SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
June 18, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
168-170
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Bill Joseph, Counsel
Bill Taylor, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2646A Public Hearing
HB
2594 Work Session
HB 2278B Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 168,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:15 a.m., announces
that HB 2110A and HB 2318A will be held over until Monday, and opens a public
hearing on HB 2646A. |
|
HB
2646A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
013 |
Rep. Max Williams |
House District 35.
Submits testimony of Wendy Johnson (EXHIBIT A) and testifies in support of HB 2646A that revises laws
relating to judgments. Introduces the –A5, -A6 and –A7 amendments (EXHIBITS B-D). |
|
110 |
Wendy Johnson |
Oregon Law Commission. Submits printed material (EXHIBIT
E) and testifies in support of HB 2646A and the –A6 amendments. Says the commission has no position on the
–A7 amendments. |
|
115 |
Dave Heynderickx |
Legislative Counsel. Testifies in support of HB 2646A. |
|
127 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if there was a specific model followed to
create the changes. |
|
128 |
Rep. Williams |
Says, no. Explains the process and how it was
individually addressed to fit Oregon’s laws. |
|
140 |
Heynderickx |
Discusses the need to make these revisions. |
|
173 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the $4 fee on a garnishment. |
|
179 |
Heynderickx |
Explains how the fee would apply to the judgment. |
|
221 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks what brought about the –A6 amendments. |
|
225 |
Rep. Williams |
Explains that there was a recognition among some of
the interested groups that garnishment was an issue that had not been
addressed. |
|
248 |
Heynderickx |
Explains the three parts of the –A6 amendments. |
|
272 |
Sen. Ringo |
Expresses concern about the new fee of $4. |
|
280 |
Johnson |
Explains the fee and how it was decided upon. |
|
300 |
Rep. Williams |
Explains that instead of the court charging the fee,
the attorney would handle it. |
|
369 |
Betsy Earls |
Harrang Long Gary Rudnick Law Firm. Submits testimony of Bill Gary and
testifies in support of the –A7 amendments to HB 2646A (EXHIBIT F). |
|
TAPE 169,
A |
||
|
038 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if these are cases that have gone through the
trial court and are now on appeal. |
|
040 |
Earls |
Says, yes. |
|
041 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if the cases would have to be retried if the
–A7 amendments were not passed. |
|
048 |
Earls |
Discusses how this legislation would affect current
law. |
|
066 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Expresses concern about a constitutional ruling being
changed. |
|
074 |
Earls |
Says the intention is not to override the entire
ruling, just a certain set of cases. |
|
100 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if the Shoup
decision might revive cases that were assumed to be resolved. |
|
105 |
Earls |
Says she is not sure it would revive cases that were
already tried. |
|
110 |
Chair Minnis |
Wonders who is affected by the retroactivity issue
that she wants to change. |
|
118 |
Earls |
Says there are three cases in her law firm on appeal
right now. |
|
123 |
Richard Lane |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Testifies in support of HB 2646A, but in
opposition to the –A7 amendments. Provides an example case and discusses what
affect the –A7 amendments would have on it. |
|
195 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if there would be remedy if this example case
went to the Supreme Court after Shoup. |
|
200 |
Lane |
Explains how Shoup
would apply to his hypothetical case. |
|
242 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Provides a copy of the Shoup
case to the committee for review (EXHIBIT
G). |
|
247 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2646A and opens a
work session on HB 2594. |
|
HB 2594
WORK SESSION |
||
|
262 |
Rep. Prozanski |
House District 8.
Testifies in support of HB 2594 that provides that certain transfers
and payments of moneys by justice and municipal courts be made not later than
last day of month following month in which collected, and the –1 amendments (EXHIBIT H). |
|
350 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2594-1 amendments dated
6/12/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ferrioli |
|
364 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
365 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2594 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ferrioli |
|
369 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
377 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2594 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2278B. |
|
HB
2278B PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
381 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2278B that provides consistent terminology for public
bodies in laws relating to districts, and the -5 amendments (EXHIBIT I). |
|
404 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses the -B5 amendments which would change
authority of the taxi industry from the City of Portland to Metro. |
|
TAPE 168,
B |
||
|
020 |
Sen. Ringo |
Continues discussing the -B5 amendments to HB 2278B. |
|
169 |
Jim Wadsworth |
Director of Licensing, City of Portland. Submits testimony and testifies in
opposition to the -5 amendments to HB 2278B (EXHIBIT J). |
|
311 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about the shift in authority from City of
Portland to Metro. |
|
314 |
Wadsworth |
Explains why the shift. |
|
365 |
Sen. Ringo |
Contends that this bill does not put any more taxis
on the streets of Portland. |
|
335 |
Wadsworth |
Says that is understood, but the question is mainly
about the limiting of local jurisdictions. |
|
366 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about the details of Metro handling the cab
business. |
|
363 |
Wadsworth |
Says a regional authority may be the solution. |
|
377 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says his understanding is that it would be better to
have some uniform standards. |
|
413 |
Wadsworth |
Says the economy and the industry itself have some
impact on how this shift would take place. |
|
450 |
Sam Fowler |
Port of Portland.
