|
|
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORK SESSION: SB 225, SB 228 |
|
|
PUBLIC HEARING: SB 229 |
|
|
WORK SESSION: SB 232 |
|
|
TAPES 34-35,
A-B |
FEBRUARY 18,
2003 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Lenn Hannon
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator Bruce
Starr
Witnesses Present: David Longanecker, Western Interstate
Commission for Higher Education
John
Phillips, Department of Revenue
Doug
Ebner, Marion County Assessor
Debra
Buchanan, Department of Revenue
Dexter
Johnson, Legislative Counsel
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Mazen
Malik, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE
34, SIDE A
|
004 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:08pm. |
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
225
|
017 |
Mazen Malik |
Explains Section 1 of SB 225 which changes
the value of payments on exempt port properties to Real Market Value (RMV). Exhibits
1-2. |
|
|
|
|
|
029 |
Malik |
Explains Sections 2 and 3 of SB 225
which freezes annual growth in Maximum Assessed Value (MAV) for farm and open
space land. |
|
|
|
|
|
044 |
Malik |
Explains Section 4 of SB 225 which
sets an effective date. |
|
|
|
|
|
046 |
Malik |
Explains Sections 5 and 6 of SB 225
which establishes Assessed Value (AV) and Maximum Assessed Value (MAV) for
partially exempt and specially assessed land. |
|
|
|
|
|
053 |
Malik |
Explains Sections 7 and 8 of SB 225
which sets an effective date. |
|
|
|
|
|
061 |
Malik |
Explains Sections 9 and 10 of SB 225
which takes out unnecessary requirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
066 |
Malik |
Discusses revenue impact of SB 225.
Exhibit 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
082 |
John Philips |
Testifies in support of SB 225
because it fixes unanticipated problems created from Measure 50. Exhibit 5.
Begins by discussing section 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
Phillips |
Discusses sections 2, 3, and 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
Phillips |
Discusses sections 5, 6, 7, and 8. |
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
Phillips |
Discusses sections 9 and 10. |
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks why sections 2 and 3 weren’t
dealt with in 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
Phillips |
States that he believes people
didn’t understand this adjustment would need to be made. Explains why it is
necessary now. |
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if there is typically a quicker
rise in property evaluation on special assessed property rather than
residential. |
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
Phillips |
Answers that special assessed
properties are so varied he can’t answer that. |
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks how it would affect the look
back period after a special exemption was no longer in effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
Phillips |
Responds that once a property is
disqualified taxes are determined by what the taxes would have been. |
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
Doug Ebner |
Responds that they compute each year
individually. Discussion follows. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
225
OPENS WORK SESSION ON SB 225
|
415 |
Sen. Corcoran |
MOTION: MOVES SB 225 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
Sen. Hannon |
States that he will vote it out of
committee but reserves the right to vote no after he checks it out with his
own county assessor. |
|
|
|
|
|
442 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: ROLL CALL VOTE: MOTION PASSES:
4-0-2. SENATORS VOTING AYE: CORCORAN,
HANNON, STARR, DECKERT. SENATORS EXCUSED: RINGO, FERRIOLI. Sen. Corcoran will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON SB
225
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB 228
TAPE 35, SIDE A
|
013 |
Malik |
Explains SB 228 which permits
disclosure of property valuation to lessor, lessee, or other person in
possession of property. Exhibit 6. States that there is no revenue or fiscal
impact. Exhibits 7-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
029 |
Phillips |
Testifies in support of SB 228
because it allows the Department of Revenue to accurately value property and
prevents double assessments. Exhibit 9. |
|
|
|
|
|
069 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks what the Department of Revenue
does without these changes. |
|
|
|
|
|
071 |
Phillips |
Responds that they currently call
the entity that reported the information and try to make sure everything is
accurate and possibly ask for written authorization. |
|
|
|
|
|
088 |
Buchanan |
Testifies in support of SB 228 because
it allows flexibility to work with taxpayers and their designees. Exhibit 9. |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks about language of the bill on
lines 22-26. |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
Phillips |
Responds that that is the language
that allows them to disclose between parties. |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if somebody could find out additional
information beyond the value of the property. |
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
Phillips |
Responds that he doesn’t believe any
conversations would involve anything else. |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
Sen. Hannon |
Points Phillips to a section that
includes reporting to child support enforcement services. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
Dexter Johnson |
States that the substance of the
language isn’t being changed but clarified. |
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks whether information other than
value of property can be obtained. |
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
Johnson |
Responds negatively. Discussion follows. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
228
OPENS WORK SESSION ON SB 228
|
244 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: MOVES SB 228 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
249 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 5-0-1. SENATOR EXCUSED: CORCORAN. Sen. Deckert will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
229
|
248 |
Malik |
Explains SB 229 which changes the
due date for additional taxes owed as a result of court decision. Exhibit 10.
