|
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
|
|
TAPES 12-13,
A-B |
JANUARY 29,
2003 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator Bruce
Starr
Members Excused: Senator Lenn Hannon
Invited Witnesses Present: Gweneth
Van Frank Carlson, Support Oregon Services Alliance
Deborah
Buchanan, Department of Revenue
Tim
Nesbitt, President, Oregon AFL-CIO
Chuck
Sheketoff, Executive Director, Oregon Center for Public Policy
Joe
Swinehart, Associated Oregon Industries
J.L.
Wilson, National Federation of Independent Business
Richard
Butrick, Associated Oregon Industries
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Lizbeth
Martin-Mahar, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE 12, SIDE A
|
003 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:20 pm |
|
|
||
|
012 |
Gweneth Van Frank Carlson |
Gives testimony in opposition to cuts
due to the failure of Measure 28 and urges legislature to raise more revenue
for human services. |
|
|
|
|
|
060 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Gives brief overview of unofficial
results from measure 28. Exhibit 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
Martin-Mahar |
Refers members to National Association
of State Budget Officers (NASBO) fiscal survey of states and discusses major
tax changes throughout the U.S. for fiscal year 2003. Exhibit 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
Paul Warner |
Adds to discussion on major tax
changes in other states. Questions and answers follow. |
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
Deborah Buchanan |
Briefly discusses state employer
withholding tax tables. Exhibit 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
Tim Nesbitt |
Refers members to document, Action
Plan For Good Jobs and Better Government. Exhibit 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
Nesbitt |
Discusses shift in tax burden from
businesses to working families. |
|
|
|
|
|
259 |
Nesbitt |
Compares Oregon state and local
taxes to other states. Exhibit 5. Questions and answers interspersed. |
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
Nesbitt |
Discusses equalizing corporate
income tax and personal income tax rates. Clarifying questions and answers
interspersed. |
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if reforming the corporate
income tax would be a disadvantage for attracting new business. |
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
Nesbitt |
Responds that there are other
reasons businesses consider when choosing a location that are more important.
|
TAPE 13, SIDE A
|
019 |
Nesbitt |
Cautions against major tax reform,
such as a sales tax, claiming it will not be any more stable than the current
system and will be more regressive. |
|
|
|
|
|
051 |
Nesbitt |
Recommends disconnecting from the
federal tax code, equalizing corporate income tax with personal income tax
rates, and to look at a statewide property tax. |
|
|
|
|
|
080 |
Chuck Sheketoff |
Briefly discusses mission of the
Oregon Center for Public Policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
Sheketoff |
Briefly discusses Oregon’s past and
present economic situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
Sheketoff |
Refers members to report, Boom,
Bust, and Beyond: The State of Working Oregon 2002. Exhibit 6. |
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
Sheketoff |
Refers members to report, Things
Don’t Look Different Here. Exhibit 7. |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
Sheketoff |
Refers members to report, Oregon
State and Local Taxes in 2002. Exhibit 8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
Sheketoff |
Recommends repealing rolling
reconnect. |
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks Warner whether a bill regarding
a disconnect from the federal tax system has to start in the house. |
|
|
|
|
|
207 |
Warner |
Responds that counsel has advised
them to start it on the house side because of intent to raise revenue. |
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
Sheketoff |
Advises legislature to preserve
inheritance tax. |
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
Sheketoff |
Advises against capital gains cuts. |
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
Sheketoff |
Advises legislature to expand and
fix Oregon’s earned income credit. |
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
Sheketoff |
Advises legislature to fix Oregon’s
corporate minimum tax. Clarifying questions and answers
interspersed. |
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
Sheketoff |
Advises legislature to adopt
corporate tax disclosure law. |
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks how corporate tax disclosure
laws would effect the decision of businesses to locate in Oregon. |
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
Sheketoff |
Responds that it would not effect
corporate locations because there are several reasons why corporations choose
locations. Adds that one example is a corporation that recently moved to
Oregon but then laid off workers. |
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
Sen. Deckert |
Argues that he is familiar with the
company and sees their potential growth and potential jobs for Oregonians as
an advantage. |
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
Sheketoff |
Continues with his argument for a
corporate tax disclosure laws. Clarifying questions and answers