Testifies in opposition to the amendments to HB 2278B. Says there are
a number of other issues that need to be looked at besides the safety issue. |
|
TAPE 169,
B |
||
|
031 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks what other issues he is referring to. |
|
032 |
Fowler |
Says safety of the roadway, the efficiency of the
roadway, a balance of supply and demand are all issues that need to be looked
at. |
|
044 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if he believes that Metro would be insensitive
to the issues described. |
|
045 |
Fowler |
Says, no. |
|
050 |
Sen. Ringo |
Explains that there has been no input from the Port
of Portland regarding this bill when he introduced it in January. |
|
058 |
Mark Pettibone |
Taxi Board of Review. Testifies in opposition to the amendments to HB 2278B. Discusses the accessibility of cabs to
handicapped individuals. |
|
093 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks why Metro couldn’t oversee that the required
number of handicapped accessible cabs are available. |
|
098 |
Pettibone |
Says there are too many unknowns with governing by
Metro, and the program is working very successfully now. |
|
111 |
Sen. Ringo |
Believes that Metro can be sensitive to all the
concerns. |
|
127 |
Wadsworth |
Expresses concern about what regulation by Metro
would entail. |
|
172 |
Steve Entler |
Radio Cab Company.
Testifies in opposition to HB 2278B.
Believes that shifting regulatory authority would add to the problem. |
|
224 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says there are many more factors involved than
competition. |
|
242 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks who owns Radio Cab. |
|
244 |
Entler |
Says it is owned by the drivers. |
|
266 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks who owns Broadway Cab. |
|
269 |
Raye Miles |
General Manager, Broadway Cab. Explains that it is a
Limited Liability Corporation (LLC).
Expresses her concern with the follow-through in shifting authority
and wonders if Metro really wants the cab business. |
|
307 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says it is a complicated shift. |
|
323 |
Miles |
Stresses the idea that there has been no indication
of how the shift would take place. |
|
338 |
Chair Minnis |
Says regional transportation planning is very poor,
and that there is a great deal of opportunity in the business. |
|
360 |
Michael Tolley |
Cab driver, Portland, Oregon. Testifies in opposition to the -5
amendments to HB 2278B. Believes the
legislature should not get involved in regulating Portland’s business. |
|
454 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks what the purpose is for government regulation
of taxi cabs. |
|
456 |
Tolley |
Says, safety, insurance, price gouging, and hours
the driver is on duty are a few of the issues. Says regulation is necessary, and better for the public at
large. |
|
TAPE 170,
A |
||
|
068 |
Sen. Ringo |
Thanks the Portland taxi industry for coming to
express their views. |
|
073 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2278B and adjourns
the meeting at 10:15 a.m. |
|
The
following prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public
testimony for HB 2278B |
||
|
Written testimony submitted by Cheryl Noonan (EXHIBIT K) |
||
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2646A, written testimony of Wendy Johnson submitted by Rep. Williams, 24
pp
B
– HB 2646A, -A5 amendments submitted by staff, 6 pp
C
– HB 2646A, -A6 amendments submitted by staff, 72 pp
D
– HB 2646A, -A7 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
E
– HB 2646A, printed material submitted by Wendy Johnson, 3 pp
F
– HB 2646A, written testimony of Bill Gary submitted by Betsy Earls, 5 pp
G
– HB 2646A, printed material submitted by staff, 8 pp
H
– HB 2594, -1 amendment submitted by staff, 2 pp
I
– HB 2278B, -B5 amendments submitted by staff, 4 pp
J – HB 2278B, written testimony submitted
by Jim Wadsworth, 4 pp
K
– HB 2278B, written testimony submitted by Cheryl Noonan, 1 p