|
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING: INVITED TESTIMONY |
|
|
PUBLIC HEARING: SB 549 |
|
|
TAPES 58-59,
A-B |
March 11,
2003 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Lenn Hannon
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator
Bruce Starr
Invited Witness Present: Randall Edwards, Oregon State
Treasurer
Witnesses Present: Fred Hansen, General Manager,
Tri-Met
George
Passadore, President, Tri-Met Board
Mike
Salsgiver, Portland Business Alliance
Lynn
Lundquist, President, Oregon Business Association
Randall
Thom, CEO, Bio Reaction Industries
Baltazar
Ortiz, CEO, Ortiz & Associates
Tom
Brian, Washington County Commissioner
Linda Lynch, Lane Transit District
Board
Pat
Hocken, Lane Transit District Board
Bob
Shiprack, Oregon State Building and Construction Trades Council
Jeff
Carlson, Iron Workers Union Local 29
Marc
Anderson, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 125
Mary
Lou Ritter, Washington County Dept. of Aging and Veteran’s Services
Roger
Martin, Oregon Transit Association
Bill
Perry, Oregon Restaurant Association
Tom
Gallagher, Urban Developers Coalition
Staff Present: Lizbeth
Martin-Mahar, Legislative Revenue Office
Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE
58, SIDE A
|
003 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:07pm |
|
010 |
Randall Edwards |
Discusses the reasons for the drop
in Oregon’s financial ratings. Gives recommendations on how to improve them
in the future. Exhibits 1-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
091 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if a downgrade means that the
raters see a risk of default on a bond. |
|
|
|
|
|
093 |
Edwards |
Responds that they don’t believe
Oregon would default on a bond and that they see the financial integrity of
the state in many facets. |
|
|
|
|
|
098 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if Edwards would comment on the
media’s views on Oregon’s policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
Edwards |
Gives history of the last time
Oregon was downgraded. States that this downgrade is really about the
perceptions of how the state manages its finances. Discusses several factors
over the last decade that have come to a head in the last week with the
continuing downfall of state revenue and recommends looking at new revenue
options. |
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Discusses a letter from a
constituent who complained about the media downplaying the cumulative factors
that have led to the downgrade in ratings and the need to educate the public
on the policies that have put Oregon in this situation. |
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
549
|
204 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Explains SB 549 which increases the
maximum payroll tax rate for mass transit districts by .1 percent, phased in
over 10 years at .01 percent a year. Exhibit 4. Discusses revenue impact. Exhibit
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
Fred Hansen |
Gives background on TriMet and
discusses the service area. Exhibit 6. |
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
Hansen |
Discusses the LIFT program for the
frail, elderly, and disabled. |
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
Hansen |
Discusses the growth in ridership. Questions and answers follow. |
|
|
|
|
|
311 |
Hansen |
Discusses the environmental benefits
of TriMet. |
|
|
|
|
|
344 |
Hansen |
Discusses bus system improvements
and the transit tracker. |
|
|
|
|
|
387 |
Hansen |
Discusses rider demand and regional
expectations. |
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
Hansen |
Discusses new federal funding for
2003-2009 and how SB 549 will enable the TriMet to obtain federal dollars. |
TAPE 59, SIDE A
|
020 |
Hansen |
Explains the productivity
improvement project. |
|
|
|
|
|
034 |
Hansen |
Discusses the current payroll tax
and how SB 549 would affect it. Discusses their projected revenues. |
|
|
|
|
|
063 |
Hansen |
Stresses the importance of SB 549 in
making federal funding available to TriMet. |
|
|
|
|
|
067 |
George Passadore |
Explains that SB 549 is intended to
help them through the current recession but rather to plan for future growth.
States that they have found universal support for the concept of a payroll
tax from the business community and have made the commitment to use the
authority to increase the tax rate only when the economy is improved. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 6. |
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if they have a percentage for
the average employer. |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
Hansen |
Responds that they have calculated
them for every employer that has come to them and summarizes those findings. |
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
Mike Salsgiver |
Testifies in support of SB 549 for
three reasons: the Alliance was impressed with TriMet’s Productivity
Improvement Program, they see the need for an increase in revenue for TriMet
to meet their service obligations, and are pleased with TriMet’s commitment
to wait to implement the tax increase until the region is well into economic
recovery. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 7. |
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks if the increase would be phased
in until 2016 if it weren’t implemented until 2006 or if the phase in would
end ten years from the passing of the bill. |
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
Hansen |
Responds that it would be phased in
until ten years after the increase was implemented. |
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks why the bill limits the annual
payroll tax increase to .02 percent when they’re talking about .01 percent. |
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
Hansen |
Responds that if there was a year
that there was no reason to implement the increase, this would say that to
make that up they could not go over .02 percent a year. |
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
Lynn Lundquist |
Explains that the Oregon Business
Association only gets involved in local issues except where they have
statewide significance and that SB 549 has a statewide significance.
