SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
June 25, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
175-178
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3630A Public Hearing
SB 655 Work Session
HB 2368B Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 175,
A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:15 a.m. and opens a
public hearing on HB 3630A. |
|
HB
3630A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
008 |
Rep. Max Williams |
House District 35.
Testifies in support of HB 3630A that requires State Accident
Insurance Fund Corporation (SAIF) to establish reinsurance program for
medical professional liability policies of certain rural doctors. |
|
074 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks why tagging this issue would be problematic
over the long term. |
|
080 |
Rep. Williams |
Explains that it was suggested in his discussions
with the Governor’s office. Continues testimony in support of HB 3630A. |
|
147 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Says he likes the concept of this bill, but wonders
why SAIF was chosen. |
|
162 |
Rep. Williams |
Explains that it is in part because SAIF is an
instrument of the State. |
|
187 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Says he believes it is very important that it is
clear why this is a good nexus. |
|
225 |
Karen Whitaker |
Oregon Health & Science University, Office of
Rural Health. Submits testimony and
testifies in support of HB 3630A (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
353 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about the incentives that are still available
in rural areas. |
|
363 |
Whitaker |
Lists the various programs available to physicians
in rural areas. |
|
390 |
Cory Streisinger |
Director, Department of Consumer and Business
Services. Submits testimony and
testifies in support of HB 3630A (EXHIBIT
B). |
|
TAPE 176,
A |
||
|
042 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks where the premium assessment excess has come
from to fund this program. |
|
048 |
Streisinger |
Explains that collections have exceeded expectations
because of September 11, 2001. |
|
079 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if the program can still be funded with a
reduction of premium assessment. |
|
084 |
Streisinger |
Says, yes. |
|
106 |
Chair Minnis |
Clarifies that this money is not a part of the SAIF
reserves. |
|
111 |
Streisinger |
Agrees.
Continues testimony in support of HB 3630A. Asks for adoption of the –A7 amendments (EXHIBIT C). |
|
174 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks for clarification of the term “financial
reinsurance.” |
|
186 |
Streisinger |
Explains that it is a tool that SAIF needs to have
available in order to take some risk. |
|
219 |
Chris Veiger |
SAIF Corporation.
Testifies in support of HB 3630A. |
|
242 |
John DiLorenzo |
Oregonians for Sound Economic Policy, Inc.
(OSEP). Submits testimony and
testifies as neutral on HB 3630A.
Says he is not opposed to the concept, but is opposed to the
participation by SAIF (EXHIBIT D). |
|
TAPE 175,
B |
||
|
018 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if the SAIF amendment to HB 3092 solves the
problem of disclosure from SAIF. |
|
025 |
DiLorenzo |
Says, yes, if the amendment survives the conference
committee. |
|
035 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks what the concern is in the –A7 amendments. |
|
041 |
DiLorenzo |
Says it is the “‘may’ consist of financial
reinsurance” in the –A7 amendments that may be problematic. |
|
074 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about oversight and disclosure as two separate
issues. |
|
082 |
DiLorenzo |
Believes that adequate disclosure is not sufficiently
addressed. |
|
105 |
Scott Gallant |
Oregon Medical Association. Testifies in support of HB 3630A, and the
–A7 and –A8 amendments (EXHIBIT E). |
|
239 |
Sen. Walker |
Expresses her concern about SAIF’s expansion of
authority. |
|
255 |
Gallant |
Believes this is not the vehicle for dealing with
that concern. |
|
302 |
Richard Lane |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Testifies in support of HB 3630A. |
|
426 |
Paul Cosgrove |
Reinsurance Association of America. Testifies in support of HB 3630A and submits
a hand-engrossed version of the –A8 amendments (EXHIBIT F). |
|
TAPE 176,
B |
||
|
029 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks why SAIF was chosen to administer the program. |
|
033 |
Streisinger |
Explains that this is an insurance program and SAIF
