|
|
PUBLIC HEARING: SB 758, SJR 30 |
|
|
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORK SESSION: SJR 7 |
|
|
TAPES 82-83,
A-B |
April 7,
2003 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Lenn Hannon
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator
Bruce Starr
Witnesses Present: Richard Jarvis, Chancellor of Oregon
University System
Dave
Frohnmayer, President, University of Oregon
Tim
White, President, Oregon State University
Dolores
Raymond, Washington County Alzheimer’s Association
Nicola
Cribb, Aloha Resident
Robert
Harvey, Alzheimer’s Association of Oregon and Greater Idaho
Jim
Davis, Alzheimer’s Association of Oregon and Greater Idaho
Senator Vicki Walker, District 7
Hasina
Squires, Association of Public Safety Communications Officials
Larry
Hatch, Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency
Kristina
Wilde, Central Lane Communications Center
Paul
Snider, Oregon Association of Counties
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Lizbeth
Martin-Mahar, Legislative Revenue Office
Richard
Yates, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE
82, SIDE A
|
004 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:05pm. |
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SJR
7
|
012 |
Richard Yates |
Explains SJR 7 which proposed an
amendment to the Oregon Constitution to reduce the general fund match
required to issue general obligation bonds under article 11-G. Exhibit 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
030 |
Richard Jarvis |
Testifies in support of SJR 7
because since the passage of Measure 5 Oregon universities have only received
enough money from the general fund to complete six projects. Discusses
proposed amendment. Exhibit 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
064 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks why they want to move the date
to general election of 2004 rather then the next primary. |
|
|
|
|
|
066 |
Jarvis |
Responds that they would be
proceeding as anticipated in the next biennium and this would be moving with
the current process. |
|
|
|
|
|
066 |
Dave Frohnmayer |
Testifies in support of SJR 7
because with record enrollment the university is exceeding capacity. Refer to
written testimony. Exhibit 4. Explains that one reason to move the election
to the general election is that they already have a major bonding issue to
deal with deferred maintenance is already on the ballot. |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
Tim White |
Testifies in support of SJR 7
because it would leverage more private investments in capital facilities.
Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 5. |
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if the passage of SJR 7 would
cause a decrease in private donations. |
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
White |
Responds that the needs are so great
that the foundation would not become less aggressive in finding private
donations. |
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
Frohnmayer |
Responds that it would be an
incentive for donors because they would see the state stepping up to do its
part. |
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if the Kelley investment would
have been less had this law been in effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
White |
Responds that if there had been a
different kind of match the investment from the Kelley group there might have
been a broader investment. |
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
Sen. Hannon |
Expresses strong support for SJR 7
and a great appreciation for the work of university leaders. |
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that supporting higher
education is the best economic development investment that the legislature
can make. |
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
Frohnmayer |
Discusses study done that found a
high return in the Oregon economy for every dollar spent. Discussion follows. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SJR
7
OPENS WORK SESSION ON SJR 7
|
335 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
MOTION: MOVES SJR 7-1 AMENDMENTS
DATED 4/3/03 BE ADOPTED. |
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 5-0-1. SENATORS EXCUSED: STARR. |
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
MOTION: MOVES SJR 7 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS AS AMENDED RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 5-0-1. SENATORS EXCUSED: STARR. Sen. Hannon and Sen. Clarno will
carry the bill on the Senate Floor. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON SJR 7
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
758
|
386 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Explains SB 758 which authorizes a
personal income tax credit for an individual that provides unreiumbursed care
to a relative that consists of providing assistance to a relative with daily
living activities for more than six months. Exhibit 6. |
|
402 |
Dolores Raymond |
Testifies in support of SB 758
because it would help families that have the financial and physical burden of
caring for relatives with disabilities. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit
9. |
TAPE 83, SIDE A
|
067 |
Nicola Cribb |
Testifies in support of SB 758
because it is necessary, especially during the current economic crisis, for
people taking care of family members with disabilities that are no longer
able to get assistance from the state. |
|
|
|
|
|
099 |
Robert Harvey |
Gives personal account of caring for
his wife who was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. |
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
Sen. Ringo |
Points out that the bill is targeted
for moderate income people. Asks about a figure given by Raymond. |
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
Raymond |
Responds that it was a fiscal
statement from the 2001 Regular Legislative Session. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
Jim Davis |
Testifies in support of SB 758
because it is important to provide more financial support to family
caregivers. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 10. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
758
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SJR
30
|
287 |
Richard Yates |
Explains SJR 30 which proposes
amendment to the Oregon Constitution to require that any revenue from a State
tax on telephone service be used to fund emergency and public safety
communications facilities, equipment, and services. Exhibit 12. |
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks if SJR 30 impacts the fees
imposed to fund services for the deaf. |
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
Yates |
Responds that he believes it would
not affect those services. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
Sen. Hannon |
Asks if all taxes used to fund other
programs would be taken for 911 funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
Sen. Walker |
Discusses the intent of the bill and
states that it needs to be amended to narrow the scope. Expresses her support
for SJR 30. |
TAPE 82, SIDE B
|
018 |
Hasina Squires |
Explains the telephone tax and how
it is distributed and used. Testifies in support of SJR 30 because it has
recently been diverted to fund other services, depleting the funds used for
9-1-1 services. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 14. |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
Larry Hatch |
Testifies in support of SJR 30
because in the future the money coming from the 9-1-1 telephone tax should be
used for what it is intended. |
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if there is an excess in funds
since the extraordinary growth in cell phones. |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
Hatch |
Responds that an increase in calls
accompanied the growth in cell phones. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
Kristina Wilde |
Responds that the FCC mandated that
wireless lines have the same technology as hard lines so that callers can be
located. |
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asks if the bill excludes areas that
do not have call centers and if it would exclude using the funds to build
cell phone towers. |
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
Squires |
Responds that amendments are going to
address what the funds can be used for. |
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
States that he supports SJR 30 but
expresses concern that the entire state needs to be able to access the
service. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States that he doesn’t like the fact
that they are amending the constitution for this and expresses concern over
the language. |
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
Squires |
Responds that the amendments would
address that language. |
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
Paul Snider |
Testifies in support of SJR 30
because the telephone tax should be used for what it is dedicated for. |
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 2:20pm. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant
Exhibit Summary:
1.
SJR 7, Richard Yates, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
2.
SJR 7, Richard Yates, Fiscal Impact Statement, 1p.
3.
SJR 7, Richard Yates, Proposed SJR 7-1 Amendments, 1p.
4.
SJR 7, Dave Frohnmayer, Written Testimony, 1p.
5.
SJR 7, Tim White, Written Testimony, 1p.
6.
SB 758, Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
7.
SB 758, Judie Christensen, Written Testimony, 2pp.
8.
SB 758, Sally Madden, Written Testimony, 2pp.
9.
SB 758, Dolores Raymond, Written Testimony, 3pp.
10.
SB 758, Jim Davis, Written Testimony, 1p.
11.
SB 758, Oregon Revenue Coalition, Written Testimony, 3pp.
12.
SJR 30, Richard Yates, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
13.
SJR 30, Richard Yates, Fiscal Impact Statement, 1p.
14.
SJR 30, Hasina Squires, Written Testimony, 13pp.
15.
SJR 30, Larry Hatch, Written Testimony, 1p.
16.
SJR 30, Kristina Wilde, Written Testimony, 1p.
17.
SJR 30, Oregon Telecommunications Association, 1p.