SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
June 23, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
173-174
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF EXCUSED: Sen. Ted Ferrioli
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Bill Taylor, Counsel
Bill Joseph, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2110A Work Session
HB 3338A Work Session
HB 3344A Work Session
HB 2646A Work Session
HB 2094A Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 173,
A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:15 a.m. and opens a
work session on HB 2110A. |
|
HB
2110A WORK SESSION |
||
|
008 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2110A that modifies application of definitions, and the
–A15 and –A16 amendments (EXHIBITS
A-B). |
|
020 |
Chair Minnis |
Reviews the issue of veterans’ benefits. |
|
034 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks what factors the courts will use to address the
“may be reduced” issue. |
|
037 |
Taylor |
Explains that it would not only be the court, but
the administrator that would look at the totality of the circumstances. |
|
043 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about the financial stability of a person. |
|
050 |
Taylor |
Explains that with sufficient assets, there would
not be a reduction. |
|
056 |
Sen. Ringo
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2110A-A15 amendments
dated 6/20/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
065 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
069 |
Sen. Ringo
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2110A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
070 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
078 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2110A and opens a work
session on HB 3338A. |
|
HB
3338A WORK SESSION |
||
|
079 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Introduces HB 3338A that modifies
provisions relating to desertion by parent in adoption proceedings, and
the–A4 conflict amendments (EXHIBIT C). |
|
086 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of Reconsidering the vote by which HB 3338A was sent to the floor of the
Senate. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
090 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
091 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3338A-A4 amendments
dated 6/20/03 to RESOLVE CONFLICTS. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
097 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
099 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 3338A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
102 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. STARR will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
105 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 3338A and opens a work
session on HB 3344A. |
|
HB
3344A WORK SESSION |
||
|
107 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 3344A that changes number of years that intangible
personal property must be held in fiduciary capacity before being presumed
abandoned from five to two. |
|
136 |
Sen. Ringo |
States the concern that he had expressed at the
previous committee hearing has been resolved. |
|
156 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 3344A to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
159 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
164 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 3344A and opens a work
session on HB 2646A. |
|
HB 2646A
WORK SESSION |
||
|
170 |
Bill Gary |
Harrang Long Gary Rudnick Law Firm. Testifies in support of HB 2646A that
revises laws relating to judgment, and the –A7 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
284 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if he knew that the case was on appeal in the Supreme
Court. |
|
287 |
Gary |
Explains the steps taken when a case is appealed to
the Supreme Court. |
|
408 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about the benefit of a new court ruling after
the fact, and wonders why special dispensation should be made. |
|
428 |
Gary |
Says the court generally does not go back to cases
that have already been tried. |
|
461 |
Sen. Ringo |
Questions the desire to have the benefit of the old
rule and not be impacted by the new decision. |
|
467 |
Gary |
Explains that the amendment asks that the new rule
apply only prospectively. |
|
TAPE 174, A |
||
|
032 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks why we should do something contrary to a
decision made by the Supreme Court. |
|
039 |
Gary |
Explains that he is asking only that the old rule
apply to those cases that were tried before the new rule was announced. |
|
097 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks for an example of when the supreme court has
not applied a new ruling. |
|
108 |
Gary |
Provides an example case. |
|
117 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks what it is about the Schoop case that would apply to the cases he is defending. |
|
123 |
Gary |
Explains why the Schoop
case should not be applied to his cases. |
|
141 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says he thinks this amendment is interfering with
the decision-making process of the Supreme Court. |
|
146 |
Gary |
Disagrees.