is the insurance company owned by the state, and which the Legislature has
the power to direct. |
|
056 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about adding the disclosure requirement that
was put into HB 3630. |
|
064 |
Streisinger |
Believes that it may not be appropriate in this
bill. |
|
076 |
Sen. Walker |
Believes that if we are expanding the authority of
SAIF there needs to be more oversight by the Legislature. |
|
081 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks to whom information would be prepared and
provided by SAIF. |
|
088 |
Streisinger |
Says the information would be provided to the
Department of Consumer and Business Services. |
|
090 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if the legislature would have access to that
information. |
|
091 |
Streisinger |
Believes it would be available to the Legislative Assembly
and members of the public. |
|
094 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about the SAIF public records issue and the
Court of Appeals ruling. |
|
100 |
Streisinger |
Says she does not know what the status is. |
|
105 |
DiLorenzo |
Explains there is a stay order pending appeal. |
|
126 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says he is willing to risk adding the proposed –A9
amendments. |
|
150 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3630A and opens a
work session on SB 655. |
|
SB 655
WORK SESSION |
||
|
158 |
Sen. Walker |
Introduces SB 655 that creates crime of unlawful
trafficking in communication or access devices. Says the -1 amendments constitute a “gut and stuff” of SB 828 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
189 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 655-1 amendments dated
5/27/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ringo |
|
194 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
195 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves SB 655 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ringo |
|
228 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
236 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on SB 655 and recesses the
meeting until 3:00 p.m. |
|
238 |
Chair Minnis |
Reconvenes the meeting at 3:07 p.m. Opens a work session on HB 2368B which
makes technical and administrative changes to cigarette and tobacco products
taxes to facilitate administration and enforcement. |
|
HB
2368B WORK SESSION |
||
|
240 |
Craig Prins |
Committee Counsel. Goes through a section-by-section
analysis of HB 2368B prepared by Pete Shepherd, Department of Justice (EXHIBIT H). |
|
390 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks why a particular section was changed from four
years to five. |
|
394 |
Prins |
Replies that he does not know. |
|
404 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy Attorney General. Also does not know why.
Introduces Mathew McCauley from the Tobacco Compliance Task Force
division of the Department of Justice. |
|
407 |
McCauley |
Department of Justice. Says the number was changed from four to five years for record-keeping
requirements. |
|
427 |
Sen. Walker |
Responds records are kept for three years for tax
purposes. |
|
432 |
McCauley |
Thinks the five-year recommendation was used because
RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization) prosecutions are five
years on the statute of limitations. |
|
507 |
Prins |
Continues his section-by-section analysis of the
bill. |
|
TAPE 177,
A |
||
|
035 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for the rationale behind Marion County being
the venue. |
|
039 |
Shepherd |
Explains the rationale as being that the tax is due
to the Department of Revenue in Salem. |
|
048 |
McCauley |
Explains that there was some ambiguity as to the
venue being in Marion County and this statute would clarify that. |
|
053 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if this applies to the private right of action
venue. |
|
060 |
McCauley |
Says he does not believe there is a private right of
action statutorily existing in ORS 323 or HB 2368B. |
|
084 |
Prins |
Continues his section-by-section analysis of HB
2368B. |
|
070 |
Shepherd |
Refers to Section 82 that deals with private cause
of action; says Section 26 would not apply to that claim. |
|
080 |
Prins |
Continues his section-by-section analysis of the
bill. |
|
097 |
Chair Minnis |
Returns to the “private right of action” issue in
Section 75. |
|
120 |
Prins |
Points out that Section 75 refers to the person
accepting the order for delivery.
