SENATE SPECIAL
COMMITTEE ON THE OREGON HEALTH PLAN
May 31, 2003 Hearing
Room A
9:30 A.M. Tapes
19-20
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Peter Courtney, Co-Chair
Sen. Jackie Winters, Co-Chair
Sen. Kate Brown
Sen. Margaret Carter
Sen. Bill Fisher
Sen. Lenn Hannon
Sen. John Minnis
Sen. Bill Morrisette
STAFF PRESENT: Marjorie Taylor, Committee
Administrator
Heather Gravelle, Committee
Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 540 – Work Session
HB 3624 A –
Informational Meeting
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 19, A |
||
|
005 |
Co-Chair
Winters |
Calls
the committee to order at 9:40 A.M. Opens a work session on SB 540. Presents
-1 amendments dated 5/30/03, -2 amendments dated 5/30/03 and -3 amendments
dated 5/30/03 (EXHIBITS A, B, C). |
|
SB 540 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
060 |
Tech
problems |
*********************************************************** |
|
070 |
Mike
Bonette |
Policy
Analyst, Senate Republican Office. States today they will walk through the revised
Oregon Health Plan pricing list. Refers members to submitted testimony.
Provides information as to when the programs will begin. States this means
existing program must run for 3 months for over $200 million or 6 months at
$424 million. States costs $70 million a month to run existing program on per
month basis. |
|
105 |
Bonette |
Discusses
program. States the populations, benefits covered and separate months of
coverage. |
|
110 |
Bonette |
Explains
the separate categories. Claims basic package comes in at $36 million a
month. Differentiates between $70 million and $36 million and cost-savings
goal. |
|
115 |
Bonette |
Discusses
pricing for dental packages. Claims full for pregnant women only, emergency
for all categories excluding pregnant women and full benefits for all
categories. States the price and length of coverage. |
|
135 |
Bonette |
Discusses
costs with add-ons. |
|
145 |
Bonette |
States
the basic benefit package with full dental and optional services $42 million
for 21 months and $36 million for 18 months. |
|
155 |
Bonette |
Discusses
medical needy program. States co-chair budget is left at $21 million
reference point. Discusses different benefit packages. |
|
180 |
Bonette |
Discusses
pricing of packages and percentages of adult couples and families. |
|
190 |
Bonette |
Explains
cost associated with each group. Claims if a new program was implemented in
January it would cost $353 million on top of the co chair budget. Adds in
October the cost would be $300 million. Discusses options and what
adjustments could be made. States could look at eliminating total hospital
benefit for all adults, couples and families. Claims optional services and dental
would still be part of the package. |
|
225 |
Bonette |
States
if eliminate hospital, optional and full dental for all adults, couples and
families then buyback would be less for 21 months and 18 months. Points out
if buy back categorically with mandatory benefit level it came in at $36
million and $48 million with other modification. Claims part of reason for
expediting process is it is over $700,000 per day in cost savings if you
implement in October rather than January. |
|
240 |
Bonette |
Discusses
category of pregnant women and children. Mentions dental and states costs
associated. |
|
265 |
Co
Chair Winters |
RECESS 9:45 A.M. for 40 minutes. |
|
270 |
Co
Chair Winters |
Re convenes the meeting at 10:50 AM. Mentions a question has been raised and want to
make certain the employed persons with disability are a part of the categories
looking at. |
|
275 |
Bonette |
Responds
do not have language currently in the bill for that population but can be
inserted to address that. |
|
290 |
Sen.
Brown |
Believes
it was included in the context of the categories. |
|
295 |
Bonette |
Responds
that was the original intent. |
|
300 |
Tina
Kitchen |
Medical
Director for Seniors and People with Disabilities, Department of Human
Services (DHS). Responds they are a separate optional category. |
|
310 |
Sen.
