SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
July 24, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
8:00 a.m. Tapes
191-193
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. John Minnis, Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Charles Starr
Sen. Vicki Walker
GUEST MEMBERS: Sen. Rick Metsger
Rep. Patty Smith
Rep. Laurie Monnes
Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Prins, Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2278B Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 191,
A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Minnis |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:10 a.m. and
introduces Sen. Rick Metsger, Rep. Patty Smith and Rep. Laurie Monnes
Anderson. Opens a work session on HB
2278B. |
|
HB
2278B WORK SESSION |
||
|
021 |
Mark Ellsworth |
Committee Services.
Submits written material and outlines the history of HB 2278B that
provides consistent terminology for public bodies in laws relating to
districts (EXHIBIT A). Introduces the B8 and B9 amendments (EXHIBITS B & C). |
|
057 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if there was a contractual agreement to the
rate increase with Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). |
|
058 |
Ellsworth |
Says there was no written contractual
agreement. Continues his
presentation. Says that originally
PERS was not notified of any contract between the city of Portland and Fire
District #10. |
|
152 |
Rep. Smith |
Asks if there was any discussion in 1984 of the unfunded
level of PERS. |
|
146 |
Ellsworth |
Says this issue was not discussed. |
|
167 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks for clarification of audits done. |
|
170 |
Ellsworth |
Refers to the packet of information provided to the
committee. |
|
176 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks about audits that might have been done by Fire District
#10 addressing unfunded liability. |
|
180 |
Ellsworth |
Says there was an auditor from Coopers & Lybrand
who was asked to look into the situation. |
|
185 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks how annexation plays in this retirement issue. |
|
209 |
Ellsworth |
Says liabilities have historically stayed with the
districts. Talks about the tax base
that has funded the retirement bill. |
|
220 |
Chair Minnis |
Explains that the tax base has been eroded by
annexations. |
|
228 |
Ellsworth |
Discusses the current budget in East Multnomah
County. |
|
241 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks if payment to employees is paid out of the tax
base, or where it comes from. |
|
269 |
Ellsworth |
Says this is the complex piece that is missing. |
|
289 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if Fire District #10 was a pay-as-you-go plan. |
|
296 |
Ellsworth |
Says that it was when under contract with
Connecticut General. |
|
321 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if this is the only district that has the
problem. |
|
326 |
Chair Minnis |
Says, no, there are others. |
|
343 |
Jim Voytko |
Executive Director, PERS. Discusses where the money comes from, and says that the
responsibility for paying the pension obligation was never put in
writing. Says the purpose of this
hearing is to weed-out these problems. |
|
430 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks if PERS has the ability to re-create the
original plan. |
|
435 |
Voytko |
Says it would take a court order. |
|
TAPE 192,
A |
||
|
011 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks what recourse is available to Fire District
#10. |
|
017 |
Voytko |
Says that is a question for the legal community. |
|
024 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks how unfunded liabilities are paid when an
employee transfers from one PERS entity to another. |
|
032 |
Voytko |
Explains the procedure. |
|
060 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks what happens to people who go from a PERS to a
non-PERS retirement system. |
|
065 |
Voytko |
Explains that an employee has the option to remain
in PERS for one year, but says the accounting is complicated. |
|
089 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks what the liability amount is based on. |
|
099 |
Voytko |
Explains that the actual liability is an unknown. |
|
114 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about the estimates and assumptions used on how
long an employee will live after retirement. |
|
123 |
Voytko |
Explains what is called “successive approximation.” |
|
150 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks about the lump sum of $40 million paid by the
city of Portland. |
|
154 |
Voytko |
Says it was like a consolidated debt payment. |
|
173 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if there is any uncertainty about the
obligation to pay. |
|
178 |
Voytko |
Explains that it is understood that these funds are
due. |
|
193 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the $40 million paid by Portland and wonders
if it was refunded when it was discovered that it should have gone to Fire
District #10. |
|
199 |
Voytko |
Says no money has been refunded to Portland. |
|
215 |
Sen. Walker |
Questions the explanation given. |
|
219 |
Voytko |
Says if payment is made to a trust fund it is not refundable,
except for administrative error. |
|
250 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks when the $40 million payment was made, and what
predicated the payment. |
|
267 |
Voytko |
Says he was not with PERS in 1999 and has not seen
any documentation that might explain why the payment was made. |
|
284 |
Chair Minnis |
Explains his understanding of why that payment was
made. |
|
310 |
Dale Orr |
PERS.