Testifies in support of SB 549 because the Association agrees with the
concept of using new revenues for new services and because TriMet will not
impose these increases unless they have support from the business community. |
|
|
|
|
|
321 |
Randall Thom |
Discusses his small startup business
and testifies in support of SB 549. Explains his past frustrations with
TriMet but how his experiences have proved to him that it is efficiently run
and important to business in the metro area. Refer to written testimony.
Exhibit 8. |
TAPE 58, SIDE B
|
010 |
Baltizar Ortiz |
Testifies in support of SB 549
because the investment is worthwhile to his business and the community, it
provides an essential service for low income and Hispanic people, and it is a
very minor increase. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 9. |
|
|
|
|
|
053 |
Tom Brian |
Presents a packet of letters from various
local governments in support of SB 549. Testifies in support of SB 549
because the regions ability to increase and sustain economic vitality and
quality of life is dependent on the continued investment in transportation
system. |
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks how the state became the
arbitrator of local transit payroll tax fees. |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
Brian |
Responds that it goes back to when
Tri-Met was formed. |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
Linda Lynch |
Testifies in support of SB 549.
Discusses Lane Transit District (LTD). |
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
Pat Hocken |
Discusses the services provided by
LTD and future plans to expand which are dependent upon federal funds and
matching dollars. Discusses the negative impact of the current recession on
Lane Transit District and how SB 549 would help them maintain services during
this time. |
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if LTD has been doing outreach
to the business community. |
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
Lynch |
Responds that they have done
outreach and that they have generally seen support. States that they have
made the same pledge to the business community that they would come back to
the business community before imposing a tax increase. |
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
Hocken |
Discusses the history of LTD’s
relationship with the business community. |
|
|
|
|
|
249 |
Bob Shiprack |
Discusses the unemployment rate for
the members of the Building and Construction Trades Council. Testifies in
support of SB 549 because it would provide employment for construction
workers and contractors. |
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
Jeff Carlson |
Testifies in support of SB 549
because it would create jobs for his members. Discusses the unemployment rate
for the Iron Workers Union Local 29 and his experiences using various
transportation systems, pointing to the failure of Seattle to build a viable
transit structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
Marc Anderson |
Testifies in support of SB 549
because it would create employment for his members. Discusses the work that
would be created by transit expansion. |
|
|
|
|
|
347 |
Bill Perry |
Testifies against SB 549 because the
hospitality industry has a low total revenue intake compared with the labor
dollars spent. States that he is supportive of the idea but not a payroll
tax. |
|
|
|
|
|
398 |
Tom Gallagher |
Expresses concern for section 2 of
the bill and how the full implementation level will be reached. Testifies in
support of the concept of using the new revenues for new services but is
concerned that there is nothing in the bill about it. |
TAPE 59, SIDE B
|
010 |
Bill Perry |
Discusses the current move in
Portland to implement a payroll tax for schools and how this has created
extra volatility. |
|
018 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if the payroll tax for Portland
schools is going to be voted on tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
019 |
Perry |
Responds that he doesn’t know. |
|
|
|
|
|
027 |
Mary Lou Ritter |
Testifies in support of SB 549
because transportation is critical for people who cannot drive, such as the
elderly, and this bill will help to build transportation in the future to
make it more accessible to these people. |
|
|
|
|
|
078 |
Roger Martin |
Gives historical background of
Oregon transit. Testifies in support of SB 549 because it is the least onerous
tax and is important to the business community. States that all regions of
the state are in support of SB 549 because when TriMet and LTD get stronger,
the transportation across the whole state also gets stronger. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
549
|
164 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 2:40pm. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant Reviewed
by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1.
Randall Edwards, Standard & Poor’s Oregon Rating, 2pp.
2.
Randall Edwards, Moody’s Investors Service Oregon Rating,
4pp.
3.
Randall Edwards, Fitch Oregon Rating, 5pp.
4.
SB 549, Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
5.
SB 549, Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Revenue Impact Statement, 1p.
6.
SB 549, Fred Hansen, Written Testimony, 38pp.
7.
SB 549, Mike Salsgiver, Written Testimony, 1p.
8.
SB 549, Randall Thom, Written Testimony, 2pp.
9.
SB 549, Baltazar Ortiz, Written Testimony, 2pp.
10.
SB 549, Marcela Alcantar, Written Testimony, 1p.
11.
SB 549, Carrol Lynn Jolley, Written Testimony, 1p.
12.
SB 549, Tom Brian, Written Testimony, 11pp.
13.
SB 549, Pat Hocken, Written Testimony, 1p.
14.
SB 549, Christine Hagerbaumer, Written Testimony, 2pp.
15.
SB 549, Jacob Brostoff, Written Testimony, 1p.