|
|
PUBLIC HEARING: SB 551, SB 550, SB 747 |
|
|
TAPES 56-57,
A-B |
March 10,
2003 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Lenn Hannon
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator
Bruce Starr
Witnesses Present: Ozzie Rose, Confederation of Oregon School
Administrators
Maxine
Kilcrease, Director of Special Education, Portland Public Schools
Lynn
Lundquist, Oregon Business Association
Gil
Riddell, Association of Oregon Counties
Gweneth
Van Frank Carlson, Lane County
Staff Present: Steve
Meyer, Legislative Revenue Office
Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE
56, SIDE A
|
003 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:14pm |
|
|
|
|
|
007 |
Sen. Deckert |
Administrative business. |
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
550 AND SB 551
|
037 |
Steve Meyer |
Explains SB 550 which increases the Individualized
Education Program (IEP) from 11 percent to 13 percent of the Average Daily Membership
(ADM) with no IEP waiver available above 13 percent of ADM. Gives estimates of the impact on each
school district. Exhibit 2. Gives
background on SB 550. Exhibit 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
089 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if SB 550 puts them at risk for
any future legal challenge that there is not an equally distributed education
quality for special education students. |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
Meyer |
Responds that there is always
potential for a challenge. |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks who brought this bill to the
committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
Meyer |
Responds it was sponsored by the
Revenue Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Explains that there was an interim
committee on special education and how to deal with high cost districts.
Discusses what the committee found and what SB 550 attempts to solve. Responds
that it should stand up to legal challenges because it can be broken down to
formulas and is meant to be equitable. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about the estimates given by
Meyer. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
Meyer |
Explains SB 551, which increases
transportation grants for small school districts. Gives estimates for the
impact on each school district. Exhibit 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Points out that these bills are
bookends with one helping rural districts and one helping special education. |
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
Ozzie Rose |
Testifies that both the bills are
good ideas but that the time is not right because the stability of schools is
already in question with the shrinking budget. Explains that by shifting
money around, some school districts will be adversely affected. Recommends not moving the bills at this
time. |
|
|
|
|
|
339 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if any consideration was given
to ESD’s and the money they contribute towards special education in the
estimates. |
|
|
|
|
|
367 |
Rose |
Responds that the interim committee
tried to keep it in the equation but that he’s not sure about Meyer’s
numbers. Discussion follows. |
TAPE 57, SIDE A
|
009 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Agrees that they should move slowly
on these bills and make sure they hear from both sides of the argument.
Discusses information not included in the estimates. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
041 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if they wouldn’t be making the
decision to not make necessary changes to the funding formula by not moving
on these bills due to the funding climate. |
|
|
|
|
|
047 |
Rose |
Responds that he’s not asking the
members to not make the decision but rather to wait. Points out that some
school districts don’t benefit from either bill and would be greatly hurt and
suggests that until the members get information on how the bills would affect
each district they should move slowly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
071 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks why it doesn’t make sense to
more accurately distribute money to schools no matter how much money there
is. |
|
|
|
|
|
085 |
Rose |
Responds that the legislature needs
to have all the information necessary to see how all 198 districts would be
impacted. |
|
|
|
|
|
099 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that he thinks it is
important to change the formula to accurately distribute money to high cost
districts no matter how much money there is because there is always going to
be winners and losers. |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
Rose |
Responds that the members need to
pay attention to the extent that the winners and losers are going to be
dramatic over the next 3 months. |
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Agrees that the legislature needs to
look closely and move cautiously but points out that SB 550 and SB 551 would
help them with school accountability and help the districts with high costs.
Suggests looking back into the reports from the interim committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
Sen. Deckert |
Points out that by not moving the
bills, school districts with high costs would be adversely affected. |
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
Rose |
Responds that he is not telling the
members not to do anything but rather asking to see the response from people
on these bills. |
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
Meyer |
States that with SB 550 there is a
lot of discretion from the Department of Education in terms of what they
would adopt for the number of students that either weight would apply to. |
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
Maxine Kilcrease |
Testifies in support of SB 550.
