 |
Pellegrini |
Explains the enforcement actions and indicates the
offenders pay for the enforcement. |
|
212 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if enforcement would change under this
legislation. |
|
214 |
Pellegrini |
Indicates there would be no change in enforcement. |
|
220 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Clarifies whether the exemptions on the federal list
or the exemptions on the state list would be paramount. |
|
224 |
Pellegrini |
Explains that the state exemptions would take
precedence in the state. |
|
238 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Clarifies that the only change which the consumer
would experience would no longer need to pay the fee currently associated
with the state list. |
|
240 |
Pellegrini |
Acknowledges. |
|
246 |
Sen. Ringo |
Questions the federal preemption if the state does
not pass the bill. |
|
253 |
Myers |
Refers to his conversations with the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) regarding the issue. |
|
256 |
Pellegrini |
Comments on the conversations with the FTC regarding
preemption. |
|
324 |
Sen. Ringo |
Points out the bill would stave off preemption. |
|
325 |
Pellegrini |
Addresses the –B7 amendments indicating they would
nullify the intent of the bill therefore ensuring noncompliance with federal
list. Asks that these amendments not
be considered. |
|
358 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about the –B8 amendments that cover businesses
lines being on the federal list. |
|
372 |
Pellegrini |
Explains that businesses would be able to be put on
the federal list. |
|
388 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks how a business would be able to register with
the federal list. |
|
406 |
Pellegrini |
Clarifies that there would still be an Oregon list,
but that it would be administered by the federal government. |
|
420 |
Sen. Walker |
Further questions enrollment on the federal list. |
|
430 |
Pellegrini |
Outlines the way in which businesses would enroll on
the list. |
|
422 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the difficulty in obtaining federal lists
and compliance with individual states’ no-call laws. |
|
435 |
Pellegrini |
Acknowledges. |
|
439 |
Myers |
Explains that the federal registry is a compromise
among the states to create one list, with the provision that the states are
able to keep their individual exemptions. |
|
TAPE 163,
B |
||
|
027 |
Connie Gallagher |
Oregon Department of Justice. Submits testimony and testifies in support
of sections I and 2 of HB 3329B that deals with crime victims assistance (EXHIBIT M). |
|
077 |
Brant Wolf |
Oregon Telecommunication Association. Testifies in opposition to HB 3329B. Addresses the –B7 amendments. |
|
120 |
Sen. Ringo |
Points out the Attorney General’s testimony that the
–B7 amendments would make Oregon noncompliant. Asks Mr. Wolf to address this
perception. |
|
127 |
Wolf |
Indicates that this is the first he has heard of
these concerns. |
|
132 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about the –B7 amendments would mean
noncompliance and points out he could not support them in this case. |
|
141 |
Wolf |
Further offers his interpretation of the –B7
amendments. |
|
149 |
Sen. Walker |
Points out the discretionary language in the –B7
amendments. Asks why someone would continue to pay if they could receive the
service for free. |
|
163 |
Wolf |
Explains that those individuals who wanted greater
protection would sign with the more stringent state list. |
|
166 |
Sen. Walker |
Comments on the effectiveness of the program, but
the concerns of having two lists. |
|
174 |
Wolf |
Explains that there would be a lack of coverage with
enrolling with the federal list, and not with the state list. |
|
180 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks that the Attorney General’s office address
these concerns. |
|
197 |
Pellegrini |
Offers her understanding of what will happen on July
1 when the FTC registry begins. |
|
220 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks whether the language could be changed in the
–B7amendments to bring them into compliance. |
|
230 |
Wolf |
Comments on the concerns which have been raised with
the –B7 amendments. |
|
250 |
Pellegrini |
Points out the issue is not about sharing lists, but
about designation. Restates the efforts of the FTC to bring the various state
lists into compliance. |
|
280 |
Sen. Ringo |
Believes the changes need to be adopted. |
|
298 |
Chair Minnis |
Expresses frustration with federal mandates, and
indicates his lack of interest in this legislation. Asks whether there is any
ability to change the bill to address the concerns expressed by Mr. Wolf. |
|
307 |
Pellegrini |
Refers to the contract the state has with the list
administrator, and indicates this contract would still be valid upon passage
of the bill. |
|
318 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks that some compromises to the bill need to be
made. Closes the public hearing on HB 3329B, and adjourns the meeting at
10:05 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2049A, -A5 amendments, staff, 2 pp.
B
– SB 620, -1 amendments, staff, 12 pp.
C
– HB 2235A, written testimony, Scott Tighe, 2 pp.
D
– HB 2770A, -A13 amendments, staff, 15 pp.
E
– HB 3330A, -A4 amendments, staff, 1 p.
F
– HB 2696A, -A3 amendments, staff, 1 p.
G
– SB 297, -4 amendments, staff, 8 pp.
H
– HB 3329B, -B6 amendments, staff, 1 p.
I
– HB 3329B, -B7 amendments, staff, 2 pp.
J
– HB 3329B, -B8 amendments, staff, 5 pp.
K
– HB 3329B, -B9 amendments, staff, 3 pp.
L
– HB 3329B, written testimony, Cheryl Pellegrini, 4 pp.
M
– HB 3329B, written testimony, Connie Gallagher, 1 p.