interspersed. |
TAPE 12, SIDE B
|
040 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if it is not in Oregon’s best
interest to have a corporate tax structure that would attract businesses to
Oregon. |
|
|
|
|
|
055 |
Sheketoff |
Responds that Oregon is only 1
percent of the national economy and that Oregon is at the whim of it, and
that decisions made at the national level are the only ones that are going to
affect the economy. |
|
|
|
|
|
063 |
Nesbitt |
Responds that in the past Oregon
managed to use targeted tax breaks to negotiate with specific companies and
that if the legislature does across the board cuts Oregon will end up giving
away money without getting anything in return. Clarifying questions and answers
interspersed. |
|
|
|
|
|
088 |
Joe Swinehart |
Discusses current economic state of
Oregon. |
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
Swinehart |
Reads recent news headlines
regarding Oregon business. |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
Swinehart |
Makes recommendations to reform PERS
and Oregon Health Plan to make them more affordable, to enact government
accountability, to regulate energy prices, to improve funding to school, to
reduce capital gains, to create more business tax credits, and to improve
roads. |
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
JL Wilson |
Refers to written testimony. Exhibit
11. Discusses Oregon’s small business problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
Wilson |
Discusses Oregon’s current tax
system and stresses that reliance on income tax is not bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
Wilson |
Recommends capital gains reductions
and elimination of estate tax at the federal and state level. Clarifying questions and answers
interspersed |
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks Swinehart about specific
numbers regarding ESDs, motor pools, and contracting out management of
prisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
Swinehart |
Responds that he doesn’t have the
answers. |
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks how Oregon can make necessary
investments on retention of current business and recruitment and investments
in higher education that will be important in ability to compete in a
knowledge based economy. |
|
|
|
|
|
396 |
Swinehart |
Responds that AOI has found that
taxes are the lead motivator for business and that Oregon needs to respond to
that motivator. |
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks about additional incentives for
business, economic development, and urban growth boundary expansions. |
TAPE 13, SIDE B
|
039 |
Swinehart |
Responds in agreement to Starr’s
position. |
|
|
|
|
|
080 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks what all of AOI’s proposed tax
cuts would amount to. |
|
|
|
|
|
089 |
Swinehart |
Responds that it would amount to a
lot of money but that AOI sees economic development as the only solution to
pull out of the recession. |
|
|
|
|
|
095 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks how it is beneficial to be in
the national news about how poor the schools are in Oregon. |
|
|
|
|
|
097 |
Swinehart |
Responds that it is not an advantage
but there are several other disadvantages as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
099 |
Richard Butrick |
Responds to previous questions
regarding ESD’s, motor pools, and contracting management of prisons. |
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Comments that AOI’s ideas for eliminating
wasteful spending, such as eliminating the Covered Bridge Association, which
gets no General Fund dollars, is hard to deal with when the state is in such
dire straits. |
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
Butrick |
Responds that AOI put the
suggestions out there just to get the legislators to think and that if the
legislature had acted on some of the suggestions years ago Oregon would not
be in its current state. |
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that AOI’s publication has
done a great disservice to the state in propagating a misconception that
there is a lot of quick fixes that can raise a lot of money. |
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
Butrick |
Responds that it has gotten a lot of
attention and repeats his assertion that a lot of money could have been saved
had the legislators taken up the suggestions years ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 3:00 pm. |
|
|
|
|
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant Reviewed
by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1.
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Measure 28 Unofficial Vote Count, 1p.
2.
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, NASBO Fiscal Survey of States:
November 2002, 9pp.
3.
Deborah Buchanan, Important Notice About the State Employer
Withholding Tax Tables, 1p.
4.
Tim Nesbitt, An Action Plan for Good Jobs and Better
Government, 16pp.
5.
Tim Nesbitt, 2003 Competitiveness Redbook, 2pp.
6.
Chuck Sheketoff, Boom, Bust, and Beyond: The State of
Working Oregon 2002, 118pp.
7.
Chuck Sheketoff, Things Don’t Look Different Here, 15pp.
8.
Chuck Sheketoff, Oregon State and Local Taxes in 2002, 2pp.
9.
Chuck Sheketoff, Empty Promises and False Hopes, 15pp.
10.
Chuck Sheketoff, Cutting Capital Gains Taxes Will Hurt, Not
Help, Oregon’s Economy, 15pp.
11.
J.L. Wilson, NFIB Written Testimony, 2pp.