Discusses the changes in special education over the last two decades and how
it has impacted Portland Public Schools. Discusses how SB 550 would help high
cost school districts. |
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks if this is the right time to
implement these bills because of the tight budget. |
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
Kilcrease |
Responds that she doesn’t have a
position on that question but that for some school districts, including
Portland, not passing this bill would be catastrophic. Gives examples of high
cost students. |
|
|
|
|
|
311 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Urges members to read the special
education handout from Kilcrease and stresses that districts can not be held
responsible for uncontrolled costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks why the schools are responsible
for children that require such high costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
Kilcrease |
Responds that they are responsible
because of what it calls for in the federal statute. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
Lynn Lundquist |
Testifies in support of SB 550
because from a business stand point it makes sense to make the school funding
system as fine-tuned as possible and suggests that the legislature moves
forward this session. Stresses that the legislature is here to make the best
policy decisions and the best policy is to allocate the dollars where the
needs are. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
550 AND SB 551
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
747
TAPE 56, SIDE B
|
040 |
Gweneth Van Frank Carlson |
Asks about the constitutional
obligations to balance the budget and why the legislature doesn’t use this as
an excuse to raise taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
048 |
Sen. Deckert |
Responds that there are two
provisions in the constitution to balance the budget and to raise revenues
and that the members have all asked which one supercedes the other. |
|
|
|
|
|
064 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Responds that the legislature has
the ability to tax and to spend and that the administration then decides on
how to do its job. Explains that to raise a new tax it has to move through
both floors of the legislature and then be approved by a majority of
Oregonians. |
|
|
|
|
|
087 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Introduces SB 747 which uses the
increase in federal forest revenue. Explains that the legislature was
incorrect in placing the money from the federal forest legislation into the
common school fund. Points out that Oregon was the only state to do this and
that the money was intended to go to the areas that were negatively impacted
by the loss of forest revenues. |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States that he signed on to SB 747
in protest of the local option bill that was introduced and that the
legislature was wrong in putting the money into the common school fund. |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
Gil Riddell |
Testifies in support of SB 747
because if fulfills the original intention of public law 106.393 that the
federal forest revenues stay with schools that are in timber dependent communities.
States that it would also help Sen. Wyden in seeking reauthorization of this
program. |
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
Rose |
Testifies against SB 747 because it
shifts money and only benefits some of the small schools. Asks that the
legislature looks at all the school funding bills closely and makes the best
decisions for all of Oregon. |
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks that in the situation that
Oregon was still harvesting timber in rural communities if the taxes would
still go into the common school fund. |
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
Rose |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Responds that all schools would
benefit if rural Oregon was able to once again manage the federal forest
land. |
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
Lundquist |
Testifies that for him SB 747 and
the local option bill are his second choice. States that he feels a local
option bill would be a great detriment to finding another statewide solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States that the legislature didn’t
use the money from the federal forest revenue appropriately and that it will
make it harder for Sen. Wyden to seek reauthorization. |
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
Sen. Ringo |
Responds that nobody is looking at
local option as the solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
Lundquist |
Responds that even if the
legislature doesn’t talk of the local option as being the solution, in the
public realm it will be considered the solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
Sen. Ringo |
Points out that they tried a small
solution with Measure 28 and that he has a difficult time being optimistic
that people will do the right thing during a difficult time. |
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
Lundquist |
Responds that the Oregon Business
Association supported Measure 28 and that he understands frustrations. Points
out that the legislature has the responsibility to find a statewide solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
Sen. Deckert |
Explains that the local option bill
would have to be out by April 11 and that it would be tough to gamble on a
bigger solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
Lundquist |
Responds that he believes some
things are going to happen outside the capitol that will put pressure on the
legislature to find a solution |
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks what is going to happen outside
the building. |
|
|
|
|
|
331 |
Lundquist |
Responds that he has talked to a
number of people in the business community that are about to say that enough
is enough and that they would be willing to step up and be a part of the
process. |
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Explains that there are different
capacities within Oregon communities and that some communities are able to
adjust to the economy more readily. References the SB 747-1 amendment
(Exhibit 7) and stresses that the legislature needs to stand out of the way
of local options. |
|
|
|
|
|
396 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Responds that local options are not
the solution for school funding and that he would support a local option if
Oregon schools were anywhere close to meeting the quality education model. |
|
|
|
|
|
431 |
Lundquist |
Declares that the Oregon Business
Association is not interested in having the cheapest education but rather
producing quality students and that this will not happen until the funding
level is raised. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB 747
|
480 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 2:35pm. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant Reviewed
by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1.
SB 550, Steve Meyer, K-12 Special Education Background, 1p.
2.
SB 550, Steve Meyer, Special Education Weight Limit 2003-04
Estimates, 5pp.
3.
SB 551, Steve Meyer, School Transportation Grants 2003-04
Estimates, 6pp.
4.
SB 550, Maxine Kilcrease, Written Testimony, 6pp.
5.
SB 747, Steve Meyer, Revenue Impact Statement, 1p.
6.
SB 747, Steve Meyer, Revenue Estimates, 6pp.
7.
SB 747, Steve Meyer, 747-1 Proposed Amendments, 1p.
8.
SJR 18, Mazen Malik, SJR 18-2 Proposed Amendments, 1p.