Discusses revenue impact. Exhibit 11. |
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
Phillips |
Testifies in support of SB 229
because it fixes the unintended consequence of SB 125 (1999 Regular
Legislative Session) of extending due dates to tax appeal cases. Exhibit 13. |
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if there are any cases right
now pending litigation that this would affect. |
|
|
|
|
|
380 |
Phillips |
Responds that there could be and
that Sen. Deckert has a good point that the language should maybe only
include appeals after the effective date of the bill. |
|
|
|
|
|
419 |
Sen. Deckert |
Suggests making changes to the bill
to exclude tax appeals currently in process. |
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
Phillips |
Agrees that the changes should be
made. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
229
OPENS WORK SESSION ON SB 232
TAPE 34, SIDE B
|
003 |
Sen. Hannon |
Discusses why he initially objected
SB 232 and why he now supports it without amendments. Refers members to memo
from the Association of Counties in support of SB 232. Exhibit 14. |
|
|
|
|
|
017 |
Sen. Hannon |
MOTION: MOVES SB 232 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
023 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 5-0-1. SENATOR EXCUSED: CORCORAN. |
|
|
|
|
|
040 |
David Longanecker |
Gives brief outline of presentation:
Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE) and Oregon.
Exhibit 15. |
|
|
|
|
|
051 |
Longanecker |
Gives brief history of WICHE. |
|
|
|
|
|
059 |
Longanecker |
Discusses mission of WICHE. |
|
|
|
|
|
074 |
Longanecker |
Discusses regional priorities of
WICHE |
|
|
|
|
|
078 |
Longanecker |
Discusses student Exchange Programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
Longanecker |
Discusses other WICHE programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
Longanecker |
Discusses Oregon’s higher education
situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
Longanecker |
Discusses the growing demand for
higher education in Oregon. |
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
Longanecker |
Discusses Oregon’s increasingly
higher need students. Questions and answers interspersed. |
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
Longanecker |
Discusses Oregon’s limited financial
aid system. |
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
Longanecker |
Discusses Oregon’ higher education
future. |
|
|
|
|
|
433 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 2:41pm. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant Reviewed
by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1.
SB 225, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
2.
SB 225, Mazen Malik, Main Points, 1p.
3.
SB 225, Mazen Malik, Revenue Impact Statement, 1p.
4.
SB 225, Mazen Malik, Fiscal Impact Statement, 1p.
5.
SB 225, John Phillips, Written Testimony, 8pp.
6.
SB 228, Mazen Malik, Staff Measures Summary, 1p.
7.
SB 228, Mazen Malik, Revenue Impact Statement, 1p.
8.
SB 228, Mazen Malik, Fiscal Impact Statement, 1p.
9.
SB 228, John Phillips and Debra Buchanan, Written Testimony,
3pp.
10.
SB 229, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
11.
SB 229, Mazen Malik, Revenue Impact Statement, 1p.
12.
SB 229, Mazen Malik, Fiscal Impact Statement, 1p.
13.
SB 229, John Phillips, Written Testimony, 2pp.
14.
SB 232, Gil Riddell, Written Testimony, 1p.
15.
David Longanecker, WICHE and Oregon Presentation, 8pp.
16.
David Longanecker, WICHE’s Role in the Dynamic West, 2pp.