Morrisette |
Asks
about the cost factor for that segment of the population. |
|
315 |
Kitchen |
Believes
continuing for 18 months would cost $3.5 million. |
|
318 |
Co-Chair
Winters |
RECESS 10:55 AM for 10 minutes. |
|
320 |
Co-Chair
Winters |
Re-convenes the meeting at 11:05 AM. Claims the documents have been reviewed and there are
technical flaws with the -5 amendments. States SB 540 will be addressed on
Monday. Closes the work session on SB 540 and opens informational meeting on
HB 3624 A. |
|
HB 3624 A – INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
335 |
Holly
Robinson |
Legislative
Counsel. Provides introduction of HB 3624 A. Refers to distributed material.
Submits written material (EXHIBITS D,
E). |
|
355 |
Robinson |
Refers
to section 2 of the bill with new or revised definitions used in the body of
the bill addressing use of prepaid managed care organizations to individuals receiving
health services through Oregon Health Plan (OHP). Discusses section 3. |
|
370 |
Robinson |
Discusses
section 4 of the bill which increases use of prepaid managed care plans and
directs department to use capitated plans and continues authority of the department
to maintain fee for service system when no capitated program available.
Discusses section 5. |
|
TAPE 20 A |
||
|
005 |
Robinson |
Discusses
section 6 of the bill. Claims this entity will be able to enter into a
physician care organization or contract with the department. |
|
008 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
how many entities fit this description. |
|
010 |
Robinson |
Responds
one. |
|
012 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
which one. |
|
014 |
Robinson |
Responds
Kaiser Permanente. |
|
015 |
Sen.
Carter |
Asks
if that advantage Kaiser over any other hospitals in the area. Claims not the
best person to state what the ramifications are. |
|
020 |
Robinson |
Responds
no in the way the question is being asked but not the best person to answer
it. |
|
025 |
Sen.
Carter |
Expresses
concern in reason for asking the question because can see profit hospitals
saying non-profit hospitals are being allowed to have an advantage. States
everyone should be treated fair but want to treat a large organization who
takes a large number of Medicaid patients in the area. Notes there should be further
discussion. |
|
028 |
Robinson |
Responds
there are a lot of people who can better answer Senator Carter’s question and
concerns. |
|
030 |
Co-Chair
Winters |
Comments
this discussion will be at another meeting. |
|
040 |
Robinson |
Refers
to section 7. Clarifies definition of “health services.” Discusses generic descriptions.
Discusses list of services provided. States the intention of placing prescription
drugs in that section is to identify situations where they would specifically
be provided and make it clear they are provided. |
|
050 |
Sen.
Carter |
States
Kaiser needed to be asked a question in terms of whether they would be
willing to provide such services to Medicaid eligible people. Claims do not
want us to make assumptions in the bill. Notes Kaiser needs to be asked the
question in terms of what they would be willing to provide in terms of
services to this population in the area. |
|
065 |
Robinson |
Provides
information on Section 8. Discusses use of actuary and capitation rates
determination. |
|
070 |
Robinson |
Discusses
section 9. Comments new provisions are contained that directs Health Services
Commission to hire an actuary to determine benchmarks for setting capitation
rates. Refers to section 10. Claims it directs DHS to contract with fully
capitated health plans to provide administrative services for individuals
receiving service on fee for service basis. |
|
095 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
for clarification on section 10 relating to prescription drug management
services and utilization of Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM.). |
|
105 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Responds
to Senator Carter’s earlier comment on flagging section 10 of the bill for
further discussion. |
|
115 |
Robinson |
Discusses
contracts in section 10. Points out the requirement in section 10 if
department enters into administrative services contract it must be cost
neutral to the department so it won’t end up costing more money. Refers to
section 11 regarding drugs. States it directs DHS to contract with fully
capitated health plans at certain rates. Adds it places cost and
administration of the anti-depression drugs into the cap rate and only
withholds anti-psychotic drugs. |
|
135 |
Robinson |
Refers
to section 12 which addresses hospital services with three primary policy decisions
included stating there are three parts to it: |
|
145 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
if other states have similar laws or rules. |
|
150 |
Robinson |
Responds
she doesn’t know of any. |
|
155 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
if it would be difficult to find the information. Asks if there is a problem
constitutionally. |
|
156 |
Robinson |
Responds
probably, and adds she will try and locate the information. |
|
158 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
for opinion regarding constitutionality provisions such as this. |
|
159 |
Robinson |
Responds
has not been asked that question but do not believe there is a problem.