Continues his section-by-section analysis of the bill specifically
referring to tobacco products. |
|
195 |
Prins |
Continues his section-by-section analysis of the
bill. |
|
230 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks how physical evidence is defined. |
|
235 |
Prins |
Says an electronic notice would be sent out, but the
certification is on paper. |
|
242 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks what the penalty is for lying about one’s age
to purchase cigarettes over the Internet. |
|
255 |
Shepherd |
Explains the infraction would be minor in possession
of tobacco which carries a small fine. |
|
267 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks what the fine is for delivery to a minor. |
|
272 |
Shepherd |
Explains the remedies for delivery are in Section 81
on page 32 and 33 and are in addition to sanctions currently provided in law. |
|
311 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Wonders how the $10,000 fine would be carried out. |
|
316 |
Shepherd |
Doesn’t believe new penalties are being prescribed
for minors. |
|
345 |
Prins |
Says he will clarify that portion with the
Department of Revenue. |
|
365 |
Sen. Walker |
Questions Section 76 and the notice of tax
liability, wonders how the tax is collected or paid. |
|
369 |
Shepherd |
Describes Section 76, page 30, lines 41-42 which
refers to Section 77, subsection 4 which tells how the tax is to be
paid. |
|
375 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the Distributor paying tax to the State
of Oregon, and their liability. |
|
415 |
Shepherd |
Explains how the tax is collected from the
distributor. |
|
420 |
Sen. Ringo |
Questions Section 76 and reference to the age of the
purchaser, and says nowhere does it mention Internet sales to minors. |
|
438 |
Shepherd |
Describes how Internet sales to minors have
developed into a problem. |
|
447 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if 15 year olds are buying cigarettes through
the Internet. |
|
460 |
Shepherd |
Describes Internet sales to minors. |
|
468 |
Prins |
Continues his section-by-section analysis of the
bill. |
|
TAPE 178,
A |
||
|
007 |
Prins |
Concludes his section-by-section analysis of the
bill. |
|
045 |
Prins |
Describes the -B15 amendments from Bill Linden (EXHIBIT I); -B16 amendments from Jim
Gardner (EXHIBIT J); and the-B17 amendments
that amend Section 82 (EXHIBIT K).
|
|
087 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if -B17 amendments restrict “BIG” tobacco from
suing. |
|
090 |
Chair Minnis |
Wants to get through all the amendments before
questions. |
|
092 |
Prins |
Continues describing the amendments -B18 (EXHIBIT L); -B19 conflict amendments
(EXHIBIT M); -B20 amendments from
Mark Nelson (EXHIBIT N); -B21 from
Marshall Coba (EXHIBIT O); the –B22 from the American Cancer Society
with a sunset clause (EXHIBIT P);
and-B23 from the American Cancer Society and the American Heart Association (EXHIBIT Q). |
|
136 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Clarifies that the –B23 amendments would be applied
only if there is a task force. |
|
139 |
Prins |
Says the –B24 amendments are from Sen. Burdick (EXHIBIT R); and the –B26 amendments
are from Sen. Ringo (EXHIBIT S). |
|
174 |
Chair Minnis |
Beginning with –B19 amendments looks for clear
consensus. |
|
185 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2368B-B19 amendments
dated 06/03/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
223 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
230 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if there is support for B15 amendments. |
|
234 |
Bill Linden |
R.J. Reynolds.
Clarifies why these amendments are needed. |
|
255 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2368-B15 amendments
dated 05/27/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
260 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
263 |
Prins |
Explains the –B16 amendments. |
|
274 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Expresses her concern for the B16 amendments. |
|
276 |
Sen. Ringo |
Expresses his ambivalence for these amendments. |
|
291 |
Jim Gardner |
Philip Morris.