Explains why this payment was made by the city of Portland. |
|
341 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Wonders about the chronology of this payment and the
Fire District 10 issue. |
|
348 |
Orr |
Clarifies the events. |
|
406 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks about the notifications of unfunded liability. |
|
423 |
Orr |
Explains unfunded liability. |
|
444 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks about the ability to validate the actuarial
liability. |
|
466 |
Voytko |
Explains that there may not be a clear paper trail. |
|
TAPE 191,
B |
||
|
041 |
Leslie Roberts |
Attorney for Fire District #10. Speaks about the contract that District
#10 formed with the city of Portland with regard to payments to retirees of the
district. |
|
099 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Asks about the legality of transferring responsibility
for liability. |
|
103 |
Roberts |
Says, yes it is legal within municipalities. |
|
128 |
Chair Minnis |
Describes the move by the City towards an aggressive
annexation. |
|
153 |
Roberts |
Confirms Sen. Minnis’ comments. Continues her testimony addressing the
concepts of a funded system versus pay-as-you-go. |
|
210 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks for clarification of the 1984 agreement with
Portland. |
|
217 |
Roberts |
Says the committee has a copy of the written
agreement between the city of Portland and Fire District #10 in their packet
of information provided by Mark Ellsworth. |
|
311 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if minutes were taken at the board meeting. |
|
319 |
Roberts |
Says she will provide the committee with those
minutes. |
|
322 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks when it was discovered that there may be an
unfunded liability attributed to Fire District #10. |
|
330 |
Roberts |
Says it was in 1997. Discusses the Connecticut General fund that came before PERS. |
|
368 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks if there were understandings with regard to liability
in 1994 when Wood Village and other municipalities withdrew from Fire
District #10 to form its own tax base. |
|
387 |
Roberts |
Explains how the withdrawal of the municipalities
was accomplished. |
|
431 |
Sen. Ringo |
Refers to the contract between Fire District #10 and
the city of Portland and asks if article 11 is what is being relied on. |
|
442 |
Roberts |
Says that article 11 sweeps up everything else. |
|
451 |
Chair Minnis |
Interjects his understanding of underlying
assumptions. Refers to article 7,
subsection 3. |
|
TAPE 192,
B |
||
|
030 |
Sen. Ringo |
Says that he disagrees with the interpretation of
article 11. |
|
035 |
Roberts |
Explains that at the time of the contract there was
no liability. |
|
063 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Declares that she has a potential conflict of
interest because of her position as a citizen trustee on the Fire and Police
Pension/Disability Board. Asks why
the employees would continue with PERS instead of being included in the Fire
and Policy Pension/Disability Board. |
|
058 |
Chair Minnis |
Says that article 7, section 3 allows this so long
as a medical evaluation is passed. |
|
071 |
Roberts |
Clarifies that this is on an employee-by-employee
basis. |
|
079 |
Steve Manton |
City of Portland.
Provides a brief chronological history. Disputes Fire District #10’s liability obligation. |
|
147 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if the $257 million included the obligation
disputed. |
|
156 |
Manton |
Explains that it was paid but there is nothing in
writing that says there was a dispute. Continues testimony. |
|
236 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if there was an obligation to notify PERS of
the transfer under the contract between Portland and Fire District #10. |
|
243 |
Manton |
Says that PERS was notified. |
|
267 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks if part of Fire District #10’s tax base became
part of the city of Portland’s tax base. |
|
284 |
Manton |
Says 65% of the tax base was transferred to city of
Portland. |
|
306 |
Terry McCall |
City of Gresham.
Contends that PERS created the problem and that they should be liable. |
|
378 |
Paul Snider |
Association of Oregon Counties. Testifies in opposition to the B8 and B9
amendments. |
|
395 |
Chair Minnis |
Wonders about the contractual obligation. |
|
410 |
Snider |
Believes that we’re looking for an equitable
solution to a very sticky problem.
Suggests looking at who was benefited by the employment of these
folks. |
|
TAPE 193,
A |
||
|
017 |
Maria Keltner |
Association of Oregon Counties. Offers to help work
on resolving the issue. |
|
035 |
Hasina Squires |
Special Districts Association of Oregon. Testifies in support of the B8 and B9 amendments. |
|
057 |
Sen. Walker |
Believes that the city of Portland knew the liability
existed even though they had not been billed for 13 years. |
|
063 |
Vice Chair Burdick |
Contends that it was believed the liability had been
taken care of in the existing rate structure. |
|
070 |
Chair Minnis |
Explains that he would like to assign a group to
work on this issue. |
|
083 |
Voytko |
Says that the decision by PERS not to bill anyone
for 13 years was not proper or actuarially sound. Explains that PERS wants to clean up the books. |
|
173 |
Chair Minnis |
Asks if it assumed that all debt is collectable. |
|
175 |
Voytko |
Says, yes. |
|
185 |
Rep. Monnes-Anderson |
Asks about the contingency fund. |
|
188 |
Voytko |
Says the fund currently contains $0. Explains what uses were planned for a
contingency fund. |
|
219 |
Dave Heynderickx |
Legislative Counsel. Talks about the contingency fund. Discusses the possibility of an unfunded mandate. |
|
264 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks about funds that come from investments and if
they should not go into the contingency fund. |
|
280 |
Heynderickx |
Says that PERS operates under a fiduciary
responsibility and that tax law limits their ability to do some of the things
that private companies do. |
|
326 |
Chair Minnis |
Contends that because of the way the transfer took
place, it would be assumed that all other obligations would go along with the
transfer. |
|
332 |
Heynderickx |
Disagrees. |
|
338 |
Chair Minnis |
Says he is appointing Sen. Walker and Sen. Ferrioli
to lead a work group to work on this problem. Believes that there are pathways to resolving this issue
already in place. |
|
397 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks that there be a clear set of parameters to
address. |
|
411 |
Bob Livingston |
Oregon State Firefighters. Asks to be included in the work group. |
|
459 |
Chair Minnis |
Closes the work session on HB 2278B and adjourns the
meeting at 10:30 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2278B, written material submitted by Mark Ellsworth, 125 pp
B
– HB 2278B, -B8 amendments submitted by staff, 8 pp
C
– HB 2278B, -B9 amendments submitted by staff, 8 pp