Says it is the interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision that is
at issue. |
|
155 |
Sen. Ringo |
Talks about the dynamics of the Schoop case. |
|
168 |
Gary |
Says ultimately, fairness is the issue. |
|
204 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if cases should be retried under the new rule. |
|
207 |
Gary |
Explains that they should be retried, but only if
the Court of Appeals ultimately concludes that there was an error in
submitting something to the jury. |
|
218 |
Chair Minnis |
Says he does not support the –A7 amendments. |
|
238 |
Wendy Johnson |
Oregon Law Commission. Testifies as neutral on the –A7 amendments. |
|
256 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Expresses her desire that this bill be moved along. |
|
305 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says he has a hard time with the fairness issue. |
|
334 |
Sen. Walker |
Agrees with Sen. Ringo and objects to the –A7
amendments. |
|
397 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Discusses the –A6 amendments that
are a combination of technical amendments from Legislative Counsel and the
Oregon Law Commission. |
|
402 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses his concerns with the –A6 amendments, but
says he will not oppose them. |
|
438 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks for clarification of the $4 fee. |
|
445 |
Sen. Ringo |
Explains how and when the fee is applied. |
|
TAPE 173,
B |
||
|
020 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2646A-A6 amendments
dated 6/17/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
021 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
029 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 2646A to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
031 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. MINNIS will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
035 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2646A and calls for a
5 minute recess at 9:30 a.m. |
|
037 |
Chair Minnis |
Reconvenes the meeting at 9:41 a.m. and opens a work
session on HB 2094A. |
|
HB
2094A WORK SESSION |
||
|
042 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel.
Introduces HB 2094A that requires tobacco product manufacturers to
report certain information to Attorney General. Reviews the section-by section analysis provided by Pete
Shepherd (EXHIBIT F). Reviews the –A10 amendments (EXHIBIT G), and the –A9 amendments (EXHIBIT
H). |
|
234 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks for clarification of where the task force
amendment is being applied. |
|
236 |
Prins |
Explains that it will apply to HB 2368. Discusses
the –A5 amendments (EXHIBIT I). |
|
261 |
Chair Minnis |
Says he would like to adopt the amendments and then
get a hand-engrossed version of the bill for review and final action. |
|
290 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2094A-A9 amendments
dated 6/11/03. |
|
290 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2094A-A10 amendments
dated 6/12/03. |
|
303 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks from where the $700,000 would be coming. |
|
311 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy Attorney General. Explains that the funds come from the General Fund and have
been accounted for in the budget. |
|
341 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the task force to look at the Master
Settlement Agreement (MSA). |
|
352 |
Shepherd |
Replies that the issue of the task force is
addressed in amendments to HB 2368B. |
|
371 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
372 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
373 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2094A-A5 amendments
dated 5/23/03. |
|
388 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks how the “loophole” addressed by the –A5
amendments escaped the MSA task force. |
|
406 |
Shepherd |
Explains how this issue was missed. |
|
420 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about exemptions that applied to some of the small
companies. |
|
460 |
Shepherd |
Says every manufacturer who participates in the MSA
must pay. |
|
481 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if this is not adopted now, if it will be back
next session. |
|
484 |
Shepherd |
Explains that it will be back and why. |
|
TAPE 174,
B |
||
|
032 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about another state that passed a similar version
of the –A5 amendments. |
|
038 |
Shepherd |
Says there is one state that did pass a version that
is conditioned on other states passing a similar piece of legislation. |
|
066 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the allocable share cap. |
|
072 |
Shepherd |
Replies that he would defend and support the share
cap. |
|
080 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if the –A5 amendments are essential to the
bill. |
|
084 |
Shepherd |
Says not if it is going to endanger the passage of
the bill. |
|
098 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks how much more money would come in to the escrow
account with the allocable share cap. |
|
102 |
Shepherd |
Says that the attorney general’s office has not made
such a calculation. |
|
107 |
Sen. Walker |
Discusses this legislation and her concerns with it. |
|
110 |
Chair Minnis |
Says it is our public duty to see that revenues
derived from the MSA are maximized to the fullest extent possible. |
|
134 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says he has no problem with the allocable cap. |
|
154 |
|
VOTE:
4-1-1 AYE: 4 - Burdick, Ringo, Starr C., Minnis NAY:
1 - Walker EXCUSED: 1 - Ferrioli |
|
155 |
Chair Minnis |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
159 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2094A and adjourns the
meeting at 10:05 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2110A, -A15 amendments submitted by staff, 40 pp
B
– HB 2110A, -A16 amendments submitted by staff, 25 pp
C
– HB 3338A, -A4 amendments submitted by staff, 7 pp
D
– HB 2646A, -A7 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
E
– HB 2646A, -A6 amendments submitted by staff, 72 pp
F
– HB 2094A, printed material from Peter Shepherd, submitted by staff, 7 pp
G
– HB 2094A, -A10 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
H
– HB 2094A, -A9 amendments submitted by staff, 2 pp
I
– HB 2094A, -A5 amendments submitted by staff, 6 pp