Explains these amendments remove language from the bill that they
originally proposed. |
|
303 |
Sen. Ringo |
Confirms that Oregon cannot oppose separate labeling
requirements. |
|
308 |
Sen. Walker |
Agrees with using the -B16 amendments. |
|
318 |
Sen. Starr
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2368-B16 amendments
dated 05/27/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
320 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
323 |
Prins |
Explains the –B22 amendments. |
|
339 |
Vice Chair
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2368B-B22 amendments
dated 06/16/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Ferrioli |
|
342 |
Chair Minnis |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
352 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks the committee to consider the B18 and B23
amendments together. |
|
359 |
Sen. Walker |
Expresses her concerns about setting up another task
force rather than using the resources already available. |
|
370 |
Shepherd |
Discusses expenses associated with the task
force. Feels the task force would
have no significant fiscal impact on the Department of Justice (DOJ). |
|
389 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if there is currently oversight for the Master
Settlement Agreement. |
|
393 |
Shepherd |
Responds, no. |
|
414 |
Sen. Ringo |
Refers to recommendations he was given by DOJ. |
|
420 |
Shepherd |
Agrees there are good ideas in the Attorney General’s
report that are not being implemented. |
|
434 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks Sen. Burdick to explain the –B24 amendments. |
|
440 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Explains that the –B24 amendments stop Internet
sales of tobacco to minors. |
|
TAPE 177,
B |
||
|
030 |
Mark Nelson |
R. J. Reynolds.
Clarifies that R. J. Reynolds does not sell on the Internet, and only
one vendor uses this approach. |
|
048 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Clarifies that the purpose of this legislation is to
verify the age of the person purchasing the tobacco products. She is willing to work with Mr. Nelson on
these amendments. |
|
068 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks Sen. Ringo to explain the –B26 amendments. |
|
070 |
Sen. Ringo |
Explains the origin of the B26 amendments. |
|
097 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks for the timeline for implementation. |
|
098 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says upon implementation of the bill. |
|
104 |
Mark Nelson |
Seven-Eleven Corporation. Says all tobacco products are behind the counter in
7-11’s. Says the Oregon Grocery
Association brought opposition last session to this type of amendment. |
|
121 |
Gardner |
Says a provision like this is on his list of
pro-active measures to pursue. |
|
133 |
Richard Kosesan |
Oregon Neighborhood Store Association. Explains how
some small grocers do not have the space to move all these products behind
the counter, even though the industry is heading in that direction
already. |
|
156 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Expresses her support for this amendment. |
|
170 |
Chair Minnis |
Says he could support this amendment if it had a future
date for implementation. |
|
181 |
Sen. Ringo |
Suggests nine months to a year. |
|
184 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if there is an emergency clause. |
|
185 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Replies, no. |
|
191 |
Chair Minnis |
Suggests drafting an implementation date. |
|
194 |
Sen. Ringo |
Suggests June 1, 2004. |
|
196 |
Sen. Walker |
Likes July. |
|
212 |
Chair Minnis |
Says the amendments adopted will be combined and
other amendments looked at on a later date.
|
|
219 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2368B and adjourns the
meeting at 4:25 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3630A, written testimony submitted by Karen Whitaker, 8 pp
B
– HB 3630A, written testimony submitted by Cory Streisinger, 6 pp
C
– HB 3630A, -A7 amendments submitted by staff, 2 pp
D
– HB 3630A, written testimony submitted by John DiLorenzo, 6 pp plus booklet
E
– HB 3630A, -A8 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
F
– HB 3630A, -A8 amendments hand-engrossed and submitted by Paul Cosgrove, 1p
G
– SB 655, -1 amendments submitted by staff, 2 pp
H
– HB 2368B, written material prepared by Pete Shepherd and submitted by staff,
10 pp
I
– HB 2368B, -B15 amendments submitted by staff, 1p
J
– HB 2368B, –B16 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
K
– HB 2368B, -B17 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
L
– HB 2368B, -B18 amendments submitted by staff, 3 pp
M
– HB 2368B, -B19 amendments submitted by staff, 2 pp
N
– HB 2368B, -B20 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
O
– HB 2368B, -B21 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
P
– HB 2368B, -B22 amendments submitted by staff, 5 pp
Q
– HB 2368B, -B23 amendments submitted by staff, 3 pp
R
– HB 2368B, -B24 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p
S
– HB 2368B, -B26 amendments submitted by staff, 1 p