Claims to make certain there are no red flags. Refers to section 13 which is
the subject of a use of a pharmacy benefit manager to manage prescription
drug benefits for medical assistance program. Discusses section further. |
|
175 |
Robinson |
Refers
to section 14 directs DHS to work with representatives of fully capitated
health plan in developing PBM contracts. Section 15 directs DHS to enter into
contracts with pharmaceutical manufacturers for supplemental rebates that may
be available to the state above and beyond discounts available. |
|
180 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
for clarification of language with respect to PBM’s. Wonders if that negates
any policies regarding preauthorization represented in 819. |
|
185 |
Robinson |
Responds
no at this point. Continues discussing section 15 regarding multi-state
prescription drugs purchasing pools for purpose of negotiating supplemental
rebates if the department agrees to that. Refers to section 16 which directs
DHS to seek federal approval to get permission to move the line of health
services from the current line to where assembly wants to take it. |
|
195 |
Robinson |
Refers
to section 17 which directs DHS to fully document residency and financial
eligibility for people enrolled in OHP. |
|
211 |
Sen.
Morrisette |
Asks
for clarification on section 4. |
|
215 |
Robinson |
States
section 4 establishes a policy that the state should move more towards
direction of fully capitated health plans when they can and not rely to the
degree they have currently on fee for service. Clarifies section 3 in regards
to the Senator Morrisette’s question. Claims between section 3 and section 4
the section describing would be addressed. |
|
240 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Asks
for sections of the bill that are ambiguous or unclear to be highlighted. |
|
255 |
Robinson |
Responds
she would be happy to attempt to clear this up. Claims much of the arena is
fact driven. |
|
265 |
Sen.
Minnis |
Expresses
concern that not having specific statutory authorization given to the agency
would be given to the agency to prevent the agency from drafting
administrative rules contrary to law. |
|
270 |
Robinson |
Understands
concerns expressed and will do her best to make things better. |
|
280 |
Co-Chair
Courtney |
Appreciates
everyone coming in today. Closes the informational meeting on HB 3624 A and adjourns
the meeting at 11:00 AM. |
The following
prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony for HB
3624 A.
Skip Klarquist submits written testimony (EXHIBIT F).
Barney Speight submits written testimony
(EXHIBIT G).
Brandi Satterlund ……submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT H).
Steven Duffin………… submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
I).
Julie McFarlane………submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
J).
Akhri Troncelliti submits written testimony (EXHIBIT K).
William Simmons submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
L).
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 540, -1 amendments dated 5/30/03, staff, 5 pp
B
– SB 540, -2 amendments dated 5/30/03, staff, 5 pp
C
– SB 540, -3 amendments dated 5/30/03, staff, 5 pp
D
– HB 3624 A, written material, Holly Robinson, 5 pp
E
– HB 3624 A, written material, Holly Robinson, 5 pp
F
– HB 3624 A, written testimony, Skip Klarquist, 5 pp
G
– HB 3624 A, written testimony, Barney Speight, 3 pp
H
– HB 3624 A, written testimony, Brandi Satterlund, 2 pp
I
– HB 3624 A, written testimony, Steven Duffin, 1 p
J
– HB 3624 A, written testimony, Julie McFarlane, 2 pp
K
– HB 3624 A, written testimony, Akhri Troncelliti, 2 pp
L
– HB 3624 A, written testimony, William Simmons, 1 p