|
|
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORK SESSION: HB 2024, HB 2025, HB
2026, HB 2027, HB 2424 |
|
|
TAPES 46-47,
A-B |
March 3,
2003 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Lenn Hannon
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator
Bruce Starr
Witnesses Present: Tom Linhares, Oregon State
Association of County Assessors
Gary
Bartholomew, Oregon Association of County Tax Collectors
Dexter
Johnson, Legislative Counsel
Staff Present: Mazen
Malik, Legislative Revenue Office
Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE
46, SIDE A
|
003 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:06pm. |
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2024
|
013 |
Mazen Malik |
Explains HB 2024 which allows the
Board of Property Tax Appeal to treat a petition as withdrawn if it has been
resolved by stipulation. Exhibit 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
032 |
Tom Linhares |
Testifies in support of HB 2024
because it simplifies the process of changing property value when both the
assessor and the property owner are in agreement by eliminating hearings in
front of the Board of Property Tax Appeal. |
|
|
|
|
|
062 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks if the bill eliminates the
ability of a person who was going to go forward with an appeal to obtain the
information that it was a stipulated withdrawal. |
|
|
|
|
|
074 |
Linhares |
Responds that it is assumed there
would not be any further appeals because both the property owner and assessor
would be in agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
085 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States that he is concerned about
how the bill is written because if a person tries to argue a change and does
research for an appeal it would only be recorded as a withdrawal. Suggests
that it be recorded as a stipulation rather than withdrawal so that a person
doing research could ask for histories on stipulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
Linhares |
States that they could accommodate Sen.
Corcoran by reworking the language of the bill and create a new category. |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that it seems odd to create a
whole new category because he doesn’t see any reason why a person would
appeal when they were in agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Suggests they use the language
stipulated withdrawal so that people could still research withdrawn appeals. |
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that people could withdrawal
appeals for various reasons and that if people understood that a withdrawn
appeal meant that in high likelihood there was a stipulated settlement there
would be no reason to change the language of the bill. |
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
Linhares |
States that they are required to
give a copy of a signed stipulation to the Board so they have it in their
records and suggests that they could have withdrawn by stipulation in the
record and don’t even have to change the language of the statute. |
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
Sen. Deckert |
States that by doing it
administratively the language of the bill would not need to be changed. |
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States that he wants clear record in
the floor speech that it is understood that the county would be able to
discern withdrawn without any stipulation with withdrawn with a stipulation. |
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
Sen. Hannon |
States that the courts have ruled
the nothing can be used from the committee and that it needs to be made clear
in the floor speech so that if the courts go back to the floor speech to look
for legislative intent that it is clear. |
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States that reading it into the
floor speech would satisfy him. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2024
OPENS WORK SESSION ON HB
2024
|
188 |
Sen. Corcoran |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2024 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION WITH THE DISCUSSION. |
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 6-0-0. Sen. Corcoran will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON HB
2024
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2025
|
199 |
Malik |
Explains HB 2025 which allows the
county assessor and property owner to reach an agreement on adjusting
property value even when a petition has been submitted to the Board of
Property Tax Appeal as long as the agreement occurs prior to the Board
meeting. Exhibit 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
Linhares |
Testifies in support of HB 2025
because it simplifies the process of changing property value when the
assessor and property owner are in agreement by allowing the assessors to
lower the value immediately without waiting to see if an appeal has been
filed. |
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks why the statute was created and
why flexibility should be given to the assessors. |
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
Linhares |
Responds that the process has
evolved and that it used to be that assessors could not change the property value
until March. |
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if the assessors are not trying
to simplify something that doesn’t need to be simplified and suggests that
the Board of Appeals was created for a reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
Linhares |
Responds that the reason the
assessors have been given more flexibility is because under Measure 50 it
doesn’t matter when they lower property values because it won’t affect rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if this statute would apply to
a large utility holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
Linhares |
Responds that he doesn’t think so
because the values are established by the Department of Revenue. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if this bill would allow the
assessor to change a property value that was found to be wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
Linhares |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if current statute only allows
the appeals board to change the value. |
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
Linhares |
Responds that the assessors
currently have the authority to change the value but only if no appeal has
been filed with the board. |
|
|
|
|
|
362 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if there has ever been a case
where there has been some merit in waiting for the two months. |
|
|
|
|
|
372 |
Linhares |
Responds negatively. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2025
OPENS WORK SESSION ON HB
2025
|
390 |
Sen. Hannon |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2025 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
396 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 5-0-1. SENATOR EXCUSED: RINGO. Sen. Corcoran will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON HB
2025
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2026
|
401 |
Malik |
Explains HB 2026 which eliminates
the need for annual exemption application of water associations if ownership
of property stays the same. Exhibit 3. |
TAPE 47, SIDE A
|
001 |
Linhares |
Testifies in support of HB 2026
because it reduces paperwork created by making water associations re-apply
every year when there haven’t been any changes. |
|
|
|
|
|
014 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if there is currently anything
to ensure that usage stays the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
018 |
Linhares |
Responds that currently it is
reflected in the annual application but that he isn’t sure that people fill
them out completely. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2026
OPENS WORK SESSION ON HB
2026
|
032 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2027 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
035 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 5-0-1. SENATOR EXCUSED: RINGO. Sen. Corcoran will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON HB
2026
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2027
|
046 |
Malik |
Explains HB 2027 which aligns the
list of people entitled to receive property tax refund to the ones who are
eligible for the refund. Exhibit 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
065 |
Gary Bartholomew |
Testifies in support of HB 2027
because it brings two different statutes into conformity. Exhibit 5. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2027
OPENS WORK SESSION ON HB
2027
|
092 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2027 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 5-0-1. SENATOR EXCUSED: RINGO. Sen. Corcoran will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON HB
2027
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2424
|
122 |
Paul Warner |
Explains HB 2424 which adjusts
grammar and syntax, repeals obsolete statutes, and conforms language to
existing statutes. Exhibit 6. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
Dexter Johnson |
Testifies in support of HB 2424
because it corrects internal references and re-order definitions. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON HB
2424
OPENS WORK SESSION ON HB
2424
|
180 |
Sen. Corcoran |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2424 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES. SENATORS EXCUSED: FERRIOLI, RINGO. Sen. Courtney will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 1:49pm. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant Reviewed
by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1.
HB 2024, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
2.
HB 2025, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
3.
HB 2026, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
4.
HB 2027, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
5.
HB 2027, Gary Bartholomew, Written Testimony, 1p.
6.
HB 2424, Paul Warner, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.